Team-Based Inquiry ASTC Preconference Workshop, October 18 www.nisenet.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NISE Network Evaluation: What We’ve Learned and Where We’re Headed Network-Wide Meeting December 2012.
Advertisements

School Improvement Work Day. Continuous School Improvement The Model of Process Cycle for School Improvement provides the foundation to address school.
Bilingual NanoDays y Más: Tools and strategies to start, or enrich, your bilingual programs
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
Association of Science-Technology Annual Conference October 31-November 1, 2009 Session Leader: Diane LaFollette, Network Coordinator, Arkansas Discovery.
An Overview of the NISE Network Presentation Overview NISE Network Network Community Educational Products Get More Involved.
Training in Nano Content Session Presenters Shari Hartshorn Science Museum of Minnesota Tifferney White Lied Discovery Children’s Museum.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
The 5 E Instructional Model
Options for researching the library’s impact on early literacy skill development Research designs for investigating cause and effect relationships: Experimental.
Nano is for Everyone Expanding Your Reach Through Partnerships
NanoDays! JUNE 2015 NETWORK-WIDE MEETING NISENET.ORG.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
This project was supported by Award No VF-GX-0001, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
Museum and Community Partnerships.
1 NARST Annual Conference, Puerto Rico, 2013 Symposium - The Policy, Practice, and Research Nexus of Climate Change Education Symposium Co-Presenters:
Integrating Nano Into Larger Themes JUNE 2015 NETWORK-WIDE MEETING NISENET.ORG.
Engaging Community Stakeholders in the Delivery of Injury Prevention Messages in Early Childhood Name of Presenter: Orgnization: Date:
An Overview of the NISE Network Presentation Overview NISE Network Network Community Educational Products Evaluation and Research.
Engaging Visitors in Nanotechnology & Society
Engaging the Public in Conversations about Nanotechnology & Society Network-Wide Meeting December 2012.
Welcome! We’re warming up with professional-style introductions. Don’t forget to… breathe, smile, make eye-contact, provide the motivation for your work,
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
1 MH513 Earth & Space Science Unit 8 Science In Social & Personal Perspective Unit 9 Science & Technology William Caten C-Track March 2011 William Caten.
Planning a Museum & Community Partnership Project Brown-Bag Workshop | Wednesday, September 30, Welcome (Kayla Berry) 2.Introduction (Rae Ostman)
Small footprint exhibitions. Overview 1.Nano small footprint exhibition 2.Possible future directions 3.Discussion.
Vermont’s Early Childhood & Family Mental Health Competencies A story of Integration & Collaboration  How can they help me?
Evaluation Overview: Rochelle Schultz Spinarski, Rural Health Solutions Community Care Learning Collaborative October 29, 2014.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Agenda Identify and define the key elements of formative assessment. Determine the relationship between the key elements of formative assessment and student.
Primary Years Programme FLIBS PYP: PYP Chair: Sandy Wesson PYP Chair Elect: Rachel Goodnow PYP Secretary: Gayle Baisch Grants Committee: Cynthia Doyle.
Building relationships and bridging social capital: An inclusive approach to immigrant civic engagement within libraries A PROCESS AND OUTCOME EVALUATION,
Science Case Network Welcome RCN-UBE Project #
Fabrication. Fabrication in 5 easy steps: 1.Choosing vendors 2.Ordering materials 3.Fabricating materials 4.Packing materials 5.Shipping materials.
Engaging Visitors in Nanotechnology & Society
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
June 2015 Network-Wide Meeting Thursday wrap-up.
Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.
Workshop # 2: Effective Family Centered Casework: Tools and Applications THE TRAINING SERIES.
NanoDays nisenet.org. Presentation Overview Intro to NanoDays NanoDays nationwide Our NanoDays event Engaging the public in nano What is nano? NanoDays.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
Engaging Visitors in Science and Society Conversations.
Literacy Partner 2007 – 2008 The literacy partner supports student learning by collaborating with teachers and administrators to model best practices and.
Team-Based Inquiry Making Evaluative Thinking Part of Your Work Network-Wide Meeting December 2012.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
The Family Nano: Engaging Family Audiences through Festivals and Evening Events Network-Wide Meeting December 2012.
What are my next steps? Incorporating universal design into your own work and advocating for accessibility in your own institution NISE Net Universal Design.
Action Research Purpose and Benefits Technology as a Learning Tool to Improve Student Achievement.
Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) – A Teacher Tool for Implementing the CCSS AGENDA October 4 th and 5 th 2012 Outcomes: Self- reflections on how the.
Building Relationships with Researchers Kevin Dilley, Sciencenter Neetha Khan, Carnegie Mellon University Lisa Porter, Carnegie Mellon University Michelle.
Engaging Visitors in Nanotechnology & Society
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Lesson Study: Learning to Plan Powerful Lessons Together.
Where We Are and Where We Want to Be
FPG Child Development Institute
Discussion and Conclusion
Universal Design Workshop July 30-31, 2013
Nanotechnology & Society
Nanotechnology & Society
Validation Team Exit Report
Nanotechnology & Society
Nanotechnology & Society
Nanotechnology & Society
Nanotechnology & Society
NanoDays Welcome, and thank you for helping out with our NanoDays event! nisenet.org.
Involving children and young people
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #XXXXXX. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations.
Validation Team Exit Report
Presentation transcript:

Team-Based Inquiry ASTC Preconference Workshop, October 18

Workshop Goals Encourage and empower museum professionals to use team-based inquiry to improve informal education experiences 1.Understand what TBI is and how it can be used to more effectively develop educational experiences and improve professional practice 2.Value TBI as a tool 3.Develop skills to use TBI 4.Use professional resources to try implementing TBI in your own work

Speed Dating What are three surprising things that most people might not know about you? How do you currently get information to help improve your work or the educational experiences you create and deliver? How did you become involved in ISE or museum work? What experience have you had with evaluation? What is your best (or worst) science-related childhood memory? What is a current challenge in your work or at your institution that you would like to address within the next year?

Team-Based Inquiry

An approach to empowering professionals to get the data they need, when they need it, in order to improve their products and practices and create successful educational experiences QuestionInvestigateReflectImprove Systematic Led by non-evaluation professionals Collaborative and team based Small scale and focused Embedded in work Systematic Led by non-evaluation professionals Collaborative and team based Small scale and focused Embedded in work

“Horton Senses Something Small” Data collection Observations of participants Surveys with caregivers and parents Example improvements Shortened story Prompted participation Does the program engage young children? How could it be improved?

Are educational posters worth including in the NanoDays 2012 kit? NanoDays 2012 Posters Data collection Interviews with 30 visitors at three museums Informal observations Debrief with educators Example lessons learned Visitors liked the graphics and suggested improvements Educators felt graphics attracted attention and defined space

Are we achieving our meeting goals? How can we better support participants? NISE Regional Meetings Data collection Butcher paper and sticky notes: (1)What do you value most about this meeting? (2)What’s one thing you’re taking from this meeting to bring back to your institution? (3)In what ways can the Network further support you nano education work? Example lessons learned More opportunities for partners to share

Team-Based Inquiry ?

TBI In Action QuestionInvestigateReflectImprove How could this activity be improved? Collect feedback by interviewing visitors after activity. Review interview responses to identify common patterns. Brainstorm, prioritize, and implement solutions.

TBI In Action

Phase 1: Question QuestionInvestigateReflectImprove How can this activity be improved to be more engaging for visitors and better communicate the main message about nanoscience? Collect feedback by interviewing visitors after activity. Review interview responses to identify common patterns. Brainstorm, prioritize, and implement solutions.

Phase 1: Question

Ferrofluid Activity How can this activity be improved to be more engaging for visitors and better communicate the main message about nanoscience?

Phase 2: Investigate QuestionInvestigateReflectImprove Collect feedback by interviewing visitors after activity. Review interview responses to identify common patterns. Brainstorm, prioritize, and implement solutions. How could this activity be improved?

Phase 2: Investigate ConnectCollectClose

Phase 3: Reflect QuestionInvestigateReflectImprove Collect feedback by interviewing visitors after activity. Review interview responses to identify common patterns. Brainstorm, prioritize, and implement solutions. How could this activity be improved?

Step 3: Reflect

Phase 4: Improve QuestionInvestigateReflectImprove Collect feedback by interviewing visitors after activity. Brainstorm, prioritize, and implement solutions. Review interview responses to identify common patterns. How could this activity be improved?

Phase 4: Improve

Wrap-Up 1.At the end of this workshop, are there new TBI questions that you might want to investigate related to your own work or projects at your institution? 2.What are the three most important things you will take away from this workshop? 3.What are three things you would like to do at your institution or as part of your work based on what you've learned or practiced today?

Wrap-Up How can we make staff meetings more useful and efficient? What exhibit topics are visitors interested in? What communication strategies are working well and not so well on this project? What would my staff like the department to focus on over the next year? How do local community organizations currently perceive the accessibility of our institution?

TBI Guide

Questions and Comments

This presentation is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.