The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carey Jang, Air Quality Modeling Group USEPA/OAQPS CMAS Workshop, RTP, 10/20/2004 CMAS Workshop, RTP, 10/20/2004 Applications of CMAQ over the Pacific.
Advertisements

NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,
Optimisation of CHIMERE configuration in the frame of an ozone sensitivity study Fanny Lasry, Isabelle Coll CHIMERE workshop 21 – 22 March 2005.
Critical Issues of Exposure Assessment for Human Health Studies of Air Pollution Michelle L. Bell Yale University SAMSI September 15, 2009.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
Ozone and Aerosols in US and East Asia between 2001 and 2002 Yun-Fat Lam 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Zuopan Li 1, Carey Jang 2, Rokjin Park 3 and Daniel J. Jacob.
2007 Group Meeting Global Climate and Air Pollution (GCAP) at Harvard University Nicky Lam and Joshua Fu University of Tennessee October 12, 2007.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
The Sensitivity of Aerosol Sulfate to Changes in Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds Ariel F. Stein Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
Simple Chemical modeling of ozone sensitivity
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
1 René Parra, Pedro Jiménez and José M. Baldasano Environmental Modeling Laboratory, UPC Barcelona, Spain Models-3 Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
Air Quality Impacts from a Potential Shale Gas Emissions Scenario - Photochemical Modeling of Ozone Concentrations in Central North Carolina Presented.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Determining Alternative Futures - Urban Development Effects on Air Quality Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin and Darko Koracin May 2007 Zagreb, Croatia.
Cost Analysis of Impacts of Climate Change on Regional Air Quality Kuo-Jen Liao*, Efthimios Tagaris and Armistead G. Russell School of Civil & Environmental.
UNCERTAINTIES INFLUENCING HEALTH-BASED PRIORITIZATION OF OZONE ABATEMENT OPTIONS UNCERTAINTIES INFLUENCING HEALTH-BASED PRIORITIZATION OF OZONE ABATEMENT.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division IMPACTS OF MODELING CHOICES ON RELATIVE RESPONSE FACTORS IN ATLANTA, GA Byeong-Uk Kim, Maudood Khan, Amit Marmur,
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Ozone SIP Schedule and CCOS Products Policy Committee Meeting John DaMassa April 18, 2002.
Why is Ozone Low in Baltimore City? In most cities, ozone is lower in city centers than it is downwind of the cities –Well established in the scientific.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Expected Ozone Benefits from EGU NOx Reductions Tim Vinciguerra, Emily Bull, Timothy Canty, Hao He, Eric Zalewsky, Michael Woodman, Sheryl Ehrman, Russell.
Presented at the AQAST 9 th Semiannual Meeting Wednesday June 3 rd, 2015 Presentation by: Dan Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate Co-authors: Tim Canty, Tim Vinciguerra,
Evidence for an increase in the photochemical lifetime of ozone in the eastern United States Presented at the 14 th CMAS Meeting Wednesday October 7 th,
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Georgia Institute of Technology Adaptive Grid Modeling for Predicting the Air Quality Impacts of Biomass Burning Alper Unal, Talat Odman School of Civil.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Report to WESTAR Technical Committee September 20, 2006 The CMAQ Visibility Model Applied To Rural Ozone In The Intermountain West Patrick Barickman Tyler.
WRAP Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting August 16, 2006 The CMAQ Visibility Model Applied To Rural Ozone In The Intermountain West Patrick Barickman.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
February 11, 2016 Nitrogen Oxides (NO x ) Emissions from U.S. Shale Plays using an Integrated Top-down and Bottom-up Approach Speaker: Andy Chang, PhD.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Ozone Sensitivity to Nitric Oxide Emissions in WRF-Chem
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
CMAQ Programs and Options
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Uncertainties influencing dynamic evaluation of ozone trends
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins University Air Pollution 2005 May 17, 2005

Tropospheric Ozone (O 3 ) Secondary pollutant formed by complex chemical reactions including NO x and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Linked to human health effects including decreased lung function and increased emergency room visits Subject to NAAQS under the U.S. Clean Air Act Estimating O 3 concentrations important from a public health and regulatory standpoint

Attainment of 8-Hour Standard November 2004 Source: EPA Greenbook Attainment or unclassified Non-attainment (entire county) Non-attainment (partial county)

Land-Use Emissions: Transportation Industry Biogenic Meteorology Wind Precipitation Solar Radiation Air Quality Modeling Inputs: Terrain

CMAQ (Community Multi-scale Air Quality) SAS Arc/Info Models-3 Framework LUPROC (Land-Use Processor) ECIP (Emissions- Chemistry Interface Processor) JPROC (Photolysis Rate Processor) ICON (Initial Conditions Processor) BCON (Boundary Conditions Processor) CCTM (CMAQ Chemical Transport Model) MEPPS (Models-3 Emissions Processing and Projection System) INPRO (Input Processor) EMPRO (Emission Processor) OUTPRO (Output Processor) MEPRO (Models-3 Emissions Projections Processor) IDA (Inventory Data Processor) MCIP (Meteorology- Chemistry Interface Processor) MM5 (Meteorological Modeling System)

Sample Output

Case Study Area (Mid-Atlantic, USA) Domain 1 Domain 4 Domain 1: 108-km grid cell resolution Domain 2: 36-km grid cells Domain 3: 12-km grid cells Domain 4: 4-km grid cells Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 1 Domain 4 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 1: 108-km grid cell resolution Domain 3: 36-km grid cells Domain 2: 12-km grid cells Domain 4: 4-km grid cells

12-km Resolution Domain 42 Rows 69 Columns 2898 Cells

4-km Resolution Domain (Maryland) Baltimore, MD Washington, DC X X 45 Rows 60 Columns 2700 Cells

Model Evaluation How well does the modeling system perform? Are ozone estimates reasonable approximations of monitor values? Several approaches applied comparing model estimates to monitor measurements (Bell & Ellis Atmospheric Environment 2004) E.g. Mean bias = 6.2 ppb

Comparison of Values at Hour of Maximum Concentration July 13 to 15, 1995 x

Comparison of Model Estimates and Measurements

8-hr Average O 3 ( ppb ) Local Time Location: Millington, Maryland Comparison of Model Estimates and Measurements (8-hour average)

Modeling Simulations 27June1990 (h 00) to 30June1990 (h 00) (GMT) –High ozone episode Emissions Scenarios –Baseline (actual emissions) –100% increase in biogenic emissions –100% increase in biogenic and motor vehicle emissions

Baseline Scenario (Maximum O 3 Concentration)

Scenario B Biogenics 100% Scenario C Biogenics and Motor Vehicles 100%

Scenario Comparisons Ozone Concentrations –Maximum hourly average, maximum 8- hour average, daily average, episode average, domain-wide average, etc. –Absolute values, increases, relative increases –Comparisons are affected by what pollution metric is used (Bell & Ellis JAWMA 2005)

Scenario Comparisons – Some Results All emissions scenarios had higher O 3 in some areas/times and lower O 3 in others The increase in motor vehicle emissions had less of an impact than the same relative % increase in biogenic emissions.

Rural vs. Urban Areas Avg. increase in Hourly Max (ppb) Rural Urban Scen B - baseline Scen C - baseline

VOC vs. NO x - sensitivity 13July1995 (h 00) to 15July1995 (h 00) (GMT) Scenarios –Baseline scenario (actual emissions) –VOCs and NO x increased 25% –VOCs only increased 25% –NO x only increased 25%

Areas for which the VOC increase always resulted in higher O 3 than the NO x increase. Areas for which the NO x increase always resulted in higher O 3 than the VOC increase.

Concluding Thoughts +Air pollution modeling can be a useful tool for many purposes – Must believe in results (validation) Results Demonstrate the importance of biogenic VOCs for the Mid-Atlantic Region of the U.S. Show that generalizations such as VOC-sensitivity or NO x -sensitivity are over simplifications Thank you