Indicators of Quality in the Design and Evaluation of Blended and Online Courses November 2006 Renee Welch, External Education – Part I Nancy Pogue, Regional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Using a Quality Evaluation Rubric in Online Course Development Eli Collins-Brown, EdD Methodist College of Nursing Peoria, IL.
Assessing the Quality of Online Courses Rayane Fayed Instructional Designer American University of Beirut June 2013.
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Institutional Policy & Quality Matters Standards: The impact of policy on course quality Deb Adair, QM Director Sloan-C Conference November 9-11, 2011.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design
Quality Bucks Inter-Collegiate Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Introducing the Quality Matters Continuing Education Rubric
+ Taking the MSW Degree Online Pedagogy, Challenges, and Lessons Learned Sarah Bradley, MSSW, LCSW Associate Professor of Practice MSW Program Director.
Rethinking Course Development: Competing on Quality Larry Gould American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU), Academic Affairs Winter.
Flexible Delivery Faculty of Nursing University of Alberta.
Roadmap for Implementing Quality Principles for Online/Hybrid Courses Brett Christie, Ph.D. Faculty Development Liaison, CSU Academic Technology Services.
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
Online Course Quality and Peer Review Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project “QUALITY MATTERS” Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Quality Matters: Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning A Grant Initiative of MarylandOnline Sponsored by the U.S. Dept. Education Fund.
Blackboard Course Design and Quality Matters
Evaluation of NUSC 530 online Process Lessons learned.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University November 2013.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Faculty Development for Teaching and Learning Online FIPSE Project Directors Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College November.
Finding the Good Fit: Faculty Members, Instruction, Evidence, and Technology Patricia A. McGee, PhD Associate Professor/2003 NLII.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
GSU Online Degree and Certificate Programs Preparation for North Central Association Accreditation Visit.
1 The Use of Standards for Peer Review of Online Courses Barbara Battin Little, DNP, MPH, RN
FALCON 2013 Well, Duh! Quality Matters™ Sharon K. Calhoon Associate Professor of Psychology, Indiana University Kokomo Assistant Vice President for University.
Best Practices & What Works in Online Learning Assessments Renee Welch & Karin Riggs External Education September 28, 2006.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
Peer Review: Promoting a quality culture Associate Professor Gordon Suddaby & Associate Professor Mark Brown Massey University New Zealand Contact details:
Sue Day-Perroots, Dean of Extended Learning & Summer, WVU Cindy Hart, Director of WVU Online.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Building Trust with Quality Assurance Strategies in TAACCCT Gerry Hanley (TAACCCT Repository Services) Executive Director, MERLOT Assistant Vice Chancellor,
© 2012 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY T WENTY YEARS OF ENHANCING ONLINE STUDENT S UCCESS Amy Buechler-Steubing & Siri Sorensen Capella University – Learning Assistance.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
Improving Courses Across an Online Program: A Design-Based Approach Leonard Bogle, Scott Day, Daniel Matthews & Karen Swan University of Illinois Springfield.
REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LAB ~ APPALACHIA The Effects of Kentucky Virtual High School’s Hybrid Course in Algebra I on Teaching Practices, Classroom Quality,
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
The Academic Technology Center
From the Ground Up: RN to BSN Completion
Ruth Fiedler, EdD, PMHCNS-BC, CNE Associate Professor
The Integration of Quality Matters™
Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
How Does Student Engagement in QM Courses
Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
Professional Development
SESSION FIVE: TIPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION
University of Maryland
Dr. Cheryl Murphy University of Arkansas
Quality Conversations in Assessment
Online Course Showcase
Leveraging Instructional Design Teams
Change the GAME! Using Adobe Connect and Rubrics to
Developing Faculty to Teach Online
The Secret Ingredient for Success
Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful Than Face-to-Face Courses Eli Collins-Brown, Ed. D. Methodist College of Nursing.
Katherine M. Hitchcock, Ph.D. Michelle Franz
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
QM – Putting the Pieces Together for Strategic Visioning and Accreditation Planning QM East Regional Conference April 26, 2019.
Quality Matters Overview
Quality Assurance in Blended Learning Standards and Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

Indicators of Quality in the Design and Evaluation of Blended and Online Courses November 2006 Renee Welch, External Education – Part I Nancy Pogue, Regional Nursing Program UIC – Part II

evaluating What do you look for in evaluating a blended or online course?

QUALITY “Define QUALITY”

Quality Assurance Institutional Faculty Student

Standards Administrative Leadership and Support Ongoing Program Concerns Course Development Faculty Support Evaluation Results Lee, J., & Dziuban, C. (2002). Using quality assurance strategies for online programs. Educational Technology Review, [Online serial], 10(2),

Evaluation vs. Assessment vs. Peer Review Faculty performance evaluation should not be confused with the assessment of student learning.

Evaluation vs. Assessment vs. Peer Review “Peer review “Peer review is the structure by which faculty conduct peer reviews of technology mediated courses in order to assure the course meets standards of best practices”.-QM

What are commonly recognized indictors of quality in a technology- enhanced, blended, or online learning environment?

Sloan-C Quality Framework: The Five Pillars

ION and the Illinois Virtual Campus have developed a quality online course rubric and evaluation system in the state of Illinois.

Instruction Design Tips for Online Learning External Education Used with written consent. Adapted from Instructional Design Tips for Online Learning: Joan Van Duzer of Humbolt State University, to be used in conjunction with the Rubric for Online Instruction developed by CSU, Chico, c2002

1.Learner Support and Resources 2.Online Organization and Design 3.Instructional Design and Delivery 4.Assessment & Evaluation of Student Learning 5.Appropriate and Effective Use of Technology 6.Faculty use of Student Feedback Categories

Categories to Evaluate Your ONLINE Course You can self-assess your own tech-enhanced, blended and online using the Rubric for Online Instruction from our colleagues at CSU Chico If you would like to be enrolled in our Intro to Teaching Online Bb course site Contact Karin Riggs to enroll:

Quality Matters Based on national standards of best practice, the research literature and instructional design principles Design to promote student learning Integral to continuous quality improvement Part of an inter-institutional, faculty-driven, collegial peer review process

QM Process Course Review Key Players Benefits Scoring Recognition

The Rubric Course Overview & Introduction Learning Objectives (Competencies) Assessment & Measurement Resources & Materials Learner Interaction Course Technology Learner Support Accessibility

For more information: Renee Welch, PhD Assistant Director, ExEd

Physiologic Basis of Nursing Practice (NUSC 530)