Mountain Watershed Association Home of the Youghiogheny Riverkeeper www.mtwatershed.com Protecting Water Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Advertisements

Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
ANTIDEGRADATON and NITROGEN IN GREAT BAY Paul Currier, P.E., P.G. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services NHEP Technical Advisory Committee.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
Status of Pennsylvania’s AMD Set-Aside Program By Pam Milavec Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
DEP Information Meeting/Hearing Elcon Recycling Services LLC Falls Township Municipal Building Dec. 10, 2014.
Proposed Revisions to the State’s Surface Water Classification System February 22, 2010 Public Workshop Daryll Joyner Bureau of Assessment and Restoration.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement MissionEnsure that coal mines are operated in a manner that protects citizens and the environment.
JT Petty: WMAN 445 Lecture Notes Lecture 5.2: STATE POLICY.
Staying on Top of Permits & Public Comments Public Comments Policy Track: Sunday, February 28, :30 pm.
US EPA Region IV Surface Coal Mining Field Activities Adventures in Mountain Top Mining / Valley Fill Chris Decker.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) NPDES in effect on November 1, 2011 Presentation by : Tom Janousek, Pest Consulting Services, Omaha,
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Tom Krapf Assistant State Conservationist NRCS - Wisconsin The Regional Conservation Partnership Program.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Trout Unlimited: Pennsylvania Chapter By: Brian Krempasky.
Pennsylvania’s DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM presented by TONY SHAW National Water Quality Monitoring Council.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Nwtboardforum.com For reference only. Not a legal document Inuvialuit Settlement Region.
Environmental Decision Making SC.912.L Why have environmental laws?  To regulate activities that are harmful to the environment. a. E.g., Clean.
FOR CLERKS AND RECORDERS  Planning Commission – public meeting and a public hearing  City Council – public hearing  Must contain: - a map of expansion.
Recent PSD Experiences in SWRO Regulatory & Statutory Requirements Relationship with EPA Federal Land Managers - FLAG Appeals.
Michael A. Skiffington Program Support Manager Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy Regulatory Advisory Panel Meeting #3 Abingdon, VA – July.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
MS4 APPLICATION PROCESS Mark Fife Water Bureau Water Bureau Permits Section Permits Section.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Public Meeting May 15, 2007, 6-9 pm Millville Grange Palo Cedro, CA.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
1 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Standards and Facility Regulation Review.
Proposed Revisions to the State’s Surface Water Classification System Jan. 7, 2010 Public Workshop Daryll Joyner Bureau of Assessment and Restoration Support.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Antidegradation and Alternatives Analysis Mary E. Gardner Regulatory Programs Administrator Littleton/Englewood WWTP Colorado.
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
Changes to Contested Case Hearing Requirements and Procedures Janis Hudson Environmental Law Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
TAS and TIP Swinomish Tribe and the Incremental Approach.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
County-Wide Act 167 Plan “County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA” was prepared by: Chester County Water Resources Authority.
Overview of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and Designation Process County of San Luis Obispo Office of the County Counsel January 8, 2015.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
Bureau of Land Management Federal Coal Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Meeting Supporting Text.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Pennsylvania’s Environmental Good Samaritan Act
HB 328 SITING OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMNT FACILITIES
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Consideration of Final Rulemaking
Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Proposed Rulemaking
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

Mountain Watershed Association Home of the Youghiogheny Riverkeeper Protecting Water Quality

About MWA Founded in 1994 Mission is protection, conservation and restoration of the Indian Creek Watershed and surrounding areas Became home of the Youghiogheny Riverkeeper in full time staff + 1 AmeriCorps intern Located in Melcroft, PA

Tools for Watershed Protection 303(d) List TMDL Development Wild & Scenic Rivers Designation Conservation Easements Stream Redesignation Petition Unsuitable for Mining Petition

Stream Redesignation Petitions

Designated Use Chapter 93 of the PA Code specifies a designated use for all water bodies in the state Uses include: – Warm Water Fishes (WWF) – Cold Water Fishes (CWF) – Trout Stocked Fishery (TSF) – High Quality Warm Water Fishes (HQ-WWF) – High Quality Cold Water Fishes (HQ-CWF) – High Quality Trout Stocking Fishery (HQ-TSF) – Exceptional Value (EV)

Find Your Stream’s Designated Use Visit Click browse>25 Environmental Protection>Chapter 93: Water Quality Standardswww.pacode.com Streams are arranged by basin Sometimes an individual stream may not be listed but the stream it drains into is. In this case, your stream would have the same designated use as the downstream water body. If you feel your stream is improperly designated, you can petition the PA Environmental Quality Board for a different designated use.

Why Seek Redesignation? Streams that are High-Quality or Exceptional Value receive more protection under PA’s anti-degradation regulations Anti-deg requires that water quality in HQ or EV streams be maintained and protected Those seeking to discharge in HQ or EV waters must: Evaluate “nondischarge alternatives” If there is no alternative, use “best available technology” Prove that the discharge will be “nondegrading” to surface waters If there is no nondischarge alternative and the discharge will be degrading, give a “social and economic justification” (SEJ) for the project *There is no option for SEJ in EV waters

Is Your Stream HQ? Streams are eligible for HQ designation if they meet at least one of three qualifiers: – Water chemistry qualifier – Biological assessment qualifier – Class A Wild Trout Stream Qualifier A redesignation petition must be based on one of the above qualifiers.

Water Chemistry Qualifier A stream may be HQ if it has long-term water quality (>1 year of data) that is better than the criteria set forth in Section 93.7 of Chapter 93 for 12 parameters at least 99% of the time. One full year of monitoring data, or at least 24 samples, is required for a petition. More is better.

Biological Assessment Qualifier A stream has an integrated benthic macroinvertebrate score >83% when compared to a HQ reference stream using PA’s Rapid Bioassessment Protocol. This is the most common qualifier used for redesignation petitions.

Class A Wild Trout Qualifier Streams listed as Class A Wild Trout by PA Fish & Boat Commission can be eligible for HQ designation. Class A Wild Trout Streams are the best of PA’s wild trout fisheries. Is your stream on the list? Find out at

Is Your Stream EV? Streams can qualify for Exceptional Value in 7 ways. 1.Location in an National Wildlife Refuge or state game propagation and protection area 2.Location in a State Park Natural Area, State Forest Natural Area, National Natural Landmark, Federal or State Wild River, Federal Wilderness Area, or National Recreational Area 3.Outstanding national, state, regional or local resource water 4.Surface water of exceptional recreational significance 5.Biological assessment qualifier 6.“Wilderness trout stream” qualifier, or 7.Surface water of exceptional ecological significance In order to be qualified under the first six, your stream must already be HQ.

How to Petition Anyone has the right to submit a redesignation petition. Petitions are evaluated by the Environmental Quality Board. The petition form is available on DEP’s website at

Petition Phases Submission, Review and Acceptance – Petition is submitted, DEP reviews for completeness and presents to EQB, and publishes notice of petition. DEP Stream Assessment & Evaluation – DEP conducts a stream assessment, and prepares an evaluation report making a recommendation to EQB on the petition. The public is allowed to comment. The Regulatory Process – If EQB adopts the proposed regulation it is published in the PA Bulletin for public comment. The final regulation is then reviewed by the Independent Regulatory Review Commission prior to adoption.

Things to Note A petition can also be submitted to reduce the level of designation on a stream. The petition process can take many years. A stream can be placed on the “existing use list” while it is being evaluated for a change in its designated use. The existing use list is for streams that are attaining a higher designation but have not formally been redesignated. Streams on the existing use list are considered to have the use for which they are listed (for example, a cold water fishery with an existing use of EV should be treated as an EV stream).

Resources PennFuture’s Stream Redesignation Handbook: River Network’s Clean Water Act Owner’s Manual: em_id= em_id=55334 DEP’s Unsuitable for Mining webpage: UFMsummary.html UFMsummary.html DEP’s Water Quality Assessments & Standards webpage: quality_standards/ quality_standards/10556

Unsuitable for Mining (UFM) Petitions

 Surface mining activities  Coal only  All coal seams or  Any specific coal seam(s) in the area  Must be unmined coal reserves present in the petition area  Not for underground mines  Not for noncoal mines WHAT CAN BE DESIGNATED

It is very important to clearly define the petition area on a U.S.G.S map or similar reference map. If petition area is for an entire watershed, it is important to include all of the headwaters if there is coal present in the headwater area. DEFINING THE PETITION AREA

Once a petition is submitted, additional information can be submitted to DEP as long as:  The petition application is active or on hold,  The technical study is active, and  UFM EQB regulatory designation process is active. SENDING IN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Pending surface coal permit applications will be blocked, pending outcome of petition IF:  Petition is received by DEP before public announcement by DEP that permit will be issued, the mine cannot be permitted until a final decision is made on the petition.  Area petitioned cannot be the same area as that of a pending coal permit application. TIMING IS EVERYTHING

MANDATORY :  Reclamation is not technologically or economically feasible.  Where operations would in all probability result in production of mine drainage.  This will have to overcome use of alkaline addition and special handling during mining operation and reclamation. CRITERIA: MANDATORY AND DISCRETIONARY

DISCRETIONARY: where strip mining would cause significant damage or long term loss of important environmental features.  Be incompatible with land use plans  Affect fragile or historic lands  Affect renewable resource lands with loss or reduction of water supply or food or fiber products  Affect natural hazard lands where strip mining operations could endanger life or property.

Supportive pollutional mining history and water chemistry data for previous or current discharges, and impacted streams, wells and springs, must only be for permits issued after January 13, 1979, the beginning of PA’s primacy permitting program Records from AML problems and bad pre-primacy bonded permits can be used to help demonstrate that overburden on the same coal seams has always been bad. If DEP has unavailable resources to conduct a technical study, the regulation states that the Department can make a decision for its recommendation to the EQB based on available information. This most likely would be what was submitted by the petitioner and what is contained in DEP permit files and databases.

Provide as much supportive data and records with the petition application to help substantiate allegations related to mandatory and discretionary criteria. IMPORTANT!!

STEPS IN THE PROCESS:  Submit the petition.  Within 30 days of receipt, DEP must determine whether or not the petition is complete.  If not complete, it is returned as incomplete with an explanation of what is needed to make it complete.  Petitioner has 30 days to complete it and resubmit.

 Complete petitions are accepted for TECHNICAL STUDY.  DEP notifies known surface and mineral owners within the petition area in writing that the area is being considered for UFM designation. Public notice is given in local newspapers and the PA Bulletin.  Intervenor status both pro and con is obtained by filing comments along with name, address, and phone number up to three days before the public hearing on the petition.

 Within ten months from receipt of a complete petition, DEP will schedule a public hearing.  Held jointly by DEP and the Environmental Quality Board.  Public comments can be made and will be addressed in a Comment and Response Document prepared by DEP.  After completion of the Technical Study and Evaluation of public comments, DEP makes a recommendation to the EQB.

If a petition application is deemed frivolous, this ruling by DEP can be appealed to EQB. If a petition is accepted for study by DEP the final outcome, either designated or nondesignated, is not appealable. WHAT IS APPEALABLE?

A NEW PETITION WITH SUBSTANTIALLY NEW INFORMATION CAN BE SUBMITTED TO ASK FOR A NEW DESIGNATION, A NEW AND DIFFERENT DESIGNATION, OR NONDESIGNATION.

Contact the Bureau of Mining and Reclamation's Environmental Studies Section by mail at: Environmental Studies Section Bureau of Mining and Reclamation Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 8461 Harrisburg, PA or telephone for more information.

Mountain Watershed Association PO Box B Indian Creek Valley Rd. Melcroft PA (724)