Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BC System – Review Options ● BC2 working point (energy-charge-compr.) ● 2BC (rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf) ● table: 2BC (rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf) dogleg + 2BC (rf-dog-rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf)
Advertisements

February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Andrew Burrill R&D ERL SRF Electron Gun Andrew Burrill February 17-18, 2010 SRF Electron Gun.
RF-Gun cavity for high charge electron generation Takuya Natsui.
Normal-Conducting Photoinjector for High Power CW FEL Sergey Kurennoy, LANL, Los Alamos, NM, USA An RF photoinjector capable of producing high continuous.
First operation of the TTF2 injector with beam Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Hamburg, 16 Sept 2003.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
Reduced Gun Simulations 1. Comparison 60MV/m Gun vs 50MV/m Gun, Flat Top Laser Pulse 2. Comparison for the worst case: Gun50+Gauss Laser Pulse 3. Summary.
CALCULATIONS OF THE LCLS INJECTOR USING ASTRA Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
F Specifications for the dark current kicker for the NML test facility at Fermilab S. Nagaitsev, M. Church, P. Piot, C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel Fermilab May.
Progress of SRF and ERL at Peking University Lu Xiangyang Institute of Heavy Ion Physics Peking University.
Institute of Radiation Physics Jochen Teichert Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf Radiation Source ELBE J. Teichert, A. Arnold, H. Büttig,
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Modelling of the ALICE Injector Julian McKenzie ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory IOP Particle Accelerators and Beams Group Status and Challenges of Simulation.
A Polarized Electron PWT Photoinjector David Yu DULY Research Inc. California, USA SPIN2004, Trieste, Italy 10/14/04.
I.V. Bazarov, Multivariate Optimization of High Brightness DC Gun Photoinjector, UCLA Workshop, 8-10 November CHESS / LEPP ERL DC Gun Injector.
Steve LidiaICFA Workshop, Chia LagunaJuly, 2002 Flat Beam Photoinjectors for Ultrafast Synchrotron Radiation Sources Steve Lidia Lawrence Berkeley National.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Interpretation of beam current experimental results in HoBiCaT Gun0 Vladimir Volkov.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Christopher Gerth DL/RAL Joint Workshop 28-29/4/04 Modelling of the ERLP injector system Christopher Gerth ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Velocity bunching from S-band photoinjectors Julian McKenzie 1 st July 2011 Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop Cockcroft Institute STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
FLS2010 Workshop, Stanford, March 1-5, 2010 Florian Loehl (Cornell University) Commissioning of the High Current ERL Injector at Cornell Florian Loehl.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Construction, Commissioning, and Operation of Injector Test Facility (ITF) for the PAL-XFEL November 12, 2013 S. J. Park, J. H. Hong, C. K. Min, I. Y.
Rong Xiang I I Dark current measurements at the ELBE SRF gun Rong Xiang, Jochen Teichert, Pengnan Lu, Andre Arnold, Petr Murcek,
Photocathode based Electron Sources for Particle Accelerators – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow B.L. Militsyn STFC ASTeC, UK European Workshop on Photocathodes.
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
Beam dynamics simulation with 3D Field map for FCC RF gun
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
MIT Compact X-ray Source
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
S-band RF gun based on new type accelerating structure
Needle Cathodes for RF Guns
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Some CEPC SRF considerations
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
CEPC Injector positron source
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Studies of Emittance & Lifetime
Superconducting High Brightness RF Photoinjector Design
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Selected simulations for XFEL photo injector
Electron sources for FCC-ee
Physics Design on Injector I
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
Minimized emittance for high charge with multi cell superconducting guns and solenoidal focusing D. Lipka, BESSY.
Injector for the Electron Cooler
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Presentation transcript:

Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance) 0.62 π mm mrad Bunch charge 1 nC Laser pulse duration / Laser pulse rise time 20 ps / 1 ps Axis peak induction of TE mode 0.3 Tesla Surface peak induction of TE and TM modes Tesla Acceleration frequency 1300 MHz Axis peak field of acceleration mode 50 MV/m Electron bunch energy 4.62 MeV Energy spread (minimum, rms) 0.32% B u d k e r I N P-FZR The calculation results obtained by SuperLANS and ASTRA codes

RF gun geometry. What are the electric and magnetic RF focusing? 1 – Heat sink 2 – Choke cell 3 – Photocathode Cu stalk 4 – Cathode cell 5 – Electric TM field pattern 6 – Magnetic TE field pattern 7 – Cavity full cell 8 – TE mode coupler (90º routed) 9 – TM mode coupler pipe Scaled cathode region Cu T=78K T= 78K Electric RF focusing region Magnetic RF focusing region

Other injector parameters Acceleration field frequency1300 MHz Acceleration peak field at the cavity axis50 MV/m Launch phase of bunch centre (optimized)55º55º Laser spot radius at the photocathode (optimized) 1.5 mm Depth of photocathode Cu stem in back cavity wall (optimized to create optimal RF focusing) 2 mm External quality factor of input coupler (Q ext )3.79·10 5 Input power / Average beam current assuming the Q ext 320 kW / 70 mA Dissipated 1300 MHz power at Cu pipe of input coupler assuming the Q ext and T Cu =78K 9.4 W Dissipated 1300 MHz power at cavity Nb wall (assuming unloaded quality factor Q o =10 10, 2K) W Dissipated 1300 MHz power at photocathode Cu stem assuming T Cu =78K 5 W Surface peak field at the photocathode32.8 MV/m Frequency of magnetic focusing TE mode3788 MHz Axis peak induction of TE mode (optimized)0.3 Tesla Maximum vector sum of surface induction of 1300 and 3788 MHz (the limit is 0.18 Tesla) Tesla Surface peak induction of TE mode0.108 Tesla Ratio of Peak Induction on the surface and on the axis (RPI) Unloaded Quality factor of TE mode assuming the Q o for 1300 MHz 0.85·10 8 Dissipated RF power of TE mode at cavity Nb wall W Dissipated RF power of TE mode at Cu pipe of input coupler assuming T Cu =78K 3.63 W Transversal normalized emittance of bunch (thermal emittance is not taken into account) 0.62 π mm mrad Full emittance: thermal emittance of Cs 2 Te photocathode (0.64  m) is taken into account 0.89 π mm mrad Axis coordinate of emittance minimum disposition from the cathode 0.85 m

RF fields in the cavity /SLANS cod The vectors of TE and TM fields are ortogonal F=1300 MHz F=3788 MHz E50 MV/m axis B TE 0.3 T axis B TM T surface B TE T surface B TM +B TE T surface Peak fields

High order TE modes selection for low Ratio of Peak Induction (RPI) at the surface and at the axis F, MHz RPI F= MHzF= MHz F= MHzF= MHz TE 021 Pipe cut off TE frequency 5226 MHz TE 011

Emittance dependence from TE field phase  n – transversal normalized rms emittance  av - average emittance A  – emittance amplitude φ TE – TE mode phase  o - constant phase B TE – TE mode peak induction at the axis, T R – laser spot radius at the photocathode, mm  TM – launch phase (here  TM =50º at maximum bunch energy) ε av,  m A ε,  m B TE, T R, mm Set examples

Parameter scanning for emittance minimization / ASTRA cod TE induction (B TE ), laser spot size (R), launch phase (  TM ) R,mm R, mm B TE,T Average emittance,  mEmittance amplitude,  m φ TM =46.3º B TE =0.29 T R=1.5 mm ε min =0.7  m Extreme valuesφ TM Average emittance,  m º Emittance amplitude,  m 0!60º Energy, MeV4.6250º Energy spread, KeV1542º Launch phase scanning Optimum for  n =5%:  B TE =0.03T DR=0.6 mm  TM =10º Sensitivity

Bunch time evolution Phase space, KeV/c X, mm Bunch cross section, mm Bunch rotation is subtracted here Bunch rotates by magnetic TE field 60 cm drift

Emittance compensation instances: without any RF focusing, with only electric RF focusing, with only magnetic RF focusing, with sum - electric and magnetic RF focusing Optimized settings & performances Without any RF focusing Electric RF focusing only Magnetic RF focusing only Electric and magnetic RF focusing ε n,  mm mrad ( ε n 2 + ε th 2 ) 1/ R (laser), mm φ TM, deg 49.4º46.3º49.4º55º Cathode depth, mm 0202 B TE (axis, peak), T B (surf., peak), T  mm mrad] - Cs 2 Te photocathode thermal normalized emittance [ K.Floettmann studed ]

1 cell superconducting RF gun (“DROSSEL”) with electric and magnetic RF focusing Optimized performances Bunch transv. norm.emitt.,  m 0.51÷0.52 Emitt. minimum disposition, m Average Energy, MeV 2.26 Launch phase of 1300 MHz 25.0º Laser spot radius, mm 1.5 B TE (peak,, axis), T B TE (peak, surface), T RPI 0.56 B TM (surface), mT | B TM + B TE |, mT Emittance TE compensation TE 021

3.5 cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Bunch transv. norm.emitt.,  m 0.78÷0.98 Emitt. minimum disposition, m 4.25 Average Energy, MeV 8.82 Launch phase of TM 1300 MHz 74.6º Laser spot radius, mm 1.5 B TE (peak, axis), T B TE (peak, surface), T RPI 0.42 B TM (surface), mT | B TM + B TE |, mT TE 021

Conclusions Emittance compensation by the electric and magnetic RF focusing as well as a high accelerating gradient are the key factors in getting a small emittance with a large charge. Either electric or magnetic RF focusing diminish the emittance more than twice. And together – about 6 times. The peak induction of magnetic field on the axis is about 0.3 T. And sum of magnetic fields on cavity surface is less than the limit of 0.18 T. The induction of peak magnetic field on cavity surface proved to be small due to vector summation of orthogonal TE and TM fields. Also because of an unoverlapping of their peak fields on the surface. TE 021 mode has a smallest ratio of magnetic peak induction on the surface to the peak induction on the axis. The dependence of emittance from TE phase has oscillatory view. There are RF gun parameter settins at which the oscillatory amplitude becomes zero. Transversal emittance remains small in wide range of RF gun settings.

Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Dietmar Janssen (FZR), Klauss Floettmann (DESY), Victor Petrov (BINP) for helping in the work.