COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEB 4, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michal Shur-Ofry, 2009 Dr. Michal Shur–Ofry Hebrew University of Jerusalem WIPO SME Seminar, May 2009 The Protection of Databases.
Advertisements

 Every writer has a purpose in mind when he/she writes.   The purpose that the writer chooses will determine what kind of style, word choice, and structure.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 5 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 28, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 CLASS 3 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 21, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 23, 2002.
Copyright Law: Fall 2006 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of October 11, 2006 OWNERSHIP: WORKS FOR HIRE, JOINT WORKS.
International Regulation of Databases: The Example of BioInformatics Douglas J. Sylvester Associate Professor of Law Arizona State University.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004: CLASS 5 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEB 2, 2004.
Intro to Copyright: Originality, Expression, and More
Intro to Copyright: Originality, Expression, and More
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008: CLASS 7 THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Sept. 10, 2008.
U. S. Law and Legal Research Pat Court Starr Foundation Workshop October 8, 2007.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 9 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEBRUARY 11, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW SPRING 2004 CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 28, 2004.
A RCHITECTURAL W ORKS Prior to 1990, architectural plans were protected as graphic works, but finished buildings were not protected due to their inherent.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 copyrightability of characters PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA October 2, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 8 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEBRUARY 6, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003: CLASS 5 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 22, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 Class 5 September 3, 2008 Fixation.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class of APRIL 7, 2004.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003: CLASS 6 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 27, 2003.
COPYRIGHT : FAIR USE Professor Fischer The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law March 31, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Sept
Introduction to Intellectual Property: Fall 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of OCT OWNERSHIP, DURATION.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 22 Infringement November 3, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 8: September 15, 2008.
WRAP UP: Termination Know the difference between s. 203 and s. 304(c)
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004: CLASS 7 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY
8A URR Vocab Feb. 22-Mar 5. Nonfiction Literature that is based on fact.
INTRO TO IP LAW FALL 2009: CLASS 2 Professor Fischer Copyrightability: The Originality and Fixation Requirements AUGUST 25, 2009.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 7 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEBRUARY 4, 2002.
COPYRIGHT : FAIR USE CONT’D Professor Fischer The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law April 2, 2003.
Introduction to Intellectual Property Class One: TYPES OF IP Prof. Susanna Frederick Fischer The Catholic University of America August 25, 2003.
Copyright Law: Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 11 February 12, 2003.
Copyright II Class 4 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner Copyright © R. Polk Wagner Last updated: 11/19/2015 1:12:27 AM.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 5 September
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 7: September 13, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 6: September Idea-Expression Dichotomy.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 CLASS 2 The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 8, 2002.
Babbitt. Sweet Home, 515 US 687 (1995) Spotted Owl Case Classic question of agency interpretation of a broad delegation of authority Does the statutory.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 23 November 5, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 CLASS 2 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 9, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2001 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 19 (MARCH 26, 2002)
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer April 3, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Professor Fischer CLASS of April : PREEMPTION.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 CLASS 6 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 30, 2002.
INTRO TO IP LAW FALL 2009: CLASS 3 Professor Fischer Copyrightability: The Idea- Expression Dichotomy, Protection for Factual Works AUGUST 27, 2009.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 CLASS 9 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA September 17, 2008.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 40 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Nov
INTRODUCTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Copyrightable Subject Matter Monday October
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 25 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 23, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 8: September 18, 2006.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 CLASS 6 Jan Fairness Feist CB p. 121: “It may seem unfair that much of the fruit of the compiler’s labor may be used by others.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 39 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America November 24, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW : FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA October 4, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March 19, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 13 (FEB. 24, 2003)
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 27 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 27, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March 24, 2004.
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7: Intellectual Property.
Introduction to Intellectual Property Class of Sept
Seminar 4 Sweat of the Brow Doctrine. Principal Issue  Whether “originality” is satisfied by the labour and expense in the “industrious collection” of.
2/14/2006Class 161 Class 16, Tuesday, Feb. 14 Announcements Thursday Friday Today’s agenda Problem 3-4 Problem Set 3 Hill v. Gateway 2000.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer November 15, 2006.
Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003
Class 4 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 Facts and Compilations
Chapter 8 The Judicial Branch
Copyright Law: Feist & Databases
Presentation transcript:

COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEB 4, 2004

WRAP-UP Fixation Copyrightability of Compilations

Fairness Feist CB p. 121: “It may seem unfair that much of the fruit of the compiler’s labor may be used by others without compensation” Do you agree?

CCC Information Services v. Maclean Hunter Copyrightability of the Automobile Red Book – Official Used Car Valuations

BellSouth Advertising v. Donnelley CB p. 153 Describe the reasoning of the lone dissenting judge? Who is right, in your opinion, the majority or the ?

Hypo Emily makes five plastic signs. Two say “For Sale” and three say “For Rent”. She arranges them in order of descending size and packages them as a set. She argues that they are copyrightable as a compilation. Should this argument succeed? Why or why not?

Another Hypo Jon compiles a list of all 50 states. Can she argue that her list is copyrightable? What if Jon compiles a list of the 12 states containing the best dressed models? Does it matter if Jon arranges the states in alphabetical order?

HYPO: FURNITURE DESIGNS Can an arrangement of furniture in a showroom be copyrightable? See Baldine v. Furniture Comfort Corp., 956 F. Supp. 580 (M.D.N.C. 1996)

OTHER KINDS OF COMPILATIONS Can a greeting card be copyrightable as a compilation? See Roth v. United Card Co., 429 F.2d 1106 (9th Cir. 1970) Can a T-shirt be copyrightable as a compilation? See Matthews v. Freeman, 157 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 1998) p. 139 CB Can a videogame be copyrightable as a compilation? Atari v. Oman, 979 F.2d 242 (D.C. Cir. 1992) p. 138 CB

COPYRIGHT IN FACTUAL NARRATIVES To what extent are historical facts copyrightable?

Nash v. CBS CB p. 129 Extent of Copyright in historical facts? Extent of Copyright in works of history?

Wainwright Securities CB p. 133 Copyright protection of news events? Overprotection?

Sui Generis Protection for Databases? European Union database directive Proposed U.S. federal legislation protecting databases – e.g. H.R. 354 (106 th Congress), H.R. Is there a need for this due to “thin” copyright protection after Feist?

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.