Radiation Laboratory Quantifying the Effects of Wind on polarimetric SAR & InSAR Tree height estimation Michael L. Benson Dr. Leland E. Pierce Prof. Kamal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signatures of Forest Radar Images at VHF-band. BioGeoSAR07 Overview Airborne SAR system IMARK Simultaneous radar and ground-based forest measurements.
Advertisements

Biophysics of somersault and arm sets in trampolining John Mitchell Thanks to Lisa Withey + Jack Mitchell for performance.
By Neil Kruger Supervisor: Prof. KD Palmer University of Stellenbosch
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Beams and Frames.
Bending Moments A bending moment exists in a structural element when an external force is applied to the element so that the element bends (or wishes to.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations SCOTT A. BRAUN AND WEI-KUO TAO PRESENTATION.
Chapter 17 Sound Waves. Introduction to Sound Waves Waves can move through three-dimensional bulk media. Sound waves are longitudinal waves. They travel.
Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR by Philip A. Townsend Neal Simpson ES 5053 Final Project.
Large-eddy simulation of flow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyons under different thermal stratifications W. C. Cheng and Chun-Ho Liu * Department.
Physics 218: Mechanics Instructor: Dr. Tatiana Erukhimova Lectures Hw: Chapter 18 problems and exercises.
Destructive Effects of Nuclear Weapons
What Do You See? Message of the Day: It is very useful to quantify how much sunlight penetrates a forest canopy.
Chapter 14 Oscillations Chapter Opener. Caption: An object attached to a coil spring can exhibit oscillatory motion. Many kinds of oscillatory motion are.
Chapter 13 Simple Harmonic Motion In chapter 13 we will study a special type of motion known as: simple harmonic motion (SHM). It is defined as the motion.
Oscillation.
Chapter 5 Vibration Analysis
Polarimetric Radiometer and Scatterometer Measurements Simon H. Yueh Jet Propulsion Laboratory Operational SVW Requirement Workshop, Miami 7 June 2006.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Vibrational and Rotational Spectroscopy
Rigid Body: Rotational and Translational Motion; Rolling without Slipping 8.01 W11D1 Today’s Reading Assignment Young and Freedman: 10.3.
Slide # 1 SPM Probe tips CNT attached to a Si probe tip.
CHAPTER 37 : INTERFERENCE OF LIGHT WAVES
On Estimation of Surface Soil Moisture from SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa Barbara.
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
Foliage and Branch Biomass Prediction an allometric approach.
Biomass retrieval algorithm based on P-band BioSAR experiments of boreal forest Lars Ulander 1,2, Gustaf Sandberg 2, Maciej Soja 2 1 Swedish Defence Research.
DOCUMENT OVERVIEW Title: Fully Polarimetric Airborne SAR and ERS SAR Observations of Snow: Implications For Selection of ENVISAT ASAR Modes Journal: International.
Name: Angelica F. White WEMBA10. Teach students how to make sound decisions and recommendations that are based on reliable quantitative information During.
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Canopy Dynamics and Tree Well Size Does the canopy height and size of coniferous trees affect the size of the tree well at the snow surface? J. Kalin Puent.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 14 Oscillations.
Hurricane Intensity Estimation from GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite Eye Sounding Fourth GOES-R Users’ Conference Mark DeMaria NESDIS/ORA-STAR,
IGARSS 2011 SAR Data for Subsurface Saline Lacustrine Deposits Detection and Primary Interpretation on the Evolution of the Vanished Lop Nur Lake Xiaolin.
Modeling and Rendering of Metallic Patinas Julie Dorsey – MIT Pat Hanrahan – Stanford University Presentation By: Brad Jones.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
IEEE IGARSS Vancouver, July 27, 2011 On the potential of TanDEM-X for the retrieval of agricultural crop parameters by single-pass PolInSAR Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez.
The Extraction of InSAR Information from Imagery of a Wind-Blown Tree Canopy with a Ground-Based SAR Keith Morrison & Muhammad Yasin Department of Aerospace,
July 11, 2006Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Probing the covariance matrix Kenneth M. Hanson T-16, Nuclear Physics; Theoretical Division Los.
ChE 452 Lecture 25 Non-linear Collisions 1. Background: Collision Theory Key equation Method Use molecular dynamics to simulate the collisions Integrate.
Effects of simulated climate change on the abundance of an exotic weevil, Cyrtepistomus castaneus Bryan Marbert (ASU ) and Paul Hanson (ORNL) Contact Information:
Remcom Inc. 315 S. Allen St., Suite 416  State College, PA  USA Tel:  Fax:   ©
Self-consistent non-stationary theory of multipactor in DLA structures O. V. Sinitsyn, G. S. Nusinovich, T. M. Antonsen, Jr. and R. Kishek 13 th Advanced.
Examination of Canopy Disturbance in Logged Forests in the Brazilian Amazon using IKONOS Imagery Michael Palace 1, Michael Keller 1,2, Bobby Braswell 1,
Retrieval of Soil Moisture and Vegetation Canopy Parameters With L-band Radar for a Range of Boreal Forests Alireza Tabatabaeenejad, Mariko Burgin, and.
7-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. February 23, 2009 Inventory # Workbench - Mechanical Introduction 12.0 Chapter.
1 InSAR Project Information. 2 Outline Purpose Two components – SAR investigation, InSAR study SAR investigation: presentation only InSAR study: presentation.
Periodic Motions.
+ Data Analysis Chemistry GT 9/18/14. + Drill The crown that King Hiero of Syracuse gave to Archimedes to analyze had a volume of 575 mL and a mass of.
Remcom Inc. 315 S. Allen St., Suite 416  State College, PA  USA Tel:  Fax:   ©
1 Rosalia Daví 1 Václav Vavryčuk 2 Elli-Maria Charalampidou 2 Grzegorz Kwiatek 1 Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences, Praha 2 GFZ German Research.
On polarimetric characteristics of mesoscale cellular convection in the marine atmospheric boundary layer Haiyan Li, William Perrie, Lanli Guo , Biao Zhang.
Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols Presented by Venkata Suresh Tamminiedi Computer Science Department Georgia State University.
Layover Layover occurs when the incidence angle (  ) is smaller than the foreslope (  + ) i.e.,  <  +. i.e.,  <  +. This distortion cannot be corrected!
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Noise
HSAF Soil Moisture Training
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
Meng Liu,Hong Zhang,Chao Wang, Bo Zhang
Motion in Two Dimensions
Period of Simple Harmonic Motion
STEM Fair: Statistical Analysis
(L, C and X) and Full-polarization
M. L. Williams1 and T. L. Ainsworth2
Material Properties and Forces
M. L. Williams1 and T. L. Ainsworth2
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
이훈열, 조성준, 성낙훈 강원대학교 지구물리학과 한국지질자원연구원 지반안전연구부
Presentation transcript:

Radiation Laboratory Quantifying the Effects of Wind on polarimetric SAR & InSAR Tree height estimation Michael L. Benson Dr. Leland E. Pierce Prof. Kamal Sarabandi

Radiation Laboratory Overview Motivation Tree Model Wind Model InSAR Simulator SAR Image Coherence InSAR Height Estimate Future Work

Radiation Laboratory Motivation InSAR is often used over forested areas to obtain information on forest structures Repeat-pass InSAR over forests suffers from poor coherence due to changes in a forests physical attributes (exact position, motion of branches, leaves, etc) and moisture which affects the dielectric constant of the scatterers. Is there a way to obtain high-coherence repeat-pass InSAR data using models of these effects? Could we then produce reliable, high-quality forest structure estimates including canopy height? This research presents a detailed model of the effects of wind on SAR image formation coherence and the associated effect on tree height retrieval through the scattering phase center.

Radiation Laboratory Overview Motivation Tree Model Wind Model InSAR Simulator SAR Image Coherence InSAR Height Estimate Future Work

Radiation Laboratory Use our existing Lindenmayer system based fractal tree generator [Lin + Sarabandi, IGRS, 1999] Trees defined by a DNA file Consists of basic parameters such as leaf radius, leaf thickness, and maximum branch angle. Different DNA for each species. DNA is iterated a set number of times to form a complex, semi- random tree realization. DNA sub-string re-writing rules are used to generate realistic branching structures, with needles / leaves. Current study uses a deciduous red maple stand only. Tree Generation

Radiation Laboratory Generate both coniferous and deciduous trees including: Red Maple Red Oak Red Pine Sugar Maple White Ash White Pine White Spruce DNA files only specify tree structure. InSAR parameters are specified elsewhere. Tree Generation (2)

Radiation Laboratory Overview Motivation Tree Model Wind Model InSAR Simulator SAR Image Coherence InSAR Height Estimate Future Work

Radiation Laboratory Modelling Wind Branches Need to know: Mechanical Parameters Length, l Center (x, y, z) Orientation (Θ,Φ) Parent & Children Young’s Modulus, E Need to Find: Moment of Inertia, I Resonant Frequency, f r Deflection angle, α

Radiation Laboratory Modelling Wind Stems & Leaves Need to know: Mechanical Parameters Stem length, l Center (x, y, z) Orientation (Θ,Φ) Family (branch  stem  leaf) Young’s Modulus, E Leaf thickness, t Need to Find for each stem-leaf pair: Moment of Inertia, I Resonant Frequency, f r Deflection angle, α

Radiation Laboratory Modelling Wind a single branch m

Radiation Laboratory Modelling Wind multiple branches W Θ = 80° Θ = 45° Θ = 90° z ⌃ y x ⌃ ⌃ WaN = WaN = 0.5 WaN = 1.0

Radiation Laboratory Modeling Wind A steady wind force on the branch causes a vibration with frequency: Moment of Inertia, I is determined by the mass distribution in the branch as well as the mass of branches attached to its end: Young's Modulus, E, is a measure of the stiffness of the branch, measurements of E for different species are available. Tree motion composes each branch motion using movement of lower branches to alter locations of upper branches.

Radiation Laboratory Modelling Wind: Branch Motion A steady wind force on the branch causes a vibration with frequency: How far should each branch move? Depends on the wind velocity and the branch’s physical parameters Assuming T = 25  C and average moisture content in each branch, calculate the maximum deflection for each branch as: Under SHM approximation branch will be directly moved along the direction of the wind field a maximum of ½  max in any direction. However, branches may move more than ½  max relative to their original (rest) position as a result of their parents’ motion.

Radiation Laboratory Modelling Wind: Branch Motion (2) Where does Φ max come from? Pressure due to wind is [ axia.com/knowledge/handbook/section1/windflow.asp ] Branch surface area (SA) presented to wind is ~ Maximum deflection for a cantilever is defined as [ ] Use of simple trigonometric relationships yield Φ max as y max Φ max L L

Radiation Laboratory Modelling Wind: Constant Breeze Movie

Radiation Laboratory Overview Motivation Tree Model Wind Model InSAR Simulator SAR Image Coherence InSAR Height Estimate Future Work

Radiation Laboratory InSAR Simulator (1) Divide stand into several horizontal slabs In each slab estimate the mean field using Foldy's approximation [Lin + Sarabandi, IGARSS, 1996] Also estimate attenuation through each slab For each branch or leaf in the tree, calculate the backscattered field as : E scat = E inc · Se i ɸ where S is the scattering matrix of the object, and ɸ is the relative phase of the scattering, due to the relative position of this object in the tree. The scattering matrix is estimated using four (4) scattering mechanisms: –Direct Scattering, S t –Ground-Object scattering S gt –Object-Ground scattering S tg –Ground-Object-Ground S gtg

Radiation Laboratory InSAR Simulator (2) Use Δk Approach [Sarabandi, TGRS, 1997]. Approximate InSAR baseline with a small change in frequency Measured phase can be calculated as For each polarization, calculate a scattering phase center as:

Radiation Laboratory Overview Motivation Tree Model Wind Model InSAR Simulator SAR Image Coherence InSAR Height Estimate Future Work

Radiation Laboratory Combined InSAR and Wind Produced 5 instances of a single red maple, without the influence of wind and placed them in a 625 m 2 region. Applied wind to these trees and saved all geometries for each time step in the simulation. –Δt = 0.02s, total time = 1s Use InSAR simulator to produce a single-look complex (SLC) image of a one-pixel forest stand for each geometry at each time step. This includes the no-wind case. Now can produce a coherence estimate between pairs of SLC images: Where u 1 is the no-wind tree and u 2 is one sample from a wind- blown tree sequence Can plot this as a function of time.

Radiation Laboratory Forming a SAR Image A SAR image formed with multiple looks in practice will be collected over a period of time, often under 1 second. Wind Speeds below vary from a strong breeze to a sustained hurricane force wind.

Radiation Laboratory Forming a SAR Image A SAR image formed with multiple looks in practice will be collected over a period of time, often under 1 second. Wind Speeds below vary from a strong breeze to a sustained hurricane force wind.

Radiation Laboratory Overview Motivation Tree Model Wind Model InSAR Simulator SAR Image Coherence InSAR Height Estimate Future Work

Radiation Laboratory Coherence and Height Estimation This Coherence measurement can also be thought of as a measure of similarity between two SAR images taken at different times. The only difference between the two images is a wind induced motion.

Radiation Laboratory Coherence and Height Estimation At L-band, the principal contributor to the VV-polarization from the target will be the tree trunks. As the wind height increases, the mean scattering phase center height decreases at a nearly consistent rate. mean SPC Strong Breeze: m Stronger Breeze: m Storm Gust: m

Radiation Laboratory Coherence and Height Estimation The physical description of the wind’s effect on higher frequency (C-band) tree height estimate is not as straight forward as the L- band VV case. We have observed that the co-polarized mean SPC increases with an increasing wind force while the mean cross-polarized SPC decreases. Mean Scattering Phase Center Height [m] Strong BreezeStorm Gust VV C-Band HH C-Band VH C-Band

Radiation Laboratory Overview Introduction Tree Model Wind Model ifSAR Simulator SAR Image Coherence InSAR Height Estimate Conclusions and Future Work

Radiation Laboratory Conclusions and Future Work Developed a realistic wind model for trees including branches, stems, leaves, and needles and demonstrated it on a red maple stand. Applied SAR and InSAR model to the stand with and without wind. Calculated coherence between wind / no-wind cases to simulate repeat-pass InSAR. Showed poor coherence for both L-band and C-band. –This is only due to the movement of the branches and leaves. Showed wind effect on IfSAR Tree Height estimation Future Work: –Different moisture conditions in branches and leaves. –Large database generation

Radiation Laboratory Questions

Radiation Laboratory Extra Slides

Radiation Laboratory Coherence due to Wind inc angle = 43.6° L-band coherence drops below 0.7 at 2.39s, 1.01s C-band coherence drops below 0.7 at 1.6s, 0.7s C-band has significantly more scattering from the tree's upper branches than does L-band and so their movement will create greater decorrelation at C-band than L-band

Radiation Laboratory Wind’s effect σ 0 comparison At both L and C bands, variations in σ 0 are minimal. σ 0 is relatively unaffected by wind motion. L-Band C-Band σ0σ0