©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 1 Process Improvement l Understanding, Modelling and Improving the Software Process

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 2 l To explain the principles of software process improvement l To explain how software process factors influence software quality and productivity l To introduce the SEI Capability Maturity Model and to explain why it is influential. To discuss the applicability of that model l To explain why CMM-based improvement is not universally applicable Objectives

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 3 l Process and product quality l Process analysis and modelling l Process measurement l The SEI process maturity model l Process classification Topics covered

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 4 l Understanding existing processes l Introducing process changes to achieve organisational objectives which are usually focused on quality improvement, cost reduction and schedule acceleration l Most process improvement work so far has focused on defect reduction. This reflects the increasing attention paid by industry to quality l However, other process attributes can be the focus of improvement Process improvement

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 5 Process attributes

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 6 l Process analysis Model and analyse (quantitatively if possible) existing processes l Improvement identification Identify quality, cost or schedule bottlenecks l Process change introduction Modify the process to remove identified bottlenecks l Process change training Train staff involved in new process proposals l Change tuning Evolve and improve process improvements Process improvement stages

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 7 The process improvement process

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 8 l Process quality and product quality are closely related l A good process is usually required to produce a good product l For manufactured goods, process is the principal quality determinant l For design-based activity, other factors are also involved especially the capabilities of the designers Process and product quality

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 9 Principal product quality factors

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 10 Quality factors l For large projects with ‘average’ capabilities, the development process determines product quality l For small projects, the capabilities of the developers is the main determinant l The development technology is particularly significant for small projects l In all cases, if an unrealistic schedule is imposed then product quality will suffer

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 11 Process analysis and modelling l Process analysis The study of existing processes to understand the relationships between parts of the process and to compare them with other processes l Process modelling The documentation of a process which records the tasks, the roles and the entities used Process models may be presented from different perspectives

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 12 l Study an existing process to understand its activities l Produce an abstract model of the process. You should normally represent this graphically. Several different views (e.g. activities, deliverables, etc.) may be required l Analyse the model to discover process problems. Involves discussing activities with stakeholders Process analysis and modelling

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 13 l Published process models and process standards It is always best to start process analysis with an existing model. People then may extend and change this. l Questionnaires and interviews Must be carefully designed. Participants may tell you what they think you want to hear l Ethnographic analysis Involves assimilating process knowledge by observation Process analysis techniques

Elements of a process model

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 15 The module testing activity

Activities in module testing ©Ian Sommerville 1995 Software Engineering, 5th edition. Chapter 31. Slide ##

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 17 Process exceptions l Software processes are complex and process models cannot effectively represent how to handle exceptions Several key people becoming ill just before a critical review A complete failure of a communication processor so that no e- mail is available for several days Organisational reorganisation A need to respond to an unanticipated request for new proposals l Under these circumstances, the model is suspended and managers use their initiative to deal with the exception

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 18 l Wherever possible, quantitative process data should be collected However, where organisations do not have clearly defined process standards this is very difficult as you don’t know what to measure. A process may have to be defined before any measurement is possible l Process measurements should be used to assess process improvements But this does not mean that measurements should drive the improvements. The improvement driver should be the organizational objectives Process measurement

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 19 l Time taken for process activities to be completed E.g. Calendar time or effort to complete an activity or process l Resources required for processes or activities E.g. Total effort in person-days l Number of occurrences of a particular event E.g. Number of defects discovered Classes of process measurement

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 20 l Goals What is the organisation trying to achieve? The objective of process improvement is to satisfy these goals l Questions Questions about areas of uncertainty related to the goals. You need process knowledge to derive these l Metrics Measurements to be collected to answer the questions Goal-Question-Metric Paradigm

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 21 l US Defense Dept. funded institute associated with Carnegie Mellon l Mission is to promote software technology transfer particularly to defense contractors l Maturity model proposed in mid-1980s, refined in early 1990s. l Work has been very influential in process improvement The Software Engineering Institute

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 22 The SEI process maturity model

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 23 l Initial Essentially uncontrolled, no effective management procedures or project plans/ no formal procedures for project control. May develop software successfully, but characteristics of product will be unpredictable. l Repeatable Product management procedures defined and used. Formal management, quality and configuration control procedures. Orgn can repeat projects of same type. Lack of formal process control. Project success is dependent on individual managers motivating a team, and on organizational folklore acting as intuitive process description. l Defined Process management procedures and strategies defined and used. Formal procedures in place to ensure that defined process is followed. l Managed Quality management strategies defined and used. Formal program of quantitative data collection. Process and product metrics are collected and fed into process improvement activity. l Optimising Process improvement strategies defined and used. Continuous process improvement is budgeted and planned and an integral part of orgn processes Maturity model levels

Key process areas Process improvement should be concerned with establishing key processes, rather than achieving some arbitrary level.

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 25 l It focuses on project management rather than product development. l It ignores the use of technologies such as rapid prototyping. l It does not incorporate risk analysis as a key process area l It does not define its domain of applicability SEI model problems

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 26 The CMM and ISO 9000 l There is a clear correlation between the key processes in the CMM and the quality management processes in ISO 9000 l The CMM is more detailed and prescriptive and includes a framework for improvement l Organisations rated as level 2 in the CMM are likely to be ISO 9000 compliant

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 27 Capability assessment l An important role of the SEI is to use the CMM to assess the capabilities of contractors bidding for US government defence contracts l The model is intended to represent organisational capability not the practices used in particular projects l Within the same organisation, there are often wide variations in processes used l Capability assessment is questionnaire-based

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 28 The capability assessment process

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 29 l Informal No detailed process model. Development team chose their own way of working. May use formal procedure like configuration mgt, but procedures used are not pre-defined. l Managed Defined process model which drives the development process. Process model defines procedures used, their scheduling and relationships. l Methodical Processes supported by some defined development method(s) (such as OOD). Processes supported by automated CASE tools l Improving Process improvement objectives. May use quantitative process measurement. Process classification

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 30 Process applicability

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 31 l Process used should depend on type of product which is being developed For large systems, management is usually the principal problem so you need a strictly managed process. For smaller systems, more informality is possible. l There is no uniformly applicable process which should be standardised within an organisation High costs may be incurred if you force an inappropriate process on a development team Process choice

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 32 Process tool support

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 33 l Process improvement involves process analysis, standardisation, measurement and change l Process models include descriptions of tasks, activities, roles, exceptions, communications, deliverables and other processes l Measurement should be used to answer specific questions about the software process used l The three types of process metrics which can be collected are time metrics, resource utilisation metrics and event metrics Key points

©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 25 Slide 34 l The SEI model classifies software processes as initial, repeatable, defined, managed and optimising. It identifies key processes which should be used at each of these levels l The SEI model is appropriate for large systems developed by large teams of engineers. It cannot be applied without modification in other situations l Processes can be classified as informal, managed, methodical and improving. This classification can be used to identify process tool support Key points