Update on Wyoming Draft 303(d) List and Changes to Watershed Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Advertisements

What are they and why are they important? Presented by: Andrew Craig and Chad Cook DNR Nonpoint Source Planning Coordinator and UWEX WI Land and Water.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
CWA §319 Grants General Conditions Grant Types Grant Format Timelines The Awards Reporting Note: § 319 monies are reimbursable grants.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) (402)
Components of every Good Watershed Management Plan NDEQ – Planning Unit August 6 th, 2014 NDEQ – Planning Unit gust 6 th 2014.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
Lucia Machado, NPS Coordinator.  Under Section 319 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) ◦ Part (h) provides the grant program.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
EPA’S WATERSHED PLANNING APPROACH FOR THE SECTION 319 PROGRAM Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch October.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
State Approaches to Funding Local Projects A Survey of RFPs The State/EPA NPS Partnership New Orleans, November 27, 2001.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List and 305(b) Integrated Report 2008 Report and List Update Process and Schedule Bruce Gwynne Environmental Scientist.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Connecticut Watershed Conservation Network Conference May 11, 2012 Department of Energy and Environmental Protection MaryAnn Nusom Haverstock.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments Briefing to the Water Resources Technical Committee January 8, 2009 Briefing to the Water Resources Technical.
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
Catawba River Basin Update to the Lower Creek Advisory Team By Melanie Williams.
The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update, 2007 The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update February 8, 2007.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
District of Columbia TMDL Schedule and Update D.C. Department of Health Water Quality Division March 2004.
Water Resources Workshop Standards, Use Attainability, Impairments and TMDLS Richard Eskin Maryland Department of the Environment February 20, 2004.
FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
New Mexico’s Nonpoint Source Management Program and Plan Revision.
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments
Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
The Basin–Wide Approach New 303(D) Vision
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Leon River Watershed Protection Plan: Addressing EPA Comments
Section 319 Grant Program – writing a proposal that can be funded
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
The Nine Elements that Must Be Included in a 319 Watershed Based Plan
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

Update on Wyoming Draft 303(d) List and Changes to Watershed Planning

Draft (d) List Public Comment Period ended March 15 th WDEQ reviewing comments Anticipated submittal to EPA after April 1 st

New Listings Table A – Impaired Waters,TMDL Required 10 new listings to Table A –Ocean Lake –South Fork Powder River –Willow Creek (Tributary to above) –Dalton Ditch (Story area) –North Piney Creek (Story area) –Middle Prong Wild Horse Creek –Little Powder River –Stonepile Creek –Goose Creek (New pollutant) –Little Goose Creek (New pollutant)

New Listings Table C – Threatened Waters, TMDL Required 1 New Listing –Kirby Creek

Prioritization for TMDL Development Schematic for Determining Priority for TMDL Development –a. Formal Commitment to Watershed Planning - Low Priority –a. No Formal Commitment to Watershed Planning b. Human Health Risk with Pollutant –c. UAA with Credible Data Submitted Low Priority –c. No UAA or UAA Lacking Credible Data d. Impairment Will be Addressed in WLA e. WLA to be Approved in Biennium High Priority e. WLA to be Approved in Second Biennium Medium Priority d. Impairment Will Not be Addressed in WLA f. Other Ongoing Actions Currently Addressing the Impairment on a Watershed Scale Medium Priority f. No Watershed-Scale Implementations or Will not Address Impairment High Priority b. No Human Health Risk with Pollutant g. UAA with Credible Data Submitted Low Priority g. No UAA or UAA Lacking Credible Data Medium Priority

Waters Impaired or Threatened but Not Requiring A TMDL Category 4a – The water has an approved TMDL. Category 4b – Water has other required pollution control requirements that are expected to address all water pollutant combinations. Category 4c – Pollution, not pollutants, is the sole source of impairment.

Delisted Waters Table D, No TMDL Required 7 Delistings (not including discharge permits renewals) –Reardon Draw –East Fork Smiths Fork –West Fork Smiths Fork –Salt Creek (moved to 4b) –Middle Crow Creek (4b) –North Branch North Fork Crow Creek (4b) –Clarks Fork Yellowstone (4a, MT TMDL)

Changes to Watershed Planning Formal Watershed Planning Commitment Letter Additional Requirements to 319 Grant Funded Projects

Formal Watershed Planning Commitment Letter Need For Commitment Letter –Everyone involved is on same page: Timelines understood Deliverables –Changes in Staff: WDEQ, CD –Changes in Watershed Planning Committee Members

Contents of Commitment Letter Parameter(s) for Listing Timeline: –Year of Listing –Deadline for Approved Watershed Plan Draft Plan in time to allow revisions Who is responsible for writing Plan

2003 EPA Section 319 Guidance Components of a Watershed-Based Plan Identification of Causes and Sources** Estimation of Necessary Load Reductions** Description of NPS Management Measures needed to achieve Load Reductions Estimate of Financial and Technical Assistance Needed An I&E Program Schedule for Implementation Interim Measurable Milestones Set of Criteria to evaluate Load Reduction Achievement** Monitoring Program

Additional Watershed Planning Information EPA New “Draft” Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters –Chapter 8: Estimate Pollutant Loads –Chapter 9: Set Goals and Identify Load Reductions

Obtain Copy Publication # EPA 841-B Phone Order: – Download pdf: – – Comments to:

Contact Information Don Newton 510 Meadowview Drive Lander, WY