Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP) May 2015 Presenter: Marie Pompel Bonneville Power Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W. WeathersModeled after Redirect Examples Examples: Reservations that are dotted show Capacity Available to Resell or Transfer. MWs in Gray are.
Advertisements

11 OASIS Subcommittee - Notification Task Force UPDATE May
DRAFT Recommendation Preemption & Competition CHALLENGER COUNTEROFFER June 25, 2013 NAESB OS.
Lottery Method in BPA’s Simultaneous Submission Windows and Potential Application to the Simultaneous Defender Matching Process NAESB Meeting 05/01/13.
Preemption and Competition Redirect Issues NAESB OS Meeting June 6, 2012 BPA Presenting.
Timing and Flowchart Assignment
W. Weathers1A Conference Call 8/18/05 Examples: In all cases a Parent Reservation to be Redirected must be Firm Point-to-Point. Unless noted otherwise,
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Timing Considerations for Short-term Preemption and Competition Automation NAESB OS Presentation.
NAESB OASIS 1A Subcommittee Wendy Weathers, Chair ESS Meeting May 2005 Resale Recommendation.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
Resales and the Northwest Market A High Level Preview presented by Pacific Northwest Customers*
Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Flat Profile Recommendation.
NAESB OASIS Subcommittee Long Term Competition Mike Norris, Rebecca Berdahl May 13, /13/141.
Oasis Overview. 2 OASIS Overview What is OASIS? S –Open Access Same Time Information System –Electronic site for transmitting utility information to customers.
Standards Development Improvement Opportunities February 18, 2014.
DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
OASIS Subcommittee Status EC Meeting 2/18/14. Preemption and Competition Annual Plan Items Affected 2013 AP Item 2(a) Develop version 2 business practice.
EC Meeting 2/24/ AP Item 7(b) Modify NAESB standards WEQ , WEQ , and related standards to be consistent with the Commission’s policy.
Treatment of Firm Redirects Recent FERC Order. Entergy Order Docket Nos. ER OA ER Issued May 16, 2013
Pseudo-Tie Reservations
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, January 19, :00 to 4:00 p.m. EST 4 th Quarter
DRAFT Request for Initiation of a NAESB Standard NAESB OS Oct 23-24, 2013 Richmond, VA.
Short-Term Competitions and Preemption.  Overview  Standards being covered are:  Motion 2 - Fixed Capacity Over Term of Request. ▪ Tier 1 Service –
NAESB WEQ UPDATE Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Meeting Salt Lake, UT August 26, 2015 Bob Harshbarger Puget Sound Energy.
OASIS Overview Transmission Customer Forum May 8-9, 2008 Jim Viikinsalo May 8-9, 2008 Jim Viikinsalo.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Resales, Aggregations & Redirects of Resales NAESB OS July 22-24, 2014 BPA Presenting.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, May 13th, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
Resale Business Practice Standards 3 Options remain.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Tuesday, April 21, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
E-Tag Notification Assignment NAESB OS Sep 17-19, 2013 Seattle, WA Assignee – Robin Cross Seattle City Light Interested Resources: Marie Pompel - BPA Power.
Resale Business Practice Standards 3 Options remain.
NITS Concepts  Contract Data Model: NITS Agreement represented as a Contract Contract has one or more Facilities Facility may be one or more Resources.
OASIS SUBCOMMITTEE STATUS EC Meeting 4/29/14. Preemption and Competition Annual Plan Items Affected  2013 AP Item 2(a) Develop version 2 business practice.
October 6, 2006 Public Stakeholder Review Portland, Oregon Conditional Firm.
Kathy Anderson Idaho Power
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Capacity Reassignments, Aggregation & Redirects of Reassignments NAESB OS – May 13th, 2014 BPA.
Consolidation (API 5.d R09015) Business Practice Standards Draft WEQ OS Marie Pompel – July 2015.
NAESB WEQ EC Meeting 10/20/2015.   Workload  Long-Term Competition for Rollover Rights OASIS Subcommittee.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Conditional Resales NAESB Assignment Update April 16th, 2014 Bob Zerfing, Rebecca Berdahl.
NAESB Update Kathy Anderson October 2015 MIC Meeting.
02/19/14 REVIEW AND UPDATE FLOWCHART AND TIMING. Goals Finish going through the process flowchart listing the steps and various options for each. Develop.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
03/11/14 RECOMMENDATION FLOWCHART AND TIMING. GOALS Finish going through the process flowchart listing the steps and various options for each. Develop.
UNCONDITIONAL AND LEAD TIMES PREEMPTION AND COMPETITION TIMING.
NT Assignment Update: 9/17/13. NT Assignment Update Resources: CompanyResources BPARebecca Berdahl, Milos Bosanac, Ann Shintani, Bob Zerfing ClarkBrenna.
NITS on webSmart OASIS. NITS on webSmart OASIS Agenda  Company and User Permissions  Electronic Industry Registry requirement  WebSmart OASIS NITS.
NAESB NITS, and Long-term Competition
Preemption-ROFR Notification
NT Assignment Update: 9/17/13.
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee
BPA Formal Comments Overview to NAESB OS
BPA Formal Comments Recap of ‘Best Offer’ Proposal
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
NAESB WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Report NAESB WEQ Executive Committee
Recommended Appendix B Redirect Standards Examples
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
Preemption & Competition Standards BPA – Southern Compromise Proposal October 24, 2017 PURPOSE: Review and discuss the inequity with the Short-Term Firm.
NITS Review Scoping Document.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
BPA Formal Comments Recap of ‘Best Offer’ Proposal
Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP)
2019 Annual Plan Items 3b and 3f (formerly 2018 API 3c and 3h)
OASIS Subcommittee Status Preemption and Competition
NAESB WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Report NAESB WEQ Executive Committee
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
OASIS Notification Recommendation.
Presentation transcript:

Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP) May 2015 Presenter: Marie Pompel Bonneville Power Administration

What is STCP?  STCP is when an incoming transmission request will try and take away capacity from a confirmed reservation or another pending request that has shorter duration and a lower priority than the incoming request.

Why STCP?  In FERC Order 890 the commission determined that it is appropriate for transmission customers to compete for capacity on the transmission system to promote longer duration, higher priority requests to more fully utilize the capacity available.

What Started STCP?  Governing Principles FERC Orders  890, 890A, 890B, 676H etc NAESB Business Practices (derived from FERC Orders)  National focus Pro Forma Tariff  Each Transmission providers Tariff must be approved by FERC

What STCP applies to:  Transmission Request with a duration of less than 1 year  Firm and Non-Firm  PTP and NT

How does Competition work?  Competition or Preemption is initiated when an incoming request for transmission is determined to be a valid Challenger and there are available valid Defenders.  The TP will evaluate the Challenger and Defenders, and will grant capacity appropriately according to the current version 3 NAESB BPS’s

What is a Challenger?  A Challenger is a Transmission request that meets certain minimum criteria: Flat profile * Pre-confirmed * Longer duration than other reservations Higher priority than other reservations Higher price than other reservations *  When the original request is submitted, the Transmission Customer will probably not know that they will be identified as a Challenger. *This is not in the current Version 3 standards, but is in the proposed STCP updates currently being addressed at the OS Subcommittee

What is a Defender?  A Defender is the transmission request/reservation that will either be bumped or have to compete to retain transmission capacity. A Pending Transmission request of shorter duration than the challenger will be bumped A Transmission Reservation of a lower Tier will be bumped A Transmission Reservation of the same tier, shorter duration or smaller price will be competed.

Types of Preemption  Bumping (non –ROFR): when a challenger takes a defender’s capacity without the defender being able to match the duration of the challenger’s request. A pending PTP request may be bumped by a higher priority PTP or NT request. A conditional PTP reservation may be bumped by an NT request or long-term higher priority PTP.  Competition (ROFR): occurs when a higher priority PTP request challenges a conditional PTP reservation. The reservation can defend itself by matching the duration of the challenging request. A conditional PTP reservation may be competed by a higher priority PTP request. A conditional PTP reservation may be competed by an equal priority and longer duration PTP request. A conditional PTP reservation may be competed by an equal duration and higher price PTP request.

When is a reservation conditional?  A reservation is conditional when it is still eligible to be bumped or competed. In the NAESB BPS’s there is a timing table that establishes the minimum timing requirements. This table is currently found in WEQ 001 table 4.2.

When is a request conditional?  Requests that have not been Confirmed are still at risk of being bumped (by NT or long- term and short-term PTP)  These include requests that are in “Accepted” status, but not yet in “Confirmed” status by the Transmission Customer (such as in a Counter-Offer, or requests that were submitted “not pre-confirmed”).

Current (As of 5/12/2015) Table 4-2

Examples of TP’s currently evaluating Transmission requests for preemption and competition.  Bonneville Power Administration  Idaho Power  Southwest Power Pool  MISO  Entergy

Changes to STCP  Due to Order 676H – the NAESB OS Subcommittee had to stop their work on updating the BPS’s on STCP and instead had to update the BPS’s to apply a new Redirect principle in which the redirect capacity is still held out on the parent reservation until the Redirect is Unconditional.  The work is nearing completion and the NAESB OS will now return to their work in STCP incorporating the new Redirect standards in their STCP standards drafting.

Appendix: STCP Terms  Tier: the priority given to certain types of requests and reservation for identifying valid challengers and defenders, and whether the defender(s) have ROFR (matching rights). Such fields will be used to determine tiers: service increment, duration, pre-confirmation, and queue time (found in WEQ 001 Table 4.3).  Right of First Refusal (ROFR): where a holder of a reservation has the ability to avoid capacity from being taken, usually by extending the duration of its reservation to match the duration of the request that is challenging it.

Appendix: Reservation Priority Tiers