U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS, STORET, and XML Advisory Committee on Water Information September 10, 2003 Kenneth J. Lanfear,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status on the Mapping of Metadata Standards
Advertisements

MN Parcel Data Standard State Standards Process and Useful Insights DCDC 12/04/2009Mark Kotz.
Pacific Northwest Water Quality Data Exchange Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Washington Department of Ecology Idaho Department of Environmental.
Routemap to derive ISO models from BUFR Why do we need both ISO and BUFR models? –The BUFR data model is very large – much larger in principle than most.
Pacific Northwest Water Quality Data Exchange Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Washington Department of Ecology Idaho Department of Environmental.
Overview of key concepts and features
1 Web Services USGS/EPA Collaboration November 27, 2007 Dwane Young, U.S. EPA Nate Booth, USGS.
1 ISO – Metadata Next Generation International consensus being built on structured metadata within a broader Geomatics Standard under ISO Technical.
Integrating Historical and Realtime Monitoring Data into an Internet Based Watershed Information System for the Bear River Basin Jeff Horsburgh David Stevens,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS National Hydrography Dataset Stewardship in West Virginia George Heleine USGS NHD POC Region.
11 Data Interface Standard for Accounting Software Project Progress Report China National Audit Office June, 2015.
XP New Perspectives on Microsoft Access 2002 Tutorial 71 Microsoft Access 2002 Tutorial 7 – Integrating Access With the Web and With Other Programs.
Data for Water Resource Management Module 14, part A – Data types and sources.
Managing Data Interoperability with FME Tony Kent Applications Engineer IMGS.
More than you probably wanted to know about NWIS and NWISWeb U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey Kenneth J. Lanfear USGS.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS, STORET, and XML National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Roger Miller, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Barry Jackson, USGS Arkansas Water Science Center ARKANSAS EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR GROUNDWATER-QUALITY.
NetTech Solutions Working with Web Elements Lesson 6.
Search Server Index Search Server Index Somewhere There’s a PLACE for Us: Linking Fedora Digital Collections and Open Geoportal Eleta Exline, Thelma Thompson,
Schema Translation – OS Mastermap, but not as we know it Eddie Curtis, Snowflake Software, Greg Byrom, Richie Fyall GeoData Management Group Ordnance Survey.
TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATIONPARTNERS DOWNLOAD DATA Download water quality data in MS Excel, CSV, TSV, and KML formats. Learn how to use the portal and data.
Facility Registry System and the Exchange Network Pat Garvey OEI/OIC May 2000.
NIWA National Science Centre for Environmental Information Jochen Schmidt, Chief Scientist Federated Information Infrastructure.
Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
Environmental & Health Data Integration for Homeland Security Support Exchange Network Users Meeting Hilton San Francisco Hotel, Continental Ballroom April.
What is Information Modelling (and why do we need it in NEII…)? Dominic Lowe, Bureau of Meteorology, 29 October 2013.
Extensible Markup Language (XML) Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a simple, very flexible text format derived from SGML (ISO 8879).ISO 8879 XML is a.
November 15, National STORET Users Conference 1 Progress Report 2004 National STORET Users Conference November 15-17, 2004 Lee Manning.
What to Know: 9 Essential Things to Know About Web Searching Janet Eke Graduate School of Library and Information Science University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana.
INTEGRATED OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL International Data Exchange Workshop – Kiel, Germany – May 9-11, 2007 SEDIS Scientific Earth.
SE Coastal Network Water Quality Inventory & Monitoring Program Database Development Wade Sheldon & John Carpenter Dept. of Marine Sciences University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Richard Huffine September 17, 2009 Council for Data Integration High Value Opportunities.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Water Data Exchange Services USGS Office of Water Information June 2009 Nate Booth, Dave Briar.
FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.
Challenge Grant Update: Linking the Network of Natural Heritage Biodiversity Data to the Environmental Information Exchange Network.
HIGHLIGHTS From the PHOENIX MEETING December 2002.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Series 2013 Data Management at the National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center.
SSWD Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 15, 2004.
Data Sharing: Progress Report National Water-Quality Monitoring Council July 20, 2004.
Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Pilot and its Potential Role in NWIS/STORET Coordination October 18, 2005.
Data Staging Data Loading and Cleaning Marakas pg. 25 BCIS 4660 Spring 2012.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Monitoring Council April 2014 Duplicated Water Data - Causes, Implications,
GIS data sources; catalogs of data and services. USGS: National Mapping.
Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) v. 1.0 Emergency Management Technical Committee.
GBIF Data Access and Database Interoperability 2003 Work Programme Overview Donald Hobern, GBIF Programme Officer for Data Access and Database Interoperability.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey FGDC CWG January 6, 2009 Geospatial One-Stop Update Rob Dollison
September 2012 Developed by Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department at Purdue University and Department of Regional Infrastructures Engineering.
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
Slide 1 SDTSSDTS FGDC CWG SDTS Revision Project ANSI INCITS L1 Project to Update SDTS FGDC CWG September 2, 2003.
1 UPDATE ON EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR AGRICULTURAL BURNING AND WILDLAND FIRE - ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SUMMARY TABLE JUNE 3 - 4, 2003 MACTEC.
Geography Markup Language (GML). GML What is GML? – Scope  The Geography Markup Language is  a modeling language for geographic information  an encoding.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Central Data Exchange Pilot Project Promoting Geospatial Data Exchange Between EPA and State Partners. April 25, 2007.
ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 Introducing ArcCatalog: Tools for Metadata and Data Management.
Using the Exchange Network A User’s Perspective Deb Soule Watershed Management Bureau New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services.
Providing web services to mobile users: The architecture design of an m-service portal Minder Chen - Dongsong Zhang - Lina Zhou Presented by: Juan M. Cubillos.
Strategy Markup Language (StratML) Enterprise Content Management Association (AIIM)
E-Government Initiative Geospatial Information One-Stop FGDC Coordination Group January 10, 2002 John Moeller.
EPA’s Vision for WQX Suzanne Schwartz, Deputy Office Director, US EPA Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds STORET/WQX Users Conference, Austin TX.
Public Libraries Survey Data File Overview. 2 What We’ll Talk About PLS: Public Library Survey State level data Public library data (Administrative Entities)
1 Web Services USGS/EPA Collaboration February 21, 2008 Dwane Young, U.S. EPA; Jon Scott, USGS; Dorinda Gellenbeck, USGS; Nate Booth, USGS.
Viewpoint Modeling and Model-Based Media Generation for Systems Engineers Automatic View and Document Generation for Scalable Model- Based Engineering.
Geog. 377: Introduction to GIS - Lecture 16 Overheads 1 5. Metadata 6. Summary of Database Creation 7. Data Standards 8. NSDI Topics Lecture 16: GIS Database.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
Developing our Metadata: Technical Considerations & Approach Ray Plante NIST 4/14/16 NMI Registry Workshop BIPM, Paris 1 …don’t worry ;-) or How we concentrate.
Updates on boreholes in EPOS Borehole UML model
TEXAS SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING INFORMATION SYSTEM
FY18 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session
WG standards for data access/exchange
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS, STORET, and XML Advisory Committee on Water Information September 10, 2003 Kenneth J. Lanfear, USGS

22 Purpose  Describe progress in providing an integrated view of NWIS and STORET data ACWI Water Quality Data Elements  Show preliminary ideas for turning ACWI Water Quality Data Elements into a practical XML Schema for describing sampling stations

33 NWIS and STORET  USGS and EPA signed an agreement on Management of Water Quality Data on January 13, Key elements include:  Geospatial internet-based query tool  Joint teams of technical staff to outline options and identify tasks  References ACWI Data Elements

44 Geospatial query tool STORET (national) STORET Warehouse NWIS NWISWeb Local STORET Transactional Distribution Query Tool

55 Phases of development become more challenging PhaseCommon data in portalMapping interfaceHow users get full data sets for stations 1 Station name/number; lat/lon One-time prototype transfer of locations to geospatial query tool Table of links to STORET and NWISWeb 2 Location (watershed, state, county); agency; general site type (surface- water, well, lake, etc.) Regular updates provided to geospatial query tool Station-by-station links to STORET and NWISWeb 3 Summary info. on constituent groups and sampling frequency "" 4 Links to all data, allowing detailed selections Standards-based web mapping services support many interfaces Portal acts as intermediary to deliver data in single format 5 "Standards-based web feature services allow interfaces to manipulate data display Delivered in a standard XML schema for water- quality data

66 Why do we need an XML Schema?  Any advanced “Water Portal” concept (index, warehouse, distributed database, web service, etc.) works a lot better with a standard way to transfer data  Designing an XML schema enforces a discipline on the data model  ACWI Data Elements is a good start  The devil is in the details!

77 DRAFT A (very) DRAFT XML schema for water- quality data: station description

88 Cautions!!!  We need to determine the scope of the data elements. Which ones actually will be needed in a data repository?  Elements must be matched to missions and goals. Most data systems probably will use a subset of the schema.  Need critical review by experts in XML Schema.

99 Some design principles  Strictly define critical elements on which we commonly perform searches, such as  lat/lon; station identification;  standard station type.  Allow more flexibility on documentation elements (e.g. method of altitude determination).  Allow documentation by citation  Individual databases can redefine by restriction.  Shamelessly steal ideas from other sources!

10 Standards and Recommendations  ACWI Data Elements  (Draft) Federal XML Developers Guide  XML Schema style  EPA Environmental Data Registry  Data element names  OpenGIS ® Geography Markup Language  Describe geographic features  ISO 8601  Date, time  HR-XML Consortium  Names and addresses They don’t all agree!

11 Name and address elements are defined by HR-XML Consortium No need to invent our own!

12 Authority: A Reference  Defines code sets, names, methods, or explanations  Allows great flexibility in documentation

13 Station – where you sample New! Simple, standard types (5-6?) plus user-defined types

14 Station Location New Link to GML for subfeatures

15 Pacific Northwest Water Quality Data Exchange (AK, ID, OR, WA)  Data exchange templates and directory services approach  XML Schema in development  Opportunities to share ideas  NWIS/STORET Portal is similar, but would provide more details about stations

16 Extension of Schema  Tie results of sampling to station or sub- features of a station  6.0 Sample Collection  7.0 Sample Analysis  Field trip information?  Where does “3.0 Reason for Sampling” fit?  Why did we select this station?  Why did we collect this sample?

17 Next Steps for XML Schema  Refine schema with expert help, compare to Pacific Northwest schema  Determine role of schema in a water portal  Scope of data elements – which are needed and which can we defer?  Test with data output from NWIS and STORET