Module on the Assessment of the Structural Condition Bucharest October 5-7, 2010 1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, BucharestDBA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Advertisements

1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings SPEAR International Workshop Joint Research Centre, Ispra, 4 th -5 th April 2005.
Evaluation of shell thicknesses Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,
1 Unsymmetrical and/or inhomogeneous cross sections | CIE3109 CIE3109 Structural Mechanics 4 Hans Welleman Module : Unsymmetrical and/or inhomogeneous.
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT Reinforced Concrete Slabs
An-Najah National University
VIRGINIA CONCRETE CONFERENCE March 3-4, 2011 Presented by: Teddy Theryo, P.E. Parsons Brinckerhoff SEGMENTAL BRIDGE GROUP.
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Structural Mechanics 4 Shear Force, Bending Moment and Deflection of Beams 20 kN RA RB 3.00m 2.00m.
Second order effects.
Safety assesment of a steel frame using current code and SBRA method Petr Konečný, M.S. Structural Mechanics Division Department of Civil Engineering.
Fuzzy Structural Analysis Michael Beer
Experimental & Analytical Studies of Drilled Shaft Bridge Columns Sandrine P. Lermitte, PhD Student Jonathan P. Stewart, Assistant Professor John W. Wallace,
Shake Table Testing of a Large Scale Two Span R-C Bridge Univ. of Washington *PI: Marc Eberhard Co-PI: Pedro Arduino Co-PI: Steven Kramer RA: Tyler Ranf.
2o Ciclo de Palestras em Engenharia Civil de Novembro de 2003 Universidade Nova de Lisboa-Centro de Investigaçao em Estruturas e Construção-UNIC.
Chapter 3: ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
Matrix Methods (Notes Only)
BC-11 The horizontal beam column shown below is subjected to service live loads as shown. The member is laterally braced at its ends. Check its capacity.
Beam Deflection Review ( )
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Colorado State University
Combined Bending & Axial Forces (BEAM – COLUMNS)
Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,
1st MEMSCON Event - 07 October 2010, Bucharest ICCS Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) today. The MEMSCON project approach Dr. Angelos Amditis Research.
Ömer O. Erbay & Ahmet Çıtıpıtıoğlu 25 April 2008
3D MEMS Accelerometers for Building Applications
Fire Testing of an Earthquake Damaged R.C. Frame Presented by: U.K. Sharma/Pradeep Bhargava Under UKIERI Project being Jointly Investigated by: Indian.
University of Palestine
1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, BucharestTECNIC EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPECIFIC TARGETED RESEARCH PROJECT – NMP – NANOSCIENCES, NANOTECHNOLOGIES MATERIALS AND.
Al-Najah National University Engineering Faculty Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project: Analysis & Design of Warehouses in Jaba’-Jenin.
Static Pushover Analysis
Reinforced Concrete Design
Distributed loads Loads are not always point loads Sometimes there are uniformly distributed loads on structures.
CIVL3310 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
1 Presentation by: Jesse Conklin Group Members: J.P. Telemaque & Mike Milano First National Educational Competition on Predicting Progressive Collapse.
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
Inelastic Seismic Response of Structures
Structural Design of Movenpick Hotel
Integrated Structural Health Monitoring Systems for Buildings Daniele Inaudi, CTO Roctest Group Roberto Walder, Sales Manager SMARTEC SA MEMSCON Workshop.
UNIT - II Shear Force Diagrams and Bending Moment Diagrams Lecture Number -1 Prof. M. J. Naidu Mechanical Engineering Department Smt. Kashibai Navale College.
Seismic of Older Concentrically Braced Frames Charles Roeder (PI) Dawn Lehman, Jeffery Berman (co-PI) Stephen Mahin (co-PI Po-Chien Hsiao.
Decision-Support-System for the Rehabilitation of Buildings: The MEMSCON Project RISA Sicherheitsanalysen GmbH Berlin 1st MEMSCON Event - 07 October 2010,
Mechanics of Materials(ME-294) Mechanics is the branch of physics that is concerned with the analysis of the action of forces on matter or material systems.
CE381 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I
DEWEK 2004 Lecture by Aero Dynamik Consult GmbH, Dipl. Ing. Stefan Kleinhansl ADCoS – A Nonlinear Aeroelastic Code for the Complete Dynamic Simulation.
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
STIFFNESS MATRIX METHOD
UNIT - IV PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES
Comparative Study of Chord forces in Flat Slabs due to Seismic loads in buildings of different plan aspect ratios Aman Gupta (B.Tech. student) Dr. S. Mandal.
BME 315 – Biomechanics Chapter 4. Mechanical Properties of the Body Professor: Darryl Thelen University of Wisconsin-Madison Fall 2009.
Examples. Finding the Maximum capacity - Example To find maximum capacity... Can be solved to find b = 56mm or 175mm Therefore 56mm is maximum Substitute.
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
سایت جامع دانشجویان و مهندسین عمران Footing Design
Deep Foundation Institute Bay Area Rapid Force Pulse Seminar
Deflection and Stiffness
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
CFHT Pier Building Evaluation
Structural Design for Host Mall
Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
An-Najah National University
A New Force-Measuring Device
Strength of Concrete Strength of concrete is commonly considered its most valuable property, although in many practical cases, other characteristics, such.
Evaluation of shell thicknesses Prof. Ch. Baniotopoulos I. Lavassas, G. Nikolaidis, P.Zervas Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki,
Section 9.4 – Solving Differential Equations Symbolically
Structural Analysis II
Presentation transcript:

Module on the Assessment of the Structural Condition Bucharest October 5-7, st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, BucharestDBA

Condition Assessment Based on Strain Measurements (Long-term Behavior) DBA1st MEMSCON Event - 07 October 10, Bucharest Direct Evaluation of Internal Forces from Measurements Data Required number of strain sensors : Column Cross-section :3 Beam Cross-section : 2 Columns : 2 Cross-sections :2x3=6 Beams : 3 Cross-sections :3x2=6 Example :5 storey building 25 columns and 40 beams per storey Required number of strain sensors : N = 5 ( 25x6+40x6 ) = 5x390 =1950

Condition Assessment Based on Strain Measurements (Long-term Behavior) DBA1st MEMSCON Event - 07 October 10, Bucharest Indirect Evaluation of Internal Forces by Computer Aided Analysis Main Long-term Effects : Shrinkage and Creep of Concrete Differential Foundation Settlements From measurement data, the variations of the reaction forces on the foundation are evaluated The internal forces of the totality of the elements are calculated by a non linear analysis computer program Required number of strain sensors: Base column cross-section over the foundation :3 Concrete specimen for shrinkage measurement :2 Concrete specimen for creep measurement :2 For the above example: N = 25x3+2+2 = 79

Condition Assessment Based on Strain Measurements (Long-term Behavior) DBA1st MEMSCON Event - 07 October 10, Bucharest

2. Long Term Behavior 2.2 Local Condition Table 3: Actual and Ultimate Internal Forces – Safety Factors 2.3 Global Condition Table 4:Differential Settlemennts DBA 1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, Bucharest ColumnInternal Forces – ActualInternal Forces - UltimateSafety c60/40NMxMyNRMxRMyRFactor ColumnNgNQ,nNnΔNnΔδ,nΔδG,nΔδQ,n

2. Long Term Behavior 2.3 Global Condition Non-linear structural analysis by SAP2000 γ G (DL) +γ Q (LL)+ γ G (Δδ G )+γ Q ψ 1 (Δδ Q )+γ G (S) From the analysis results the capacity of the structural members: Table 5: Internal Forces DBA 1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, Bucharest FrameStationOutputCaseCaseTypePV2V3TM2M3PMMRatio Textm KN KN-m Unitless 520COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination COMB1Combination

3. Seismic Behaviour DBA 1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, Bucharest δx 1,δy 1,δx 2,δy 2 : Horizontal displacements at A1,A2 as functions of time δ = δ(t), resulting after double integration of the acceleration α = d(t)

3. Seismic Behaviour 3.1 Seismic Displacements Velocities: Displacements: Table 6:Accelerations and displacements at the positions of the two accelerometers in the storey m. DBA 1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, Bucharest Storey 1 ntn (x10^-3s)a(11x)δ(11x)a(11y)δ(11y)a(12x)δ(12x)a(12y)δ(12y) E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E-04

3. Seismic Behaviour 3.3. Local Condition DBA 1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, Bucharest Total Plastic Rotation Resultant Bending Moments Damage Index Table 10. Damage Index D

3. Seismic Behaviour 3.4. Global Condition DBA 1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, Bucharest Total Failure Condition Formation of Plastic Hinge Storey Mechanism

3. Seismic Behaviour 3.4. Global Condition DBA 1 st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, Bucharest 0.20  Plastic Hinge IF n m : The number of columns in the storey 2n m :The required number of hinges for instability n hm : The number of hinges develeved in storey, the index of instability of the storey is Index of the Global Instability of the Building Table 11. Index of Global Instability