System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMMREM Predicted Dose Rates for CRaTER N. Schwadron, L. Townsend, K. Kozarev, H. Spence, M. Golightly et al.
Advertisements

M.E. Wiedenbeck, JPL/Caltech Thanks to: the ACE/ULEIS &SIS Teams and the STEREO/LET, SIT, & SEPT Teams 9 June 20101ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop.
DOSE SPECTRA FROM ENERGETIC PARTICLES AND NEUTRONS (DoSEN) S. Smith 1, N. A. Schwadron 1 C. Bancroft 1, P. Bloser 1, J. Legere 1, J. Ryan 1, H. E. Spence.
SEP Data Analysis and Data Products for EMMREM Mihir I. Desai & Arik Posner Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, Texas Mihir I. Desai & Arik Posner.
4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,
An Analysis of Heliospheric Magnetic Field Flux Based on Sunspot Number from 1750 to Today and Prediction for the Coming Solar Minimum Introduction The.
Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott,
CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM WORKSHOP 1 Observations Questions.
IMPRS June Energetic particles in the solar system The heliosphere is flooded with those particles, from at least 6 different sources!
03/18/091 Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Module: System Overview and Model Validation K. Kozarev, N. A. Schwadron, L. Townsend, M. Desai, M. A.
DOPPLER DOPPLER A Space Weather Doppler Imager Mission Concept Exploration Science Objectives What are the most relevant observational signatures of flare,
GCR Methods in Radiation Transport F.A. Cucinotta And M.Y. Kim NASA Johnson Space Center.
Session 6 Key Questions for Understanding This Unusual Solar Minimum Alan Gabriel Todd Hoeksema Janet Luhmann Bill Matthaeus Neil Sheeley.
NASA Sun-Solar System Connection Roadmap 1 Targeted Outcome: Phase , Safeguarding our Outbound Journey Determine Extremes of the Variable Radiation.
EFFECTS of the TERRESTRIAL MAGNETOSPHERE on RADIATION HAZARD on MOON MISSIONS R. Koleva, B. Tomov, T. Dachev, Yu. Matviichuk, Pl. Dimitrov, Space and Solar-Terrestrial.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
Elevated Astronaut Radiation Hazards in a New Era of Decreasing Solar Activity N. A. Schwadron 1, C Bancroft 1, P. Bloser 1, J Legere 1, J. Ryan 1, S.
Focus Topics and New Strategic Capabilities N. A. Schwadron, K. Kozarev, L. Townsend, M. Desai, M. A. Dayeh, F. Cucinotta, D. Hassler, H. Spence, M. PourArsalan,
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
The Sun Chapter 29 Section 29.2 and Spaceweather.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
1 Introduction The TOP-modelPotential applicationsConclusion The Transient Observations-based Particle Model and its potential application in radiation.
LRO/CRaTER’s Discoveries of the Lunar Radiation Environment and Lunar Regolith Alteration by Radiation N. A. Schwadron, H. E. Spence, J. K. Wilson, A.
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
Outline of WG 2 Sessions: Interplanetary Phenomena Working Group Leaders: Ian Richardson and Ilia Roussev.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
GCR Primaries (See Wilson et al. poster for latest CRaTER proton albedo map) RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF GALACTIC COSMIC RAYS AND LUNAR PARTICLE ALBEDO TO.
Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.
C. J. Joyce, 1 N. A. Schwadron, 1 L. W. Townsend, 2 R. A. Mewaldt, 3 C. M. S. Cohen, 3 T. T. von Rosenvinge, 4 A. W. Case, 5 H. E. Spence, 1 J. K. Wilson,
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
C. J.Joyce 1, J. B. Blake 2, A. W. Case 3, M. Golightly 1, J. C. Kasper 3, J. Mazur 2, N. A. Schwadron 1, E. Semones 4, S. Smith 1, H. E. Spence 1, L.
Is the Terrestrial Magnetosphere a Natural Radiation Shield on Moon Space Missions ? R. Koleva, B. Tomov, T. Dachev, Yu. Matviichuk, Pl. Dimitrov, Space.
N. A. Schwadron U. New Hampshire Solar Wind and Coronal Electron Temperature in the Protracted Solar Minimum, the Cycle 24 Mini Maximum, and Over Centuries.
Radiation on Planetary Surfaces M. S. Clowdsley 1, G. DeAngelis 2, J. W. Wilson 1, F. F. Badavi 3, and R. C. Singleterry 1 1 NASA Langley Research Center,
Space Radiation Health Effects of Astronauts in Explorative Missions
1 Organ Dose and Organ Dose Equivalent Rate Calculations from October 26, 2003 (Halloween Event) Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) Event using Earth-Moon-
Composition and spectral properties of the 1 AU quiet- time suprathermal ion population during solar cycle23 M Al-Dayeh, M I Desai, J R Dwyer, H K Rassoul,
Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Model N. A. Schwadron, K. Kozarev, L. Townsend, M. Desai, M. A. Dayeh, F. Cucinotta, D. Hassler, H. Spence, M. Pourars,
Evolution of Magnetic Fields from the Sun’s Surface to the Heliopause of one Solar Cycle Nathan Schwadron, Boston University.
C. J. Joyce, 1 N. A. Schwadron, 1 L. W. Townsend, 2 R. A. Mewaldt, 3 C. M. S. Cohen, 3 T. T. von Rosenvinge, 4 A. W. Case, 5 H. E. Spence, 1 J. K. Wilson,
End-to-End Overview of Hazardous Radiation Len Fisk University of Michigan.
Solar and Cosmic Ray Energetic Particle Models : Space Weather Aspects
16-20 Oct 2005SSPVSE Conference1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Composition, Spectra, and Time Variations Mark E. Wiedenbeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
Solar Storm Radiation Model (SStoRM) Prepared by: Joshua Lande–Marlboro College, VT and Ron Turner–ANSER, 2900 South Quincy Street, Suite 800, Arlington,
Dose Predictions for Moon Astronauts Image Source: Nicholas Bachmann, Ian Rittersdorf Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences.
Approaches to forecasting radiation risk from Solar Energetic Particles Silvia Dalla (1), Mike Marsh (2) & Timo Laitinen (1) (1) University of Central.
08/4/2009NAS - SHINE-Suprathermal Radial Evolution (1-11 AU) of Pickup Ions and Suprathermal Ions in the Heliosphere N. A. Schwadron Boston University,
CRaTER TIM April 2005 Proj. Sci. Justin Kasper (MIT) Galactic Cosmic Rays and Solar Flares Justin Kasper (MIT) CRaTER Project Scientist LRO/CRaTER TIM.
Lunar Surface Atmosphere Spectrometer (LSAS) Objectives: The instrument LSAS is designed to study the composition and structure of the Lunar atmosphere.
Breakout Session F: Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays Rick Leske and Maher Dayeh 5 presentations…and lots of discussion.
The heliospheric magnetic flux density through several solar cycles Géza Erdős (1) and André Balogh (2) (1) MTA Wigner FK RMI, Budapest, Hungary (2) Imperial.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz Extraterrestrische Physik Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik Christian Albrechts-Universität.
EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz
Atmospheric radiation modeling of galactic cosmic rays using LRO/CRaTER and the EMMREM model with comparisons to balloon and airline based measurements[1]
Inferring the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Back to the Maunder Minimum
EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz
Atmospheric radiation modeling of galactic cosmic rays using LRO/CRaTER and the EMMREM model with comparisons to balloon and airline based measurements.
Scientists demonstrate a new Solar Energetic Particle warning technique using K-COR ground coronagraph data A Heliophysics science publication using ESA/NASA.
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
THEMIS and Space Weather
Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Model
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter CRaTER Critical Design Review
Solar Flare Energy Partition into Energetic Particle Acceleration
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
Presentation transcript:

System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots of Current Yearly Doses at Earth and Mars Note: Exceeding 1-yr Free Space Dose Limits at Earth and Moon for < 1 g/cm 2 Al Shielding See more at du/ du/ Free Space Dose Near Earth

Approaching 1- yr Free Space Dose Limits at Mars See more at r.unh.edu/ r.unh.edu/ Free Space Dose Near Mars

Hourly updates (Earth, Moon, Mars) give time- critical updates on space radiation at Earth, Moon & Mars Shown Here recent 7/12 and 7/15 events at Moon and Mars Fluxes Near Moon Fluxes Near Mars

Validation with CRaTER! SEP Events During 2012: Indicators of Larger SEP Events in the New Cycle (24) Shown here are the major SEP events of 2012 and the comparisons between CRaTER observations (blue) and prediccs predictions (red and green). Agreement reveals overall accuracy of models, while deviations likely reveal heavy ion contributions to dose observed by CRaTER Jan. 23 rd, 2012 Event Mar 7, 2012 Event May 16, 2012 Event

EMMREM has proved very successful at predicting SEP spectra and radiation dose estimates at different distances in the inner heliosphere. Figures below show two recent papers by which SEP time profiles, onset, and radiation estimates were successfully predicted at Mars (Odyssey) and Ulysses located at 1.44 AU and 4.91 AU, respectively. 1 AU measurement from ACE, SoHO, and GOES. Dayeh, M. A., et al, Space Weather, 8, S00E07, doi: /2009SW Zeitlin, C., et al., Space Weather, 8, S00E06, doi: /2009SW GCR background SEP Modeling — EMMREM

[From Schwadron et al., JGR Planets, 2011] The modulation parameter based on observations of neutrons using McMurdo data (red),interplanetary magnetic field (green) and based on the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) Cosmic Ray Isotope Spectrometer (CRIS) measurements (blue [see O’Neill, 2006]). The modulation potentials are used via EMMREM to infer GCR lens dose rates. (a) Dose rates deduced from EMMREM are shown as well as measurements from CRaTER’s D1-D2 detectors (black curve). The CRaTER D1-D2 dose rates were altitude adjusted to the lunar surface, have been adjusted for dose deposition in water (these dose rates), and represent two-week averages with SEP events removed. The polarity of the large-scale solar magnetic field is indicated by A: for A > 0 the Sun’s large-scale northern polarity is positive. The periods indicated by r show when field reversals occurred. Dose rates observed by CRaTER (black points in Figures 2a and 2c) near the highest dose levels during the space age. (d– g) The solar images showconditions of the corona (Figures 2d and 2f) and photosphere (Figures 2e and 2g) near solar maximum (Figures 2d and 2e) and solar minimum (Figures 2f and 2g)

[From Schwadron et al., JGR Planets, 2011] Comparison between EMMREM and CRaTER showing excellent agreement for dose rate. Observations from GOES at energy levels [0.74–4.2, 4.2–8.7, 8.7–14.5,15–40, 38–82, 84–200, 110–900] MeV are fed into BRYNTRN on a 5-min basis and used as the boundary conditions for characterizing the radiation environment throughout the inner heliosphere [Schwadron et al., 2010a]. Observations are both fed directly into BRYNTRN (red curves) and utilized as input within the EMMREM framework (blue curves) allowing propagation throughout the inner heliosphere. We show both the progression of the doses over (top) a month and (bottom) a 5-day period focused on the June 7 event.

[From Schwadron et al., JGR Planets, 2011] The accumulated dose during the June 7, 2011 CRaTER event. The final dose for the June 7, 2011 event is 2 cGy, much smaller than historic events that typically reveal 100 s of cGy. The agreement between modeled and observed doses is excellent. The small offsets between data values at the start of DOY 156 are due to differences in the resolution of the different data sources.

PREDICCS - Predictions of radiation from REleASE, EMMREM, and Data Incorporating CRaTER, COSTEP, and other SEP measurements - is an on-line system to predict and forecast the radiation environment through interplanetary space. PREDICCS uses SEP (Solar Energetic Particle) measurements from the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) instrument currently on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and data from the Comprehensive Suprathermal and Energetic Particle Analyzer (COSTEP) and integrates two radiation environment models: The Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Module (EMMREM) and the Relativistic Electron Alert System for Exploration (REleASE). REleASE very accurately forecasts SEP events up to one and a half hours ahead of the event. The EMMREM model predicts the real-time radiation environment using Energetic Particle Radiation Environment Module (EPREM) and the Baryon Transport Module (BRYNTRN). We combine these two models to nowcast and forecast the radiation environment at various observers - including the Earth, Moon, Mars, and at specific target observers such as comets and asteroids - and for future SEP events. Support for the Project: – THE NASA-NSF/LWS/EMMREM PROJECT (GRANT NUMBER NNX07AC14G) – NASA LRO/CRATER/PREDICCS PROJECT (CONTRACT NUMBER NNG11PA03C) – NSF/FESD SUN-TO-ICE PROJECT (GRANT NUMBER AGS )