Mike Johnsen, FMCSA, sponsor Doug Lee, Volpe Center, PI Garrett Hagemann, Economist Kent Hymel, Economist Adam Klauber, Environmental Engr George Noel,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Advertisements

Travel Time Estimation on Arterial Streets By Heng Wang, Transportation Analyst Houston-Galveston Area Council Dr. Antoine G Hobeika, Professor Virginia.
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling. Outline –Safety Modeling »Safety Modeling Process –Set-up for Worked Example –Develop / Build Safety Model »Project.
Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.
Highways and Highway Components
Capacity, Level of Service, Intersection Design (1)
Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
Industry Benchmarks How do you measure up?. Driver Qualification Standards For years insurance companies have been tightening up their driver MVR standards.
Byron Becnel LA DOTD June 16, Microscopic simulation models simulate the movement of individual vehicles on roads It is used to assess the traffic.
By: Pranav Koshiya Committee Member Huaguo Zhou, PhD 1 CE 491 dacq/idotmapdistrict.gif.
Pedestrian Crashes on Five Orlando-Area Arterials.
Early 2008 Highlights Office of Accident Records Lee Axdahl.
Coordinated Highways Action Response Team -Performance and Benefits- Dr. Gang-Len Chang Department of Civil Engineering University of Maryland February,
Session C2: Promising Research Roundtable An Integrated Work-Zone Computer System For Capacity Estimation, Cost/Benefit Analysis, and Design Of Control.
TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project Guidance on Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Incident Management Strategies 31.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
Highway Capacity Software (HCS) – Part II
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Amar Sarvepalli. 500 projects in 6-8 weeks Need VMT, VHT and More.
An Empirical Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Paradigms Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Qi Yang Caliper Corporation 14.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model Travel Management Subcommittee May 26, 2009 MOVES: Motor.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
ITS Sketch Planning Tool Webinar 2:00 – 4:00 PM January 8, 2009.
Investigation of Speed-Flow Relations and Estimation of Volume Delay Functions for Travel Demand Models in Virginia TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
Benefit-Cost Analysis of the SMART SunGuide Operations in Fort Lauderdale, Florida June 2006 Steve Corbin District ITS Operations Manager FDOT District.
Hcm 2010: work zones.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Traffic Flow Fundamentals
A. Horni and K.W. Axhausen IVT, ETH Zürich GRIDLOCK MODELING WITH MATSIM.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Project L07 Identification and Evaluation of the Cost- Effectiveness of Highway Design Features to Reduce Nonrecurrent.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Assessing the Marginal Cost of Congestion for Vehicle Fleets Using Passive GPS Data Nick Wood, TTI Randall Guensler, Georgia Tech Presented at the 13 th.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
July 29 and 30, 2009 SPF Development in Illinois Yanfeng Ouyang Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Modeling Drivers’ Route Choice Behavior, and Traffic Estimation and Prediction Byungkyu Brian Park, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Studies University.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.
I-270/MD 355 Simulator: An Intelligent Online Traffic Management System Dr. Gang-Len Chang Nan Zou Xiaorong Lai University of Maryland Saed Rahwanji Maryland.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Real-Time Information and Response Jon Nelson, P.E. MoDOT.
Characterizing Interstate Crash Rates Based on Traffic Congestion Using Probe Vehicle Data Michelle M. Mekker, Stephen M. Remias, Margaret L. McNamara,
2007 Incident Management Summit Sri Balasubramanian Chief, Office of Emergency Management Division of Maintenance California Department Of Transportation.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Traffic Simulation L0 – How to use AIMSUN Ing. Ondřej Přibyl, Ph.D.
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
The Transportation & Air Quality Research Group
Utilizing Traffic Simulation Tools with MOVES and AERMOD
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Introduction Traffic flow characteristics
Systematic Identification of High Crash Locations
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
George Noel and Dr. Roger Wayson
Module 6 A 21st Century Transportation Network
Presentation transcript:

Mike Johnsen, FMCSA, sponsor Doug Lee, Volpe Center, PI Garrett Hagemann, Economist Kent Hymel, Economist Adam Klauber, Environmental Engr George Noel, Environmental Engr David Pace, Economist Catherine Taylor, Economist

Fatalities Medical Costs Property Damage Emergency Services Delay Emissions (Hazardous Materials) 2

where D i = delay for crash type i and F i = relative frequency of type i 3CMV 1/24/2011 average delay across all volumes is NOT = delay from the average volume

Volume – functional class – time of day – day of week Duration – severity (fatality, all) 4CMV 1/23/2011

Queuing Delay on the facility (microsimulation modeling) – capacity closure – volume – other road type characteristics – diversion rules Network (diversion) delay (deterministic queueing model) – road type detour – speed speed limits congestion 5CMV 1/23/2011

Traffic Simulation runs (TSIS CORSIM tool – version 6.2) – Baseline cases (without crashes) Monte Carlo 10 runs each – Crash scenarios, Monte Carlo 40 runs each Full closures (15 minutes; 1½ hour; 4 hr) diversions for longer 2 runs Partial closures (same durations as full closure) – Network configurations Expressway, urban & rural (without surface network) Arterial, urban only (with connected expressway) Other, urban & rural local/collector/minor arterial (with connected expressways) Outputs – Delay distributions (median value selected)- baseline delay subtracted – Animation files (vehicle time-step data) for binary code conversion (parser) 6

All States contacted for crash data – Kentucky and Pennsylvania contributed statewide CMV crash closure duration and location data AttributeKentuckyPennsylvania LocationRoad mile markerLatitude/longitude DurationDiscreet value of lane closure7 range values for incident (e.g min.) SeverityFatal, Injury, Property Damage Only (PDO) Fatal, Injury, PDO Truck typeNo dataYes Urban/rural distinctionAs defined by Kentucky State Highway Patrol As defined by PennDOT Vehicle configuration4 truck types, 2 bus types 7 truck types, 2 bus types Other relevant dataHazmat presence, other involved vehicles # injuries/fatalities, Hazmat presence 7

Variable ranges – Volumes- 50-6,000 vehicles per hour – Lane number range- 2-6 bi-directional (HPMS data) – Speeds mph (HPMS data) – Fleet composition- 4-20% trucks (HPMS data) – Link miles (segment length contains all queues) – Node- various including signalized intersections (e.g. urban arterials) – Non-involved direction traffic Rubber necking factor for interstates only Other (urban and rural) rotating blockage on partial closure 8

Parsing Application Developed to Translate Binary Output – Time Step Data Files (TSD) - Individual Vehicle data Parse TSIS-CORSIM binary files – Utilize for the TRAFVU component for visualizing the simulation Contains second-by second data Contains aggregated information for each time interval assigned 9

Emissions Methodology – Parsing of TSIS-CORSIM binary files Utilize Parser Application developed by Volpe Center Parser reads CORSIM animation & calculates vehicle specific power (VSP) VSP calculated for each link and separated by vehicle type – Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) 2010a Parser application creates and output table using MOVES Operating Mode Distribution feature for Project Level Scenario Operating Mode Distribution utilizes drive cycle across each link – Emissions analysis Incident minus Baseline to estimate the emissions impacts 10

Road Type (functional class, urban/rural) Fatality Truck Type 11CMV 1/23/2011 ALLFatalInjuryPDO Vehicle Delay (hrs) 1,805 9,292 2,236 1,531 Value of Time $ 21,893 $ 112,715 $ 27,120 $ 18,574 Emissions and Fuel Costs $ 6,190 $ 31,871 $ 7,668 $ 5,252 Total Cost $ 28,083 $ 144,585 $ 34,788 $ 23,825 Urban Interstates/Expressways