Groningen, June 3, 2009 2 From Spinning Tops to Rigid Body Motion Department of Mathematics, University of Groningen, June 3, 2009 Peter H. Richter University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bifurcations and foliations of the Kovalevskaya System Peter H. Richter - Institut für Theoretische Physik International Conference Classical Problems.
Advertisements

Lectures D25-D26 : 3D Rigid Body Dynamics
Chapter 9 Rotational Dynamics.
Ch 9. Rotational Dynamics In pure translational motion, all points on an object travel on parallel paths. The most general motion is a combination of translation.
Physics 430: Lecture 24 Euler Equations Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
Rotational Equilibrium and Rotational Dynamics
Maribor, December 10, Stability of relative equilibria in spinning tops 9th Christmas Symposium dedicated to Prof. Siegfried Großmann CAMTP, University.
Rotational Equilibrium and Rotational Dynamics
Chapter 10 Angular momentum Angular momentum of a particle 1. Definition Consider a particle of mass m and linear momentum at a position relative.
Ch. 7: Dynamics.
Euler Rotation. Angular Momentum  The angular momentum J is defined in terms of the inertia tensor and angular velocity. All rotations included  The.
Symmetry. Phase Continuity Phase density is conserved by Liouville’s theorem.  Distribution function D  Points as ensemble members Consider as a fluid.
Physics 1901 (Advanced) A/Prof Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
Collisionless Dynamics III: The Jeans Equation Collisionless Dynamics III: The Jeans Equation.
Mechanics of Rigid Bodies
Introduction to ROBOTICS
Ch.12 Energy II: Potential energy Ch. 12 Energy II: Potential energy.
Chapter 10 Rotational Motion.
Chapter 10 Rotational Motion.
T. K. Ng, HKUST Lecture IV. Mechanics of rigid bodies.
Stanford University Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Introduction to Symmetry Analysis Brian Cantwell Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Force on Floating bodies:
Central Force Motion Chapter 8
Concluding Remarks about Phys 410 In this course, we have … The physics of small oscillations about stable equilibrium points Driven damped oscillations,
Section 17.5 Parameterized Surfaces
Two-Body Systems.
Concluding Remarks about Phys 410 In this course, we have … The physics of small oscillations about stable equilibrium points Re-visited Newtonian mechanics.
Physics 321 Hour 39 Final Review. When, Where, etc. Be on time! Classroom Counts 10% of the total grade.
Chapter 9: Rotational Dynamics
12/01/2014PHY 711 Fall Lecture 391 PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods 10-10:50 AM MWF Olin 103 Plan for Lecture 39 1.Brief introduction.
Jacobs University Feb. 23, The complex dynamics of spinning tops Physics Colloquium Jacobs University Bremen February 23, 2011 Peter H. Richter.
AP Physics C: Mechanics Chapter 11
The Two-Body Problem. The two-body problem The two-body problem: two point objects in 3D interacting with each other (closed system) Interaction between.
MATH4248 Weeks Topics: review of rigid body motion, Legendre transformations, derivation of Hamilton’s equations of motion, phase space and Liouville’s.
Motion in a constant uniform magnetic field Section 21.
Two-Dimensional Rotational Kinematics 8.01 W09D1 Young and Freedman: 1.10 (Vector Products) , 10.5.
Chapter 17 PLANE MOTION OF RIGID BODIES: ENERGY AND MOMENTUM METHODS
Sect 5.7: Heavy Symmetrical Top with 1 Point Fixed, Part I Euler’s Eqtns of Motion for a Rigid Body with 1 pt. fixed: I 1 (dω 1 /dt) - ω 2 ω 3 (I 2 -I.
Phase Separation and Dynamics of a Two Component Bose-Einstein Condensate.
D’Alembert’s Principle the sum of the work done by
9.4. Newton’s Second Law for Rotational Motion A model airplane on a guideline has a mass m and is flying on a circle of radius r (top view). A net tangential.
Chapter 11 Angular Momentum. Angular momentum plays a key role in rotational dynamics. There is a principle of conservation of angular momentum.  In.
Finding Brake Orbits in the (Isosceles) Three- Body Problem Rick Moeckel -- University of Minnesota Feliz cumpleaños, Ernesto.
The Spinning Top Chloe Elliott. Rigid Bodies Six degrees of freedom:  3 cartesian coordinates specifying position of centre of mass  3 angles specifying.
6th International Summer School / Conference „Let‘s Face Chaos through Nonlinear Dynamics“ CAMTP University of Maribor July 5, 2005 Peter H. Richter -
Chapter 9 Rotational Dynamics.
Classical Chaos in Geometric Collective Model Pavel Stránský, Pavel Cejnar, Matúš Kurian Institute of Particle and Nuclear Phycics Faculty of Mathematics.
Q UANTUM CHAOS IN THE COLLECTIVE DYNAMICS OF NUCLEI Pavel Cejnar, Pavel Stránský, Michal Macek DPG Frühjahrstagung, Bochum 2009, Germany Institute.
Topology of dynamics of a nonhomogeneous rotationally symmetric ellipsoid on a smooth plane. Sechkin Georgii (Lomonosov Moscow State University)
Interacting boson model s-bosons (l=0) d-bosons (l=2) Interpretation: “nucleon pairs with l = 0, 2” “quanta of collective excitations” Dynamical algebra:
Maribor, July 1, Chaotic motion in rigid body dynamics 7th International Summer School/Conference Let‘s face Chaos through Nonlinear Dynamics CAMTP,
Cutnell/Johnson Physics 8th edition Reading Quiz Questions
Peter Richter Institute for Theoretical Physics 1 Integrable and Non-Integrable Rigid Body Dynamics – Actions and Poincare Sections Classical Problems.
International Conference Classical Problems of Rigid Body Dynamics Donetsk, June 23-25, 2004 Peter H. Richter - Institut für Theoretische Physik The study.
H ÉNON -H EILES H AMILTONIAN – C HAOS I N 2-D M ODELING C HAOS & C OMPLEXITY – 2008 Y OUVAL D AR UCD P HYSICS D EPT. PHYSICS. UCDAVIS. EDU
Peter Richter Institute for Theoretical Physics 1 Iso-Energy Manifolds and Enveloping Surfaces in the Problem of Rigid Body Motions Classical Problems.
Celestial Mechanics VI The N-body Problem: Equations of motion and general integrals The Virial Theorem Planetary motion: The perturbing function Numerical.
1 Angular Momentum Chapter 11 © 2012, 2016 A. Dzyubenko © 2004, 2012 Brooks/Cole © 2004, 2012 Brooks/Cole Phys 221
Celestial Mechanics VII
From: Nonlinear Dynamical Analysis of the “Power Ball”
PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods
Graphs of Equations In Two Variables; Intercepts; Symmetry
Review Lecture Jeffrey Eldred Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism
Honors Physics 1 Class 12 Fall 2013
Rolling, Torque, and Angular Momentum
Outline We examine the existence of parabolic resonances and various regimes of instabilities in the perturbed Nonlinear Shrödinger equation (NLS). Model:
UNDERSTANDING THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ROTATIONAL KINEMATICS
Physics 321 Hour 31 Euler’s Angles.
Selected Problems in Dynamics: Stability of a Spinning Body -and- Derivation of the Lagrange Points John F. Fay June 24, 2014.
Physics 319 Classical Mechanics
Presentation transcript:

Groningen, June 3, From Spinning Tops to Rigid Body Motion Department of Mathematics, University of Groningen, June 3, 2009 Peter H. Richter University of Bremen S3S3 2S 3 S 1 xS 2

Groningen, June 3, Outline Demonstration of some basic physics Parameter sets Configuration spaces SO(3) and S 2 vs. T 3 and T 2 Phase space structure Equations of motion Strategies of investigation

Groningen, June 3, Demonstration of some basic physics Parameter sets Configuration spaces SO(3) and S 2 vs. T 3 and T 2 Phase space structure Equations of motion Strategies of investigation

Groningen, June 3, Parameter space at least one independent moment of inertia  for the Cardan frame 6 essential parameters after scaling of lengths, time, energy: angle  between the frame‘s axis and the direction of gravity two moments of inertia  two angles  for the center of gravity

Groningen, June 3, Demonstration of some basic physics Parameter sets Configuration spaces SO(3) and S 2 vs. T 3 and T 2 Phase space structure Equations of motion Strategies of investigation

Groningen, June 3, Configuration spaces SO(3) versus T 3 after separation of angle  : reduced configuration spaces Poisson (    )-sphere „polar points“  defined with respect to an arbitrary direction Poisson (    )-torus „polar  -circles“  defined with respect to the axes of the frame coordinate singularities removed, but Euler variables lost Cardan angles (     )   Euler angles (     )

Groningen, June 3, Demonstration of some basic physics Parameter sets Configuration spaces SO(3) and S 2 vs. T 3 and T 2 Phase space structure Equations of motion Strategies of investigation

Groningen, June 3, Phase space and conserved quantities 3 angles + 3 momenta 6D phase space 4 conserved quantities 2D invariant sets super-integrable one angular momentum l z = const 4D invariant sets mild chaos energy conservation h = const 5D energy surfaces strong chaos 3 conserved quantities 3D invariant sets integrable

Groningen, June 3, Reduced phase spaces with parameter l z 2 angles + 2 momenta 4D phase space 3 conserved quantities 1D invariant sets super-integrable 2 conserved quantities 2D invariant sets integrable energy conservation h = const 3D energy surfaces chaos

Groningen, June 3, (   l ) - phase space 3  i  -components + 3 momenta l i 6D phase space 3 conserved quantities 1D invariant sets super-integrable 2 Casimir constants  ·  = 1 and  ·l = l z 4D simplectic space 2 conserved quantities 2D invariant sets integrable energy conservation h = const 3D energy surfaces chaos

Groningen, June 3, Demonstration of some basic physics Parameter sets Configuration spaces SO(3) and S 2 vs. T 3 and T 2 Phase space structure Equations of motion Strategies of investigation

Groningen, June 3, Without frame: Euler-Poisson equations in ( ,l)-space Casimir constants: Coordinates: Energy constant: Effective potential:  motion:

Groningen, June 3, With frame: Euler – Lagrange equations where Reduction to a Hamiltonian with parameter, Coriolisforce and centrifugal potential Demo

Groningen, June 3, Demonstration of some basic physics Parameter sets Configuration spaces SO(3) and S 2 vs. T 3 and T 2 Phase space structure Equations of motion Strategies of investigation

Groningen, June 3, topological bifurcations of iso-energy surfaces their projections to configuration and momentum spaces integrable systems: action variable representation and foliation by invariant tori chaotic systems: Poincaré sections periodic orbit skeleton: stable (order) and unstable (chaos) Search for invariant sets in phase space, and their bifurcations Katok Envelope Actions Tori Poincaré Periods

Groningen, June 3, Katok‘s cases s 2 = s 3 = colors for 7 types of bifurcation diagrams 6colors for 6 types of energy surfaces S 1 xS 2 1 2S 3 S3S3 RP 3 K3K3 3S

Groningen, June 3, types of envelopes (I) (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (1.7,0.9,0.86) (h,l) = (1,1) I S3S3 T2T2 (1,0.6) I‘ S3S3 T2T2 (2.5,2.15) II 2S 3 2T 2 (2,1.8) III S 1 xS 2 M32M32

Groningen, June 3, types of envelopes (II) (1.9,1.759) VI 3S 3 2S 2, T 2 (1.912,1.763)VII S 3,S 1 xS 2 2T 2 IV RP 3 T2T2 (1.5,0.6) (1.85,1.705) V K3K3 M32M32 (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (1.7,0.9,0.86)

Groningen, June 3, EulerLagrangeKovalevskaya Energy surfaces in action representation

Groningen, June 3,

Groningen, June 3, Examples: From Kovalevskaya to Lagrange B E (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (2, ,1) (s 1,s 2,s 3 ) = (1,0,0)  = 2  = 1.1

Groningen, June 3, Example of a bifurcation scheme of periodic orbits

Groningen, June 3, Lagrange tops without frame Three types of bifurcation diagrams: (cigars) five types of Reeb graphs When the 3-axis is the symmetry axis, the system remains integrable with the frame, otherwise not. VB Lagrange

Groningen, June 3, The Katok family – and others arbitrary moments of inertia, (s1, s2, s3) = (1, 0, 0) Topology of 3D energy surfaces and 2D Poincaré surfaces of section has been analyzed completely (I. N. Gashenenko, P. H. R. 2004) How is this modified by the Cardan frame?

Groningen, June 3, Invariant sets in phase space

Groningen, June 3, (h,l) bifurcation diagrams Momentum map Equivalent statements: (h,l) is critical value relative equilibrium is critical point of U l  is critical point of U l

Groningen, June 3, Rigid body dynamics in SO(3) - -Phase spaces and basic equations Full and reduced phase spaces Euler-Poisson equations Invariant sets and their bifurcations - -Integrable cases Euler Lagrange Kovalevskaya - -Katok‘s more general cases Effective potentials Bifurcation diagrams Enveloping surfaces - -Poincaré surfaces of section Gashenenko‘s version Dullin-Schmidt version An application

Groningen, June 3, Integrable cases Lagrange: „ heavy“, symmetric Kovalevskaya: Euler: „gravity-free“ EEEE LLLL KKKK AAAA

Groningen, June 3, Euler‘s case l- motion decouples from  -motion Poisson sphere potential admissible values in (p,q,r)-space for given l and h < U l (h,l)-bifurcation diagram BBBB

Groningen, June 3, Lagrange‘s case effective potential (p,q,r)-equations integrals I: ½ <  < ¾ II: ¾ <  < 1 RP 3 bifurcation diagrams S3S3S3S3 2S 3 S 1 xS 2 III:  > 1 S 1 xS 2 S3S3S3S3 RP 3

Groningen, June 3, Enveloping surfaces BBBB

Groningen, June 3, Kovalevskaya‘s case (p,q,r)-equations integrals Tori projected to (p,q,r)-space Tori in phase space and Poincaré surface of section

Groningen, June 3, Fomenko representation of foliations (3 examples out of 10) „atoms“ of the Kovalevskaya system elliptic center A pitchfork bifurcation B period doubling A* double saddle C 2 Critical tori: additional bifurcations

Groningen, June 3, EulerLagrangeKovalevskaya Energy surfaces in action representation

Groningen, June 3, Rigid body dynamics in SO(3) - -Phase spaces and basic equations Full and reduced phase spaces Euler-Poisson equations Invariant sets and their bifurcations - -Integrable cases Euler Lagrange Kovalevskaya - -Katok‘s more general cases Effective potentials Bifurcation diagrams Enveloping surfaces - -Poincaré surfaces of section Gashenenko‘s version Dullin-Schmidt version An application

Groningen, June 3, Katok‘s cases s 2 = s 3 = colors for 7 types of bifurcation diagrams 7colors for 7 types of energy surfaces S 1 xS 2 1 2S 3 S3S3S3S3 RP 3 K3K3K3K3 3S 3

Groningen, June 3, Effective potentials for case 1 (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (1.7,0.9,0.86) l = 1.763l = l = 1.86l = 2.0 l = 0l = 1.68l = 1.71 l = 1.74 S3S3S3S3 RP 3 K3K3K3K3 3S 3

Groningen, June 3, types of envelopes (I) (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (1.7,0.9,0.86) (h,l) = (1,1) I S3S3 T2T2 (1,0.6) I‘ S3S3 T2T2 (2.5,2.15) II 2S 3 2T 2 (2,1.8) III S 1 xS 2 M32M32

Groningen, June 3, types of envelopes (II) (1.9,1.759) VI 3S 3 2S 2, T 2 (1.912,1.763)VII S 3,S 1 xS 2 2T 2 IV RP 3 T2T2 (1.5,0.6) (1.85,1.705) V K3K3 M32M32 (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (1.7,0.9,0.86)

Groningen, June 3, variations of types II and III 2S 3 2S 2 II‘ (3.6,2.8) S 1 xS 2 T2T2 (3.6,2.75) III‘ Only in cases II‘ and III‘ are the envelopes free of singularities. Case II‘ occurs in Katok‘s regions 4, 6, 7, case III‘ only in region 7. A = (0.8,1.1,0.9) A = (0.8,1.1,1.0) This completes the list of all possible types of envelopes in the Katok case. There are more in the more general cases where only s 3 =0 (Gashenenko) or none of the s i = 0 (not done yet).

Groningen, June 3, Rigid body dynamics in SO(3) - -Phase spaces and basic equations Full and reduced phase spaces Euler-Poisson equations Invariant sets and their bifurcations - -Integrable cases Euler Lagrange Kovalevskaya - -Katok‘s more general cases Effective potentials Bifurcation diagrams Enveloping surfaces - -Poincaré surfaces of section Gashenenko‘s version Dullin-Schmidt version An application

Groningen, June 3, Poincaré section S 1 Skip 3 Skip 3

Groningen, June 3, Poincar é section S 1 – projections to S 2 (  ) S-()S-()S-()S-() S+()S+()S+()S+()  0       0 0

Groningen, June 3, Poincaré section S 1 – polar circles Place the polar circles at upper and lower rims of the projection planes.

Groningen, June 3, Poincaré section S 1 – projection artifacts s =( ,0, ) A =( 2, 1.1, 1)

Groningen, June 3, Explicit formulae for the two sections S1:S1: with S2:S2: where

Groningen, June 3, Poincaré sections S 1 and S 2 in comparison s =( ,0, ) A =( 2, 1.1, 1)

Groningen, June 3, From Kovalevskaya to Lagrange (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (2, ,1) (s 1,s 2,s 3 ) = (1,0,0) (s 1,s 2,s 3 ) = (1,0,0)  = 2 Kovalevskaya  = 1.1 almost Lagrange

Groningen, June 3, Examples: From Kovalevskaya to Lagrange B E (A 1,A 2,A 3 ) = (2, ,1) (s 1,s 2,s 3 ) = (1,0,0) (s 1,s 2,s 3 ) = (1,0,0)  = 2  = 1.1

Groningen, June 3, Example of a bifurcation scheme of periodic orbits