This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When Students Can’t Read…
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
Professional Standards and Professional Values in HE Christine Smith, University of Salford.
PBL Post-Project Review. 1. Student Engagement2. Project Idea3. Student Learning4. Authenticity of Project Tasks and Products5. Quality and Use of Driving.
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
What Makes a Good Activity? Lessons from research and experience Cathy Manduca Science Education Resource Center Carleton College.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geosciences.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Learning targets Learning Goals, Learning Targets, Success Criteria,
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geosciences.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
T 8.0 Central concepts:  The standards for all lessons should not be treated simply as a “to do” list.  Integration of the disciplines can be effective.
Richards Middle School Columbus, Georgia
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments Oct 2013.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
The Areas of Interaction are…
CAPP ALGEBRA FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT GRANT Professional Development Aspect.
InTeGrate Assessment David Steer, University of Akron Ellen Iverson, Carleton College May 2012.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Developing materials for InTeGrate: A Big Picture View David Steer, The University of Akron Ellen Iverson, Science Education Resource Center.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments May 2013.
What Makes a Good Activity? Lessons from research and experience Cindy Shellito (U of Northern CO) and Cathy Manduca (SERC)
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Writing Learning Outcomes October 2013.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
A five-year community effort to improve Earth literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues An NSF STEP Center DUE
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
Presented to GETSI by Ellen Iverson, SERC, Carleton College Developed as InTeGrate talk by David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron.
Stuart Birnbaum Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at San Antonio Learning objectives and assessments June 15, 2015.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geosciences.
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation’s Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM program within the Directorate for Education and.
Karen Viskupic Department of Geosciences Boise State University Writing Learning Outcomes November 2014.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geosciences.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geosciences.
Karen Viskupic Department of Geosciences Boise State University (but you have to suffer through Stuart presenting) Writing Learning Outcomes June 2015.
An AAC Professional Learning Module Book Study based on the AAC publication Creating Credible Criteria Creating Credible Criteria Module 4: The “I Can”
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences.
Assessment and Evaluation Feedback to Teams Summer 2015.
A Growing Concern This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Teacher Work Sample. Lectures Objectives: 1.Define the teacher work sample. 2.Integrate lesson plans with a practice Teacher Work Sample in terms of the.
Good teaching for diverse learners
GETSI/InTeGrate Development Approach & Writing Learning Goals Modified from presentations by Joshua Caulkins (U of RI) and David Steer (U of Akron)
Welcome to the 2016 InTeGrate Professional Development Webinar Series
Intro to GETSI-Field Development Model & Guiding Principles
A systems approach to transformative change in teaching about Earth
A five-year community effort to improve Earth literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports integrated.
Assessment and Evaluation Feedback to Teams
Incorporating InTeGrate Materials into your Course and Syllabus
Quick Picture of a Module: A Big Picture View
InTeGrate Materials Development
Assessment and Evaluation Feedback to Teams
InTeGrate supports integrated interdisciplinary learning about resource and environmental issues across the undergraduate curriculum to create a sustainable.
A five-year community effort to improve geoscience literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Presentation transcript:

This work is supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) collaboration between the Directorates for Education and Human Resources (EHR) and Geociences (GEO) under grant DUE InTeGrate Materials Design Rubric Professional Development Webinar The webinar begins at: 9 am PDT | 10 am MDT | 11 am CDT | 12 pm EDT

InTeGrate Materials Design Rubric Joshua Caulkins The University of Rhode Island InTeGrate Webinar Coordinator Assessment Team Member Becca Walker Mt. San Antonio College InTeGrate Module Author Climate of Change Stuart Birnbaum Univ. of Texas San Antonio InTeGrate Assessment Team Lead

Goals of this webinar Describe how the InTeGrate Materials Design Rubric is used to review materials.

Goals of this webinar Describe how the InTeGrate Materials Design Rubric is used to review materials. Identify the most challenging parts of the rubric and how to ensure your team can meet the criteria.

Goals of this webinar Describe how the InTeGrate Materials Design Rubric is used to review materials. Identify the most challenging parts of the rubric and how to ensure your team can meet the criteria. Consider materials your team has developed using the rubric as a guide to identify areas that may need additional revision.

Six main sections of the rubric: Guiding Principles (5 criteria, requires 15/15)

Six main sections of the rubric: Guiding Principles (5 criteria, requires 15/15) Learning Objectives and Goals (5 criteria, requires 13/15)

Six main sections of the rubric: Guiding Principles (5 criteria, requires 15/15) Learning Objectives and Goals (5 criteria, requires 13/15) Assessment and Measurement (5 criteria, requires 13/15)

Six main sections of the rubric: Guiding Principles (5 criteria, requires 15/15) Learning Objectives and Goals (5 criteria, requires 13/15) Assessment and Measurement (5 criteria, requires 13/15) Resources and Materials (6 criteria, requires 15/18)

Six main sections of the rubric: Guiding Principles (5 criteria, requires 15/15) Learning Objectives and Goals (5 criteria, requires 13/15) Assessment and Measurement (5 criteria, requires 13/15) Resources and Materials (6 criteria, requires 15/18) Instructional Strategies (5 criteria, requires 13/15)

Six main sections of the rubric: Guiding Principles (5 criteria, requires 15/15) Learning Objectives and Goals (5 criteria, requires 13/15) Assessment and Measurement (5 criteria, requires 13/15) Resources and Materials (6 criteria, requires 15/18) Instructional Strategies (5 criteria, requires 13/15) Alignment (2 criteria, requires 5/6)

Section 1: Guiding Principles 1.Course/module addresses one or more geoscience-related grand challenges facing society.

Section 1: Guiding Principles 1.Course/module addresses one or more geoscience-related grand challenges facing society. – Rarely an issue: most modules/courses deal with one (or more) grand challenges facing society.

Section 1: Guiding Principles 1.Course/module addresses one or more geoscience-related grand challenges facing society. 2.Course/module develops student ability to address interdisciplinary problems.

Section 1: Guiding Principles 1.Course/module addresses one or more geoscience-related grand challenges facing society. 2.Course/module develops student ability to address interdisciplinary problems. – Geoscience as it relates to a social, political, or economic system. – Ask yourself: Could a non-geoscientist teach your course/module in a non-geoscience class?

Section 1: Guiding Principles 1.Course/module addresses one or more geoscience-related grand challenges facing society. 2.Course/module develops student ability to address interdisciplinary problems. 3.Course/module improves student understanding of the nature and methods of geoscience and developing geoscientific habits of mind.

Section 1: Guiding Principles 1.Course/module addresses one or more geoscience-related grand challenges facing society. 2.Course/module develops student ability to address interdisciplinary problems. 3.Course/module improves student understanding of the nature and methods of geoscience and developing geoscientific habits of mind. – Examples: Temporal Reasoning, Spatial Thinking, Geographic Facility, Systems Thinking, Uncertainty –

Section 1: Guiding Principles 1.Course/module addresses one or more geoscience-related grand challenges facing society. 2.Course/module develops student ability to address interdisciplinary problems. 3.Course/module improves student understanding of the nature and methods of geoscience and developing geoscientific habits of mind. 4.Course/module makes use of authentic and credible geoscience data to learn central concepts in the context of geoscience methods of inquiry.

Section 1: Guiding Principles 1.Course/module addresses one or more geoscience-related grand challenges facing society. 2.Course/module develops student ability to address interdisciplinary problems. 3.Course/module improves student understanding of the nature and methods of geoscience and developing geoscientific habits of mind. 4.Course/module makes use of authentic and credible geoscience data to learn central concepts in the context of geoscience methods of inquiry. – Rarely a problem – Just be sure to use data.

Section 1: Guiding Principles 5.Course/module incorporates systems thinking.

Section 1: Guiding Principles 5.Course/module incorporates systems thinking. – See Systems Thinking webinar page: ink.html – Example from Climate of Change module: Students examine real data (sea surface temp, wind, precipitation, etc) and discuss how the parts of the system interact

Section 1: Guiding Principles 5.Course/module incorporates systems thinking. – See Systems Thinking webinar page: ink.html – Example from Climate of Change module: Students examine real data (sea surface temp, wind, precipitation, etc) and discuss how the parts of the system interact – Evolution of our approach to Systems Thinking: Course/module should present Systems Thinking and terminology explicitly and then apply it to different case studies, scenarios, problems, etc. Should be a theme throughout the course/module.

Section 1: Guiding Principles 5.Course/module incorporates systems thinking. – See Systems Thinking webinar page: ink.html – Example from Climate of Change module: Students examine real data (sea surface temp, wind, precipitation, etc) and discuss how the parts of the system interact – Evolution of our approach to Systems Thinking: Course/module should present Systems Thinking and terminology explicitly and then apply it to different case studies, scenarios, problems, etc. Should be a theme throughout the course/module. – Assess Systems Thinking: Make sure you are measuring students ability to apply Systems Thinking in your assessments (quizzes, homework, projects, exams, etc).

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals.

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. – Use Bloom’s Taxonomy, include variety of cognition levels – See Learning Goals interactive page: _materials/learning_goals.html

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. 7.Instructions and/or rubrics provide guidance for how students meet learning goals.

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. 7.Instructions and/or rubrics provide guidance for how students meet learning goals. – Almost all assessment should have rubrics – See Rubrics webinar or Interactive pages: Webinar: /index.html Interactive Page: v/effective_materials/rubrics.html

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. 7.Instructions and/or rubrics provide guidance for how students meet learning goals. 8.Learning objectives and goals are appropriate for the intended use of the course/module.

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. 7.Instructions and/or rubrics provide guidance for how students meet learning goals. 8.Learning objectives and goals are appropriate for the intended use of the course/module. – Rarely an issue.

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. 7.Instructions and/or rubrics provide guidance for how students meet learning goals. 8.Learning objectives and goals are appropriate for the intended use of the course/module. 9.Learning objectives and goals are clearly stated for each module in language suitable for the level of the students..

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. 7.Instructions and/or rubrics provide guidance for how students meet learning goals. 8.Learning objectives and goals are appropriate for the intended use of the course/module. 9.Learning objectives and goals are clearly stated for each module in language suitable for the level of the students. – Rarely a problem.

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. 7.Instructions and/or rubrics provide guidance for how students meet learning goals. 8.Learning objectives and goals are appropriate for the intended use of the course/module. 9.Learning objectives and goals are clearly stated for each module in language suitable for the level of the students. 10.Learning objectives and goals address the process and nature of science and development of scientific habits of mind.

Section 2: Learning Objectives and Goals 6.Learning objectives describe measurable geoscience literacy goals. 7.Instructions and/or rubrics provide guidance for how students meet learning goals. 8.Learning objectives and goals are appropriate for the intended use of the course/module. 9.Learning objectives and goals are clearly stated for each module in language suitable for the level of the students. 10.Learning objectives and goals address the process and nature of science and development of scientific habits of mind. – Rarely a problem.

Section 3: Assessment and Measurement 11.Assessments measure the learning goals. 12.Assessments are criterion referenced. 13.Assessments are consistent with course activities and resources expected. 14.Assessments are sequenced, varied and appropriate to content. 15.Assessments address goals at successively higher cognitive levels.

Section 3: Assessment and Measurement 11.Assessments measure the learning goals. 12.Assessments are criterion referenced. 13.Assessments are consistent with course activities and resources expected. 14.Assessments are sequenced, varied and appropriate to content. 15.Assessments address goals at successively higher cognitive levels. These are rarely problematic. Be sure to base assessments on learning goals, develop a rubric, use Bloom’s Taxonomy. Be sure to assess student’s abilities regarding System Thinking.

Section 4: Resources and Materials 16. Instructional materials contribute to the stated learning objectives. 17.Students will recognize the link between the learning objectives, goals and the learning materials. 18.Instructional materials should be sufficiently diverse and at the depth necessary for students to achieve learning objectives and goals. 19.Materials are appropriately cited. 20.Instructional materials are current. 21.Instructional materials and the technology to support these materials are clearly stated.

Section 4: Resources and Materials 16. Instructional materials contribute to the stated learning objectives. 17.Students will recognize the link between the learning objectives, goals and the learning materials. 18.Instructional materials should be sufficiently diverse and at the depth necessary for students to achieve learning objectives and goals. 19.Materials are appropriately cited. 20.Instructional materials are current. 21.Instructional materials and the technology to support these materials are clearly stated. Again, mostly straightforward. These are rarely problematic.

Section 5: Instructional Strategies 22.Learning strategies and activities support stated learning objectives and goals. – Rarely an issue.

Section 5: Instructional Strategies 22.Learning strategies and activities support stated learning objectives and goals. 23.Learning strategies and activities promote student engagement with the materials. – Also, rarely an issue.

Section 5: Instructional Strategies 22.Learning strategies and activities support stated learning objectives and goals. 23.Learning strategies and activities promote student engagement with the materials. 24.Learning activities develop student metacognition.

Section 5: Instructional Strategies 22.Learning strategies and activities support stated learning objectives and goals. 23.Learning strategies and activities promote student engagement with the materials. 24.Learning activities develop student metacognition. – More challenging than other criteria. – “Thinking about thinking,” encourage student to reflect – Use your assessment team consultant, Metacognition resources

Section 5: Instructional Strategies 22.Learning strategies and activities support stated learning objectives and goals. 23.Learning strategies and activities promote student engagement with the materials. 24.Learning activities develop student metacognition. 25.Learning strategies and activities provide opportunities for students to practice communicating geoscience.

Section 5: Instructional Strategies 22.Learning strategies and activities support stated learning objectives and goals. 23.Learning strategies and activities promote student engagement with the materials. 24.Learning activities develop student metacognition. 25.Learning strategies and activities provide opportunities for students to practice communicating geoscience. – Recall ENSO jigsaw activity described previously. – Consider Geoscientific habits of mind (#3 in Guiding Principles). – Students should use the terms listed there.

Section 5: Instructional Strategies 22.Learning strategies and activities support stated learning objectives and goals. 23.Learning strategies and activities promote student engagement with the materials. 24.Learning activities develop student metacognition. 25.Learning strategies and activities provide opportunities for students to practice communicating geoscience. 26.Learning strategies and activities scaffold learning.

Section 5: Instructional Strategies 22.Learning strategies and activities support stated learning objectives and goals. 23.Learning strategies and activities promote student engagement with the materials. 24.Learning activities develop student metacognition. 25.Learning strategies and activities provide opportunities for students to practice communicating geoscience. 26.Learning strategies and activities scaffold learning. – Start with basic knowledge, build on that, assessing students (both formative and summative), should be straightforward.

Section 6: Alignment 27.Teaching materials, assessments, resources and learning activities align with one another. 28.All aspects of the module/course are aligned.

Section 6: Alignment 27.Teaching materials, assessments, resources and learning activities align with one another. 28.All aspects of the module/course are aligned. These rarely pose a problem during review.

Questions?