Awareness of Decisions in Evaluating Promotion and Tenure (ADEPT) Carol Colatrella, Professor, ADEPT Coordinator, Energeia Editor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pennsylvania BANNER Users Group 2006 NCATE Assessments John Tabor University of Scranton.
Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
1 RSC College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists – York Internal Nomination Process Office of the Vice-President Research & Innovation Lisa Philipps,
Pathology Faculty Promotions November, 2013 Faculty Meeting.
Retention, Tenure, and Promotion and Faculty Workload This fall the College of Business and Economics’ FAC will be considering going quantitative to remove.
Promotion and Tenure at Ohio University Martin Tuck PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
AdvanceVT Mentoring. Let’s Benchmark: Who Does Mentoring Well? 2008 Faculty Worklife Survey, 700 tenure- track faculty responses (53% RR); College RRs.
Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.
Summary of the Proposed Research Track. Background National prominence requires increasing diversity of our faculty not only in terms of disciplinary.
Review of Appendix 16 FA Purpose –Review Appendix 16 for compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement Changes –Compliance –Removing.
COACHE Survey Results Faculty of Arts & Science March 28, 2014.
2012 International Education Conference: IPDC Annual Update June 11, 2012 International Professional Development Committee (IPDC)
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
Creating a Culture of Student Affairs Assessment Katie Busby, Ph.D. Jessica Simmons Office of Student Affairs Assessment & Planning University of Alabama.
USING DATA FOR PRACTICES OF INSTITUITONAL TRANSFORMATION Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator Georgia Tech – NSF ADVANCE Initiative Session on “Using.
Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
UW Faculty Retention Toolkit Joyce W. Yen, ADVANCE Program/Research Manager.
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.
ADVANCE AT UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY THE GOAL OF THE NSF ADVANCE PROGRAM IS TO PROMOTE INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FIELDS BY INCREASING.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
Kerstine Wanas, MHA Faculty Appointments Manager College of Medicine, Office of Faculty Affairs.
Georgia Tech-NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Program Mary Lynn Realff, Director and Co-PI March 31, 2005.
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences WELCOME Assistant Professor P&T Workshop Defining Scholarship and P&T Portfolio Development April 22, 2015.
What is NIJAC Established in June 2005 under the Justice Northern Ireland Acts 2002 and 2004 as an independent public body –to bring about a new system.
Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator Georgia Tech ADVANCE Conference March 2005 NSF ADVANCE Research Program.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL EDUCATORS Laura Lamps, M.D. Stacy Rudnicki, M.D.
Outline Survey overview Instrument Construction Survey Logistics Response Rates Uses of Survey Data Communication with campus groups Program evaluation.
P&T ADVANCE COMMITTEE (PTAC) Sponsored by ADVANCE Program Report to GT NSF ADVANCE Conference March 31, 2005.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Building an Inclusive Faculty: Stakeholders, Standards, and Strategies Luis Ricardo Fraga Associate Vice Provost for Faculty Advancement Russell F. Stark.
ADVANCE: A Bottom Up and Top Down Approach to Diversifying College Campuses Spurty Surapaneni, BA, Lisa M. Larson, PhD, Bonnie Bowen, PhD, Luiza Dreashear,
Conversation Starters: How would you describe your department’s and college’s cultures around service? How would you describe the university’s culture.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #7July 14, 2015  PANEL: What do Department Chairs Look for in a Dossier?  Review Clinical Statement of.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #6 July 8, 2014  Review Clinical Statement of Endeavors  Review Supporting Materials Peer Evaluations of.
ADVANCE Conference Georgia Tech NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Program March 10, 2006.
Bias Tidbits Multidisciplinary Work A forthcoming paper in the American Journal of Evaluation by Irwin Feller discusses the issues, noting that in disciplines.
Overview Presentation Mary Lynn Realff Co-PI and Project Director NSF Site Visit June 8, 2004 GT NSF ADVANCE – taking an integrated approach to institutional.
Georgia Tech NSF ADVANCE Research Program Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator NSF ADVANCE Site Visit June 2004.
Faculty Diversity Benchmarking Analysis- Southern Illinois University Brianna Addis Brian Skaggs Rachel Scheuneman Shanique Brown.
ADVANCEment for Women in Science: Nuts and Bolts Sue Rosser, ADVANCE Co-PI and Dean of the Ivan Allen College, GT WISEST Leadership Seminar U of I--Chicago,
Recommendation: Accept P&T Work Group Implementation Recommendations Subject to recommended modifications.
Office of the Senior Vice President and Provost Promotion & Tenure Debrief Jonathan Wickert Dawn Bratsch-Prince.
Klod Kokini Associate Dean for Academic Affairs College of Engineering Professor of Mechanical Engineering 1 ADVANCE-FAST October 21, 2014.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Dietrich School Diversity Committee Kathleen Blee - Associate Dean for Graduate Studies and Research & Chair, Diversity Committee Rebecca Roadman - Project.
Emily Freeman Faculty Appointments and Training Manager College of Medicine, Office of Faculty Affairs.
SELF EVALUATION: FINDING YOUR VOICE THROUGH SELF REFLECTION AND THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS Writing Across the Curriculum Jake Cohen, WAC Fellow Samar ElHitti,
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
Partnership for Practice
Cultivating An Inclusive Culture for Faculty Retention:
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Promotion in Extension Presented by: Ken Martin, Ph. D
UAB Office of the Provost
Planning and Managing your Academic Career: Deciding Where to Go and How to Get There Iain Young MD, CM, FRCPC Professor, Department of Pathology & Molecular.
Achieving Tenure and Promotion
The Tenure Process at Babson College: The Fourth-Year Review
Considerations in Engineering
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Transition from LRT to P&T
Promotion and Tenure.
Promotion & Tenure workshop
Welcome to FSU Janet Kistner VP Faculty Development & Advancement
Presentation transcript:

Awareness of Decisions in Evaluating Promotion and Tenure (ADEPT) Carol Colatrella, Professor, ADEPT Coordinator, Energeia Editor

ADEPT Construction Case studies (career accounts) exemplify issues raised in ADVANCE Research Team surveys and research, PTAC deliberations and surveys, ADVANCE Team meetings Instrument activities constructed to communicate standards and best practices of evaluation Instrument designed to raise awareness of how bias and preferences affect evaluation processes

Promotion and Tenure ADVANCE Committee (PTAC) Studied bias and preferences in scholarly literature on evaluation Inventoried unit evaluation procedures Discussed critical issues in advancement, mentoring, evaluation Designed survey of GT faculty Contributed ideas & counsel for ADEPT

PTAC 2003 Report Bias in Faculty Development and Evaluation Promotion and Tenure Practices across Georgia Tech Summary of 2003 PTAC Survey Results Recommended Best Practices in RPT Processes Awareness of Decisions in Evaluation of Promotion and Tenure

ADEPT Designed to prepare candidates and members of evaluation committees Website at with downloadable instrument Website contains case studies of careers; annotated, linked bibliography of bias in evaluation; links to GT Resources ADEPT instrument contains activities for individuals and groups

ADEPT Career Case Studies Currently nine in SMET fields Represent range of rank, gender, ethnic characteristics Describe diverse professional issues: leave of absence, variation in productivity, interdisciplinarity Intended for group discussion and individual consideration

Bibliography of Bias in Evaluation Approximately 120 annotated entries drawn from scholarly and journalistic accounts of evaluation issues Issues include social characteristics, professional barriers and facilitators, evaluation criteria Linked to ADEPT activities

GT Faculty Development Online Resources m ADVANCE website & research ADEPT website & activities 2003 PTAC report & survey College links to evaluation information & documents Faculty Handbook Office of Faculty Support Services

Case Study Discussion & ADEPT Session Career Coaching and Chair’s Sessions participants Room ADEPT instrument available until 12:15 Other Participants Room 334 and 335 to discuss case studies Room 149 – ADEPT instrument after lunch (1:30pm) Lunch at 12:15 1st Floor Atrium – boxed lunches