Quadrennial Review Retrospective performance review every 4 years Standardized to fairly evaluate Staff Scientists despite various roles Success judged.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Maximizing Your Chances for Promotion and Tenure School of Medicine March 19, 2013.

Advertisements

1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.

Appointments and Promotions Lynn M Schnapp Professor, Dept of Medicine University of Washington Thanks to Ginny Broudy, Brad Anawalt.

Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Sameh Abul-Ezz, M.D. Carmelita Pablo, M.D.

What they never taught me about being a clinician investigator.

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT DAY Brown Bag on Merit Advancement Christine Miaskowski, Shari L. Dworkin & Sally Marshall.

Building a Research CV Yeoh Khay Guan Deputy Chief Executive, NUHS Dean, NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine 30 September 2014.

“Tales from the Promotion and Tenure Committee: An Insider’s View and In Depth Analysis of What It Takes to Get Promoted” Dr. Gerard Silvestri and Dr.

Faculty Promotion and Tenure NYU SOM. Faculty Tracks Criteria for appointments and promotions Q&A Faculty Appointments NYU SOM.

Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre April 1, 2010.

Retention, Tenure, and Promotion and Faculty Workload This fall the College of Business and Economics’ FAC will be considering going quantitative to remove.

Stacy A. Rudnicki, M.D. Brendan C. Stack, Jr., M.D., FACS, FACE.

How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)

FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Promotion in Academics: Mounting Jacob’s Ladder Without Being Wrung Brad Anawalt, MD Chief of Medicine Professor of Medicine University of Washington 7/28/11.

Demystifying Academic Appointments and Promotions Karen Freund MD MPH Jane Freedman MD – Department of Medicine Appointments and Promotion Committee Jackie.

McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.

Feinberg School of Medicine Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program June 2015.

Wishwa N. Kapoor, MD, MPH, Director Doris M. Rubio, PhD, Co-Director Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Scholars Program.

Promotion Expectations and Preparation Dianne Delva.

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.

CCR Clinical Research Priorities Clinical research is an essential part of the CCR research program Translational (collaborative) Interaction between basic.

From Tenure Track to Tenure: The View of the NIH Central Tenure Committee (CTC) NCI-CCR Investigators Retreat June 16, 2006 by Arlyn Garcia-Perez, Ph.D.

Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.

RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Peter Emanuel, M.D. Laura Lamps, M.D.

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL EDUCATORS Michele Moss, M.D. Alexander Burnett, M.D.

+ Meeting of Assistant Professors June 29, Faculty and Academic Affairs Leadership Steven Abramson, M.D., Vice Dean for Education, Faculty and.

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #4 June 23, 2015  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.

Introduction to the Most Ancient of Orders and its Habits: Appointment, Promotion and Tenure In the Professorial Ranks.

Academic Pathway Pharmaceutical Sciences NTUSPAA-NA Annual Event San Francisco, CA, August 6, 2005 Diana Shu-Lian Chow, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pharmaceutics.

Preparing for the renewal and tenure processes Bernard Robaire Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics MAUT Tenure Workshop April 24, 2015 – Faculty.

Promotion in Academics: Mounting Jacob’s ladder without being wrung Brad Anawalt, MD Chief of Medicine Professor of Medicine University of Washington 7/15/10.

1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.

The Process of Accreditation

Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Marvin Frazier Director, Life Sciences Division Office of Biological and Environmental Research April 30, 2004.

Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.

So You Want to Get Tenure? One Perspective from the Faculty of Medicine Barbara Hales Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Checking off your tenure “to do” list Maureen Gannon, PhD Vanderbilt University Medical Center Associate Professor of Medicine, Molecular Physiology and.

Demystifying Academic Appointments and Promotions Karen Freund MD MPH Chair, Appointments and Promotions Boston University School of Medicine FDDC September.

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL EDUCATORS Laura Lamps, M.D. Stacy Rudnicki, M.D.

Promotion guide Understanding the tracks Librarian – tenure and non-tenure tracks Clinicians and Researchers - tenure and two non-tenure tracks –Tenure.

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.

Role of the Drug Project Team in Formulating the Initial Development Plan of NCI-IND agents Jeff Moscow, MD IDB, CTEP.

PREPARING A FELLOWSHIP NOMINATION PROCESS & RESPONSIBILITIES The primary nominator is a CAHS Fellow. In addition to providing a letter of nomination that.

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR BASIC SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Dana Gaddy, Ph.D. Patricia Wight, Ph.D.

Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.

How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #5 June 30, 2015  Review Research/Scholarship Section  Discuss Service Section.

Putting Together an Effective Package Doug Lowy, CCR TT Investigators Retreat June 16, 2006.

Michael Sesma, Ph.D. National Institute of Mental Health Early Stage Investigators and the Program Perspective.

Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)

From Hire to Promotion What Everyone Should Know About Faculty Appointments Faculty Affairs and Development (FAD) Executive Dean’s Office School of Medicine.

Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures

Faculty Toolkit: Promotion & Tenure

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM

Feinberg School of Medicine Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program

What you need to know now to be promoted later!

Preparing for Promotion at the UNC School of Medicine

Feinberg School of Medicine Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program

Department of Medicine Michael Farkouh, Vice-Chair Research michael

DIVISION OF DERMATOLOGY Retreat ACADEMIC HR

Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track

Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks

Maximizing Your Chances for Promotion and Tenure

Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures

National Pediatric Critical Care Collaborative Research Network

Biosketches and Other Attachments

Presentation transcript:

Quadrennial Review Retrospective performance review every 4 years Standardized to fairly evaluate Staff Scientists despite various roles Success judged by independent scientific achievement and/or contributions to collaborations/team science Functions of Quad review evaluate continuation/placement determine salary adjustment track allocation of personnel resources

Quad Review Package You and your PI should assemble the package together. Package contains: Check Sheet Standardized Recommending memo from PI 2 letters of recommendation from collaborators Standardized CV and biblio BSC Recommendations Review Report

Recommending Memo Your PI is asked to describe your accomplishments in the following areas: 1. Scientific Productivity 2. Scientific Presentations 3. Participation in Special Interest Groups, Tech Transfer, Involvement in GMP production, INDs, etc. 4. Collaborations 5. Mentoring/Teaching 6. Continuing Education (training programs participated in) 7. Awards 8. Other significant achievements 9. Description of Core activities, list of collaborators and/or users: (For Facility Heads who are not reviewed by the BSC)

Standardized CV Membership in Scientific Societies/Professional Associations: Honors & Scientific Recognition: Awards received Fellowships received Editorial Board of Scientific Journal Reviewer for Scientific Journals Membership in Reviewing Boards (grant application boards etc.) Invited Lectureships Chairpersonships Funding: Grants and Funding Received Technology Transfer - CRADA relationships Patents: Employee Invention Reports Patent applications Patents awarded

Standarized CV Collaborations: Intramural Extramural Scientific Community Activities: Academic appointments Mentoring Participation in Intramural Faculties & Special Interest Groups Participation In Intramural Committees Clinical Trial Participation – role: Investigational New Drug (IND) Applications Submitted: FDA approvals: Consultant Appointments: Institutional Review Boards: Proposals submitted and approved Core/Program Accomplishments: PRESENTATIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY

Quad Review Panel CCR PRP provides the core expertise 12 scientists representing a cross-section of CCR research meet monthly to review Staff Scientist appointments familiar with accomplishments expected from Staff Scientists ad hoc reviewers are recruited to assist with the Quad Review Three reviewers are assigned to evaluate each package reviewers submit brief evaluations and preliminary score reviews compiled and grouped by rank Review meeting begins with a discussion of the review criteria Individual packages are discussed rankings adjusted taking into consideration mitigating issues scientific environment, mentoring, duties, etc.

Quad Report Rank Outstanding Excellent Good Satisfactory 5 Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement in Productivity Collaboration Participation in faculties/special interest groups Scientific presentations Teaching/mentoring Continuing education/training Core activities Other

Number of Staff Scientists (Total 110) Results Outstanding Excellent Good Satisfactory Quad Review Scores