Keeping Forests in Forests Considering all the options Richard L. Porterfield SE SAF Annual Meeting Sandestin, FL September 23-25, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hardwood Resource Ownership, Location, and Supply Issues Glenn Ahrens Oregon State University Extension Forester.
Advertisements

Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Protecting Forests for the Long Haul Potomac Conservancys approach to improving water quality through forest conservation.
The Maryland Forests Association and A Landowners Concerns.
The State of Forestry in the Commonwealth Charlie Becker Utilization and Marketing Manager.
Farm Service Agency Farm Loans Program Lender of First Opportunity.
NEW APPROACHES TO FORESTRY RESEARCH FUNDING RETHINKING WHO BENEFITS AND WHO PAYS John Gordon Interforest LLC.
Trends for Large Forest Landowners Michael Goergen Executive Vice President and CEO Society of American Foresters June 2005.
IBM Annual Report Chris LaSalle Section 004. IBM: Executive Summary Recognizing the shift in the field of information technology, IBM’s Management team.
Sustainable Forestry in New England linear problems, chicken cyclical solutions.
Managing Timberlands Owned by a REIT. 2 Key Components of a REIT  REIT Background: Form of C-corporation Created in 1960 Vehicle for the multitudes Pass-through.
Non-Industrial Private Forests Karen Potter-Witter Department of Forestry.
The economics of forest management National and international forest policy.
1 Chapter 12 Forest Economics --Forests cover about 30% of the land surface of the earth; 8,000 years ago, this percentage was about 50 --More than 60%
Comparison of Use Value Appraisal Programs Jamey Fidel Vermont Natural Resources Council.
Presentation 5.3: Interface Entrepreneurs: A New Service Industry for Small Forest Landowners.
LECTURE XIII FORESTRY ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. Introduction  If forestry is to contribute its full share to a more abundant life for the world’s increasing.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
Stockholders’ Equity Chapter 10.
Economics of Forestland Use and Even-Aged Rotations Land tends to be used for the activity that generates the greatest NPV of future satisfaction to the.
Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 The Tax Environment.
ForestParcelization and Forest Fragmentation in the U.S., Northeast, and Vermont Brett J. Butler U.S. Forest Service Forest Fragmentation and Parcelization.
Ecosystem Services Studies in Minnesota Jan. 9, 2013 ES 281.
Protecting Forests for the Long Haul Potomac Conservancy’s approach to improving water quality through forest conservation.
TIMBER MARKET CONDITIONS Forest Landowners Association August 24, 2010 Ian A. Munn (With thanks to James Henderson) Department of Forestry Mississippi.
 Timber, wood fiber, fuel wood  Gas regulation and climate control  Carbon sequestration  Watershed services (water supply and quality)  Clean air.
Think Break #8 You operate a farm with market value of $700,000 in land, buildings, machinery, etc. Your debt is $300,000 with an annual interest payment.
Working in the Urbanizing Landscape: Changing Roles for Natural Resource Professionals Oregon Department of Forestry “Stewardship in Forestry”
Ratio Analysis.
CLIMATE ACTION RESERVE PROJECT SHOWCASE Alligator River Avoided Conversion Project CAR – BAAQMD California Offsets Workshop Project Showcase August 8,
An Educator’s Guide to the Forest Land Enhancement Program (FLEP) in New York Source: Cornell Cooperative Extension & NYS Department of Environmental Conservation.
Community owned forests conference Missoula, June 2005.
1 Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Farm Bill) Disclaimer: Provisions provided in this presentation are subject to change or interpretive differences.
Preserving Farms and Forests in Sussex County, Delaware: Public Value Sussex Communities: Growing Better A Workshop Sponsored by the University of Delaware.
Carbon Offset Projects and the FIA Neil Sampson March 3, 2009.
Planning with Personal Financial Statements
Community Forests: June, 2005 Changes in Timberland Ownership The New Hampshire Experience - By Paul Doscher Society for the Protection of NH Forests.
1 7. Ethical Issues in Forestry & Public Land Use Larry D. Sanders Spring 2002 AGEC 4990 Dept. of Ag Economics Oklahoma State University.
Meaningful Incentives for Landscape and Species Conservation on Private Lands Tom H. Logan Peninsular Florida LCC – Steering Committee August 21, 2012.
Unique Characteristics of Forests and Their Management (Economic) Implications.
Forestry in the 2008 Farm Bill and Associated Federal Acts Craig McKinley NREM, OSU-Stillwater.
Beyond the Basic Forest Resource Model Monday, April 10.
The Maryland Forests Association and A Landowner’s Concerns.
The Forest Resource in Iowa. Iowa’s Forest Cover   Iowa’s forests cover 8% of our landscape   87% of our 2,97,000 acres are owned by private landowners.
Future of Hardwoods in Oregon (and the Pacific Northwest) Glenn Ahrens Oregon State University Extension Forestry Clatsop and Tillamook County.
Alder Supply + Red Alder Plantation Growth and Yield RAP ORGANON Glenn Ahrens Oregon State University Extension Forester.
Community Ownership and Management of Productive Forestland Building Natural and Social Capital Keith Bisson: Quebec Labrador Foundation Rodger Krussman:
3.6 Ratio Analysis Chapter 23 – Part 2.
Forest Management Challenges & Opportunities Green Counties: Green Lands Madison, VA 18 September 2007 Mike Santucci Region 3 Forest Conservation Specialist.
Carbon Sequestration: Michigan Forestry Carbon Project Presentation to: The USDA Forest Service Landowner Assistance Meeting Charleston, SC October 5,
Update from the Longleaf Economics Team “An Overview of the Literature” Longleaf Partnership Council October 2014.
Making Conservation Work Sally Collins Associate Chief, USDA Forest Service.
11/24/2015 State Land Valuation in the ADK Forest Preserve David P. Wolff.
2009 NPS 319 Project Review Arkansas Forestry Commission U of A Cooperative Extension Service September 16-17, 2009.
Agricultural Economics An Introduction to Markets for Ecosystem Services (Carbon Offsets) Jack Schieffer.
The LIME Exchange Giving you financial options you never new you had.
Cornell Forestry Extension Partnership with County CCE Master forest owner Forest owner awareness –Articles –Web page –Brochures Forest owner knowledge.
Chapter Capital Budgeting C H A P T E R. Chapter Objectives Define capital budgeting. Distinguish between the various techniques of capital budgeting.
Comprehensive Issues List Green Ribbon Task Force on Forest Products, Conservation and Jobs.
Peter R. Stein Managing Director The Lyme Timber Company 23 South Main Street, 3 rd Floor Hanover, NH (603) x 112
Analytical Tools Marginal analysis Discounted cash flow.
Insert Your Image Here © Insert Image Credit Josh Parrish – Director, TNC Working Woodlands Program Gay Thistle – Private Forest Owner Bill Kunze – Executive.
David R. Jackson Penn State Cooperative Extension February 10, 2009 “I Have Timber to Sell” Timber Sales and Marketing.
1 Chapter 12 Forest Economics --Forests cover about 30% of the land surface of the earth; 8,000 years ago, this percentage was about 50 --More than 60%
Forestry In the Lakes Region: Looking at the Woods with 20/20 Vision Eric Johnson Program Director, NHTOA Natural Resources in the Lakes Region Meeting.
The Forestland Group LLC Strategies for Conserving Private Working Forests Charles H. Collins The Forestland Group, LLC Cambridge, MA/Chapel Hill, NC.
Strategies for Conserving Private Working Forests
Forest Certification: An Introduction for Forest Landowners
“In our discussions, time and time again, we faced a fundamental conflict – between market-driven efficiency that encourages maximum consumption.
Unique Aspects of Forests and Their Management (Economic) Implications
Presentation transcript:

Keeping Forests in Forests Considering all the options Richard L. Porterfield SE SAF Annual Meeting Sandestin, FL September 23-25, 2007

The Dawg Factor Expected net return from holding forest land.

The Gator Factor Expected net returns from alternative uses of forest land or from the cash produced by the sale of the forest land.

The Tiger factor The net “psychic” value associated with forest land ownership.

Keeping forests in forests 1.Expected net returns from forest land. (Dawg) 2.Expected net returns from alternative non-forest use of land/cash equivalent. (Gator) 3.Net “psychic” value from forest land ownership. (Tiger)

To keep forests in forests  Increase the Dawg factor.  Decrease the Gator factor.  Increase Tiger factor.

Forest Ownership Most Significant Change Traditional forest industry has sold nearly all its forest land or converted to REIT structure. –Declining value of stumpage. –Abundant non-company timber. –High return uses for capital elsewhere. –Need to pay down debt. –Inability to monetize the forest land asset.

So, Forest industry ownership has decreased significantly. TIMO forest land ownership has increased significantly. Non-Industrial (non-business) private forest land ownership has increased significantly. Public forest land ownership has increased slightly.

New non-business private forest landowners: Are younger. Are better educated. Own, on average, somewhat smaller forest tracts. Value aesthetics and legacy of forest landownership much more than previous non- business private forest landowners. Are more likely to have a management plan. Are still harvesting timber.

Conservation easements:  Increase the Dawg factor, decrease the Gator factor and may increase the Tiger factor for some forest landowners.  But may be viewed as reducing future options and/or represent loss of control to other forest landowners.

Land use planning, sometimes in the form of zoning, typically reduces the Gator factor. Can be used to identify forest land for public purchase. In the form of zoning, viewed as “for the greater public good”. Can raise the “take” issue.

There is a long history of forestry incentive programs and they typically increase the Dawg factor. CRP very successful example. Are one way to pay for environmental service values/social benefits from forest land. May reduce operating costs or increase returns. Often involve tax reductions.

Possible New Incentive Program and New Product Market Direct payment for non-market forest resources (water, recreation, habitat, aesthetics, etc.) increases the Dawg factor. Development of new products/markets (e.g. carbon sequestration credits) increases the Dawg factor.

But the Tiger factor may be most important to many, if not most, new non-business forest landowners. An opportunity for foresters?

Take advantage of all the methods and means of increasing the probability that forests stay in forests offered at this meeting.

For millions of forest land acres owned by TIMOs, REITS, forest industry and many non- business private forest landowners a traditional forest management plan focused on timber production will be needed. But for additional millions of forest land acres owned by an emerging majority non-business private forest landowner a forest resources management plan based primarily on non- timber resource goals may well be best.

Now more than ever, keeping forests in forests will require foresters to: Have comprehensive knowledge of all forest resources and how to manage to favor each. Have excellent communication skills not only to explain resource tradeoffs but to better understand forest landowner desires/goals for ownership. Have the ability to show value (both market and non-market) from forest land ownership. Likely monitor fewer logging operations and make more dreams come true.

Keeping Forests in Forests  The best result of all these ownership changes is that only a professionally trained forester can deliver the dreams envisioned by so many new forest landowners.  The opportunities for foresters may never have been greater than they are today.  Good luck to you all.