Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On The Right Track Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model 1, 2008.
Advertisements

1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Southern Alberta Child and Family Services
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Presented by Cedric R. Hendricks, Associate Director Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency.
A Successful Approach to Family Care and Collaboration Patricia “Shannen” Davis, MSW, CAP (SPI) Silvia Quintana, LMHC (DCF) Islem Pardinas, MSW (Our Kids)
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
White Earth Indian Child Welfare Initiative 2010
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model The North Carolina Foster and Adoptive Parent Association.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models The Service Array Process National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement.
Partnering with Families for MRS/SOC Success!. North Carolina’s Family Support and Child Welfare System Family-centered practice and system of care principles.
North Carolina’s Multiple Response System and the Role of the GAL North Carolina Division of Social Services Child Welfare Services Section Charisse S.
Strengthening Child Protection Systems in Viet Nam
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
DENVER CHILDREN’S ADVOCACY CENTER. ABOUT DCAC: Our mission is to prevent abuse, strengthen families, and restore childhood. DCAC works to improve the.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
1 ACS 101 An Introduction to the N.Y.C. Administration For Children’s Services.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
 By Amie Little  EDU 644 Discussion 1 week 2. The mission of DCFS is to protect children who are reported to be abused or neglected and to increase.
Education Welfare Service. Organisational Structure Chief Education Welfare Officer Deputy Chief EWO 1 (Operations Management) Senior EWO Derry North.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.
Mental Health is a Public Health Issue: What I Learned from Early Childhood.   Presented by  Charlie Biss 
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency CM 124_OAP_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
1 Legislative Briefing February 9, 2012 Commissioner Joette Katz Department of Children and Families.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Families Achieving Independence Through Recovery Detroit Department of Health and Wellness Promotion/Bureau of Substance Abuse Prevention Treatment & Recovery.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Integrating Substance Abuse Competency Within A Child Welfare System Kim Bishop-Stevens LICSW Loretta Butehorn PhD Jan-Feb 2007.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Using the Safe and Together ™ Model to Guide and Enhance Policy Related to Domestic Violence and Child Maltreatment Kristen Selleck, MSW David Mandel &Associates,
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
© CDHS College Relations Group Buffalo State College/SUNY at Buffalo Research Foundation Guiding Framework for Interventions Recommendation 1.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Workshop Topic: Prevention Services By: Otissa Williams, Family Services Worker April Bacon, Family Services Worker Richmond Department of Social Services.
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
LA County Department of Children & Family Services
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Commit to Agency Mission and Values
LA County Department of Children & Family Services
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Comprehensive Youth Services
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview

The mission of the Department of Children and Families is to protect children, improve child and family well-being and support and preserve families. These efforts are accomplished by respecting and working within individual cultures and communities in Connecticut, and in partnership with others. Mission

Juvenile Justice Prevention Behavioral Health DCF Mandates Child Welfare

4 Budget: $851 million FY11 General Fund Staffing: 3456 Authorized full-time General Fund positions Structure: Central Office, 6 Regions, 14 Area Offices, USDII School District, 3 Facilities – Connecticut Juvenile Training School, Solnit Children’s Psychiatric Center (North and South Campuses) – and the Wilderness School Current Profile

5 36,000 children served (approx.) (16,000 families) 36,000 children served (approx.) (16,000 families) 250 Total Careline Calls Received (91,000 annually)250 Total Careline Calls Received (91,000 annually) 113 Abuse/Neglect Reports Received (41,000 annually)113 Abuse/Neglect Reports Received (41,000 annually) 4,500 children in DCF care and custody (placements)4,500 children in DCF care and custody (placements) On any Given Day

6 DCF Organization Chart

DCF Regions

ReportCareline Area Office Intake Unit Area Office On-Going Services Permanency Planning Closure The Life Span of a DCF Case

DCF 101—Fundamentals Take Aways General Understanding of what occurs in a DCF Case General Understanding the various types of cases Intake / Assessment Family with Service Needs Probate Interstate Compacts Voluntary On Going Services Reunification Permanency Transfer of Guardianship, Adoption, Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement

DCF Careline receives and accepts a Report of Abuse of Neglect. Assignment is made to Area Office Intake Unit Assessment of Safety and Risk is completed Case is closed with services Case is closed without services Case is Transferred to appropriate ongoing services social worker. How a DCF Case is Opened for Service A Referral is received from: Superior Court/Juvenile Matters, Probate Court Interstate Compacts Office Parents, as a Behavioral Health, Voluntary Services Application Assignment is made to appropriate social worker

Ongoing Services In Home Case Services 2 x month visitation Ongoing Assessment (FSNA) Out of Home Case Services Child Parents Wellbeing Services Placement stability→ Domestic Violence Permanency → Mental Health Education → Substance Abuse

Legal Superior Court /Juvenile Matters Goal →Reunification Status 1. Custody 2. Guardianship (committed) Probate Court Study is Completed R eport of Assessment with recommendations submitted to court. The Courts and the Department share the responsibility for the protection of children when parents are unwilling and/or unable to provide for the children’s well being. The ultimate goal is the welfare and best interests of the child.

The goal of the Practice Model is to provide a framework for how the agency as a whole will work internally and partner with families, service providers, and others to put our mission and guiding principles into action. At its core, the model is the description of what we do, how we do it, why we do it and what outcomes we hope to achieve for children and families. The goal of the Practice Model is to provide a framework for how the agency as a whole will work internally and partner with families, service providers, and others to put our mission and guiding principles into action. At its core, the model is the description of what we do, how we do it, why we do it and what outcomes we hope to achieve for children and families. Based upon engagement and assessment, the DCF Practice Model emphasizes case supervision with administrative, educational and supportive components as primary strategies. Based upon engagement and assessment, the DCF Practice Model emphasizes case supervision with administrative, educational and supportive components as primary strategies. Strengthening Families— DCF Practice Model

Practice Model Strategies Phase 1 strategies- orange Phase 2 strategies- green Family Engagement Purposeful Visitation Family Centered Assessments Supervision & Management Initial &Ongoing Assessments of Safety and Risk Effective Case Planning Individualizing Services

Strengthening Families—Practice Model Principles of Partnership- A new perspective on Child Welfare 1. Everyone desires respect 2. Everyone needs to be heard 3. Everyone has strengths 4. Judgments can wait 5. Partners share power 6. Partnership is a process

Practice Principles 1. Family Engagement 2. Purposeful Visitation 3. Family Centered Assessments 4. Supervision and Management 5. Initial and Ongoing Assessments of Safety and Risk 6. Effective Case Planning 7. Individualizing Services

Family Engagement: The Common Thread PRACTICE MODEL- The Differential Response System Family Engagement: The Common Thread

Practice Model–DRS diagram Supervision Administrative Case Educational Supportive Practice Model Phase 1 Family Assessment Purposeful Visits Family Centered Assessment Improved Outcomes For Children And Families Practice Setting DRS Family Engagement “Forensic” Assessment Track Life of a Case Coaching Family Engagement Purposeful Visits Family Cent. Assessments to “Partners in Change

Differential Response System A philosophical shift in the way we do our work Moving from a single response system to a dual response system- both with emphasis on safety, risk and engagement but with different policy and procedural approaches “Forensic”/Traditional Assessment Track Track Response Response Finding No Finding

“Families are most commonly a child's greatest source of strength and therefore our most important Partner in promoting the well-being of the child.[…] Our relationship with families is the result of how we communicate and show our respect for families” (Joette Katz, DCF Commissioner, Memorandum 'New Department Administration', January 6, 2011)