Facilitating Reflective Feedback as a Complementary Evaluator “It is when you lose sight of yourself, that you lose your way. To keep your truth in sight.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Language of Coaching-based Supervision
Advertisements

Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Focus on Instructional Support
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
LEARNING CENTERED CONFERENCING USING THE CEL FRAMEWORK NICK HEDMAN AND PATTY HOWARD.
The Reinforcement Area of the Post Conference Presenters: Alishia Ancar & Nicole Bolen.
 To identify the characteristics of an effective post- conference  To identify the protocol for a TAP post-conference  To target areas to improve my.
Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice.
Session 3: Living a Lesson Part 1 (Elementary)
Implementing Peer Coaching in PLTs Teacher Leadership for High Student Growth Sara Overby WCPSS Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy,
Customer Focus Module Preview
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Collaborative Data Teams
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Leadership: Session #2A. Exemplary leaders are interested in others’ success than in their own. Their greatest achievements are the triumphs of those.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Presentation Five Using Descriptive, Analytical, and Reflective Writing to Analyze Practice.
Examining Student Work and Data Professional Learning Community Action Teams PUSD Instructional Services-PLC Action Team Training Fall 2008.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
TEAM Evaluation Post-Conference Process
LOGO Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Conferencing and Feedback.
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
Agenda: PD What drives PD? +/- of Traditional PD Analyzing Data/Categorizing Data Characteristics of Effective PD PAGES SWOT EQ: How can you create.
EngageNY.org Living a Lesson Part 1 (Secondary) Session 3, November 2013 NTI.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
EngageNY.org Supporting Module Implementation: Feedback.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, School Year Learning-Focused Interactions “Putting it all.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
Facilitate Group Learning
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Practical Suggestions for Success Lois Yocum, Ph.D. University of Arkansas – Fort Smith.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Examining Student Work in Science Jacque Melin – GVSU
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Connections and Actions Utilizing coaching skills to enhance mathematics instruction Astrid FossumLee Ann Pruske Laura MalyCynthia Rodriguez MTL Sessions,
Experience Protocols Tools that provide framework for discussions By Claire Dean.
Academic Language and Standards-Based Instruction Session 4 1/28/16.
Chapter 8: High-Leverage Practice 3: Reciprocal Teaching.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Academic Language: Standards, Domains, Objectives Session 5 March 3, 2016.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Handwriting vs. Keyboard Skills
M.A.T.C.H. Professional Series: Module 10
Multi-Classroom Leadership
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
CCRS Meeting # 3 Planning for Mathematical Rigor
Reading Closely For Textual Details
Group Talk Feedback – A focus on the individual
Creating Coaching Cycles that Move Coach Practice Forward
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Teaching Science for Understanding
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Presentation transcript:

Facilitating Reflective Feedback as a Complementary Evaluator “It is when you lose sight of yourself, that you lose your way. To keep your truth in sight you must keep yourself in sight and the world to you should be a mirror to reflect to you your image; the world should be a mirror that you reflect upon.” ― C. JoyBell C.

Purpose of Training/Objective Participants will learn a protocol for the complementary evaluator’s feedback conversations. Participants will address the processes and skills required for successful reflective feedback conversations. 2

Agenda 3 1. Coaching, Reflection, and Evaluation 2. Reflection Feedback Conversation Thinking Map 3. Processes to Consider 4. Essential Skills 5. Video Analysis

What To Expect From This Session On subsequent slides, we will present a structure for the conversations and analyze each portion of the structure. As we do so, consider how each portion of the structure connects with coaching, reflection and/or evaluation. 4

Differences Among Coaching, Reflection and Evaluation Read Handout 1 Take a few minutes to reflect on what the differences are among the 3 terms. What value would there be to including all 3 concepts in the Complementary Evaluator process? What potential pitfalls would there be to including all 3 concepts in the Complementary Evaluator process? 5 Handout 1

Mirror Consider the quote on the opening slide and again on this slide. How do you interpret the quote’s meaning in light of your responses about coaching, reflection, and evaluation? What would be your various roles in the complementary evaluation processes? 6 “It is when you lose sight of yourself, that you lose your way. To keep your truth in sight you must keep yourself in sight and the world to you should be a mirror to reflect to you your image; the world should be a mirror that you reflect upon.” ― C. JoyBell C.

A Thinking Map for the Conversations Take a minute to predict how the thinking map template’s design and how it could be used in a reflective feedback conversation. We will then go in-depth with each element. Handout 2

Explain the Process and Purpose Purpose: Allow the teacher to know what to expect from the conversation Length: 2 minutes Key Considerations: Expectations, length of conversation, scores, roles, set the tone 8 Handout 2

Explore the Teacher’s Perspective Purpose: Seek to understand how the teacher views their own practice Length: 5-8 minutes Key Considerations: The evaluator is exploring the teacher’s perspective and comparing it to his/her own. Ask questions and listen to the responses. 9 Handout 2

Expose the Teacher’s Strengths Purpose: Expose a strength(s) or relative strength and the impact on learning Length: 5-8 minutes Key Considerations: The evaluator should focus the conversation on how/why the strength impacts learning. Handout 2

Expand the Teacher’s Repertoire Purpose: Expand the teacher’s repertoire of teaching behaviors Length: 10 minutes Key Considerations: This part of the conversation includes what happened and the impact on learning, along with how to improve the teaching behavior and how/why the improvement impacts learning. 11 Handout 2

Extend the Learning to the Classroom Purpose: Get the teacher to commit to implementing the teaching behaviors that were discussed Length: 3-5 minutes Key Considerations: Part of both the discussions of the strength and area for growth, extend the conversation back to the classroom and instructional practice 12 Handout 2

Scores and Evidence Purpose: Compare scores and discuss other key indicators of teaching and learning Length: 5-8 minutes Key Considerations: All teachers are different. The goal is to do a comparison and talk about where there are big differences in the complementary evaluator’s scores and the teacher’s scores. 13 Handout 2

Processes To Consider Before the Conversation Ask the teacher to self-score and consider the evidence they used to determine the rating before coming to the conversation. Take time to reflect, plan, and prepare. Develop possible questions. Anticipate how the teacher may answer and how you would respond. Develop models with a focus on their impact to potentially use in the conversation. 14 Handout 3

Processes/Skills to Consider During the Conversation Take notes (where the teacher can see) and encourage the teacher to take notes. Use the framework/rubric, evidence, and script. LISTEN* Paraphrase* Question, but DO NOT Interrogate!* Pause Link/connect Focus on IMPACT and “whys” of instructional moves. Adjust your behaviors based on the teacher. Each teacher is different. 15 Handout 3 *Participants can access self-study modules for more information on this topic.

Ideas to Consider When Presenting Scores Compare and talk about the differences and why the differences exist. Ask the teacher to explain how they arrived at their rating(s). Explain how you arrived at a rating(s). Use the framework/rubric in order to be specific. Look for misunderstandings/different understandings. Apply the skills of listening, questioning, and paraphrasing. 16 Handout 3 *Participants can access self-study modules for more information on this topic.

Processes to Consider After the Conversation Send resources. Follow-up to see how the teacher is continuing to process the conversation. Finalize your paperwork, as per your district’s requirements. Reflect on the process to consider areas of strength and growth for you as a facilitator of the process. Send resources. Follow-up to see how the teacher is continuing to process the conversation. Finalize your paperwork, as per your district’s requirements. Reflect on the process to consider areas of strength and growth for you as a facilitator of the process. 17 Handout 3

Video Analysis As you watch the video: – Identify the parts of the thinking map in action. – Note the questions asked and their impact on reflection. – Note the use of the various materials (notes, framework, evidence, etc.) – Write down any questions or wonderings you have. 18

Processing of Video Consider what you noticed in the video. – Elements of the thinking map – Questions – Paraphrasing – Listening/wait time – Processes – Materials 19

Objectives Check/Reflection – Describe the protocol for the complementary evaluator’s feedback conversations and the purposes of each part of the protocol. – What processes and skills are required for successful reflective feedback conversations? 20 Handout 4