1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Review of 2006-07 Progress and Approval of 2007-08 Targets A presentation to the Board by Vince.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.
Advertisements

Review and Discussion of AMAO 2 Criteria & Targets NC Department of Public Instruction With WestEd & Wisconsin Center for Education Research Statewide.
New Jersey Statewide Assessment Results: Highlights and Trends State Board of Education, February 6, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D., Assistant Commissioner,
May 3, 2006WV Department of Education Annual Measurable Objectives for Improving the Achievement of LEP Students Title III AMAOs.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 R-2 Report: Success in algebra by the end of ninth grade A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional.
A presentation to the Board of Education
1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Work session on Strategies to meet Results Targets A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad.
1 Oakland Unified School District Student Results Policy Report: R-3 Citizenship A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic.
1 R-2 Report: Graduation A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional Services Staff Research and Assessment.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
School Improvement Advisory Committee October 15, 2008 Welcome!
STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board.
MCSD EQUITY UPDATE Presented by Sergio Sanchez K-12 Math and ESOL Program Specialist Educational Equity and ADA Coordinator MCSD sanchezs 1.
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
OVERVIEW OF H.B HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to.
AVID Excel Goal To interrupt students’ path to long-term ELL status, accelerate their language acquisition, and put them on the path to AVID and college.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015 EL SEGUNDO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Reclassification of English Learner Students in California
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
Provincial Assessment Results Anglophone West School District November 26, 2015.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Kentucky Board of Education OCTOBER 9, 2012 College/Career Readiness, Proficiency and Achievement Gap Update.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Teacher SLTs
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Teacher SLTs
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Teacher SLTs
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Hedenkamp Elementary School
Leader SLTs
Teacher SLTs
English Learning Meeting June 12th, :00 – 2:15 pm
The RFEP Process RFEP: Redesignated Fluent English Proficient
Teacher SLTs
Presentation transcript:

1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Review of Progress and Approval of Targets A presentation to the Board by Vince Matthews Brad Stam December 8, 2007

2 SECTION 1: Monitoring Progress of R- 2 Academic Achievement: READING All students will meet or exceed rigorous standards in all academic disciplines. Monitoring of performance will include milestone assessments: –Read and write at the end of third grade

3 Statement of Progress: With respect to the provisions of its policy, R-2 Academic Achievement on Reading, the staff concludes based on academic performance during the previous year that, Oakland Public Schools has: _Achieved Reasonable Progress in the area of Reading X Failed to achieve Reasonable Progress in the area of Reading _ Failed to provide sufficient data

4 Interpretation: The results policy states that OUSD students will attain grade level literacy by the end of 3rd grade. The OUSD staff interprets ALL to mean all students except the following: students with severe learning disabilities who are not tested on the CST and students who are CELDT level 1 and 2 and have been in the country for less than 12 months. The OUSD staff interprets proficiency in reading and writing to mean English proficiency in these subjects.

5 Targets and Indicators:

6 Staff Recommendation The Oakland Unified School District has made some progress toward the achievement on the Results Policies, but the staff does not consider this progress reasonable in most cases and there is no evidence of accelerated progress.

7 Key Findings:

8 Supporting Data: This graph shows ELA proficiency by grade for the last two years. There is a sizeable dip from 2nd to 3rd grade. This trend exists statewide, but it is particularly pronounced in OUSD.

9 Supporting Data This graph shows cohort-matched growth of the same set of students who were 2nd graders in and 3rd graders in % of students who scored far below basic in as 2nd graders grew at least one proficiency level in as 3rd graders. Overall, only 22% of students grew one of more performance bands (or remained at advanced) between 2nd and 3rd grade.

10 Supporting Data: This graph shows our performance compared to the state in Reading Comprehension, one component of the ELA CST. OUSD closed the gap slightly in 2nd grade last year, but a 5 percentage point gap in average percent correct remains in both 2nd and 3rd grade.

11 Supporting Data This graph shows our performance compared to the state in Writing Strategies, one component of the ELA CST. OUSD closed the gap slightly in 2nd grade last year, but a 6 percentage a gap in average percent correct remains in both 2nd and 3rd grade.

12 SECTION 2: Approval of Targets for R-2 Academic Achievement: READING

13 Recommendation to Add 3-Year Growth Target The staff recommends defining reasonable district- wide progress to be the following: –Meeting a minimum of 5 of the 8 one-year reasonable progress targets, OR –Meeting a minimum of 5 of the 8 three-year reasonable progress target The staff recommends the one or three year goal as two separate options to demonstrate reasonable progress because it recognizes the fact that growth might not always be linear.

14 Proposed Targets

15