Oregon State University School of Education Community College Leadership Program Delores E. McNair Major Professor Dr. Larry D. Roper March 22, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reform and Innovation in Higher Education
Advertisements

An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
How Do Female and Male Faculty Members Construct Job Satisfaction? Diana Bilimoria, Susan R. Perry, Xiangfen Liang, Patricia Higgins, Eleanor P. Stoller,
NSF NC STATE. NSF ADVANCE: Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers The goal of the.
Quarry Bay School What is CoIS? The Council of International Schools is an organisation in International Education for the.
CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE DECEMBER 2012 FACULTY QUALIFICATION.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Contingent Faculty and the Future of Higher Education: What Role Can University Life Play? Marisa Allison Graduate Assistant Women and Gender Studies #adjunct.
1 AACC Annual Convention 2014 Center for Community College Student Engagement Supported by MetLife Foundation.
The Academic Advising Process Dr. Bob Hurt, C.F.E. Professor of Accounting, Cal Poly Pomona Faculty Advising Commission chair, NACADA.
A Changing Faculty: Contingency and its Consequences for Higher Education Presentation to the American Political Science Association, Department Chairs.
Introduction Wenna Katherine Sy Background of the Study Wenna Katherine Sy.
Campus Climate for UNC Charlotte Faculty Findings from the 1998, 2001, & 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Faculty Development. Committee’s Charge Summarize literature Identify existing campus resources Identify successful practices Indicate elements located.
Writing the Honors Thesis A Quick Guide to Long-term Success.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
What Attracts Nurse Faculty & What Keeps Them in Education? Preliminary findings Jane D. Evans BSN RN MHA University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College.
Part-Time Faculty: Who? What? How? 1. Courtney Adkins, Ph.D. Assistant Director Center for Community College Student Engagement Misha Turner, Ph.D. Associate.
A Report on Progress toward the Strategic Goals Presented to the Valencia District Board of Trustees on behalf of the College Planning Council.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
GSU-NACDD-CDC Chronic Disease and Public Health Workforce Training Training Needs Survey and Public Health Certificate in Chronic Disease Training for.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Rose Asera, Ph.D Rethinking Pre-college Math Summer Institute Aug 22, 2012.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
Lifetime Advantages of Degree Completion Presented by: Lauren Hubacheck, Director of Career Services, Salem State University.
TEACHING FOR CIVIC CAPACITY AND ENGAGEMENT : How Faculty Align Teaching and Purpose IARSLCE 2011 | CHICAGO Jennifer M. Domagal-Goldman | November 3, 2011.
Adrianna Kezar Professor, University of Southern California THE CHANGING FACULTY and STUDENTS’ TRANSITITION TO COLLEGE.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Hiring and Evaluation Processes: Building Future Successes Paul Starer and Lesley Kawaguchi Leadership Institute Hayes Mansion, San Jose, CA June 16, 2007.
Bringing Vision and Change to Tulsa Community College (TCC) Biology Department, Tulsa Community College Tulsa, Oklahoma Melissa Masse, Jennifer Kneafsey,
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Online Faculty Development Modules Abstract Utilizing student feedback on effective instructional practices, Online Faculty Development Modules are designed.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.
Searching for Faculty Members The Search Committee Succession Planning.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
Robert Martin Jane Overmoe Linda Thompson Spring 2009.
Rethinking Pre-College Math: A Brief Reminder about Why We’re Here and What We’re Trying to Do Overall context/purpose of project Defining characteristics.
1 Power, Passion, Rapport and Reflexivity: Political and Personal Implications of Biographically Situated Research(ers) Cec Pedersen Faculty of Business.
Faculty Learning Communities: Recommendations for Initiating & Implementing a FLC within your Department Marian Moore, Career Services.
Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) Workshop on Institutionalizing Undergraduate Research Report from the CUR Workshop Team.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Introduction of the Curriculum for Prospective NHTI Faculty NHTI Coordinating Committee Association of College & University Housing Officers – International.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ARHU Report.
How do teachers use research findings to improve their practice?
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ENGR Report.
OCTEO October 30, 2015 Dianne M. Gut & Pamela C. Beam
SUNY TAACCCT Grant PLA Advisory Board Agenda Review of Charge WordPress Site Policy – Philosophical differences on PLA – What makes a good: Policy?
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
Instructors’ General Perceptions on Students’ Self-Awareness Frances Feng-Mei Choi HUNGKUANG UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: BMGT Report.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
Understanding Student Evaluations of Teaching: Perspectives from African American Faculty Armon R. Perry, Ph.D., MSW Sharon E. Moore, Ph.D. Sherri L. Wallace,
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
ASCCC Cultural Competency and Advocacy Plan Update Cleavon Smith, Berkeley City College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College.
Keeping your Senate Involved, Engaged and On Course Grant Goold Professor & Chair, Emergency Medical Services, American River College Area A, Academic.
Action Research for School Leaders by Dr. Paul A. Rodríguez.
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
New Agent Professional Development
A discussion of characteristics of a healthy department
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Adrianna Kezar University of Southern California
Cultural Intelligence
Presentation transcript:

Oregon State University School of Education Community College Leadership Program Delores E. McNair Major Professor Dr. Larry D. Roper March 22, 2002

Project Title Out from the Shadows: Women who Teach Part-time in Community Colleges

Purpose of the Study  The purpose of the study was to investigate the experiences of women who teach part-time in community colleges.  This qualitative analysis was designed to move behind quantitative statistics to reveal the range of part-time faculty, their aspirations, their experiences, and the impact of academic organizational structures.

Why Was This Important to Study?  Part-time faculty comprise 2/3 of the community college faculty.  The number of part-time faculty is expected to increase.  Nearly 50% of the part-time faculty are women.  Limited research available on part- time faculty in community colleges.

Questions Guiding Inquiry  How do women describe their experiences teaching part-time?  What issues do women who teach part- time encounter?  How do women perceive the impact of part-time teaching on their career?  How do women who teach part-time believe their working conditions & experiences could be improved/enhanced?

Literature Review The literature review focused on: 1. Part-time labor issues, trends, social impacts, and the nature of part-time employment in the U.S. 2. Women who work part-time in the U.S., their characteristics, and the impact of part-time employment on women. 3. Historical development of the social conditions/social structures related to the employment of part-time faculty in community colleges.

Study Design  Qualitative study  Semi-structured conversations  Stories from participants

Data Analysis  Data was analyzed by reviewing conversations for patterns, clustering of ideas, and points of convergence.  The patterns, idea clusters, and points of convergence were then grouped around the four questions guiding the study.

Findings  Those aspiring to full-time faculty positions closely identified with their role as faculty member: They saw themselves as full-time with multiple assignments.  Those who had chosen part-time teaching did not identify themselves as closely with their role as faculty.

Findings  The lack of on-going job security, limited access to college resources, & the need to teach at multiple campuses, impacted participants’ ability to form collegial relationships and provide on-going support to students – both of which they felt negatively impacted students’ learning environment.

Findings  All participants indicated they were treated as “less than” full-time faculty.  This manifested in the allocation of resources and office space, evaluation procedures, ability to participate in the academic community, representation, and compensation.  These disparities result in privileges extended to one group that are not extended to another based solely on their employment arrangement with the college.

Findings  Participants rely primarily on the department chair to understand & negotiate the college environment.  Teaching at more than one college limits discretionary time which can lead to further social isolation & increased stress.  Those teaching at only one campus found it possible to spend more time on campus if needed, but found that often meant performing duties not covered by their contract and/or were not compensated.

Findings  Part-time teaching experience was not perceived as advantageous when seeking full-time positions.  Professional development opportunities were accessible to full- and part-time faculty.

Implications for Practice  Structures that privilege one group over another result in silencing those without privilege.  Not all part-time faculty may be interested in greater engagement with the academic community. However, those who are, need opportunities to participate more fully.  Suggests the need to examine role of the department chair.

Implications for Practice  We need to broaden our notion of academic community: Reconceptualize roles and duties of part-time faculty.  Examine structures of privilege and their impact.  Plan for future faculty in consideration of institutional mission/goals.  “Take the pulse” of all faculty to determine needs.

Limitations  Number of participants.  Academic discipline.  Composition of the group.

Areas for Future Research  Expand the number of participants and the disciplines in which they teach.  Diversify composition of the group.  Use systems-approach to inquiry.  Develop a model to determine total cost of hiring part-time faculty.  Examine contributions of part-time faculty.

Out from the Shadows: Women who Teach Part-time in Community Colleges March 22, 2002