CO over South America Modeling inter annual variability of biomass burning emissions Pim Hooghiemstra & Maarten Krol 28 November 2011 – TM meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applications of space-borne Carbon- monoxide measurements in Atmospheric Chemistry and Air Quality Maarten Krol, Wageningen University / SRON / IMAU Jos.
Advertisements

Regional flux estimates of CO2 and CH4 inferred from GOSAT XCH4:XCO2 ratios Liang Feng Annemarie Fraser Paul Palmer University of Edinburgh Hartmut Bösch.
MOPITT CO Louisa Emmons, David Edwards Atmospheric Chemistry Division Earth & Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Setup of 4D VAR inverse modelling system for atmospheric CH 4 using the TM5 adjoint model Peter Bergamaschi Climate Change Unit Institute for Environment.
Slides for IPCC. Inverse Modeling of CO 2 Air Parcel Sources Sinks wind Sample Changes in CO 2 in the air tell us about sources and sinks Atmospheric.
Interpreting MLS Observations of the Variabilities of Tropical Upper Tropospheric O 3 and CO Chenxia Cai, Qinbin Li, Nathaniel Livesey and Jonathan Jiang.
Inverse modelling of CO emissions J.-F. Müller and T. Stavrakou Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy Avenue Circulaire 3, 1180 Brussels
Andrew Schuh 1, Stephen M. Ogle 1, Marek Uliasz 1, Dan Cooley 1, Tristram West 2, Ken Davis 3, Thomas Lauvaux 3, Liza Diaz 3, Scott Richardson 3, Natasha.
How Important Are Temporal Constraints and Vertical Injection of Boreal Fire Emissions? Yang Chen 1,3, Qinbin Li 1,2, James Randerson 3, Evan Lyons 2 Ralph.
Data assimilation of trace gases in a regional chemical transport model: the impact on model forecasts E. Emili 1, O. Pannekoucke 1,2, E. Jaumouillé 2,
The Averaging Kernel of CO2 Column Measurements by the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO), Its Use in Inverse Modeling, and Comparisons to AIRS, SCIAMACHY,
Estimation of daily CO 2 fluxes over Europe by inversion of atmospheric continuous data C. Carouge and P. Peylin ; P. Bousquet ; P. Ciais ; P. Rayner Laboratoire.
Towards a multi-species variational assimilation system for surface emissions of CH 4, CO, H 2 I. Pison, F. Chevallier, and P. Bousquet Laboratoire des.
Improving estimates of CO 2 fluxes through a CO-CO 2 adjoint inversion Monika Kopacz, Daniel J. Jacob, Parvadha Suntharalingam April 12, rd GEOS-Chem.
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
Trans-Pacific transport of Asian dust and pollution: Accumulation of biomass burning CO in subtropics and dipole structure of transport Junsang Nam 1,
Effects of Siberian forest fires on regional air quality and meteorology in May 2003 Rokjin J. Park with Daeok Youn, Jaein Jeong, Byung-Kwon Moon Seoul.
Constraining global isoprene emissions with GOME formaldehyde column measurements Changsub Shim, Yuhang Wang, Yunsoo Choi Georgia Institute of Technology.
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
Effects of Tropical Deforestation on Tropospheric Chemistry: A 10-year Study using GEOS-Chem Prasad Kasibhatla, Duke University James Randerson and Yang.
Application of Geostatistical Inverse Modeling for Data-driven Atmospheric Trace Gas Flux Estimation Anna M. Michalak UCAR VSP Visiting Scientist NOAA.
Gloudemans 1, J. de Laat 1,2, C. Dijkstra 1, H. Schrijver 1, I. Aben 1, G. vd Werf 3, M. Krol 1,4 Interannual variability of CO and its relation to long-range.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Interpretation of station data with an adjoint Model Maarten Krol (IMAU) Peter Bergamaschi (ISPRA) Jan Fokke Meierink, Henk Eskes (KNMI) Sander Houweling.
Fires and the Contemporary Global Carbon Cycle Guido van der Werf (Free University, Amsterdam, Netherlands) In collaboration with: Jim Randerson (UCI,
ICDC7, Boulder, September 2005 CH 4 TOTAL COLUMNS FROM SCIAMACHY – COMPARISON WITH ATMOSPHERIC MODELS P. Bergamaschi 1, C. Frankenberg 2, J.F. Meirink.
Sharon M. Gourdji, K.L. Mueller, V. Yadav, A.E. Andrews, M. Trudeau, D.N. Huntzinger, A.Schuh, A.R. Jacobson, M. Butler, A.M. Michalak North American Carbon.
Intercomparison methods for satellite sensors: application to tropospheric ozone and CO measurements from Aura Daniel J. Jacob, Lin Zhang, Monika Kopacz.
OMI HCHO columns Jan 2006Jul 2006 Policy-relevant background (PRB) ozone calculations for the EPA ISA and REA Zhang, L., D.J. Jacob, N.V. Smith-Downey,
Sensitivity of top-down correction of 2004 black carbon emissions inventory in the United States to rural-sites versus urban-sites observational networks.
Constraining the lightning-NO x (LiNOx) source using TES O 3 observations N. Bousserez, R.V. Martin, K.W. Bowman, D.K. Henze 5th International GEOS–Chem.
TOP-DOWN CONSTRAINTS ON REGIONAL CARBON FLUXES USING CO 2 :CO CORRELATIONS FROM AIRCRAFT DATA P. Suntharalingam, D. J. Jacob, Q. Li, P. Palmer, J. A. Logan,
Simulation of N 2 O with GEOS-Chem and its adjoint: evaluation of observational constraints Kelley Wells, Dylan Millet, Nicolas Bousserez, Daven Henze,
Regional Inverse Modeling in North and South America for the NASA Carbon Monitoring System Arlyn Andrews (NOAA/ESRL), John Miller (NOAA/ESRL, CIRES), Thomas.
Validation of TES Methane with HIPPO Observations For Use in Adjoint Inverse Modeling Kevin J. Wecht 17 June 2010TES Science Team Meeting Special thanks.
Regional Inversion of continuous atmospheric CO 2 measurements A first attempt ! P., P., P., P., and P. Philippe Peylin, Peter Rayner, Philippe Bousquet,
Transport analysis and source attribution of the tropical CO seasonal and interannual variability in the UT/LS Junhua Liu and Jennifer Logan School of.
Daily Inventory of Biomass Burning Emissions using Satellite Observations and Using Satellite Observations of CO from MOPITT Colette Heald Advisor: Daniel.
Results Figure 2 Figure 2 shows the time series for the a priori and a posteriori (optimized) emissions. The a posteriori estimate for the CO emitted by.
Emissions of CO from Asia during TRACE-P Paul Palmer, Daniel Jacob, Dylan Jones, Colette Heald David Streets, Glen Sachse, Hanwant Singh
Developing Daily Biomass Burning Inventories from Satellite Observations and MOPITT Observations of CO during TRACE P Colette Heald Advisor: Daniel Jacob.
Regional CO 2 Flux Estimates for North America through data assimilation of NOAA CMDL trace gas observations Wouter Peters Lori Bruhwiler John B. Miller.
INVERSE MODELING TECHNIQUES Daniel J. Jacob. GENERAL APPROACH FOR COMPLEX SYSTEM ANALYSIS Construct mathematical “forward” model describing system As.
TROPOSPHERIC CO MODELING USING ASSIMILATED METEOROLOGY Prasad Kasibhatla & Avelino Arellano (Duke University) Louis Giglio (SSAI) Jim Randerson and Seth.
TEMIS User Workshop, Frascati, Italy October 8-9, 2007 Formaldehyde application Derivation of updated pyrogenic and biogenic hydrocarbon emissions over.
ICDC7, Boulder September 2005 Estimation of atmospheric CO 2 from AIRS infrared satellite radiances in the ECMWF data assimilation system Richard.
Diurnal Water and Energy Cycles over the Continental United States from three Reanalyses Alex Ruane John Roads Scripps Institution of Oceanography / UCSD.
Observational Constraints on Aerosol Deposition and Optical Depth Mark Flanner 1 Phil Rasch 1 Jim Randerson 2 Joe McConnell 3 Tami Bond 4 1 NCAR 2 University.
MOPITT during INTEX David Edwards Louisa Emmons, Gabriele Pfister, John Gille, Dan Ziskin, Debbie Mao Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
1 Examining Seasonal Variation of Space-based Tropospheric NO 2 Columns Lok Lamsal.
Simulation Experiments for TEMPO Air Quality Objectives Peter Zoogman, Daniel Jacob, Kelly Chance, Xiong Liu, Arlene Fiore, Meiyun Lin, Katie Travis, Annmarie.
Using CO observations from space to track long-range transport of pollution Daniel J. Jacob with Patrick Kim, Peter Zoogman, Helen Wang and funding from.
This report presents analysis of CO measurements from satellites since 2000 until now. The main focus of the study is a comparison of different sensors.
Analysis of Daily Rainfall from a Nested Modeling System for South America Anji Seth International Research Institute for Climate Prediction Maisa Rojas,
The Link between Wildfires and Precipitation in Africa Ziming Ke.
RESULTS: CO constraints from an adjoint inversion REFERENCES Streets et al. [2003] JGR doi: /2003GB Heald et al. [2003a] JGR doi: /2002JD
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park with support from EPRI, EPA/OAQPS.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS SURFACE PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS FROM THE ORBITING CARBON OBSERVATORY-2.
ESF workshop on methane, April 10-12, years of methane : from global to regional P. Bousquet, S. Kirschke, M. Saunois, P. Ciais, P. Peylin, R.
© Crown copyright Met Office Assimilating infra-red sounder data over land John Eyre for Ed Pavelin Met Office, UK Acknowledgements: Brett Candy DAOS-WG,
27-28/10/2005IGBP-QUEST Fire Fast Track Initiative Workshop Inverse Modeling of CO Emissions Results for Biomass Burning Gabrielle Pétron National Center.
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service CAMS General Assembly, Athens, June 2016 Frédéric Chevallier (LSCE/IPSL) Rona Thompson (NILU) Arjo Segers.
CO2 sources and sinks in China as seen from the global atmosphere
Monika Kopacz, Daniel Jacob, Jenny Fisher, Meghan Purdy
Analysis of CO in the tropical troposphere using Aura satellite data and the GEOS-Chem model: insights into transport characteristics of the GEOS meteorological.
What determines column CO2?
Estimation of Emission Sources Using Satellite Data
Directions of Inquiry Given a fixed atmospheric CO2 concentration assimilation scheme, what is the optimal network expansion? Given the wide array of available.
Hartmut Bösch and Sarah Dance
Inverse modeling of European sources:
Presentation transcript:

CO over South America Modeling inter annual variability of biomass burning emissions Pim Hooghiemstra & Maarten Krol 28 November 2011 – TM meeting

Motivation Inter annual variability is observed in MOPITT columns over the Amazon region.

Goal Robust monthly total CO emissions on high resolution for 2006 – 2010 over South America Using TM5-4D-Var with 1 o x1 o zoom over South America Prior from EDGARv4.1, GFED3.1, TM4-Crete MOPITT columns / NOAA surface observations

Prior simulation vs observations Emissions seem too low a priori (large region) Over main BB regions, prior is too high in 2007 and 2010

Posterior fit with MOPITT 4D-Var system brings model simulation close to observations. Fit is very good for large regions, a bit less for small regions.

Emissions 1 o x1 o region Large variability in emissions from year to year Emissions increase for all months

Spatial patterns 2007 & 2010: Emissions go down for deforestation regions Brazil Other years, emissions increase (both BB and other sources)

Validation with NOAA Much too high => assimilate NOAA obs also

Bias correction A bias correction is needed to fit NOAA and MOPITT

Fit with data Fit with NOAA improves greatly! Fit with MOPITT remains good!

Effect on inferred emissions Effect is only small

Sensitivity studies Emission estimates are robust Using GFED for 2010 makes a large difference NOAA only inversion yields too high biomass burning emissions in September and too low background emissions

Conclusions (1) Robust IAV in BB emissions: Peak month emissions vary from 28 Tg CO in 2009 to 67 Tg CO in BB emissions of GFED3.1 are too high in main deforestation regions in Brazil in 2007 & In other years, GFED3.1 seems a bit too low. Remark: difficult to quantify, we only optimize total. What about errors in the model?

Conclusions (2) Inferred emissions sensitive to total prior BB emission. Bias correction is necessary to fit both MOPITT & NOAA observations. No significant difference in optimized emissions and fit with MOPITT, fit with NOAA improves significantly.