Gathering Audio Metadata for the Monterey Jazz Festival Concerts OLAC 2006 By Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Stanford University Libraries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METS: Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard Merrilee Proffitt Society of American Archivists August 2002.
Advertisements

METS Awareness Training An Introduction to METS Digital libraries – where are we now? Digitisation technology now well established and well-understood.
Putting together a METS profile. Questions to ask when setting down the METS path Should you design your own profile? Should you use someone elses off.
Introduction to METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard) Jerome McDonough New York University
October 28, 2003Copyright MIT, 2003 METS repositories: DSpace MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology MIT Libraries.
Standards showcase: MODS, METS, MARCXML ALA Annual 2006 Rebecca Guenther and Jackie Radebaugh Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of.
METS: An Introduction Towards a Digital Object Standard Rick Beaubien Library Systems Office U.C. Berkeley.
METS: An Introduction Structuring Digital Content.
DRS 2 Metadata Migration June 25, Agenda Introduction Preliminary results - content analysis Metadata options Next steps Questions.
DRS 2 one in a series of periodic updates Harvard University Library Andrea Goethals October 21, 2009 DRS = Digital Repository Service.
Audio Technical Metadata Importance of metadata to digital audio preservation Brief history of audio preservation standards Overview Kinds of Audio Metadata.
Introduction to metadata for IDAH fellows Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Digital Library Program.
Workflows for Digital Curation and Preservation Stacy Kowalczyk PASIG Dublin 2012 October 17, 2012.
METS Dr. Heike Neuroth EMANI – Project Meeting February 14 th - 16 th, 2002 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg Göttingen State and University Library (SUB)
Fedora 3.0 and METS: A Partnership for the Organization, Presentation and Preservation of Digital Objects Open Repositories Georgia Tech, Atlanta,
1 Extending the Implementation of PREMIS to Geospatial Resources in the Stanford Digital Repository: An Exploration By Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Metadata.
Joachim Bauer Senior System Engineer, CCS
R.Jantz, August 31, Two-day forum on PREMIS Preservation Metadata and the Trusted Digital Repositories August 31, September 1 National Library of.
METS What is METS ? What is METS ? A schema that provides a flexible mechanism for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata for a.
Keeping the pieces together: The Role of METS in the Preservation of Digital Content Robin Wendler Harvard University Library January 16, 2005 [Men in.
METS Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard Metadata Working Group Forum April 19, 2002.
DigiTool METS Profile DigiTool Version 3.0. DigiTool METS Profile 2 What is METS? A Digital Library Federation initiative built upon the work of MOA2.
AIP Archival Information Package – Defines how digital objects and its associated metadata are packaged using XML based files. METS (binding file) MODS.
THE RUTGERS WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Mary Beth Weber Cataloging and Metadata Services Rutgers University Libraries August 3, 2007.
METS: An Introduction Part III METS and MOA2. MOA2: A Brief History Digital Library Federation project started in 1997 Main goal was to create a digital.
METS: Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard Richard Gartner Oxford University Library Services
Incompatible or Interoperable? A METS bridge for a small gap between two digital preservation software packages Lucas Mak Metadata & CatalogLibrarian
A METS Application Profile for Historical Newspapers
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC’s Digital Archive – Disseminating with METS Jay Goodkin Software Engineer Digital Collection and Preservation.
Metadata standards, tools and processes for audio preservation at the British Library: An overview of new systems for audio description, preservation and.
Metadata Standards and Applications 4. Metadata Syntaxes and Containers.
METS Intro & Overview Mets Opening Day Germany May 7, 2007 Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Stanford University Libraries.
Data Exchange Tools (DExT) DExT PROJECTAN OPEN EXCHANGE FORMAT FOR DATA enables long-term preservation and re-use of metadata,
Case History: Library of Congress Audio-Visual Prototyping Project METS Opening Day October 27, 2003 Carl Fleischhauer Office of Strategic Initiatives.
METS-Based Cataloging Toolkit for Digital Library Management System Dong, Li Tsinghua University Library
Case History: Library of Congress Audio-Visual Prototyping Project METS Opening Day (2003), Revised For the CUL Metadata Working Group July 22, 2004 Carl.
A CIDOC CRM – compatible metadata model for digital preservation
Metadata: Essential Standards for Management of Digital Libraries ALI Digital Library Workshop Linda Cantara, Metadata Librarian Indiana University, Bloomington.
An Introduction to METS Morgan Cundiff Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard.
JENN RILEY METADATA LIBRARIAN IU DIGITAL LIBRARY PROGRAM Introduction to Metadata.
Preservation Audio Using METS: The Sound Directions Project Robin Wendler Harvard University Library 7 May 2007.
Archival Information Packages for NASA HDF-EOS Data R. Duerr, Kent Yang, Azhar Sikander.
PREMIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT.
HUB AND SPOKE TOOL SUITE PREMIS Implementation Fair – 7 October 2009 Bill Ingram Visiting Research Programmer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Implementor’s Panel: BL’s eJournal Archiving solution using METS, MODS and PREMIS Markus Enders, British Library DC2008, Berlin.
Implementation of PREMIS in METS Rebecca Guenther Sr. Networking & Standards Specialist, Library of Congress PREMIS Implementation Fair San.
Habing1 Integrating PREMIS and METS PREMIS Tutorial Implementers’ Panel June 21, 2007, 9:00-5:30 Library of Congress, Jefferson Building, Whittall.
PREMIS Implementation Fair – SF 2009 PREMIS use in Rosetta Yair Brama – Ex Libris.
METS: Implementing a metadata standard in the digital library Richard Gartner Oxford University Library Services
Introduction to metadata
PREMIS Implementation Fair, San Francisco, CA October 7, Stanford Digital Repository PREMIS & Geospatial Resources Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Knowledge.
Introduction to Metadata Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program.
PREMIS at the British Library Markus Enders, The British Library PREMIS Implementation Fair, San Fransisco, CA 07 October 2009.
5. Applying metadata standards: Application profiles Metadata Standards and Applications Workshop.
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
Metadata and Meta tag. What is metadata? What does metadata do? Metadata schemes What is meta tag? Meta tag example Table of Content.
The Care and Feeding of Digital Collections Amy Jackson March 14, 2005.
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects The Final Curtain December 4, 2006.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Metadata – what, why and how Ann Chapman.
Digitizing Historical Newspapers South Carolina Digital Newspaper Program's participation with the Library of Congress' Chronicling America: Historic American.
Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Metadata Coordinator, Stanford University 1 Metadata for the NGDA: Developing a Shared Approach Joint UCSB / Stanford meeting.
Metadata & Repositories Jackie Knowles RSP Support Officer.
and Transmission Standard overview – and case study
Bentley Project Reel Digitization Bentley Historical Library t
Introduction to Metadata
Integrating PREMIS and METS
Sobek for Curators and Collection Managers
Medusa at the University of Illinois
Introduction to METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard)
Presentation transcript:

Gathering Audio Metadata for the Monterey Jazz Festival Concerts OLAC 2006 By Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Stanford University Libraries

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Workshop Goals Surface issues associated with gathering MD req’s for access & long term preservation of audio files Surface issues associated with gathering MD req’s for access & long term preservation of audio files Demonstrate how to use METS for content packaging & Demonstrate how to use METS for content packaging & –MODS for description & retention of logical & physical structures of digital audio objects –PREMIS for preservation MD –AES Draft Data Dictionary & JHove for Format MD

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Monterey Jazz Festival Project Description Multi-year, multi-part project initiated jointly by Stanford University Libraries and the Monterey Jazz Festival Multi-year, multi-part project initiated jointly by Stanford University Libraries and the Monterey Jazz Festival Goal to preserve and provide access to approximately 750 original audio and 92 original video recordings Goal to preserve and provide access to approximately 750 original audio and 92 original video recordings Recordings Recordings –Date from 1958 to present –Document the world's longest running jazz festival

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Project Description, cont. Grant funding provided by: Grant funding provided by: –Grammy Foundation –National Historic Publications and Records Commission –Save America’s Treasures. Current timeline: October 1, 2005 – September 31, Current timeline: October 1, 2005 – September 31, 2008.

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Collection Description Complete collection currently comprises over Complete collection currently comprises over –1,200 sound recordings –370 moving image materials –130 linear feet of paper-based records of the founding organization Forms a unique collection of historic recordings of high research value, currently inaccessible to scholars due to the condition and format of the materials Forms a unique collection of historic recordings of high research value, currently inaccessible to scholars due to the condition and format of the materials Approximately 750 tapes have been selected to be digitized Approximately 750 tapes have been selected to be digitized Formats: ¼” and ½” analog reel tape, audiocassette, and digital audio tape. (only audio for this project) Formats: ¼” and ½” analog reel tape, audiocassette, and digital audio tape. (only audio for this project)

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Intentions for Collection Creation of master and derivative digital audio files Creation of master and derivative digital audio files Augmentation of existing descriptive MD to access component level files Augmentation of existing descriptive MD to access component level files Entire digital collection will be accessible to listeners on Stanford campus Entire digital collection will be accessible to listeners on Stanford campus MD made accessible to the public via the SULAIR web; [selected sound clips may also be available] MD made accessible to the public via the SULAIR web; [selected sound clips may also be available] Deposit into preservation repository (SDR) Deposit into preservation repository (SDR)

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Descriptive / Structural MD Req’s per curator & SDR Retain relationships among “tracks” or segments, tape-side and tape to allow physical access to analog artifact Retain relationships among “tracks” or segments, tape-side and tape to allow physical access to analog artifact Replicate physical structure, but also provide direct access to the logical structure Replicate physical structure, but also provide direct access to the logical structure “Find”, “identify” & “select” by tape, performer(s), performance, date “Find”, “identify” & “select” by tape, performer(s), performance, date

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Minimal MD Req’s for SDR Structural Structural Descriptive enough for minimal access Descriptive enough for minimal access Admin Admin –Technical for Audio –Preservation –Rights MD Packaged with its resource MD Packaged with its resource

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 FM Pro beginning of project Field tags = Field tags = –Tape number –Performer (of all on given tape) by group with individual & instrument also listed –Performance (of all songs on the tape, differentiated by performer) –Date of performance

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006

Extra performers

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006

Extra group performer

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006

Date #1 Date #2 Date #3

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 The plot thickens… How to [retain] link between Descriptive MD and “digital-physical” files?? How to [retain] link between Descriptive MD and “digital-physical” files?? –Assigned “markers” = virtual BE / END determined by timestamps –Files & structural naming conventions

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Why worry about digital object structure? So many files So many files No inherent order to their order No inherent order to their order Just streams of bits Just streams of bits

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006

Physical structure by naming convention, hmm…. 0001pm.wav 0001pm.sfk 0001pm.wav.gpk 0001pm.wav.mem 0001sh.wav 0001sh.mrk 0001sh.cd 0001sh.wav.gpk 0001sh.wav.mem 0001pm.wav 0001pm.sfk 0001pm.wav.gpk 0001pm.wav.mem 0001sh.wav 0001sh.mrk 0001sh.cd 0001sh.wav.gpk 0001sh.wav.mem

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Physical structure by file naming w/ directories sul-dl-nas1\mjf\Batch01\040606\ PM\ 0001pm.wav 0001pm.sfk 0001pm.wav.gpk 0001pm.wav.mem SH\ 0001sh.wav 0001sh.mrk 0001sh.cd 0001sh.wav.gpk 0001sh.wav.mem sul-dl-nas1\mjf\Batch01\040606\ PM\ 0001pm.wav 0001pm.sfk 0001pm.wav.gpk 0001pm.wav.mem SH\ 0001sh.wav 0001sh.mrk 0001sh.cd 0001sh.wav.gpk 0001sh.wav.mem

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Long term storagebets Different naming conventions Different naming conventions Different directory structures, if any Different directory structures, if any Need for device & OS independence Need for device & OS independence Value in “packaging” of metadata & content together even if stored separately Value in “packaging” of metadata & content together even if stored separately

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 What to do? Packaging = Descriptive + Structure Packaging = Descriptive + Structure METS = (Logical structure expressed as) Descriptive MD + (Physical Structure expressed as) Structural Map METS = (Logical structure expressed as) Descriptive MD + (Physical Structure expressed as) Structural Map

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 How does METS work? Initial scope limited to objects comprised of text, image, audio & video files Initial scope limited to objects comprised of text, image, audio & video files Technical Components Technical Components –Primary XML Schema –Extension Schema –Controlled Vocabularies –Community based profiles

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 METS XML Schema METS Header Descriptive Metadata Administrative Metadata Content File Inventory Structural Map Behaviors METS Document Structural Link

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Structural Map is key Digital Object modeled as logical or physical tree structure (e.g., book with chapters with subchapters, image file with encoded text transcription file and audio file of oral interview….) Digital Object modeled as logical or physical tree structure (e.g., book with chapters with subchapters, image file with encoded text transcription file and audio file of oral interview….) Every node in tree can be associated with descriptive/administrative metadata and… Every node in tree can be associated with descriptive/administrative metadata and… Individual/multiple files (or portions thereof) or Individual/multiple files (or portions thereof) or Other METS documents Other METS documents

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Associated Metadata Descriptive Descriptive –Endorsed XML schemas of these standards to date: MARCXML, Dublin Core simple, MODS; can use others such as FGDC, VRA, etc. Administrative Administrative –Technical (Z39.87 for still images, Text endorsed), –Rights, Source – Digital Provenance (PREMIS endorsed) Can be associated with entire digital object or subcomponent(s) Can be multiple instances; type used is not prescribed Can be contained internally (as XML or binary files) Can be contained externally by reference (using Xlink) Provides controlled vocabularies for tags and declaration of standards used

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Ex., simple METS Object Book Desc MD (MARC or DC or MODS) FileX= Pg1 FileY= Pg2 Tech MD: Image Admin MD (Digiprov) Tech MD: Image Admin MD (Digiprov) Admin MD: Rights

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Ex., Audio METS Object Audio Tape- side Desc MD ( MARC or DC or MODS) FileX= Track1 FileY= Track2, Track3 Tech MD: Audio Admin MD (Digiprov) Tech MD: Audio Admin MD (Digiprov) Desc MD for Track - (DC or MODS) Admin MD: Rights

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 First, descriptive FMPro  qDC  MODS FMPro  qDC  MODS finalDMDTemplate PDF finalDMDTemplate PDF finalDMDTemplate PDF finalDMDTemplate PDF

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006

Taking advantage of the technologies Mechanism for keeping tracks (segments) connected to tape-side Mechanism for keeping tracks (segments) connected to tape-side –using mods:relatedItem to nest, or not –Retaining IDs from data provider – SDR Using subfields / attributes to trigger code events, e.g., subject/genre & title information Using subfields / attributes to trigger code events, e.g., subject/genre & title information

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Viewing the XML See dmdSec See dmdSec See fileSec See fileSec See structMap See structMap

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Administrative MD rightsMD using PREMIS Rights rightsMD using PREMIS Rights sourceMD used AES draft data dictionary elements sourceMD used AES draft data dictionary elements techMD for format specific MD techMD for format specific MD –Preservation Master (Broadcast wave, uncompressed) (AES & Jhove) –Service High (Broadcast wave, compressed) (AES & Jhove)

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Viewing the XML See amdSec See amdSec –rightsMD –sourcMD –techMD For file For file For format For format

NjH, Stanford University Libraries, October, OLAC 2006 Questions, Comments? References: References: Monterey Jazz Festival Monterey Jazz Festival Archive of Recorded Sound MJF Collection, Archive of Recorded Sound MJF Collection, Stanford University Libraries ml Stanford University Libraries ml ml ml METS METS Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Dublin Core Metadata Initiative MODS MODS PREMIS PREMIS Audio Preservation information, see Audio Preservation information, see JHove JStor / Harvard Object Validation Environment JHove JStor / Harvard Object Validation Environment Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Special thanks and acknowledgement to Hannah Frost, Media Preservation Librarian at SULAIR Special thanks and acknowledgement to Hannah Frost, Media Preservation Librarian at SULAIR Contact : Contact : Nancy Hoebelheinrich Nancy Hoebelheinrich And, why are we doing this??? And, why are we doing this??? MFOO29-BillieH MFOO29-BillieH MFOO29-BillieH MF00229-BillieH2 MF00229-BillieH2 MF00229-BillieH2