-AND- 2002 Findings from the Kaiser/HRET and Kaiser/Hewitt Employer Surveys.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Employee Benefits BENCHMARKING DATA from 2010 and prior Resource: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation (not Kaiser Permanente) discover the DBS difference.
Advertisements

1 Survey of Retiree Health Benefits, 2007: A Chartbook Jon Gabel, Heidi Whitmore, and Jeremy Pickreign National Opinion Research Center September 2008.
Massachusetts Employer Survey 2007 Division of Health Care Finance and Policy Executive Office of Health and Human Services.
Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Report They Made the Following Changes as a Result of the Economic Downturn, by Firm Size,
Health Benefits 2007: A USA and California Update Jon R. Gabel Senior Fellow National Opinion Research Center.
This research is funded in part through a U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, State Planning Grant to the Hawaii State Department of Health.
This research is funded in part through a U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, State Planning Grant to the Hawaii State Department of Health,
Employer Health Benefits KFF/HRET 2008 Survey Health Benefits in 2008: Premiums Increase Modestly as CDHP Grows and Deductibles Rise Sharply Jon Gabel.
This research is funded in part through a U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, State Planning Grant to the Hawaii State Department of Health.
Employer-Sponsored Health Coverage Release Slides Tuesday, September 11, 2012 March 15, 2013.
Jon R. Gabel Senior Fellow National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.
Employer Health Benefit Survey Release Slides Tuesday, August 20, 2013.
Figure 1 NOTE: Tests found no statistical difference from estimate for the previous year shown (p
LESSON 11.3: HEALTH INSURANCE Module 11: Health Policy Obj. 11.3: Calculate the cost of health care based on health insurance plan.
Evolution of Managed Care. Introduction What is Managed Care? Brief History.
Review of Trends in Minnesota Health Insurance Coverage Health Care Transformation Task Force September 17, 2007 Julie Sonier Director, Health Economics.
Employer Health Benefit Survey 2015
0 Beneficiary Choices in Medicare Part D and Plan Features in 2006 Supported by PhRMA September 13, 2006.
Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2011 (1) Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary. Data released.
Retiree Health Benefit Task Force Recommendations UK Employee Benefits.
This research is funded in part through a U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, State Planning Grant to the Hawaii State Department of Health.
Employer Health Benefits Survey Release Slides September 10, 2014.
The Kaiser/HRET 2002 National Survey of Employers: What Are Its Implications for Health Insurance? Jon Gabel Vice President, Health System Studies Health.
Employer Health Benefits
Average Annual Premium Increases for Family Coverage,
Web Briefing for Media: 2015 Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey Tuesday, September 22, 2015 Presented by the Kaiser Family Foundation and Health.
Trends in Employer-Based Health Insurance Jon Gabel Senior Fellow, NORC.
A Summary of Insurance Coverage Chapter 2. 2 Overview Extent and nature of coverage Extent and nature of coverage Employer sponsored Employer sponsored.
Employer Health Benefits Survey 2017
Web Briefing for Media: Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey
Exhibit 5.2 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type and Firm Size, % 1% *Enrollment in plan type is statistically.
Exhibit 5.2 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type and Firm Size, 2012
Exhibit Among Firms Offering Health Benefits with 50 or More Employees, Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled at a Firm That Offers Benefits Through.
Exhibit 4.2 Percentage of Covered Workers in Firms Offering One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2016 *Distribution is statistically different.
Exhibit 5.2 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type and Firm Size, 2016 *Enrollment in plan type is statistically different.
Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2016 *Distribution.
Exhibit 7.8 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a High General Annual Deductible for Single Coverage, by Firm Size, 2016 * Estimate is.
Exhibit 8.15 Distribution of Covered Workers with the Following Annual Employer Contributions to Their HRA or HSA, for Family Coverage, 2016 NOTE: For.
Exhibit 8.18 Among Firms Offering Family Coverage and an HSA-Qualified HDHP, Percentage of Firms That Vary Their HSA Contribution for Family Coverage on.
ACCESS: AFFORDABLE CARE
Increases in Health Insurance Premiums Compared with Other Indicators, 1988–2007 Percent * Premiums are growing at rates more than twice that of other.
Exhibit 7.12 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $2,000 or More for Single Coverage, by Firm Size,
Chartbook Section 3 Employment-Based Health Insurance.
Exhibit 7.9 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $1,000 or More for Single Coverage, By Firm Size,
Exhibit 9.1 Distribution of Covered Workers Facing Different Cost-Sharing Formulas for Prescription Drug Benefits, * Distribution is statistically.
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Exhibit 11.1 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,
Exhibit 1.7 Distribution of Annual Premiums for Single and Family Coverage Relative to the Average Annual Single or Family Premium, 2016 Percentages.
Exhibit 11.1 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers, Percentage of Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits,
Exhibit 11.4 Among All Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers and Offering Retiree Coverage, Percentage of Firms.
Exhibit 6.20 Distribution of the Percentage of Total Premium Paid by Covered Workers for Single and Family Coverage, by Firm Wage Level, 2016 SINGLE COVERAGE.
Exhibit 7.11 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $1,000 or More for Single Coverage After Any HRA/HSA.
Exhibit 7.13 Percentage of Covered Workers Enrolled in a Plan with a General Annual Deductible of $2,000 or More for Single Coverage After Any HRA/HSA.
Exhibit 2.9 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer to Part-Time Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2016 * Estimate is statistically.
Exhibit 2.10 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage That Offer Health Benefits to Temporary Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2015 * Estimate is statistically.
Exhibit 10.2 Percentage of Covered Workers in Partially or Completely Self-Funded Plans, by Firm Size, * Estimate is statistically different.
Exhibit 9.10 Percentage of Covered Workers with Drug Coverage Who Face a Separate Prescription Drug Deductible, by Plan Type, NOTE: Tests found.
Exhibit 2.9 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage That Offer Health Benefits to Part-Time Workers, by Firm Size, 1999–2015 * Estimate is statistically.
Exhibit 14.8 Among Offering Firms With Fewer Than 500 Employees, Percentage of Employers who Provide Benefits Through a Co-Employment Arrangement with.
Exhibit 6.18 Distribution of the Percentage of Total Premium Paid by Covered Workers for Single and Family Coverage, by Wage Level, 2013 SINGLE COVERAGE.
Exhibit 8.14 Distribution of Covered Workers with the Following Annual Employer Contributions to Their HRA or HSA, for Single Coverage, 2016 NOTE: For.
Exhibit 2.5 Percentage of Firms Offering Health Benefits to At Least Some of their Workers, by Firm Size, 2015 NOTE: Estimates presented in this exhibit.
Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2015 *Distribution.
Exhibit 4.2 Percentage of Covered Workers in Firms Offering One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2013 *Distribution is statistically different.
Exhibit 7.15 Distribution of General Annual Deductibles for Single Coverage After any HRA/HSA Contributions, By Firm Size, NOTES: Testing found.
Exhibit 11.4 Among Large Firms (200 or More Workers) Offering Health Benefits to Active Workers and Offering Retiree Coverage, Percentage of Firms Offering.
Exhibit 5.2 Distribution of Health Plan Enrollment for Covered Workers, by Plan Type and Firm Size, 2013
Exhibit 2.4 Percentage of Firms Offering Health Benefits to At Least Some of Their Workers, by Firm Size, 2016 * Estimate is statistically different from.
Exhibit 6.19 Distribution of the Percentage of Total Premium Paid by Covered Workers for Single and Family Coverage, by Wage Level, 2014 SINGLE COVERAGE.
Exhibit 4.1 Among Firms Offering Health Benefits, Percentage of Firms That Offer One, Two, or Three or More Plan Types, by Firm Size, 2013 *Distribution.
Presentation transcript:

-AND Findings from the Kaiser/HRET and Kaiser/Hewitt Employer Surveys

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Overview - Methods - Health Insurance Costs - Plan Choice and Enrollment - Coverage and Benefits - Retiree Coverage

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Survey Methods Kaiser/HRET National Employer Health Benefits Survey –Telephone survey was conducted between January and May 2002 –3,262 randomly selected public and private employers, ranging from 3 to 300,000 employees, representative of all regions and industries –2,014 firms responded to the full survey –An additional 1,248 firms indicated whether or not they provide health coverage Kaiser/Hewitt Retiree Health Survey –Online survey was conducted between July and September 2002 –435 private employers with more than 1,000 employees responded to the survey. Only firms offering retiree benefits were surveyed –The sample sample represents 36% of Fortune 100 companies and 28% of Fortune 500 companies, impacting 18.5 million employees and family members, and 5.4 million retirees and family members

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Increases in Health Insurance Premiums Compared to Other Indicators, Source: KFF/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1988, 1989, 1990, 1993, Note: Data on premium increases reflect the cost of health insurance premiums for a family of four. Chart #1

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Premium/Cost Increases 1, by Plan Type and Funding Arrangement, 2002* Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: Chart #2 Note 1 : Fully insured plans measure premium increases, self-insured measures cost increases. * Tests found no statistically different estimates between Fully Insured and Self-Insured within a plan type.

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Conventional HMO PPO POS All Plans Average Annual Premium Costs for Covered Workers, by Plan Type, 2002 * Estimate is statistically different from All Plans by coverage type. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: Chart #3

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Average Monthly Worker Contribution, * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1988, 1993, 1996 Percentage of Premium Paid by Covered Workers, * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1988, 1993, Chart #4

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, Average Monthly Premium Costs for Covered Workers, * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , , , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: Data not available for 1993 Single Coverage. All data are nominal figures. Chart #5 NA // California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits 2002 Annual Survey Source: Health Insurance Association of America, 1988; KPMG, 1996; Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, Family premiums are calculated for a family of four. All data are nominal figures. Average Monthly Premium Costs for Covered Workers, $89 $197 $170 $442 $202 $529 $255 $663

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Percentage of Covered Workers With a Choice of Conventional, HMO, PPO, or POS Plans, Chart #6 Source: KFF/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1988, 1993, * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , ^ Information was not obtained for POS plans in ^

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Health Plan Enrollments for Covered Workers, by Plan Type, * Distribution is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , , , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1988, 1993, Chart #7 8 * * * * *

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Chart #8 12 Percentage of All Firms Offering Health Benefits, * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1996, 1998.

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Note: Nationwide, there are about 6,290,665 firms with workers and 85,448 with 200+ workers. Percentage of Firms Offering Health Benefits, by Firm Size, 2002 Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: Chart #9 13

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Note: Nationwide, there are about 6,290,665 firms with workers and 85,448 with 200+ workers. Percentage of Firms Offering Health Benefits, by Firm Size, * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , , ^ Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: at p<0.1. Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1996, Chart #10 14 * ^

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Even When a Firm Offers Health Benefits, Not All Workers Are Covered, 2002 Percentage of Workers Employed in Firms That Offer Part-Time and Temporary Workers Health Coverage, Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , Sources: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1999, 2000, 2001, Chart #11 15

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Percentage of Covered Workers With Benefit Changes in 2002; Percent of Covered Workers With Benefit Declines, 2000, 2001 and 2002 Chart #12 17 * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, Percentage of Covered Workers

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Average Annual Deductibles for Single Coverage in PPO and POS Plans, Chart #13 * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown: , , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer Sponsored Health Benefits:

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Percentage of Covered Workers Facing Different Cost Sharing Formulas for Prescription Drugs, 2000, 2001, and 2002 * Distribution is statistically different from the previous year shown: , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, Three Tier = One payment for generic drugs, another for preferred drugs, and a third for non-preferred drugs Two Tier = One payment for generic drugs and one for name brand Payment the same regardless of type of drugs Other/ Don’t know Chart #14 20 * *

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Average Copayments for Generic Drugs, Preferred Drugs, and Non-Preferred Drugs, 2000, 2001, and 2002 * Estimate is statistically different from the previous year shown by drug tier: , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 2000, 2001, Chart #15 21

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Likelihood of Large (200 or more workers) Employers Making the Following Changes in the Next Year, 2002 Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: Chart #16 2%

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Chart #17 Percentage of Large Firms Offering Retiree Health Benefits, * All Large Firms (200+Workers) All Small Firms (3-199 Workers) 23 * Test found no significantly different estimates from the previous year shown: , , , Source: Kaiser/HRET Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002; KPMG Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits: 1988, 1991, 1993, 1995, 1998.

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Percentage of Large Employers Offering Retiree Health Benefits, by Type of Employee/Retiree Note: Based on responses from private-sector firms with 1,000 or more employees that offer retiree health benefits. SOURCE: Kaiser/Hewitt 2002 Retiree Health Survey, December Chart #18

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Average Estimated Increase in Total Retiree Health Costs, by Firm Size, 2001 to 2002 Note: Based on responses from private-sector firms with 1,000 or more employees that offer retiree health benefits. SOURCE: Kaiser/Hewitt 2002 Retiree Health Survey, December Chart #19

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Employer Caps on Contributions to Retiree Health Benefits for Age 65+ Retirees Have already hit the cap Yes, anticipate hitting the cap within the next year Yes, anticipate hitting the cap within the next 3 years No, do not anticipate hitting the cap Of large private employers with a cap, percentage that anticipate hitting the cap: Note: Based on responses from private-sector firms with 1,000 or more employees that offer retiree health benefits. SOURCE: Kaiser/Hewitt 2002 Retiree Health Survey, December Chart #20

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Average Monthly Premiums for New Retirees, 2002 Note: Based on responses from private-sector firms with 1,000 or more employees that offer retiree health benefits. Weighted average premiums for full-time employees retiring on or after January 1, 2002, in plans with the largest number of enrolled retirees. SOURCE: Kaiser/Hewitt 2002 Retiree Health Survey, December $194 $365 $406 $729 Retiree-Only Retiree+Spouse Chart #21

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Changes in Retiree Health Coverage Within the Past Two Years Note: Based on responses from private-sector firms with 1,000 or more employees that offer retiree health benefits. SOURCE: Kaiser/Hewitt 2002 Retiree Health Survey, December Percentage of large private-sector employers that made the following changes: Chart #22

California Employers Health Benefits Survey 2000 Employer Health Benefits, 2002 Expected Changes in Retiree Health Coverage in the Next Three Years Note: Based on responses from private-sector firms with 1,000 or more employees that offer retiree health benefits. SOURCE: Kaiser/Hewitt 2002 Retiree Health Survey, December Percentage of large private-sector employers very/somewhat likely to make the following changes: Chart #23