Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXPERIENCE WITH THE LENSTEC KH3500 TETRAFLEX LENS.
Advertisements

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.
Goals of Cataract Surgery Provide a Full Range of Vision Minimize Dependence on Glasses Including Reading Glasses and Bifocals Improve Lifestyle Activities.
Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti
R. Lehmann, MD ASCRS 2008 Clinically Relevant Advantages in the Functional Performance of the AcrySof ® IQ IOL Robert P. Lehmann, MD, FACS Lehmann Eye.
Keiichiro Minami, Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima, Mami Yoshino, Kunihiko Nakamura Department of Ophthalmology Tokyo Dental College Suidobashi Hospital, Tokyo,
Visual outcome & subjective visual symptoms of the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens in Asian eyes Dr Colin S.H. Tan MBBS, MMed (Ophth), FRCSEd.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses & Contrast Sensitivity
Anupama Kotha 1, Simar J. Singh 1, William B. Trattler 1,2, Carlos Buznego 1,2 The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
CLINICAL OUTCOMES WITH A NEW DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) Pilar Casas de Llera Ana Belen Plaza Alfredo Vega-Estrada Jorge L Alio Vissum.
Eltutar, Kadir; Akcetin, Tulay A.; Ozcelik, N. Demet Istanbul Education and Research Hospital Department of Ophthalmology The authors state that they have.
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,
Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Southwestern.
The Effect of the Restor Multifocal IOL on Frequency Doubling Perimetry Elizabeth Yeu, MD1, Elizabeth Woznak, BS2, Nicole Kesten, BS2, Steven VL Brown,
Functional Vision With Apodized Diffractive Aspheric Multifocal IOL With +3.0 D Add Jonathan M. Davidorf, MD Los Angeles, CA ASCRS Annual Symposium March,
Panel Questions 1.Please discuss the following regarding endothelial cell density: a.The primary safety endpoint for this study was mean ECD ≤ 17%. The.
Bret Fisher, MD The Eye Center of North Florida Panama City, FL
1 Cataract Surgery Stephen G. Slade MD, FACS. 2 Financial Disclosure Alcon, AMO, B&L Consultant, Clarity, NuLens, RVO, Technolas 2 This presentation represents.
Mike P. Holzer, MD Annett Mannsfeld, MSc Angela Ehmer, MSc Gerd U. Auffarth, MD International Vision Correction.
USAMA MOURIS BEBAWY, MB MBCh CLINICAL FELLOW, MCMASTER UNIV No Financial Disclosure GEORGE H.H. BEIKO, B.M.,B.Ch.,FRCSC ST. CATHARINES, CANADA ASSIST PROF,
Unilateral multifocal lens implantation in patients with a contralateral monofocal or phakic eye is a viable presbyopic correction option Robert J. Cionni,
Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.
W. Andrew Maxwell, MD, PhD Rob Gray, PhD Disclosures: This study was funded by Alcon Research, Ltd, which also assisted with the preparation of these slides.
A Fellow Eye Comparison of Aberrations, Modulation Transfer Function and Contrast Sensitivity After AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural IOL Implantation. Mayank.
Authors: Col. Assoc.Prof. Jiri Pasta, MD, PhD. Katerina Buusova Smeckova, MD, MBA Jaroslav Madunicky, MD Eva Vyplasilova, MD Department of Ophthalmology.
SK Kwok, MD Hong Kong Laser Eye Centre, Hong Kong The author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster ASCRS 2011 San Diego, US.
Clinical and simulation outcomes of a multifocal intraocular lens with rotational asymmetry and two different levels of near addition Jorge Alió, MD,PhD.
Use of Multifocal IOLs in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Helga P. Sandoval, MD, MSCR 1 Reid B. Murphy, MD, 1 Luis E. Fernández de Castro,
P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.
Kaori Morii, M.D. Shinji Miura, M.D, Ph.D. Dept. of Ophthalmology, Asagiri Hospital, Hyogo, JPN We have no financial interest. This retrospective study.
LONG TERM OUTCOMES OF RESTOR IOL IMPLANTATION Lori Dao, Orkun Muftuoglu, V. Vinod Mootha, Steven M. Verity, R. Wayne Bowman, H. Dwight Cavanagh, James.
Department of Ophthalmology Rudolf Foundation Clinic Vienna Head: Prof. Dr. Susanne Binder YEWHI-Study - A Comparison Between Blue Light Filtering and.
Binocular Defocus Curve of Apodized Diffractive Multifocal IOL in Asian-Indian Eyes Dr.A. Shetty; Dr. M. K. Kummelil; Dr. S.Nagappa Cataract and Refractive.
DGII 2008 Comparison of Aspheric ReSTOR and Tecnis multifocal IOL Dongho Lee MD, PhD Yonsei eye center, Seoul, South Korea No Financial Interest.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL. Aspheric IOL AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® 2 AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL SN6AD3 Add Power: +4 D Spectacle Plane: 3.2 D Range:
Controversies about binocular function and patient satisfaction after induced conventional monovision in case of bilateral intraocular lens implantation.
S. Lee/M.Kim 2010 M. Kim 1, H. Lee 1, S. Lee 1,, S.D. Lee 1 1 ASA-Vision Clinics Seoul Comparative Analysis Preliminary Results of.
LogMAR-Analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses: Clinical performance A. Mannsfeld, I.-J. Limberger, A. Ehmer, M.P. Holzer, G. U.Auffarth International.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Apodized Diffractive IOL. What is the AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL? The AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL incorporates an apodized diffractive optic.
Comparative Study of the Aspheric Akreos Adapt AO IOL Versus the Spherical Akreos Adapt IOL Maghizh Anandan Martin Leyland.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
Comparison of 2 Models of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal IOL
Presbia: a new solution for presbyopia correction Dr M. Fantozzi (1), Dr I. Lenzetti (2), Dr A. Canovetti (1) (1) Casa di cura “Barbantini”, Lucca, Italy;
Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.
Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.
Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.
9-Month Results after Implantation of a new accommodative IOL that works with one focus Mark Tomalla M.D.* Clinic for Refractive and Ophthalmic Surgery,
Division of Plastic Surgery University of Puerto Rico Norma I. Cruz, MD Nothing to disclose.
"Mix and Match" approach implantation
Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.
Intrastromal Ring Segments for Keratoconus: A Retrospective Review Brad Feldman MD, Alan Carlson MD, Terry Kim MD, Natalie Afshari MD, Ricardo Santaella.
0 Femtosecond-Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery: Is it living up to the hype? 117 th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Press Briefing.
FreeVis LASIK Zentrum Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Analysis of Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetes Using Optical Coherence Tomography  Stephen J. Kim, MD, Robert Equi, MD, Neil.
Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.
Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Consultant for Alcon. AMO, Bausch and Lomb
Long Term Clinical Outcomes of Refractive Lens Exchange in Moderate     to High Hyperopia Frank Goes, BELGIUM Ascrs 2008.
Thomas Kohnen, MD Department of Ophthalmology
Clinical results with Diffractive Acritec Multifocal IOL implantation following cataracts and myopic and hyperopic clear lens Margarita Cabanás, MD Contributing.
Figure 1 Evolution of visual function after acute optic neuritis Figure shows the measurement of high-contrast visual acuity (VA) using the Early Treatment.
The authors have no financial interest to disclosure
David T. Vroman, MD Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology
Kellan Tetraflex KH3500 Accommodative IOLs vs. Acri
Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL
Comparative Global Literature Review of Visual and Optical Quality of Refractive, Diffractive, and Hybrid IOL Designs James P. McCulley, MD Department.
Consultant Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth
Presentation transcript:

Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Visual Acuity After Bilateral Implantation of Apodized Diffractive +3.0 IOLs Stephen Lane, MD Consultant, Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Alcon sponsored the study and provided statistical and presentation support.

ASCRS 2010 Methods Purpose  To assess changes in patient-reported outcomes (PRO), satisfaction, and visual acuity (VA) after bilateral implantation of the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D IOL in cataract patients Prospective, multi-center, 6-month trial  Twelve U.S. study centers  Subjects ≥21 years of age in need of bilateral cataract surgery  Bilateral implantation of IQ ReSTOR ® +3.0 D IOL  Cataract TyPE at baseline and 6 months post-operatively  Results reported for 147 subjects

ASCRS 2010 Assessments Binocular Uncorrected Visual Acuities  100% contrast Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart under photopic lighting Uncorrected Near VA (UCNVA) at 40 cm Uncorrected Intermediate VA (UCIVA) at 60 cm Uncorrected Distance VA (UCDVA) at 4 m Cataract TyPE questionnaire  Limitations in distance vision function  Limitations in near vision function  Limitations in social activities  Satisfaction with vision  Self rating of vision quality

ASCRS 2010 Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity Horizontal line across the center of each diamond = group mean. Vertical span of each diamond = 95% confidence intervals around the group mean logMAR Preop6 months p< /40 20/20 Statistically significant improvement in Near VA from preop baseline. 20/25 20/32 20/50 20/80 20/60

ASCRS 2010 Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity p<.0001 logMAR Statistically significant improvement in Intermediate VA from preop baseline. 6 months p<.0001 logMAR Preop 20/20 20/25 20/40 20/32 20/50 20/80 20/60

ASCRS 2010 Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity logMAR Preop6 months p< /40 20/20 20/25 20/32 20/50 Statistically significant improvement in Distance VA from preop baseline. 20/60

ASCRS 2010 Limitations in Distance Vision Assessed limitations associated with: usual daily activities, recognizing people or objects across the street, daytime & nighttime driving, reading street or freeway signs, watching television, walking up or down stairs. Statistically significant less limitations in distance vision activities. p<.0001 None Extreme Preop Without Glasses Preop With Glasses 6 months Without Glasses Limitation Scale (0-4)

ASCRS 2010 Limitations in Near Vision Function Assessed limitations associated with activities such as: reading a magazine, doing crafts or hobbies (sewing, painting), reading labels or prices, depth perception (pouring coffee, hitting a golf ball, or parking a car), and shaving or putting on makeup. Preop Without Glasses Preop With Glasses 6 months Without Glasses Limitation Scale (0-4) p<.0001 None Extreme Statistically significant less limitations in near vision activities.

ASCRS 2010 Limitations in Social Function Assessed limitations in social activities such as: going out to dinner, going to the movies, visiting with friends or relatives, going to party or dance, going to sporting events or church. Limitation Scale (0-4) Preop Without Glasses Preop With Glasses 6 months Without Glasses None Extreme Statistically significant less patient reported limitations in social activities. p<.0001

ASCRS 2010 Overall Satisfaction with Vision Preop Without Glasses Preop With Glasses 6 months Without Glasses Satisfaction Scale (0-4) p<.0001 Statistically significant improvement in overall satisfaction from preop baseline. Not Satisfied Completely Satisfied

ASCRS 2010 Self-rating of vision quality Preop Without Glasses Preop With Glasses 6 months Without Glasses Self-Rating of Vision (0-10) p<.0001 Best Worst Statistically significant higher self-rating of uncorrected vision quality compared with preop baseline.

ASCRS 2010 Conclusions Statistically significant improvements observed for patients with bilateral AcrySof IQ ReSTOR +3.0 D Add IOL at 6 months compared with preoperative visit :  improved near, intermediate, and distance VA  less limitations in distance vision activities  less limitations in near vision activities  less limitations in social activities  greater overall satisfaction with vision  higher self-rating of vision