Bicycling in Montgomery County Where we are and where we’re going Montgomery Bicycle Advocates (MoBike) – 5/14/11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ODOTs Complete Streets Initiative. 2 Tipping Point for Complete Streets.
Advertisements

Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
1. Region of Peel Active Transportation Study2 Where is Peel?
Twinbrook Sector Plan A New Community in the Technology Corridor
B.I.K.E. | Boyle County Recommendations for Discussion Community Trails Forum M A R C H
NORTHEAST CORRIDOR INFRASTRUCTURE (NECI) BICYCLE FACILITIES STUDY Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) Update in collaboration with: + STV/Ralph Whitehead.
Nonmotorized Regional System Plan 1 3 rd Technical Task Force meeting Regional Nonmotorized Transportation System Plan Thursday April 3 rd 2014 Steer Davies.
1 Think Big – Build Small Presented to White Flint Sector Plan Advisory Committee Nov, 2007 Presented by Natalie Goldberg.
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Steering Committee Meeting Presented to Montgomery County Department.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Bicyclist and Pedestrian Behavior in Mexico City and Los Angeles May 12, 2014 source: portlandmercury.comsource: bklynbrokenwindow.blogspot.comsource:
1 Item 9: (DRAFT) Briefing on the Draft Update of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell DTP Presentation to the.
1 City of Rapid City and Rapid City Community Planning RAPID CITY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN in collaboration with: Kadrmas, Lee and Jackson RDG.
Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Jason Ridgway February 11, 2014.
Walking and Biking the Busiest Roads Around Atlanta: a Bike/Ped Plan that establishes non-motorized transportation among regional-scale priorities Regan.
DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.
Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board June 6, 2012 Bicycle Master Plan Update.
Why do you need a plan for walkers? They can walk anywhere, can’t they?
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
City of Leawood Bicycle Friendly Community The Year in Review.
Contents Regional Travel Options Bicycle Friendly Policies Potential for Converting Drive Alones Bicycling + Health and Wellness What is ZAP Twin Cites.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Health Outreach Partners’ (HOP) “Outreach Across Populations: 2013 National Needs Assessment of Health Outreach Programs” identifies transportation as.
Planning & Implementing Transportation Alternatives for Energy Efficiency and the Future Is Now Foundation October 4, 2011 Debbie Griner, Environmental.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
New Visions Bicycle & Pedestrian Action Plan Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation – Bicycle and pedestrian travel is vital to the region’s public health,
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Countywide Master Plan of Transportation. Project Overview Master Plan of Transportation Purpose 2002 General Plan Guidance The Development Pattern Report.
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Service Planning and Integration Study Work Group Report 7/30/13.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
TAG 2012 Survey Data. Survey sent to 16, responded.
Lompoc Community Assessments “What We Learned” Presented by Judy Taggart MS, CHES March 25, 2010.
Bike Walk Ambassador Program Workplace Outreach and Campaigns Photos and Bike Walk Ambassador Programwww.bikesbelong.org.
Publication No. FHWA-HRT Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Lesson 1 The Need for Bicycle.
Transport for Canberra. 1.Setting the scene 2.Public transport 3.Active travel 4.Roads, Parking, Freight and Fleet 5.Measuring our progress 6.How to have.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Designing for Mobility Designing for Mobility Bicycle and Pedestrian Programs when you don’t have good Infrastructure (or $) for either!
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Making the Most of a Linear Park Hugh Morris Rails-to-Trails Conservancy
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Saint John. ATSJ VISION A City that supports a high quality of life where calm and friendly streets encourage the connection between.
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
City Leadership & Bike Edina Task Force Annual Work Session February 16 th, 2010.
Paul Lippens, AICP Senior Planner phone x Themes for Complete Streets November 13, 2012.
East Coast Greenway Connecting Urban Centers, Train Stations and Greenways in Northern Delaware Delaware Trail Summit - February 25, 2010 On the Map: Regional.
Cycling in the 21 st Century: Developing a Bike-Friendly Community in Hartford, CT By: Alex Perez Trinity College 17’
City Leadership & Bike Edina Task Force Annual Work Session June 7 th, 2011.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Cycling Programs and Infrastructure Rochelle Owen, Director Office of Sustainability.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
Accessibility for All Ages and Abilities: Opportunities for Austin Billy Fields Assistant Professor Political Science.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Complete Streets Training
Portland 2040 Analysis. Portland residents drive less… While per capita vehicle miles traveled is increasing nationally at an average of 2.3% per year,
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
Mason to Metro Bicycle Route Project. Proximity to DC DC was listed as the forth best biking city in the United States by Bicycling Magazine Had an 80%
2016 Active Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives & Criteria Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee March 2, 2016 meeting.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Our Seniors, Our Streets, Our Schools TAM Listening Tour 2010.
City of Belmont Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 11/4/2015.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Transportation Initiative Sales Tax Prioritization
Transportation Makes a Difference
Transportation Makes a Difference
MPO Board Presentation
What follows after approval of Active Transportation
Presentation transcript:

Bicycling in Montgomery County Where we are and where we’re going Montgomery Bicycle Advocates (MoBike) – 5/14/11

4.35

$4.3 5

Where we are Most roads are not bike-friendly Frustrating gaps and holes in the bikeway network Too few paths – many canceled over the years Missed opportunities to incorporate bikes into road projects Can’t rely on just having a bike, even in urban areas The not-so-good news…

Missing Links As many missing links (magenta) as routes (green)

Gap – Metropolitan Branch/Capital Crescent Trail

Gap – Twinbrook Parkway

Gap – Bethesda Trolley Trail

Gap – US 29 Commuter Bikeway

Where we are… the good news More people are biking for transportation Sector plans are recognizing bikes Working well with county and state DOTs Better county road design standards Improving connectivity one project at a time – –Rock Creek Trail bridge –Montrose Parkway Trail –ICC Trail (sections)

Vision for the future Better infrastructure – Make biking more feasible Complete streets – All roads should support bicycling Bike-friendly growth – Biking and Smart Growth go together Robust networks – Quick access to all destinations Stand-alone trails – Highly effective bypasses Programs and Policies – Supporting bicyclists’ needs

Better Infrastructure Build what’s needed – Bike lanes, shoulders, shared use paths, new trails, good street design Fill in gaps and build missing links – “I would bike there if only there were a good, safe route” Track progress against the Countywide Bikeways Functional Master Plan Require developers to make bike improvements Prioritize projects to give the best bang for the buck Make biking more feasible

Complete Streets All roads should serve bicyclists and pedestrians, not just drivers New or rebuilt streets should must provide for bicycling – don’t waste opportunities! Community plans (sector plans) should support biking on every street Establish priorities for improving existing streets Balance on-road vs. off-road accommodations All roads for all modes

Bike-friendly Growth Smart Growth is good for biking – easier distances, local shopping, available transit Biking in turn supports Smart Growth – provides a transportation option that makes it all work Biking supports transit – larger accessibility radius Biking reduces congestion where it’s the worst Focus bike improvements on short trips – –Short trips are doable for most people, strong bang for the buck Target locations: White Flint, Wheaton, Kensington, Silver Spring, Bethesda Biking and Smart Growth go together

Robust Networks Great networks within communities Great connections between communities Once again: no gaps, holes, or missing links Connect routes to each other Network of “spine” routes criss-crossing the county –Support typical commuting distances –Make longer distances shorter (in miles or minutes) –Direct access to every community Quick access to all destinations

Stand-alone Trails Highly effective bypasses Fast, direct and safe transportation – –Fewer road crossings –More direct than zig-zagging roads –Bridges and tunnels Quality of Life –Exercise, tours and hikes, family outings Rails to Trails – Metropolitan Branch, Capital Crescent, Bethesda Trolley Trail Linear parks – Rock Creek, Matthew Henson, and NW Branch trails Along highways/rail lines – Rt. 29, ICC, Midcounty Hwy, Corridor Cities Transitway, Purple Line

Programs and Policies Supporting bicyclists’ needs Bike Share Trail maintenance, snow removal Bike racks and showers Laws to protect bicyclists –No texting while driving, hands free calling –Recognizing cyclists rights on the road Use all available funding sources – federal, state, county and… developers

Happy Riding!