Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Data / MC Comparisons for Low Hadronic Energy CC-like Events Reminder of problem Fiducial studies with more MC statistics Effect of offset in.
Advertisements

Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Update: Run1 vs Run2 CC inc & First look at Water-out/Water-in Erez Reinherz-Aronis and Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) May 9,
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Multiplicity analysis and dN/d  reconstruction with the silicon pixel detector Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati (Italy) – November.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
OPERA 2008 run: a report from the Swiss scanning lab Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern university for the Swiss scanning team OPERA Collaboration meeting Ankara,
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT in general scanning (unbiased) mode Giovanni De Lellis on behalf of Andrea Russo Naples University.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT G.D.L., Andrea Russo, Luca Scotto Lavina Naples University.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
MCP checks for the H-4l mass. Outline and work program The problems: – Higgs mass difference from the  – Possible single resonant peak mass shift (with.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Monday Meeting, Apr. 18th Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS.
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
FROST: Status of  p -> K +  analysis Liam Casey Catholic University of America Adviser: Dr. Franz Klein.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
Study of hadron interactions in OPERA-like bricks Aim: background study of   h, hhh decays 4 th September 2012 H. Shibuya, H. Ishida, T. Matsuo, T. Fukuda,
The inсlusive produсtion of the meson resonanсes ρ 0 (770), K * (892), f 0 (980), f 2 (1270) in neutrino- nuсleon сharged сurrent (CC) interaсtions Polyarush.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
Comments on systematics of corrected MB distributions Karel Safarik (presented by A. Morsch) Meeting of the Minimum Bias and Underlying Event WG CERN,
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Open and Hidden Charm production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions Presented by Marko Starič for the Hera-B collaboration The.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Data Analysis Practice looking for Φ(1020) Nuclear Physics Ⅲ Kyung-Eon,Choi.
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
P0D reconstruction/analysis update
CLAS12 Analysis and First Experiment Organization
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU

Overview Preliminary look at charged current events originating in P0D using Global Reconstruction Distributions shown (MC and Data): –Pseudo-vertex (track start) distributions in P0D –Momentum and Cos θ Similar study with Central ECAL pseudo vertices only Quick look at status of related Global Reconstruction parameters

Sample and Selection for CC Study Sample: –Monte Carlo (v7r21) NEUT Kinematics Generator corresponding to 3.3 x Protons on Target (POT) –Data (v7r19) for Full P0D study from Run 2010a corresponding to 2.9 x Protons on Target (POT) Selection BEAM DIRECTION CUTSREASON Require Track TPC Segment Access to momentum measurement from TPC Reduce high angle tracks that cause reconstruction failures Require Track P0D Segment Negative Charge Muon hypothesis Highest Momentum Track Start in P0D Fiducial Volume Reject sand muons Reject Magnet interactions Track Start in C-ECAL Volume Only Look for variation in distributions from change in target density TPC 1 P0D TPC 3TPC 2

X and Y Pseudo-Vertex Distributions As expected MC

Muon Vertex Distributions BEAM Good agreement between Data and Monte Carlo in Z position of vertex Buildup of vertices in the downstream end of the P0D Muons originating further upstream more likely to range out (~500 MeV for P0D) BEAM MC Data

Data comparison agrees rather well after POT normalization for both Muon Momentum and Cos(θ) Post-selection contamination (Non-CC events) very low! Cos(θ) distribution biased towards forward going tracks due to TPC segment requirement Post-selection muons show deficiency in < 500 MeV region (Muon range out momentum in P0D is ~500 MeV) Complimentary study would use range out to determine momentum of muons stopping in P0D Full P0D: P  and Cos(θ) CC-QE 1 Pi Multi Pi Other (DIS, Eta0, K) Non-CC events CC-QE 1 Pi Multi Pi Other (DIS, Eta0, K) Non-CC events Reconstructed Cos(θ) Data Entries: MC Entries: Data Entries: 4259

Data and Monte Carlo remain reasonably comparable Momentum distribution cut off below 400 MeV, but range out in ECAL is only 70 MeV!! Possibly failed reconstruction due to short P0D Track Lower bias towards forward going tracks (understandably) C-ECAL Only: P  and Cos θ CC-QE 1 Pi Multi Pi Other (DIS, Eta0, K) Non-CC events Entries: 8381

CC-QE 1 Pi Multi Pi Other (DIS, Eta0, K) Non-CC events Full P0D: P  vs. Z Vertex Position Note location of misclassified events. Low energy and smaller lever arms

Momentum Checks Sample: Muon Particle Gun –1000 events processed with v7r21 and v8r5p3 –0 to 2 GeV flat Energy distribution –All vertices in P0D Cuts: –Only single Lepton track in Event –Vertex in P0D Fiducial region –Muon Track doesn’t stop in P0D From v7r21 to v8r5p3, we see an improvement in reconstructed momentum, Energy Loss application corrected? Algorithm: Should take TPC measured momentum, project track to P0D vertex, correct for energy loss in P0D, but Global Reconstruction possibly missing P0D tracks v7r21 v8r5p3

Success/Failure Rates CategoryV7r21v8r5p3 Total in Selection Evts. w/ Single Global Muon Track reconstructed 262 (54%)227 (53%) Evts. w/ Single P0D 3D Track Reconstructed 387 (80%)424 (99%) Evts. w/ > 1 Global Track reconstructed 132 (27%)382 (89%) Evts. w/ > 1 Global Muon Track reconstructed 24 (5%)60 (14%) Evts. Where Global picked up a P0D Piece 248 (51%)0 (0%)

Conclusion Provided a cross check for P0D-TPC studies preceding this one To first order, reasonable agreement between NEUT MC and Data C-ECAL only momentum distribution not fully understood; Cut off in momentum (400 MeV) doesn’t match energy loss range out value of ECAL (70 MeV) Marked increase in Global Reconstruction failure at: –Matching multiple global tracks to the same muon track (5%  14%) –Picking up the Track piece in P0D (51%  0%) Future Work: –Continue checks on Global Reconstruction –Look at incorporating PID cuts