Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
Advertisements

Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Student Satisfaction Inventory Results Saint Joseph’s College March 12, 2013.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
1 Strategic Planning Workshops February 23, 2007.
Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.
TRANSFER STUDENT Survey Results. Number of Invitees: 438 Invitees that responded: 137 Invitee Response rate: 31% Average of no answers 150 Transfer Results.
Human Services Associate in Science Degree Program Program Review Summit April 22, 2008.
Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
Academic Assessment Workshop: A Review of the Student Satisfaction Inventory Implementation & Implication Liz Baldizan, Ed.D., Assistant Dean, Academic.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
Expectation & Experience Surveys 1998 & 2002 AIRPO, June West Point, New York.
Pilot New Student Orientation. Today’s Roadmap Background Orientation as part a piece of the puzzle Orientation learning objectives Overview of the in-person.
2007 Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Bruce Schultz, Dean of Students and Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Development Michael Votava, Associate.
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research.
© 2011 by Anthony A. Piña, Ed.D. Using Sloan-C Quality Scorecard & Accreditation Standards as Administration Tools Dr. Anthony Piña, Dr. Larry Bohn & Nina.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Students’ feedback - Can higher education quality management systems put it to good use? Babes-Bolyai University, 18 September 2009 Monica Zaharie Melinda.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
What is the Focus?  Round 2 Analysis observed trends in student perception after first survey.  Allows us to recognize improvements of lower measures.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS. Overview Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide teaching goal Advising Results Q&A.
Student Satisfaction Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, LLC. Permission is required to reproduce information. Adult.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
Getting the data off the shelf Jimmy Davis, Ph.D. Vice Provost Kimberly Thornbury, Ph.D. Dean of Students Union University.
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
The 4-Year College Plan College Academic Vocabulary.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
Noel Levitz Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL) Joan Costello —Chief Academic Officer, Inver Hills Community College Deborah Proctor —eCurriculum.
* Number before each statement is the item number in the survey. Number with “S” prefix in parentheses indicates the scale the statement is under. Institutional.
Who Are Our Students? Demographic Profile Retention and Choice Student Time Use Alcohol and Drugs Student Satisfaction Academic Performance Career and.
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Overview Orientation consists of a university segment, a college segment and a departmental segment. In this,
Student Satisfaction Report: Pacific Oaks College: Addendum: Instructional Sites Vs. Cohorts Office of Institutional Research TCS Education System September.
0 1 1.Key Performance Indicator Results ( ) KPI Survey Statistics Student Distribution by Year in Program KPI Overall Results Student Satisfaction.
Transfer Student Survey Enrollment Management Student Assessments for Missouri S&T Transfer Conference | October 9, 2008
Senior Survey Data: Overview. First administration fall 05  135 responses; grad class 608;  22% response rate Second administration spring 06  264.
Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminal Justice Pre-Advising PowerPoint.
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Overview Course registration, Transfer courses, Academic advising, Internships/student clubs. Orientation consists.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Charts: Identified Challenges Department of Institutional Research.
Welcome Aboard! CCC-QEP Carteret Community College Quality Enhancement Plan.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
Community College Faculty & Staff Tell it Like it Is! The El Paso Community College Employee Survey.
Institutional Effectiveness: Sophomores’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Sophomore Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
An Institutional Look at Students’ Satisfaction with NWTC Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
Cañada Noel-Levitz Results Spring 2010 Semester. What is the Noel-Levitz Survey? National survey of students conducted by hundreds of colleges every year.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
College Student Satisfaction & Assessment By: Laura Heidel Western Kentucky University CNS 610.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey University of Louisville Fall of 2002.
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
ACT Student Opinion Survey Results
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Student Priorities Survey Results
Student Equity Planning August 28, rd Meeting
Select Findings from the Fall 2018 Enrolled Student Survey
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008

 Students are our customers - What are their expectations?  Responses are the reality of students’ experiences at NWTC  To determine if NWTC is allocating resources in areas students deem important to their experience at NWTC?  To assess the continuous improvement strategy at NWTC –is it working?

 1,290 physical classroom students (64% response rate of sample population)

Scale Mean Importance & Satisfaction level Mean difference between 2008 and 2005 satisfaction levels Mean difference between NWTC and WTCS satisfaction levels Academic Services5.98/ ***.11** Instructional Effectiveness6.16/ ***-.04 Student Centeredness5.89/ ***.00 Responsiveness to Diverse Populations Registration Effectiveness6.08/ ***.05 Campus Climate5.89/ ***-.01 Service Excellence5.85/ ***.04 Concern for the Individual5.98/ ***-.07* Academic Advising/Counseling5.95/ **-.11** Admissions and Financial Aid5.92/ ***.00 Safety and Security5.88/ ***.01 Campus Support Services4.90/ **-.02

1. The quality of instruction I receive in most of my classes is excellent 2. Nearly all of the faculty are knowledgeable in their fields. 3. There is a good variety of courses provided on this campus. 4. I am able to experience intellectual growth here. 5. The campus is safe and secure for all students. 6. The quality of instruction in the vocational/technical programs is excellent 7. Program requirements are clear and reasonable. 8. Computer labs are adequate and accessible. 9. The equipment in the lab facilities is kept up to date. 10. On the whole, the campus is well-maintained.

11. Faculty are usually available after class and during office hours 12. I can easily register online 13. The personnel involved in registration are helpful 14. It is an enjoyable experience to be a student on this campus. 15. Students are made to feel welcome on this campus. 16. Library resources and services are adequate. 17. Nearly all classes deal with practical experiences and applications. 18. This institution has a good reputation within the community.

1. Classes are scheduled at times that are convenient for me (1.10) 2. I am able to register for classes I need with few conflicts (.90) 3. Financial aid and scholarships are easily accessible (1.19) 4. This school does whatever it can to help me reach my educational goals (.92) 5. My academic advisor is knowledgeable about my program requirements (.96) 6. Adequate financial aid is available for most students (1.09) 7. Students are notified early in the term is they are doing poorly in a class (1.30) 8. The amount of student parking space on campus is adequate (1.43) 9. Help is readily available to students whose grades fall below average (1.09)

1. Classes are scheduled at times that are convenient for me. 2. The quality of instruction I receive in most of my classes is excellent. 3. I am able to register for classes I need with few conflicts. 4. Nearly all of the faculty are knowledgeable in their fields. 5. There is a good variety of courses provided on this campus 6. I am able to experience intellectual growth here. 7. The campus is safe and secure for all students. 8. The quality of instruction in the vocational/technical programs is excellent. 9. Program requirements are clear and reasonable. 10. Faculty are fair and unbiased in their treatment of individual students. 11. Computer labs are adequate and accessible. 12. This school does whatever it can to help me reach my educational goals. 13. On the whole, the campus is well-maintained. 14. Faculty are usually available after class and during office hours. 15. Faculty are understanding of students’ unique life circumstances.

16. Faculty provide timely feedback about student progress in a course. 17. Adequate financial aid is available for most students. 18. The personnel involved in registration are helpful. 19. Students are notified early in the term if they are doing poorly in a class. 20. Student are made to feel welcome on this campus. 21. Library resources and services are adequate. 22. Admissions staff are knowledgeable. 23. Nearly all classes deal with practical experiences and applications. 24. Policies and procedures regarding registration and course selection are clear and well-publicized. 25. The amount of student parking space on campus is adequate 26. Class change (add/drop) policies are reasonable. 27. There are convenient ways of paying my school bill. 28. Parking lots are well-lighted and secure. 29. There are adequate transfer opportunities between NWTC and other colleges. 30. This institution has a good reputation within the community.

1. Students have adequate opportunities to participate in clubs, organizations and social activities at NWTC Performance gap: Satisfaction increased.39*** compared to Financial aid and scholarships are easily accessible. Performance gap: New question in There are adequate transfer opportunities between NWTC and other colleges. Performance gap:.78. Satisfaction increased.38*** compared to New student orientation is beneficial to be a successful program student. Performance gap: New question in I can easily register online. Performance gap: New question in 2008.

6. NWTC employees help minority students feel a sense of belonging at NWTC Performance gap: Satisfaction increased.14* compared to Fellow students help minority students feel a sense of belonging at NWTC. Performance gap: Satisfaction increased.12 compared to My advisor assisted me in shaping my academic plan. Performance gap: New question in Help is readily available to students whose grades fall below average. Performance gap: New question in I would take more credit courses during summer semester if available. Performance gap: New question in 2008.

Summary QuestionSpring 2008 Spring 2005 Mean Difference WTCS 2008 So far, how has your college experience met your expectations? Rate your overall satisfaction with your experience here thus far All in all, if you had to do it over, would you enroll here again? *5.80

 Overall satisfaction is higher than Spring 2005  Increase in satisfaction of all Scales compared to Spring 2005; satisfaction of Responsiveness to Diverse Populations remained statistically unchanged.  31 items had higher satisfaction vs. Spring 2005; no items had lower satisfaction compared to Spring 2005

 531online students (30% response rate of sample population)

Scale Spring 2008 Importance Spring 2008 Satisfaction Spring 2005 Satisfaction Mean Satisfaction Difference Institutional Perceptions Enrollment Services * Student Services * Instructional Services Academic Services *

1. Registration for online courses is convenient. 2. This institution responds quickly when I request information. 3. Billing and payment procedures are convenient for me. 4. Appropriate technical assistance is readily available. 5. Assessment and evaluation procedures are clear and reasonable.

1. Student assignments are clearly defined in the syllabus (.66) 2. The quality of online instruction is excellent (.79) 3. Online course offerings meet my needs (.66) 4. Course requirements are reasonable (.71) 5. Faculty provide timely feedback about student progress (.83) 6. There are sufficient offerings within my program of study (.75) 7. It is easy to find information on NWTC’s website 5.83 (.69)

1. Faculty are responsive to student needs. 2. There are sufficient offerings within my program of study. 3. NWTC courses transfer to other colleges or universities. There were no items with lower satisfaction vs. 2005

1. Completing a total program online is valuable to me. Performance gap: Online course offerings meet my needs. Performance gap: Course requirements are clear. Performance gap: Course requirements are reasonable. Performance gap: Taking classes via interactive television or video- conferencing is valuable to me. Performance gap -.31

6. Taking classes via Technical college of the Air (TCA or correspondence) is valuable to me. Performance gap NWTC courses transfer to other colleges or universities. Performance gap: Courses taken at other colleges or universities transfer to NWTC. Performance gap: Courses taken during high school can be approved for transfer to NWTC. Performance gap: It is easy to find information on NWTC’s website. Performance gap:.69

Summary QuestionSpring 2008 Spring 2005 Mean Difference So far, how has your college experience met your expectations? Rate your overall satisfaction with your experience here thus far All in all, if you had to do it over, would you enroll here again?

 Overall satisfaction remained unchanged for most items compared to Spring 2005  Statistically significant; increase for 3 specific items: ◦ I receive timely information on the availability of financial aid. (satisfaction increased 0.38*** since 2005) ◦ Adequate online library resources are provided. (satisfaction increased 0.33*** since 2005) ◦ Channels are available for providing timely responses to student complaints. (satisfaction increased 0.34*** since 2005)  No items had significantly lower satisfaction compared to Spring 2005

 Six NWTC major initiatives since 2005 and corresponding student responses: 1.Increased security measures  Safety and Security responses increased both in importance (.12) and satisfaction (.32**) since Increased diversity and quantity of student life activities  Student Centeredness and Campus Climate responses both increased in importance (.06,.06) and satisfaction (.16***,.18***)  NWTC question “ Students have adequate opportunities to participate in clubs, organizations and social activities at NWTC (Importance 5.08, Satisfaction 5.07) Performance gap: Satisfaction increased.39*** compared to 2005

3.Initiated academic advising  Academic Advising/Counseling responses increased both in importance (.11) and satisfaction (.16**) 4.Increased articulation opportunities There are adequate transfer opportunities between NWTC and other colleges. Responses remained relatively unchanged in importance (-.04) and increased in satisfaction (.38***) NWTC courses transfer to other colleges or universities (online). Satisfaction increased.24* Courses taken at other colleges or universities transfer to NWTC (online). Satisfaction increased.04 Courses taken during high school can be approved for transfer to NWTC. Satisfaction increased.29*

5.Improved financial aid and scholarship access and awards  Admissions and Financial Aid responses increased in both importance (.11) and satisfaction (.24***)  NWTC specific question: Scholarships and financial aid are easily accessible; importance 6.18; satisfaction Is in the top quartile for importance. 6.Developed continuous improvement program  Satisfaction levels improved in all areas  2005 SSI Challenges all had significant improvement in 2008 satisfaction levels  2008 SSI Challenges all had significant satisfaction improvement levels compared to 2005

 Our students expect more; SSI Importance scores increased since 2005 ◦ Of 70 standard questions, 68 had a higher mean importance score in 2008 compared to 2005 ◦ 24 standard questions (34%) had mean importance scores increase by more than.10  Performance gaps decreased for all SSI questions (the difference between students’ importance and satisfaction for a question) ◦ Even though our students are telling us the importance of items is greater, NWTC is delivering products and services more closely to the desired level

 Online students indicated few areas of importance or satisfaction change compared to 2005 ◦ 10 of 36 importance questions had slight increases; 26 slightly decreased ◦ 10 of 36 satisfaction items satisfaction increased; 26 items had no change in satisfaction ◦ Range of satisfaction scores for 36 questions is 6.25 – 5.28; less than 1 point separates the issues of highest to lowest satisfaction however performance gap scores increased for 12 items

 Strategic planning efforts  Retention initiatives  Continuous improvement and operational productivity planning  Data-driven decision making  Marketing and recruitment within the community