Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading Day 4: Instruction: Time, Scheduling & Grouping / Reading.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2011
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2010
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Core Program Analysis Coaches’ State Conference Winter 2009.
Using a Comprehensive Assessment Plan to Meet All Students’ Instructional Needs Leadership Conference 2005 Orlando, Florida Pat Howard and Randee Winterbottom.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Grade 1.
Cohort 4 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring 2009.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Progress Monitoring Cadre 8 Training February 6 th, 2012.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Middle Schools Winter, 2009.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Cohort 4 - Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
Open Court Reading Tools for Schools June 9, 2008.
June 081 Competent Learner Model Overview. June 082 Today you will learn… What is the CLM What is the goal of the CLM What are the foundations of the.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Cohort 4 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Interpreting data for program evaluation and planning.
Universal Screening Cadre 6 Training October 12, 2010.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Behavior Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring
1 Linking DIBELS Data to Differentiated Instructional Support Plans 32 nd Annual COSA Seaside Conference June 23, 2006 Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Schoolwide Reading: Day 3 Module 4.0 Evaluating the Schoolwide Reading Program Cohort 7 Winter
Schoolwide Systems Review: Module 3.0 Gather Cohort 7 Middle Schools.
White Pages Team Grey Pages Facilitator Team & Facilitator Guide for School-wide Reading Leadership Team Meetings Elementary.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Module 10 Assessment Logistics
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Data-Based Leadership
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Systems Problem Solving
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009

Schoolwide Reading: Where have we been? Day 1: –DIBELS administration and scoring Day 2: –DIBELS Foundations and Report interpretation –Maximizing classroom instruction Day 3: –Core program analysis –Schoolwide reading program evaluation (PET)

Reading systems review Components on our checklist: 1.DIBELS data system 2.Maximizing classroom instruction 3.Core program analysis – targeted skill review 4.Planning and evaluation tool (PET-R)

DIBELS Data system MiBLSi assignment from Day 2: –Assess first grade students (or a single grade) using DIBELS measures Be ready to assess all students by Spring 2009 –Assessment team (training, integrity checks) –Logistics (schedule, materials, data entry) –Using the data

DIBELS Data Collection Goal: To collect valid and reliable benchmark data as efficiently and economically as possible, with minimal disruption How is this working for you? DIBELS Training Institute, Essential Workshop: Logistics, 2006.

Are you efficient? Measure Approximate time per student Initial Sound Fluency (ISF)3 minutes Letter Naming Fluency (LNF)1.5 minutes Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) 1.5 minutes Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)2 minutes Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) 3 passages 4 minutes DIBELS Training Institute, Essential Workshop: Logistics, 2006.

Are you minimally disruptive? Data collection methods –Teacher –Assessment teams Schedule posted in advance One person coordinating flow of students and managing assessment team needs

Are you collecting reliable data? Has your DIBELS assessment team (or classroom teachers) been trained? Are you running fidelity checks as a team before you take the students?

DIBELS Assessment Team Fidelity check DIBELS data needs to be accurate! Check: –Standardized directions –Timing (e.g. 1 minute) –Prompting rules –Scoring rules –Correct student score entered Validate with classroom teacher

DIBELS Fidelity Check Tool Before every benchmark assessment, run an integrity check with your staff or assessment team Briefly review scoring rules and prompts Have someone be the student and run through scripts Have blank materials available to score Discuss your scoring together Periodically, have checks on scorers

Review the status of your DIBELS assessment team. 1.Are you efficient? 2.Are you minimally disruptive? 3.Are you collecting reliable data and how do you know? Team Time Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done

DIBELS Data entry Who is entering DIBELS data into website? Does someone verify the accuracy of those entries?

Sharing DIBELS data with staff On Day 2, we trained MiBLSi leadership teams on the Foundations (research) behind the DIBELS measures How has that information been delivered to the whole staff?

Sharing DIBELS data with staff Does your staff have ownership of the data? People doing the teaching need to be involved in collecting the DIBELS measures, at some level –Part of assessment team –Collecting progress monitoring data

Sharing DIBELS data with staff Which DIBELS reports are given to your staff? –Building level (Histograms, Box Plots) –Grade level (Histograms, Class list reports) –Individual student (Class list report) How is your staff acting on the data?

1.What is the status of your building’s DIBELS data entry (one person for data entry, one person for oversight)? 2.What is the status of sharing your DIBELS data with your staff? Team Time Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done

Reading systems review Components on our checklist: 1.DIBELS data system 2.Maximizing classroom instruction 3.Core program analysis – targeted skill review 4.Planning and evaluation tool (PET-R)

Maximizing classroom instruction Review of training content from Day 2: Characteristics of diverse learners Time (allocated, actual, engaged, opportunities to respond and receive feedback) Systematic and explicit instruction

Maximizing classroom instruction Is your staff maximizing classroom instruction by using the following techniques? –Modeling –Using explicit language –Providing multiple opportunities to respond and practice –Cumulative review

Ideas for professional development on maximizing classroom instruction Specialist models lesson in classroom Model and practice skills during grade level meetings Peer to peer practice and observation Principal walk-through

Time Do you have a protected 90 minute block? Has your staff had an opportunity to identify the level or amount of student opportunities to respond (active engagement) within that block?

Considering what we know about maximizing classroom instruction (e.g. explicit instruction, protected time and active engagement): Have you shared this information with the rest of your staff?Have you shared this information with the rest of your staff? What are your next steps?What are your next steps? Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Team Time

Reading systems review Components on our checklist: 1.DIBELS data system 2.Maximizing classroom instruction 3.Core program analysis – targeted skill review 4.Planning and evaluation tool (PET-R)

Core program analysis Two basic questions: Are we teaching the right things at the right time? Are we teaching the right things well such that all students are learning? How do we answer those questions?

Looking at the data Always start with your data. –What does it say about your core instruction? in terms of percent of students in the low risk and established categories (80% or above) in terms of sustaining appropriate growth? (95%) –If you are meeting the above criteria and other data substantiates your findings, there is very little need to do a comprehensive analysis of your core. –If not,...reexamine your core!

Use standards such as curriculum maps

Review core program Targeted skill review steps included: Identify instructional priorities based on curriculum maps Look for them within the core program Evaluate instructional delivery (is it explicit?) Evaluate sequence of skills (is it systematic?) Identify instructional enhancements

In Day 3, we asked you to practice conducting a targeted skill review with first grade. Then you were to discuss the findings with the first grade staff before engaging other grade levels in the process. Was this activity completed? What are your next steps? Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Team Time

Reading systems review Components on our checklist: 1.DIBELS data system 2.Maximizing classroom instruction 3.Core program analysis – targeted skill review 4.Planning and evaluation tool (PET-R)

Planning & Evaluation Tool (Simmons & Kame’enui, 2003) The Planning and Evaluation Tool- Revised (PET-R) is designed to help schools “take stock” of their strengths and areas of improvement in developing a schoolwide beginning reading plan. The items and criteria in the PET- R represent the “ideal” conditions and total to 100 points. Score reflects how you are currently doing as a school in your instructional practices. This tool is designed to assist in your planning and implementation.

Overview of the PET-R Evaluation Sections reflect critical components of a Schoolwide Model: I.Goals, Objectives, Priorities II.Assessment III.Instructional Program and Materials IV.Instructional Time V.Differentiated Instruction/Grouping/Scheduling VI.Administration/Organization/Communication VII.Professional Development

In Day 3, your assignment was to have the entire staff complete the portion of the PET-R that your team identified as a priority for action. 1.Was this completed? 2.What are your next steps? Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Team Time

Reading systems review Components on our checklist: 1.DIBELS data system 2.Maximizing classroom instruction 3.Core program analysis – targeted skill review 4.Planning and evaluation tool (PET-R)

International Cafe Take a few minutes to review your Follow-up activity sheet from todayTake a few minutes to review your Follow-up activity sheet from today Write on a blank sheet of paper,Write on a blank sheet of paper, –Identify accomplishments that you want to celebrate with your staff –Identify two critical next steps for your school that should be your immediate priority Gallery walkGallery walk Team Time

Assignment Have DIBELS data assessments completed and entered before your next Data Review day.