Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Public Hearing on Facilities Plan Agenda Introduction of PGOLID Board of DirectorsDale Haakenstad Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Improvement Plan Financial Options September 12, 2013 Presented by: City Administration Finance Department.
Advertisements

Community Land-Based Wastewater Disposal in Pennsylvania Prepared by: Mr. Brian Oram, PG Wilkes University
1 R URAL L ANDOWNER S TEWARDSHIP G UIDE for the Ontario Landscape Self-assessment for your environmental performance as a property owner Second Edition.
Stonegate Village Metropolitan District (“SVMD”) Community Meeting Options Going Forward July 27, 2011.
Wastewater Collection Options for Lakota Beach Area Sub-Basin Special Meeting June 27, 2001 John Bowman Lakehaven Utility District (253)
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Funding for Municipal Infrastructure Ruth Noemí Colón Acting Secretary of State George Stafford Deputy Secretary of State Public Finance and Management.
Presented to the Connecticut Association of Water Pollution Control Authorities | April 26, 2013 Community Systems 101 Presented by Thom Knowlton, P.E.
Town of Plattsburgh Cumberland Head Sewer District Welcome To CUMBERLAND HEAD SEWER DISTRICT INFORMATIONAL MEETING JULY 2009.
2 Water and Waste Loans and Grants United States Department of Agriculture??? Rural Development: Mandate to improve the quality of life in Rural America.
WASTEWATER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT by John Lisenko Wastewater systems are indispensable for community health. One of the signs of progress and civilization is.
“Nucor Road Industrial Corridor – Sanitary Sewer Project” Presented by: Justin Longstreth, P.E. Brian Hannon, P,E, Moore & Bruggink, Inc. October 14 th,
Mobile Washing Policy Florida Statutes Section contain the basic requirement for DEP regulation. Must be a stationary pollution source, such as.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Critical Infrastructure Program Wastewater Sub-sector.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Basic Assumptions Facilities managing MSW must go through Site Assignment Materials that are pre-sorted are not considered MSW Residuals remaining after.
Fort Bliss Energy, Water, and Solid Waste Sustainability Initiatives Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Public Meetings June & 13, 2013.
Promoting Smart Growth with Wastewater Management Optimizing Conservation and Growth with Wastewater Management Strategies.
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
Hide-A-Way Lake, Inc. Low Pressure Sewer System Prepared by Dungan Engineering, P.A.
UK WIR The UK Experience Christopher Royce Anglian Water Services.
Who Should Pay for Costly Water and Sewer Infrastructure? The Legal Considerations TRWA / TWCA Water Law Seminar January 24 – 25, 2013 Austin, Texas Leonard.
SEPTIC SYSTEMS AND WELLS IN SOLANO COUNTY Solano County Environmental Health Division 601 Texas Street, Fairfield CA (707)
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
United Water & Sanitation District Stonegate Village Metro District Water Supply Opportunities 1.
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 5: Design and Plan Review— Non-Conventional Systems.
Failing Septic Systems: Problems and Solutions Protect Our Waters 2003 Legislative Session Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Environmental.
PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATION (S) by John Lisenko Definition: A public works organization is any organized system set up for the purpose of managing the physical.
OH NO! WHAT DO WE DO NOW. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN YOU DISCOVER THAT YOU’VE NOT BEEN DOING SOMETHING THAT YOU ARE REQUIRED TO DO? THE STORY OF RCW WATER.
April 28, 2015 City Council Workshop. City Council Goal 1 Expansion  Objective: To enhance infrastructure in order to maintain quality neighborhoods.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force March 29,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
Municipal Tax Increment Financing Daniel Stevenson, Office of the Commissioner, DECD Phone:
Water & Waste Disposal Loans and Grants The funding purpose is to construct, enlarge, extend or improve water, wastewater and solid waste systems in rural.
May 5, 2015 Water Resources Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
1 Riverwood Community Governance Forum March 7, 2011 Cal Teague Riverwood C.D.D. District Manager.
Chapter 33 Dam Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Give reasons why.
Author name here for Edited books chapter 5 Facility Site and Design 5 chapter.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Infrastructure management system Managers and engineers need clear guidelines for life-cycle management of infrastructure systems for water, sewer, and.
Economic challenges of wastewater treatment and use in agriculture Javier Mateo-Sagasta, FAO Pay Drechsel, IWMI.
Proposed Retail Rate Change Effective January 1, 2008.
September 23, 2005 Local Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County Washington Program Funding.
Water Recycling. Why? Do you think water should be recycled? Why? How do you think water is recycled?
Sewer Rate Evaluation Wareham, Massachusetts January 14, 2014 Michael J. Schrader, P.E.
How do we harvest rainwater and why should we.. Why Harvest Rainwater? Decrease the volume of potable water used for irrigation. Recharge the groundwater.
PRESENTSITS Sanitary Wastewater Concentrator. A Shortcut to Reusable Clean Water From Sanitary Wastewater!
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
1 Highland Water District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
 171 Public wells sampled in 2014  Bacteria and Nitrate samples taken  38 wells inspected (Surveyed)  1 nitrite sample taken.
The Dane County Regional Hydrologic Study. Conceptualized groundwater flow system for Dane County Source: Bradbury and others, 1999.
1 CTC 450 Review WW Sludge Processes. 2 Objectives Understand the basics with respect to operation of wastewater systems.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 8. Water Reuse Water reuse describes the process whereby wastewater (it's include storm water which is a term used to describe.
CSA 7 – Boulder Creek. YOUR SANITATION FACILITY Facility Includes the Following Five Pump Stations –Total of 10 pumps 16,553 feet of collection lines.
Grey Owl Municipal Water feasibility study
WASTEWATER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT by John Lisenko
CTC 450 Review WW Sludge Processes.
Feasibility of Bass Lake Wastewater Treatment
Mangawhai Wastewater Strategy and Options 7 August 2017.
Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update May 28, 2014
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Completion Report Summary
FEE INCREASES Public Work Shop June 2, 2018.
Washington State Infrastructure Financing
10 Feet Cistern, clear water drain
EAST MESABI JOINT WATER SYSTEM A JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN THE east range communities REQUEST A $6 million request for State Funding in 2019 to build a comprehensive.
Presentation transcript:

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Public Hearing on Facilities Plan Agenda Introduction of PGOLID Board of DirectorsDale Haakenstad Introduction of PGOLID ConsultantsDale Haakenstad Introduction of Hearing moderatorDale Haakenstad Explanation of Hearing SequenceThomas Wold Purpose of HearingJohn Kolb

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Public Hearing on Facilities Plan Agenda Explanation of Project ProposalJeff Ledin Review of Facilities PlanJeff Ledin Review of legal aspects of projectJohn Kolb Review of project financing optionsJames Prosser

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Public Hearing on Facilities Plan Agenda Public discussion/questions/commentThomas Wold (On facilities plan) Consideration by PGOLID BoardPGOLID Board Additional discussion/questions/commentsThomas Wold (On project proposal in general) AdjournmentPGOLID Board

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Purpose of Hearing on Facilities Plan Review Facilities Plan Solicit public comment on Facilities Plan Adopt or Reject Plan Discretionary Decision of PGOLID Board Based on Reasonableness and Feasibility of Recommended Treatment Option Transmit Plan to MPCA

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Motivation for the Project To protect the water quality of our lakes. Critical to survival of the lake. Already failing & potential failure of older wastewater systems which degrade surface and groundwater. Central system ensures no water quality degradation from on- site systems. To protect or increase the value of our property. Quality lake water ensures recreation value. Central system will be appealing to future property owners. Improve aesthetic appeal of property by eliminating mounds. Provide safe drinking water.

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Motivation for the Project Offer a solution to problems associated with drain fields (ie.) lack of land, mounds, etc. Running out of room for drain fields. Many have to purchase additional back-lots for drain fields. Offer a more convenient & efficient system. Less individual maintenance. Can install both systems at one time cheaper than installing them separately.

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Pros of Central System Improves overall quality of environment & water. Increases property value year life expectancy. Less individual maintenance (ie.) will include a softening & treatment system – saves money. No concerns with drinking water or problems with staining laundry. Cheaper to construct two systems at the same time. Cons of Private Systems Concerns with older systems & potential for failure. Decreases aesthetic quality of property (ie.) mounds or little room for expansion. 20 year life expectancy. High cost of individual maintenance (ie.) replacing pumps, salts, softeners, electricity, screens, drilling, draining, lack of room, etc. – hidden or forgotten costs.

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Wastewater Facility Plan Low Pressure Collection System Individual, Grinder Pump Stations. Directional boring capability reduces surface disruption. Cheaper than a gravity system. Stabilization Pond System Proven, effective treatment technology. Treated water will be land applied via spray irrigation. System with least environmental impact. Lower operations, maintenance, & replacement costs.

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Water System Plan Water Supply Deep, Municipal-style Wells. Treatment System Soften and remove iron & manganese. Gravity-type filtration plant. Storage 250,000 gallon ground storage tank. Distribution Domestic Water Flow System which loops around the lake to keep water fresh & maintain water pressure.

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Requirements of Facilities Plan 1. Describes and Evaluates Current Wastewater Treatment, Identifies Problems or Potential Problems 2. Describes Existing and Probable, Future Residential and Non-residential Wastewater Flows and Loadings 3. Discusses/Evaluates Treatment Alternatives Feasibility Suitability

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Requirements of Facilities Plan 4. Describes Selected/Recommended Treatment Alternative Design Capital Costs Operating Charges

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Legal Aspects of Project 1. Purpose of Lake Improvement District 2. Authority of Lake Improvement District to Construct Projects 3. Authority of Lake Improvement District to Finance Projects 4. Authority of Lake Improvement District to Impose Charges

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Legal Aspects of Project 1. Purpose of Lake Improvement District To preserve and protect the lakes of the state and to increase and enhance the use and enjoyment of the lakes, the legislature created a statewide lake improvement program to: preserve the natural character of lakes and their shoreland environment; improve the quality of water in lakes; provide for reasonable assurance of water quantity in lakes; and to assure protection of the lakes from the detrimental effects of human activities and certain natural processes.

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Legal Aspects of Project 2. Authority of Lake Improvement District to Construct Projects A Lake Improvement District may build, construct, reconstruct, repair, enlarge, improve, or in any other manner obtain water, sewer, or joint water and sewer systems, water or sewage treatment works, storage or disposal systems, and other facilities for disposing of sewage, industrial waste, or other wastes, or for pumping, treating, storing or distributing drinking water.

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Legal Aspects of Project 3. Authority of Lake Improvement District to Finance Projects For the purpose of paying the cost of obtaining water, wastewater, or combined systems, a lake improvement district may issue and sell general obligations, which may be made payable primarily from taxes, from special assessments, from other nontax revenues pledged for their payment under charter or other statutory authority, or from two or more of the sources; or it may issue special obligations, payable solely from taxes or special assessments or from revenues, or from two or more of the sources.

Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Legal Aspects of Project 4. Authority of Lake Improvement District to Impose Charges To pay for the construction, reconstruction, repair, enlargement, improvement, or other obtainment and the maintenance, operation and use of water and wastewater systems a lake improvement district may impose just and equitable charges for the use and for the availability of the systems and for connections with them.

Pelican Group of Lakes Water & Sewer Improvements