Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the Johnson County Stormwater Management Program Casey J. Lee U.S.
Advertisements

Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee August 24, 2010 Metro Permit Reissuance Proposed.
Optimum Allocation of Discharged Pollutant Loads from Nonpoint Sources in a Watershed using GIS Alok Kumar Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering Division.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Effects of Land Use and Associated Factors On Biological Communities of Small Streams in the Illinois River Basin of Arkansas by James C. Petersen, Billy.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
Impact of Sampling Frequency on Annual Load Estimation Amber Spackman Jones Utah Water Research Lab Nancy Mesner Watershed Science Jeff Horsburgh Utah.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Watersheds on Wall Street? Water Pollutant Trading Becky Shannon, Missouri Department of Natural Resources Craig Smith, University of Missouri Extension.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
NYCDEP Evaluation of Watershed Management Programs FAD requirement: Last one ; Next FAD Assessment : Use models to evaluate effects.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Laboratory Analysis: Samples were analyzed for: Dissolved Organic Nitrogen (DON) Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (NH 4 and NO 3 ) Total Dissolved Nitrogen.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 Potential Reductions of Street Solids and Phosphorus in Urban Watersheds from Street Cleaning, Cambridge,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluations of Heavy Metal Listings on the State of Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters Assabet.
Water-Quality Monitoring for Environmental Management and Source-Water Protection U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Importance of Ground-Water Flow and Travel Time on Nitrogen Loading from an Agricultural Basin in.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Department of the Environment Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program Phase I- Trading between point sources and trading involving connecting on-site septic.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Automated Continuous Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring in the Blackstone River at the Massachusetts-Rhode Island State Line U.S. Geological Survey.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
Trends in Precipitation and Stream Discharge over the Past Century for the Continental United States Andrew Simon 1 and Lauren Klimetz 1,2 1 USDA-ARS National.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Ground-Water Quality Trends in the South Platte River Alluvial Aquifer, Colorado Suzanne S. Paschke, Shana L. Mashburn, Jennifer L. Flynn, and Breton Bruce.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Nitrogen Problem Excessive nitrogen (N) from a variety of sources has led to decreases in the environmental quality of coastal rivers, ponds, and harbors.
Shingle Creek Chloride TMDL Abby Morrisette and Josh Kuhn 9/10/11.
Answering the Question: Why? Factors Affecting Change in Water Quality Exceptional challenge to explain “why” Poor quality of pollution source information.
Estimating the Volume of Fine-Grained Sediments Behind Four Low-Head Dams, Kalamazoo River, Michigan. In cooperation with the Michigan Department of Environmental.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
Charge Question 3-1 Comment Summary for HHCB Peer Review Panel Meeting January 9, 2014.
Point Sources Progress Reporting Management Board Conference Call February 9, 2012.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Confidential AECOM Environment Draft TMDL for pH Compliance for Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir October 20, 2009 Draft TMDL Review Meeting.
Linear Programming Water Resources Planning and Management Daene McKinney.
Watershed Overview of Wastewater Treatment Plant Performance Presentation to Wastewater Practitioners Group 15 October 2015.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Conclusions & Future Work
Presented to Minnesota Water Resources Conference Oct 14 – 15, 2014
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
Presentation transcript:

Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation with Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management US Department of Interior US Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Background: Municipal wastewater discharge to the river TMDL-mandated reductions in total-P concentrations in effluent: Apr-Oct – Reduced 0.75 mg/L 0.10 mg/L Nov-Mar – 1.0 mg/L (no change) Previous studies include field investigations of phosphorus flux from bed sediment, aquatic plant distribution, laboratory column experiments and computer modeling

DRAFT Problem Complex system- before and after upgrades would be difficult with conventional monthly sampling Solution Automated, flow- proportional composite sampling and continuous streamflow to accurately estimate of concentrations and loads

Objectives: Oct Apr 2014 measure changes in phosphorus concentrations and loads in response to mandated reductions in WWTP effluent concentrations. Evaluate the effects of seasonal changes in phosphorus levels. Assess the effects of reservoirs on in-stream fluxes of total and dissolved phosphorus. DRAFT

Maynard AMVETS Port Street Stow Assabet River monitoring stations Westborough WWTP Marlborough Westerly WWTP Hudson WWTP DRAFT

Total-P concentrations at WWTPs decreased significantly following completion of all treatment- plant upgrades in early Median total-P concentrations in WWTP effluent approached 0.1 mg/L. Similar decreases were observed in concentrations measured at each of the monitoring stations, with the exception of Port Street. DRAFT Annual decrease in TP concentrations

Median reported total-P loads decreased significantly following implementation of WWTP upgrades. Median reported post-TMDL WWTP loads were less than 2 kg/day. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) decreases in median total-P loads were observed at all four in-stream monitoring stations. DRAFT Pre- and Post upgrade loads:

DRAFT Westboro + Marlboro + Hudson WWTP TP load (kg/day) PrePostChange Maximum Minimum Median Stow TP load (kg/day) Maynard TP load (kg/day) PrePostChange PrePostChange Maximum Minimum Median The change in median reported load, pre- to post- TMDL implementation, for the combined WWTPs was 17 kg/day. Similar changes were observed at the Stow (17 kg/day ) and Maynard (18 kg/day ) monitoring stations. Pre- and Post upgrade loads:

Conclusions: Significant decreases in total-P concentrations and loads in WWTP effluent were matched by similar decreases at all four in-stream monitoring stations. No significant seasonal differences were observed after the upgrades. Effects of impoundments on P transport are variable. Continuous monitoring can greatly increase the ability to see the effects of management actions in highly varying systems. DRAFT