Core Outcome Domains for Eczema – Results of a Delphi Consensus Project Introduction Eczema is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disorder that affects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence-based Dental Practice Developing guidelines or clinical recommendations Slide #1 This lecture follows the previous online lecture on evidence.
Advertisements

INVOLVE Conference Nottingham November 2004 Service User Involvement in Forensic Research Sue Spiers, Kathryn Harney and Clair Chilvers The UK National.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
1 Vision for better co-ordinated care: how could mental health payment systems serve as a key enabler for integration and personalised care? Mental Health.
A feasibility study to explore patient, clinician and GP decision making of acute recurrent tonsillitis for NATTINA: The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy.
BACKGROUND AND AIM Website: Challenges in conducting a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of genetic tests: an example.
Authors and affiliation Research, University of Sheffield, 3 East Midlands Ambulance Service Study flow Conclusion In addition to measures relating to.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Providing DAFNE to Subgroups of Predicted Responders J Kruger 1, A Brennan 1, P Thokala 1, S Heller 2 on behalf of the DAFNE.
Accessing Sources Of Evidence For Practice Introduction To Databases Karen Smith Department of Health Sciences University of York.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Non-Clinical Hot Topics in General Practice Professor Azeem Majeed Department of Primary Care & Social Medicine.
Unit 4: Monitoring Data Quality For HIV Case Surveillance Systems #6-0-1.
AHRQ National Advisory Council on Healthcare Research and Quality Subcommittee on Children’s Healthcare Quality Measures for Medicaid and CHIP Programs.
The cost-effectiveness of providing a DAFNE follow- up intervention to predicted non-responders J Kruger 1, A Brennan 1, P Thokala 1, S Heller 2 on behalf.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
HIV Patient ART Monitoring Meeting: International Conference Centre, Geneva March 2004 Defining the variables.
Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire Health and Social Care Forum Community Action.
POSTER TEMPLATES BY: Introduction Results Discussion References Study Objective(s) Methods (Continued) Specify the objective(s)
Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 12 Undertaking Research for Specific Purposes.
Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences Outcome measures in psoriatic arthritis Preliminary identification.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Systematic Reviews.
Welcome to SURF 09 Involving Patients and the Public in HCAI Research.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
London and South East Burns Services Review Patient Stakeholder Event 15 th January 2011 The Olympic Lodge Hotel, Aylesbury.
Improving international comparability of health expectancy indicators Task Force on Health Expectancies, European Commission, Luxembourg, 2 June 2008.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
The Broader Impact of Incentive Schemes to Enable Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Tina Williams June 2015.
Results The final report was presented to NICE and published by NICE and WHO. See
Criteria to assess quality of observational studies evaluating the incidence, prevalence, and risk factors of chronic diseases Minnesota EPC Clinical Epidemiology.
The (ab)use of symptom scores in asthma clinical trials: a systematic review Geoff Frampton & Jonathan Shepherd Southampton Health Technology Assessments.
Registering the care sector – next steps Dr Linda Hutchinson Director, Care Quality Commission National Care Association Conference, 21 October 2010.
Evidence Based Review. Introduction to Evidence Based Reviews Systematic reviews comprehensively examine the medical literature, –seeking to identify.
Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture b This material (Comp1_Unit9b) was developed.
Chronic Disease Management Why is this an important issue? High numbers of patients affected Effective interventions may be available Concern that there.
1 Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, U. K. 2 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, U. K.
BRIGHTLIGHT: emerging results Dr Rachel Taylor on behalf of the BRIGHTLIGHT Team.
Information on ethnic minorities and demographic data from asthma clinical trials does not reach the public domain Evidence from a systematic review and.
Methodological quality of malaria RCTs conducted in Africa Vittoria Lutje*^, Annette Gerritsen**, Nandi Siegfried***. *Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group.
1 Evaluation of Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiatives Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD February 24, 2009.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Linking the learning to the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare Joan Heffernan Inspector Manager Regulation – Healthcare Health Information.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
Background Acute psychiatric inpatient wards experience high levels of conflict behaviour (e.g. violence, absconding, self-harm) which are managed by containment.
 Friends and Family Test (FFT) -single question ‘would you recommend…’  The Adult National Inpatient Survey (AIPS) - AIPS uses validated questions based.
Quality and Outcomes Framework The national Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) was introduced as part of the new General Medical Services (GMS) contract.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
TRIAL PARTICIPATION IN THE OVER 60s: A RE-AUDIT OF THE MANAGEMENT OF AML IN THE SOUTH WEST OF ENGLAND South West Cancer Intelligence Service
ACNE CORE OUTCOMES RESEARCH NETWORK Information for new members 11/2015.
Annual Cochrane Skin Group Meeting, London, February 22nd & 23rd, The Cochrane Skin Group - Core Outcome Set Initiative to develop core outcome.
Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. The Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group at 20: ensuring our evidence is relevant Dr Nicola Lindson-Hawley.
Contact: Patrick Phillips,
admissions in residents in care homes.
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Evidence-based Medicine
The DELTA2 Study: Summary of Methodology and Results
RCPCH & RCN Annual Conference
Development of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire to capture the impact of living with a vascular condition: ePAQ-VAS Patrick Phillips, Elizabeth.
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Y. Zhao, S. Rennie, J.D. Tucker
Diagnosis of disease M2/D2
Core Outcome Domains for Controlled Trials and Clinical Recordkeeping in Eczema: International Multiperspective Delphi Consensus Process  Jochen Schmitt,
L. Thorlacius. 1,2, J. R. Ingram. 3, B. Villumsen4, S. Esmann1, J. S
This study/project is funded by/ supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [name of NIHR programme (Grant Reference Number XXX)/name.
Systematic review of atopic dermatitis disease definition in studies using routinely-collected health data M.P. Dizon, A.M. Yu, R.K. Singh, J. Wan, M-M.
This study/project is funded by/ supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [name of NIHR programme (Grant Reference Number XXX)/name.
C.I.M. Busard, J.Y.C. Nolte, M.C. Pasch, Ph.I. Spuls
This study/project is funded by/ supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [name of NIHR programme (Grant Reference Number XXX)/name.
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Presentation transcript:

Core Outcome Domains for Eczema – Results of a Delphi Consensus Project Introduction Eczema is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disorder that affects up to 20% or children and 3-5% of adults. Many trials of treatments for eczema are published every year, but there is no consensus over the most appropriate way of measuring treatment success, and many different named (and unnamed) scales are used. Wide variation in the use of outcome measures for assessing eczema, makes if difficult to combine trial results by meta-analysis in systematic reviews. Core sets of outcome measures are useful for increasing clinical interpretability, preventing selective reporting bias, limiting statistical errors by reducing the number of variables to be analysed, and enabling valid pooling of results across different studies. The first step in identifying a core set of outcome measures for use in eczema research is to establish a core set of outcome domains. In order to do this, we conducted an international Delphi consensus project. Results  Forty-six individuals from 11 countries (81% of those invited) participated.  Of these, 100% (n = 46) and 93% (n = 43) participated in the 2 nd and 3 rd rounds.  Overall, 6 consumer, 32 clinical experts, 1 regulatory agency representative and 7 journal editors took part  Consensus was achieved for inclusion of symptoms, physician-assessed clinical signs, and a measurement for long-term control of flares in the core set of outcome domains for eczema trials.  For medical recordkeeping, consensus was reached to regularly monitor eczema symptoms in clinical practice.  In contrast to clinical experts, journal editors and the regulatory agency representative, the majority of patients (67%) indicated that dermatology- specific should not be included in the core set.  People with a specific interest in outcome measurement (e.g. people who had developed the scales) were not invited to participate. Discussion  The Delphi process is a useful consensus method to define core sets of outcome domains.  Involvement of patients in the process was a key strength, but may have been limited by the relatively small number of patients / carers involved.  This project represents the first step in trying to identify a core set of outcome measures for eczema research and management.  A face-to-face consensus meeting is now required to establish the best way of measuring these outcome domains.  Such a meeting was held in Amsterdam in June 2011, at which the three core domains were confirmed and an additional domain for quality of life was added.  For further details about the progress of the HOME initiative, please see : Schmitt J*, Williams HC + & Thomas KS + on behalf of the Harmonizing Outcome Measurements in Eczema (HOME) Delphi panel * Medical Faculty, University of Dresden, Germany and + Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham Aim  To develop a consensus based set of core outcome domains for eczema that can be used for controlled clinical trials, and for clinical recordkeeping. Method  Three-stage web-based international Delphi consensus exercise conducted between June 2008 and March  Participants: 57 individuals from four stakeholder groups, and representing 13 different countries were included. These consisted of:  Consumers  Clinical experts  Regulatory agency representatives  Journal editors.  All participants were asked to rate the importance of 19 outcome domains for eczema and to choose which domains should be included in two core sets of outcomes:  For use in clinical trials  For use in medical record keeping  Participants received standardized feedback, including the group median, inter-quartile range, and previous responses, and the assessment was repeated in two subsequent rounds.  Consensus was defined a priori as at least 60% of the members of at least three stakeholder groups, including consumers, recommending domain inclusion in the core set. Conclusion Preliminary consensus over a core set of outcome domains has been reached. Core outcomes for eczema trials include: o Eczema symptoms o Physician-assessed clinical signs o Long-term control of flares o Quality of Life Core outcomes for medical record- keeping: o Eczema symptoms Acknowledgements This poster presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme (RP-PG ). The views expressed in this poster are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Outcome domains considered  Clinical signs assessed by physician  Clinical signs assessed by patient  Investigator global assessment  Patient global assessment  Symptoms  Quality of life (dermatology-specific)  Quality of life (general)  Short-term control of flares  Long-term control of flares  Cost  Extent of disease  Involvement of high expression areas  Treatment utilisation Figure: The eczema severity scales Tower of Babel