CURRICULUM CONSTRUCTION II AMANDA SKELTON & GINA NAAS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Developing Quality Assessments
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge, Standards, and the New State Assessments (AMP)
Principles of High Quality Assessment
ABC Curriculum Showcase Coventry Public Schools February 10, 2009 An introduction for parents and community members Left click your mouse to advance to.
+ 21 st Century Skills and Academic Standards Kimberly Hetrick Berry Creek Middle School Eagle County School District.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
The New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Alignment Study December 5, 2006.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Steve Williams DESE Fine Arts Consultant Presented at: Missouri Music Educators Association January 30,
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
Assessment Literacy Module
Depth of Knowledge A HEAP of Complexity. BLOOM’S TAXONOMYBLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY KNOWLEDGE “The recall of specifics and universals, involving little.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Designing Common Core Assessment Questions for Educators Creating Type II and Type III Assessments.
Quality Instruction The ♥ of the matter is the depth of knowledge.
HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER 1. Early Connections Planning Phase 2. District Strategic Plan.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Kentucky’s Curriculum Documents A driving force behind education in Kentucky.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
Depth of Knowledge. Let’s review... 1.Students perform simple procedures like copying, calculating, and remembering. They either know an answer or they.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Assessment Basics and Active Student Involvement Block II.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
With great power comes great responsibility.
1. 10:00 – 10:05AmWelcome 10:05 -10: 10Starter 10: :30DOK and Blooms 10: :30DOK activity 11 :30AM Prayer Break 12: :15Pm Broad.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING October 30, Bell Ringer Choose four formative assessment practices that research reviews suggest lead to improved student.
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
Depth of Knowledge Civic Literacy Teacher Network Social Studies.
Mathematics Common Core Standards and Depth of Knowledge Presented February 8, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Mapping to the Core May 21, 2013.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Palmyra Area School District Summer Goals  Develop an understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the area of Math, including the.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Assessment Information
Assessment Information
Assessing the Common Core Standards
What is it with these two?
Creating Common Assessments Part I: Item Development
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Ice-breaker In triads, answer the following questions (4-5 min):
February Fourth Friday
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Norman L Webb.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Presentation transcript:

CURRICULUM CONSTRUCTION II AMANDA SKELTON & GINA NAAS

Goals and Objectives for Curriculum Workshops  WHY Make connection between effective curriculum and 4 th cycle MSIP curriculum expectations  WHAT Outline components and qualities of an effective curriculum  HOW Ensure that curriculum is aligned and implemented

4 th Cycle MSIP…it’s all about instruction. Earning high marks for quality instruction and assessment that yields increased student learning.

MSIP REVIEW Based on performance, districts receive one of four kinds of reviews: –Waiver –Mini-review (desk) –Targeted review –Full review

Targeted or Full Curriculum Review What: District submits: 1. Curriculum for two areas (Math OR Communication Arts AND one other area) 2. All assessments used during a two-week window except daily “practice” homework Who: Panel of experts in cooperation with the Show-Me Curriculum Administrators Association (SMCAA) When: First two weeks in October Why: To help answer the essential curriculum question: “If fully implemented, will this curriculum lead to improved student performance?” Where: Materials are sent to DESE

1.All school districts will be required to submit curriculum for MSIP for a full review. Truth 1. Only districts receiving a full or targeted review will be required to submit curriculum for MSIP for a full review. 4th Cycle MSIP Curriculum Misconception

2. The school districts receiving full reviews will be asked to submit both their K-12 math and communication arts curriculum and another randomly selected K – 12 curriculum. Truth 2. The school districts receiving full reviews will be asked to submit either their K-12 math OR communication arts curriculum and another randomly selected K – 12 curriculum. 4th Cycle MSIP Curriculum Misconceptions

3.There is a specific format for all curriculum documents. Truth 3. There is NOT a specific format for curriculum documents. 4th Cycle MSIP Curriculum Misconceptions

4.MSIP has defined quality curriculum as one that is aligned only to the GLEs. Truth 4. MSIP has defined quality curriculum as one that is aligned to the Show-Me Standards and is fully implemented. 4th Cycle MSIP Curriculum Misconceptions

1.Quality of the learner objectives 2.Quality of the articulation of the curriculum among the grade levels (Does curriculum flow from one grade level to the next?) 3. “Guaranteed and viable” curriculum -viable content -opportunity to learn -time 4th Cycle MSIP Curriculum Focus

Today’s Goals More In-depth Look at MAP Data Depth of Knowledge DESE’S Model Curriculum

MAP DATA 2006 Content Standards Report (less than 50 % of the points earned) Grade LevelContent 3CA MA SC 4CA MA SS 5CA MA 6 7CA MA SC 8CA MA SS 10CA MA SC 11CA MA SS

For example – only 17% of the possible points were earned on the 10 th grade Punnett Square Question – I will make sure that I teach Punnett Squares more in- depth this spring. What do I do with the Content Standards Report?? Use it to plan instruction and develop curriculum

MAP should be affirming local assessment! (MM) 2

Measures the degree to which the knowledge elicited from students on assessments is as complex as what students are expected to know and do as stated in the curriculum/GLEs/Show-Me Standards. Developed by Norman Webb from the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Is a common language for educators to use to describe the complexity of the items on an assessment. Is a tool that anyone may use to determine if the performance issue of students is an alignment issue, an implementation issue, or an interpretation issue. A part of reflective teaching. Language used in 4 th cycle MSIP curriculum reviews.

D.O.K. Level-Descriptors Content→ Level↓ CAMASCSS Level 1 Recall of information Recall and Reproduction Recall of information Level 2 Basic reasoning Skill and Concept Skill and Concept Basic Reasoning Level 3 Complex Reasoning Strategic Thinking Complex Reasoning Level 4 Extending Reasoning Extending Thinking Extending Reasoning

SYNTHESIS AND EVALUATION “Putting together elements & parts to form a whole, then making value judgments about the method.” EXTENDED THINKING Requires an investigation; time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem or task. BLOOM’S TAXONOMYWEBB’S DOK KNOWLEDGE “The recall of specifics and universals, involving little more than bringing to mind the appropriate material ” COMPREHENSION “Ability to process knowledge on a low level such that the knowledge can be reproduced or communicated without a verbatim repetition.” APPLICATION “The use of abstractions in concrete situations.” ANALYSIS “The breakdown of a situation into its component parts.” RECALL Recall of a fact, information, or procedure (e.g., What are 3 critical skill cues for the overhand throw?) SKILL/CONCEPT Use of information, conceptual knowledge, procedures, two or more steps, etc. STRATEGIC THINKING Requires reasoning, developing a plan or sequence of steps; has some complexity; more than one possible answer Wyoming School Health and Physical Education Network (2001). Standards, Assessment, and Beyond. Retrieved May 25, 2006, from

DESE’S MODEL CURRICULUM What is it? Where is it? curriculum/ModelCurriculum/index.html

MO’s Grade Level Expectations provide a description of the content represented by the test.