Hwy 101 from SW 29 th St. to SW 32 nd St. Highway Capacity per Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Números.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Special Right Triangles
In-Home Pantry Inventory Updated: November Background and Methodology Background In 1996 a National Eating Trends (NET) pantry survey found that.
EuroCondens SGB E.
RWTÜV Fahrzeug Gmbh, Institute for Vehicle TechnologyTÜV Mitte Group 1 GRB Working Group Acceleration Pattern Results of pass-by noise measurements carried.
Predicting the pH of salt solutions. Hydrolysis of ions Hydrolysis refers to a reaction with water (e.g. splitting water into H + and OH – ) When salts.
1 When you see… Find the zeros You think…. 2 To find the zeros...
4-4 Variability Objective: Learn to find measures of variability.
Chapter 14 Rational Expressions.
12.3 – Analyzing Data.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
Signing Plan Design - At Grade Intersections TEM Chapter Application Guidelines - Regulatory Signs.
FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
US101: SE 16 th – SE 36 th Street (Lincoln City) )Project Community Advisory Committee July 11, 2007 Meeting.
2009 Roadway Conference April 20, 2009 Cathy Nelson, Technical Services Manager / Chief Engineer.
Joint PDT/CAC Meeting June 16, 2010 Citizens Advisory Committee Project Development Team OR 62 Corridor Project Date: Wednesday, June 16 th 2010 Time:
Superelevation Lennie Torgerson Engineering Applications Support Team
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FILE: CAPACITY~.PPT DATE: 08/20/2007 REGION 2 TECH CENTER Region 2 Traffic LINCOLN CITY: 16 TH – 36 TH PROJECT 32 ND.
Federal Safety Funding for Local Governments Martin Andersen Local Government Section Manager February 19, 2010.
Presentation to ODOT Planners April 25, 2012 Bill Johnston – Area 1 Planner (Astoria) US 101: Camp Rilea to Surf Pines Lane Facility Plan.
Dennis L. Edwards Tunnel
Public Involvement Open Houses Develop Problem Statement Review plans, policies, regulations, and standards Identify and assess Alternate Mobility.
1/15 Collaboration and Vision: The Seaside Transportation System Plan.
Transportation Engineering School of Civil and Construction Engineering Karen Dixon Associate Professor, OSU Advisory Curve Speeds on Oregon Highways.
OR 22 – Greenwood Road to Doaks Ferry Road Expressway Management Plan.
Supported by ESRC Large Grant. What difference does a decade make? Satisfaction with the NHS in Northern Ireland in 1996 and 2006.
Identifying money correctly 1
Selfish Flows over Time Umang Bhaskar, Lisa Fleischer Dartmouth College Elliot Anshelevich Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
The 5S numbers game..
The basics for simulations
Roundabout Level of Service and Delay and Comparison to Other Intersection Types Roundabout Level of Service and Delay and Comparison to Other Intersection.
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT DEPLOYMENT EVALUATION I-270/I-255 Traffic and Safety Conference May 12, 2010 Missouri University of Science and Technology and HDR.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Public Meeting Presentation March 15, Project Location Project Purpose –Traffic reliever to I-95 –Integrate road with the Northwest Sector Plan.
Visual Highway Data Select a highway below... NORTH SOUTH Salisbury Southern Maryland Eastern Shore.
CSE 6007 Mobile Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
MATHS FACTS YOU NEED TO KNOW
Box-and-Whisker Plots. Important Terms Median:The middle number in a set of data when the data are arranged in numerical order. Quartile:One of four equal.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Signs, Signals, and Pavement Markings
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Drivers Education Journal # Please pick up all the handouts Get out a sheet of loose leaf paper and something to write with Write the.
WARNING This CD is protected by Copyright Laws. FOR HOME USE ONLY. Unauthorised copying, adaptation, rental, lending, distribution, extraction, charging.
2-10 ODOT Sign Policy and Guidelines for the State Highway System Ch. 6 – Construction and Maintenance Signs Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic-Roadway.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
úkol = A 77 B 72 C 67 D = A 77 B 72 C 67 D 79.
5/19/20151 Segoe Road Proposed Remarking Plan Scott Langer Traffic Engineer City of Madison Traffic Engineering Division Madison, Wisconsin.
Vehicle Flow.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Course Logistics HW3 and HW4 returned Midterms returned Wednesday HW5 assigned today, due next Monday Project 1 due Friday.
CTC-340 Signals - Basics. Terms & Definitions (review) Cycle - Cycle Length - Interval -. change interval - clearance interval- change + clearance = Yi.
A network is shown, with a flow f. v u 6,2 2,2 4,1 5,3 2,1 3,2 5,1 4,1 3,3 Is f a maximum flow? (a) Yes (b) No (c) I have absolutely no idea a b c d.
Traffic Concepts CEE 320 Steve Muench.
WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 Tolling Study Committee.
SR 997 / KROME AVENUE Florida Department of Transportation April 27th, 2006 South Miami-Dade Watershed Study Advisory Committee.
Freeways and Multilane Highways CTC-340. HMWK Ch 13 Read Section 13.7 Ch 13 # 2, 3 Ch 14# 1, 4, 5, 6, 8.
Vehicle Flow. Homework Ch 3 # 1,4, 7, 15 Vehicle Flow How do vehicles operate in the system –capacity –speed –headway –density.
US 25 Corbin to London Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting #3 May 2012.
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
2012 UPDATE Peter A. Allain, PE Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
Presentation transcript:

Hwy 101 from SW 29 th St. to SW 32 nd St. Highway Capacity per Design

Mobility Standards Maximum Volume to Capacity Ratio V/C is the volume to capacity ratio that measures the functionality of an intersection. (Analogy – a bucket represents the capacity of a roadway and varying amounts of water as the demand on the roadway. If the bucket is less than half full it is easy to carry and move around. Once the water level reaches the ¾ mark it becomes harder to move without splashing and the person carrying it moves much slower. When the bucket is full it is very hard to move without splashing even taking very small steps (V/C=1). If more water is added, it flows over the sides creating a big mess (V/C >1.0)!) Statewide Hwy Non-Freight Routes with posted speed less of 35 mph or less – 1999 Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) mobility (V/C) standard is 0.85 (the absolute maximum for this vicinity). 20 Year Highway Design Manual (HDM) - Mobility Standard for Statewide Hwy (NHS) Non-Freight Routes with posted speed less than 45 mph – maximum V/C ratio is 0.75.

2 Lane 4 Lane 2007 V/C = V/C = 0.83 (Need V/C < 0.75) HDM* Mobility Standard = V/C = 1.06 (Need V/C < 0.75) HDM* Mobility Standard = Lane design Inadequate * HDM – ODOT 2003 Highway Design Manual 2007 V/C = V/C = 0.53 (Need V/C < 0.75) HDM* Mobility Standard = V/C = 0.62 (Need V/C < 0.75) HDM* Mobility Standard = Lane design Adequate