Goal: Learn about potential, principles and Format : Lecture, sometimes followed by exercise. Course project.. Topics : Deterministic interferometry, stochastic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relations between reflection and transmission responses of 3-D inhomogeneous media Kees Wapenaar Department of Applied Earth Sciences Centre for Technical.
Advertisements

Time-reversal acoustics, virtual source imaging, and seismic interferometry Haijiang Zhang University of Science and Technology of China.
Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar 75 th SEG meeting, Houston November 8, 2005.
Seismic Interferometry
3D Super-virtual Refraction Interferometry Kai Lu King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Seismic interferometry: Who needs a seismic source? Roel Snieder Center for Wave Phenomena Colorado School of Mines
Locating Trapped Miners Using Time Reversal Mirrors Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping CaoKim McCarter Gerard T. Schuster November 12, 2008.
Local Reverse Time Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Function Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Local Reverse Time Migration with VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah May 1, 2008 PhD Defense 99 pages.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D OBS Data Weiping Cao, University of Utah Oct
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Name: Gerard Schuster Current Position: Geology & Geophysics Dept., Univ. of Utah Grad. Education: PhD Columbia Univ., 1984 Research: Exploration, Engineering,
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Interferometric Prediction and Least Squares Subtraction of Surface Waves Shuqian Dong and Ruiqing He University of Utah.
Improve Migration Image Quality by 3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Seismic Interferometry: Instead of using just primary arrivals, you also use the multiples for a wider view.
Migration and Attenuation of Surface-Related and Interbed Multiple Reflections Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah April 21, 2006.
Salt Flank Delineation by Interferometric Imaging of Transmitted P-to-S Waves Xiang Xiao Advisor: Gerard T. Schuster Committee: Michael Zhdanov Bob Smith.
1 Interferometric Interpolation and Extrapolation of Sparse OBS and SSP Data Shuqian Dong and G.T.Schuster.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Interferometric Extraction of SSP from Passive Seismic Data Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
1 Fast 3D Target-Oriented Reverse Time Datuming Shuqian Dong University of Utah 2 Oct
Imaging Every Bounce in a Multiple G. Schuster, J. Yu, R. He U of Utah.
Virtual Source Imaging vs Interferometric Imaging Gerard T. Schuster, Andrey Bakulin and Rodney Calvert.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Theory of acoustic daylight imaging revisited
Demonstration of Super-Resolution and Super-Stacking Properties of Time Reversal Mirrors in Locating Seismic Sources Weiping Cao, Gerard T. Schuster, Ge.
Seismic interferometry by cross-correlation or deconvolution?
Seismic interferometry for passive and exploration data:
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Seismic interferometry-by- deconvolution for controlled-source and passive data Kees Wapenaar, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Deyan Draganov, Juerg.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Mitigation of RTM Artifacts with Migration Kernel Decomposition Ge Zhan* and Gerard T. Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology June.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
1 OBS->OBS Extrapolation Interferometry Shuqian Dong and Sherif Hanafy Coarse OBS Virtual SWP.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar with many contributions from: Deyan Draganov, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Evert Slob, Juerg Hunzicker, Jan.
Green function retrieval versus Interferometric imaging Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Delft University of Technology 2005 Joint Assembly May 25, 2005 New.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping Cao Gerard T. Schuster October 2009.
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Interferometric Traveltime Tomography M. Zhou & G.T. Schuster Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Hydro-frac Source Estimation by Time Reversal Mirrors Weiping Cao and Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat Feb 7, 2008.
Seismic interferometry: a comparison of approaches Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Joost van der Neut Jan Thorbecke Delft University of Technology.
The acoustic Green’s function in 3D is the impulsive point source response of an acoustic medium. It satisfies the 3-D Helmholtz equation in the frequency.
1.1 Seismic Interferometry Optical interferometry.
The acoustic Green’s function in 3D is the impulsive point source response of an acoustic medium. It satisfies the 3-D Helmholtz equation in the frequency.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
Migration of intermediate offset data from two-boat-survey Zongcai Feng Nov 3, 2015.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
ABSTRACT –Basic Principles and applications
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Seismic Interferometry
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Tutorial on Green’s Theorem and Forward Modeling, SRME, Interferometry, and Migration ..
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Seismic Interferometry and 3x3 Classification Matrix
Super-virtual Refraction Interferometry: Theory
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Goal: Learn about potential, principles and Format : Lecture, sometimes followed by exercise. Course project.. Topics : Deterministic interferometry, stochastic interferometry, 3x3 classification matrix, reciprocity theorems, applications to VSP, SSP, OBS, and Xwell data. Seismic Interferometry Course (Schuster, Cambridge Press) algorithms of seismic interferometry

Seismic Interferometry: Instead of using just primary arrivals, you also use the multiples for a wider view

Overview of Seismic Interferometry and Applications in Exploration Gerard Schuster KAUST & University of Utah

Outline What is Seismic Interferometry?What is Seismic Interferometry? ApplicationsApplications ConclusionsConclusions VSP->SSP (surface seismic profile)VSP->SSP (surface seismic profile) VSP->SWP (single well profile)VSP->SWP (single well profile) SSP->SSPSSP->SSP

SELECTIVE HISTORY SEISMIC INTERFEROMETRY 1968 Claerbout V(z)+passive 1980s Cole+Claerbout V(x,y,z)+passive? 1990s Scherbaum earthquake V(z)+passive 2001 Utah: Stationary Phase Theory, SSP, and VSP Seismic Interferometric imaging, deterministic Wapenaar Recip. Thm. Correlation Type Shell Virtual Sources:Calvert+Bakulin Snieder Stationary Phase Redatuming Gerstoft + others Surface Wave Interferometry Gerstoft + others Surface Wave Interferometry ! 1999 Rickett+Claerbout V(z) Helioseismology Daylight Imaging, passive 1970s Berryhill model-based redatum redatum

SELECTIVE HISTORY SEISMIC INTERFEROMETRY ! redatum Surface waves Shapiro, Derode, Larose, Dong, Xue, Halliday, Curtis, Van Mannen, Robertsson, Gerstoft, Sabra, Kepler, Roux, Gerstoft, Sabra, Kepler, Roux, He, Ritzwoller, Campillo etc Interpolation Sheng, Curry, Berkhout, Wang, Dong, Hanafy, Cao, etc Extrapolation Dong, Hanafy, Cao, etc Theory: Acoustic, EM, Elastic, Potential Fink, Wapenaar, Snieder, Papanicolaou, Blomgren, Slob, Thorbeck, van der Neut etc Refractions Boise State Univ, Dong Passive Reservoir Shell, Draganov, Wapenaar, Snieder, Polleto Miranda, etc Exploration Curry, Guitton, Shragg, Yu, Artman Yu, Calvert, Bakulin, He, Jiang, Hornby, Xiao, Willis, Lu, Toksoz, Campman etc VSP Model Tank Scales, Malcolm etc Volcanoes+Coda Snieder, Scales, Gret et al Engineering Xwell Minato, Onishi, Matsuoka etc Nowack, Sheng, Curtis etc Earthquakes EM Slob, Wapenaar, Snieder

What is Seismic Interferometry? Answer: Redatums data by correlation of trace pairs and stacking the result for different shot positions stacking the result for different shot positions A G(B|x) * = G(B|B) Point Source Response with src at B and rec at B Assume a VSP experiment VSP experiment direct F.S. multiple i  e xBxBxBxB +  BzBzBzBz zBzBzBzB i  e xBxBxBxB i  e  BzBzBzBz zBzBzBzB = VSP => SSP B z z Phase of Common Raypath Cancels Raypath Cancels virtual primary B x z virtual sourcecorrelation No need to know src. location No need to know src. location No need to know src excitation time No need to know src excitation time stacking Redatum source closer to target Redatum source closer to target s

A G(B|x) * = G(B|B) Point Source Response with src at B and rec at B i  e xBxBxBxB +  BzBzBzBz zBzBzBzB i  e xBxBxBxB i  e  BzBzBzBz zBzBzBzB = z z Phase of Common Raypath Cancels Raypath Cancels x z x x ~~ No need to know src. location No need to know src. location No need to know src excitation time No need to know src excitation time Redatum source closer to target Redatum source closer to target Answer: Redatums data by correlation of trace pairs and stacking the result for different shot positions stacking the result for different shot positions correlation stacking What is Seismic Interferometry?

Reciprocity Correlation Equation 2D Reflection Data Phase of Common Raypath Cancels x x A A B VSP VSP SSP BA Old Multiples Become New Primaries! x = G(A|B) G(x|B)* G(x|A) k ~~ No need to know VSP rec location at x No need to know receiver statics

Reciprocity Correlation Equation 2D Reflection Data x = G(A|B) G(x|B)* G(x|A) k xx A A B AB Old Multiples Become New Primaries! { } G(A|x) G(B|x) G(B|x) G(B|x) - G(A|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) n * * * S well (Wapenaar, 2004) 1-way+ far-field approx. 1-way+ far-field approx. Problems: Finite source aperture No attenuation Deghostfilt., U & D separation Muting, Least squares or MDD Atten. Compensation Finite aperture leads to incomplete G(B|A)

 Prediction Multiple by Convolution (SRME)  Prediction Primaries by Crosscorrelation (Crosscorrelation migration interferometry) * BCABCAB

X (ft) Depth (ft) VSP Multiple (12 receivers ft spacing; 500 shots) TLE, Jiang et al., 2005

X (ft) Depth (ft) Surface Seismic TLE, Jiang et al., 2005

X (ft) Depth (ft) VSP Multiple (12 receivers ft spacing; 500 shots) TLE, Jiang et al., 2005

Instead of using just primary arrivals, you also use the multiples for a wider/partial vision Small vs Huge Illumination Primary reflections Multiple reflections Standard VSP Imaging Interferometric VSP Imaging Standard VSP vs Interferometric VSP Imaging

Stellar Interferometry An astronomical interferometer is an array of telescopes or mirror segments acting together to probe structures with higher resolution. stellar interferometry, a team of French astronomers has captured one of the sharpest color images ever made. They observed the star T Leporis with the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI; Cerro Paranal, Chile), which emulates a virtual telescope Very Large Telescope InterferometerVery Large Telescope Interferometer about 100 meters across, and which revealed a spherical molecular shell around the aged star. about 100 meters across, and which revealed a spherical molecular shell around the aged star.

3x3 Classification Matrix SSPVSPSWP VSP SSP SWP SSPSSPSSPSSPVSPSWP VSPVSPVSP SWPSWPSWP VSP SWP SWP VSP SSP SSP in out

Summary Seismic Interferometry:Seismic Interferometry: x Im[G(A|B)] Im[G(A|B)] G(x|B)* G(x|A) ~ ~ A B x G(A|x) G(B|x) imaginary k A B x G(A|B) Merits: Eliminates need for src location, excitation time, some statics. Moves rec./srcs closer to target, no velocity model needed (unlike Berryhill).Merits: Eliminates need for src location, excitation time, some statics. Moves rec./srcs closer to target, no velocity model needed (unlike Berryhill). Challenges: Finite aperture and noise, attenuation, acoustic & farfield approximations, amplitude fidelityChallenges: Finite aperture and noise, attenuation, acoustic & farfield approximations, amplitude fidelity Killer Apps in Earthquake: Surface wave interferometryKiller Apps in Earthquake: Surface wave interferometry Killer Apps in Exploration: Passive reservoir monitoring? OBS? EM? VSPKiller Apps in Exploration: Passive reservoir monitoring? OBS? EM? VSP

Outline What is Seismic Interferometry?What is Seismic Interferometry? Reciprocity Equation Correlation TypeReciprocity Equation Correlation Type Classification MatrixClassification Matrix ApplicationsApplications ConclusionsConclusions Background for Non-geo typesBackground for Non-geo types

Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type 0. Define Problem Given:Find:A G(A|B) Free surface B G(A|x)AB G(B|x) x

Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type 1. Helmholtz Eqns: 2 + k 2 []G(A|x) =- (x-A); 2 + k 2 []P(B|x) =- (x-B) * * 22 + k []G(A|x) =- (x-A)P(B|x) 22 + k []P(B|x) =- (x-B)G(A|x) * * P(B|x) - G(A|x) 2 = (B-x)G(A|x) - (A-x)P(B|x) 2 ** * * 2. Multiply by G(A|x) and P(B|x) and subtract * G(A|x) AB Free surface P(B|x) x G(A|x) = P(B|x) P(B|x) P(B|x) G(A|x) G(A|x) 2 { } - P(B|x) - P(B|x) G(A|x) G(A|x) *** [ ] P(B|x) = G(A|x) G(A|x) G(A|x) P(B|x) P(B|x) 2 - G(A|x) - G(A|x) P(B|x) P(B|x) [ ]*** [ ]

Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type 1. Helmholtz Eqns: 2 + k 2 []G(A|x) =- (x-A); 2 + k 2 []P(B|x) =- (x-B) * * 22 + k []G(A|x) =- (x-A)P(B|x) 22 + k []P(B|x) =- (x-B)G(A|x) * * P(B|x) - G(A|x) 2 = (B-x)G(A|x) - (A-x)P(B|x) 2 ** * * 2. Multiply by G(A|x) and P(B|x) and subtract * G(A|x) = P(B|x) P(B|x) P(B|x) G(A|x) G(A|x) 2 { } - P(B|x) - P(B|x) G(A|x) G(A|x) *** P(B|x) = G(A|x) G(A|x) G(A|x) P(B|x) P(B|x) 2 - G(A|x) - G(A|x) P(B|x) P(B|x) [ ]*** G(A|x)P(B|x) - G(A|x) { } = (B-x)G(A|x) - (A-x)P(B|x) * * * G(A|x) AB Free surface P(B|x) x [

Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type 3. Integrate over a volume 4. Gauss’s Theorem Source line G(A|x)P(B|x) - G(A|x)d x 3 = G(A|B) - P(B|A) { } *** G(A|x)P(B|x) - G(A|x)d x 2 = G(A|B) - P(B|A) { } n * * * G(A|B) Integration at infinity vanishes AB Free surface x

Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type 3. Integrate over a volume 4. Gauss’s Theorem Source line G(A|x)P(B|x) - G(A|x)d x 3 = G(A|B) - P(B|A) { } *** G(A|x)G(B|x) - G(A|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) { } n* * *G(A|B) Integration at infinity vanishes AB Free surface x Relationship between reciprocal Green’s functions

Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type Source line G(A|x)G(B|x) - G(A|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) { } n** * = 2i Im[G(A|B)] Recall G(A|x ) = |r| iwr/c e iw/cnnr G(B|x )* = |r| -iwr/c e -iw/c nnr(1)(2a)(2b) Plug (2a) and (2b) into (1) G(A|x ) ik G(B|x ) *-ik Source line G(A|x)G(B|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) r * * = 2i Im[G(A|B)] (3) n 2ik Neglect 1/r 2 A X B

Far-Field Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type G(A|B) AB Free surface x nr~~ 1 Source line G(A|x)G(B|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) r * * = Im[G(A|B)] = 2i Im[G(A|B)](3) n k Source line G(A|x)G(B|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) r * * = Im[G(A|B)] = 2i Im[G(A|B)](4) nk A n r^^

Far-Field Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type nr~~ 1 Source line G(A|x)G(B|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) r * * = Im[G(A|B)] = 2i Im[G(A|B)](3) n k Source line G(A|x)G(B|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) r * * = Im[G(A|B)] = 2i Im[G(A|B)](4) nk G(A|B)AB Free surface x

Source line G(A|x)G(B|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) r * * = Im[G(A|B)] = 2i Im[G(A|B)](4) nk Far-Field Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type x B A G(B|x)* x G(A|x)x G(A|B) Source redatumed from x to B Virtual source

Outline What is Seismic Interferometry?What is Seismic Interferometry? ApplicationsApplications ConclusionsConclusions VSP->SSP (surface seismic profile)VSP->SSP (surface seismic profile) VSP->SWP (single well profile)VSP->SWP (single well profile) SSP->SSPSSP->SSP

Implementation x = Im[G(A|B)] G(A|x)* G(B|x) k A x B A x B A x B VSP VSP SSP 1. FK Filter up and downgoing waves 2. Correlation:  (A,B,x) = G(A|x)* G(B|x) 3. Summation: x = Im[G(A|B)] k  (A,B,x) 4. Migration: M(x) = Mig(G(A|B)) Challenge: Finite Receiver Aperture = Partial Reconstruction

3D SEG Salt Model Test (He, 2006)

VSP Multiples Migration Courtesy ( Courtesy of P/GSI: ~¼ million traces, ~3 GB memory, ~4 hours on a PC ) Stack of 6 receiver gathers (He, 2006)

Marine 3D VSP Field Data Application

BP 3D VSP Survey Geometry (36 recs) ~ 11 km 3 km 1.6 km 4.0 km (He et al., 2007)

VSP->SSP Summary ! Key Point #1: Every Bounce Pt on Surface Acts a New Virtual Source Key Point #2: Kills Receiver Statics Key Point #3: Redatuming = Huge Increase Illumination area x = Im[G(A|B)] G(A|x)* G(B|x) k A x B A x B A x B VSP VSP SSP Key Point #4: Liabilities: Finite Aperture noise, attenuation, loss amplitudes fidelity

Outline What is Seismic Interferometry?What is Seismic Interferometry? ApplicationsApplications ConclusionsConclusions VSP->SSP (surface seismic profile)VSP->SSP (surface seismic profile) VSP->SWP (single well profile)VSP->SWP (single well profile) SSP->SSPSSP->SSP

Problem: Overburden+statics defocus VSP migration Redatum sources below overburden Local VSP migration Solution: VSP -> SWP Transform (Calvert, Bakulin) MotivationVSPVSPSWP

VSP Geometry Offset (m) Depth (m) (m) Time (s) 0 3 Reflectionwavefield (He, 2006)

VSP Geometry Offset (m) Depth (m) (m) (He, 2006) Time (s) 0 3 Reflectionwavefield superresolution China

VSP Salt Flank Imaging (Hornby & Yu, 2006) ? 98 geophones 120 shots Overburden Poor image of flank by standard migration

ft Interferometric Migration Result

VSP->SWP Summary ! 3. Kills Source Statics and no need to know src location or excitation time 1. Redatum sources below overburden 2. Local VSP migration 4. Super-resolution 5. Instead of redatuming receivers to surface, we redatum sources to depth. redatum sources to depth.

Outline What is Seismic Interferometry?What is Seismic Interferometry? ApplicationsApplications ConclusionsConclusions VSP->SSP (surface seismic profile)VSP->SSP (surface seismic profile) VSP->SWP (single well profile)VSP->SWP (single well profile) SSP->SSPSSP->SSP

x BA Surface Wave Interferometry G(A|x)* G(B|x) x B A G(B|A)

A Surface Wave Interferometry G(A|x)* G(B|x) = G(B|A) B x

Shear velocity A Surface Wave Interferometry G(A|x)* G(B|x) = G(B|A) B x x Yao (2009) S-velocity distribution, surface wave predic.+elimination

3x3 Classification Matrix SSPVSPSWP VSP SSP SWP SSPSSPSSPSSPVSPSWP VSPVSPVSP SWPSWPSWP VSP SWP SWP VSP SSP SSP in out

Summary Seismic Interferometry:Seismic Interferometry: x Im[G(A|B)] Im[G(A|B)] G(x|B)* G(x|A) ~ ~ k A B x G(A|B) A B x G(A|x) G(B|x) Merits: Eliminates need for src location, excitation time, some statics. Moves rec./srcs closer to target, no velocity model needed (unlike Berryhill).Merits: Eliminates need for src location, excitation time, some statics. Moves rec./srcs closer to target, no velocity model needed (unlike Berryhill). Challenges: Finite aperture and noise, attenuation, acoustic & farfield approximations, amplitude fidelityChallenges: Finite aperture and noise, attenuation, acoustic & farfield approximations, amplitude fidelity Killer Apps in Earthquake: Surface wave interferometryKiller Apps in Earthquake: Surface wave interferometry Killer Apps in Exploration: Passive reservoir monitoring? OBS? EM? VSPKiller Apps in Exploration: Passive reservoir monitoring? OBS? EM? VSP

Thanks UTAM sponsorsUTAM sponsors Min Zhou, Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat, Ge ZhanMin Zhou, Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat, Ge Zhan

Outline What is Seismic Interferometry?What is Seismic Interferometry? Reciprocity Equation Correlation TypeReciprocity Equation Correlation Type Classification MatrixClassification Matrix ApplicationsApplications ConclusionsConclusions Background for Non-geo typesBackground for Non-geo types

Saudi Land Survey overburden shale sandstone shale sandstone

Saudi Land Survey primary multiple

-3.6 Offset (km) 0 2 Time (s) Saudi Land Survey SSP=Surface Seismic Survey

12.5 m SSP=Surface Seismic Survey Marine SSP Survey

Vertical Seismic Profile Survey

Survey Goal: Get d from d Geologist Goal: Get m from d Geologist Goal: Get m from d d(g,t) g t m(x,z) Lm=dLm=dLm=dLm=d m = [L L] L d ~ L d TTT Model based Data based

Source line G(A|x)G(B|x) d x 2 = G(A|B) - G(B|A) r * * = Im[G(A|B)] = 2i Im[G(A|B)](4) nk Far-Field Reciprocity Eqn. of Correlation Type Source redatumed from x to B x B A G(B|x)* x G(A|x) x G(A|B) Recovering the Green’s function

Outline What is Seismic Interferometry?What is Seismic Interferometry? Reciprocity Equation Correlation TypeReciprocity Equation Correlation Type Classification MatrixClassification Matrix ApplicationsApplications ConclusionsConclusions Background for Non-geo typesBackground for Non-geo types