Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continuous Improvement Professional Learning Community Framework What does it look like? What does it look like? Module Two.
Advertisements

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Continuous Improvement
PDSA Classroom.
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Theme by Richard Strauss…from 2001 A Space Odyssey, 1968: Also Sprach Zarathrustra State Systemic Improvement Plan : Challenge and Opportunity for the.
High Quality Child Outcomes Data in Early Childhood: More Important than Ever Kathleen Hebbeler, SRI International Christina Kasprzak, Frank Porter Graham.
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
SPP/APR/SSIP/SiMR Welcome to More Acronyms. Who is here? Introductions – who are you HERE? Your name cards are color coded by which group you represent.
REL Midwest REL Midwest: An Overview Matt Dawson Director, REL Midwest July 2012.
State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report SPP/APR State Systemic Improvement Plan SSIP / Indicator 17.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Getting Ready for Phase II of the SSIP
Ready for Phase II? Developing an Effective Systemic Improvement Plan Anne Lucas, ECTA/WRRC Grace Kelley, SERRC Taletha Derrington, DaSy Christina Kasprzak,
Ready for Phase II? Developing an Effective Systemic Improvement Plan Anne Lucas, ECTA/WRRC Grace Kelley, SERRC Taletha Derrington, DaSy Christina Kasprzak,
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
4 th Annual SPDG National Meeting: Day 2 Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. OSEP Project Director and SPDG Program Lead John Lind Director, SIGnetwork.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems What Practitioners Need to Know about Measuring EI and ECSE Outcomes Kathleen Hebbeler, SRI International.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
State Systemic Improvement Plan March 18,  All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best supports States in.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Anne Lucas, WRRC/ECTA Ron Dughman, MPRRC Janey Henkel, MPRRC 2013 WRRC Leadership Forum October.
Engagement as Strategy: Leading by Convening in the SSIP Part 2 8 th Annual Capacity Building Institute May, 2014 Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Mariola.
Presentation to SAC June 3, 2015 Ruth Littlefield.
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
SSIP Implementation Support Visit Idaho State Department of Education September 23-24, 2014.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
SSIP Process A Suggested Pathway, Timeline and Gantt Chart WRRC Regional Forum Eugene October 31 and November 1, 2013.
RPTAC Region 4 Conference: Results-Driven Accountability Gregg Corr, Ed.D. Director Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning Office of Special.
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 5. Agenda for Today Stakeholder involvement Review Draft SSIP –Baseline Data / Target setting –Introduction –Data.
All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Georgia Parent Mentor Kickoff: Inform, Imagine, Inspire with Results-Driven Accountability Ruth Ryder DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
Collaboration through State Systemic Improvement Planning: Working together to improve outcomes for young children with disabilities Division for Early.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
2016 Utah Transition Institute Developing Improvement Strategies.
Arizona State Systemic Improvement Plan Update State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report  All indicators are still significant and will be.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
1 STATE SYSTEMIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN Early Intervention Colorado Technical Assistance Call April 3, 2014.
Infrastructure Analysis: Part C Christina Kasprzak, ECTA, DaSy Verna Thompson, Early Development and Learning Resources, Delaware Joicey Hurth, NERRC and.
84.323A State Personnel Development Grants Program FY 2015 Competition Jennifer Coffey, PhD December 15 th, 2014.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Rorie Fitzpatrick & Dona Meinders, WestEd
Region 1 PTAC Regional Conference
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool
Leveraging Evaluation Data: Leading Data-Informed Discussions to Guide SSIP Decisionmaking Welcome Mission of IDC- we provide technical assistance to build.
Using Data for Program Improvement
Regulated Health Professions Network Evaluation Framework
Using Data for Program Improvement
Part B: Evaluating Implementation Progress and Impact of Professional Development Efforts on Evidence-Based Practices   NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives.
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)

SSIP Purpose Multi-year, achievable plan that: Increases capacity of early intervention programs to implement, scale up, and sustain evidence-based practices Improves outcomes for children with disabilities and their families 2

Year 1 - FFY 2013 Delivered by Feb 2015 Year 2 - FFY 2014 Delivered by Feb 2016 Years 3-6 FFY Feb Feb 2020 Phase I Analysis Phase II Plan Phase III Evaluation Data Analysis; Identification of the Focus for Improvement; Description of Infrastructure to Support Improvement and Build Capacity; Theory of Action Multi-year plan addressing: Infrastructure Development; Support EIS Program/LEA in Implementing Evidence-Based Practices; Evaluation Plan Reporting on Progress including: Results of Ongoing Evaluation Extent of Progress Revisions to the SPP Proposed SSIP Activities by Phase 3

SSIP: The Basics SSIP process includes: Analyzing and Focusing Investigating Planning and Doing Evaluating 4

How well is the solution working? What is the problem? Why is it happening? What shall we do about it? SSIP 5 SSIP Phase I SSIP Phase I and II SSIP Phase III SSIP Phase I

How well is the solution working? What is the problem? Why is it happening? What shall we do about it? SSIP 6 SSIP Phase I SSIP Phase I and II SSIP Phase III SSIP Phase I

Phase I -Data Analysis Analyze key data including: – Review of disaggregated data – Identification of data quality issues – Identification of how data quality issues will be addressed – Identification of compliance issues that are barriers 7

Phase I - Infrastructure Analysis Determine current system capacity to: – Support improvement – Build capacity in early intervention programs and providers to implement, scale up, and sustain evidence-based practices to improve results 8

Phase I - Infrastructure Analysis Address State system components including: – Governance – Fiscal – Quality standards – Professional development – Data – Technical assistance, and – Accountability 9

Phase I - Infrastructure Analysis Identify: – System strengths – Areas for improvement within and across system – Alignment and impact of current state initiatives – How decisions are made – Representatives needed to plan system improvement 10

Phase I - Identify Problem Area Select area of focus for improvement “What identified area, which when implemented or resolved, has the potential to generate the highest leverage for improving outcomes/results for children with disabilities?” 11

How well is the solution working? What is the problem? Why is it happening? What shall we do about it? SSIP 12 SSIP Phase I SSIP Phase I and II SSIP Phase III SSIP Phase I

Phase I - Root Cause Analysis Identify contributing factors in focus area (including infrastructure) Contributing factors: – Explain why you have the problem – Point to how the problem can be addressed 13

Phase I - Root Cause Analysis Identify barriers for each contributing factor – What is standing in the way of addressing this contributing factor? – Why hasn’t it been addressed to date? 14

Phase I - Root Cause Analysis Identify leverage points for each contributing factor – What are the assets or strengths that can be tapped to address the contributing factors? 15

How well is the solution working? What is the problem? Why is it happening? What shall we do about it? SSIP 16 SSIP Phase I SSIP Phase I and II SSIP Phase III SSIP Phase I

Phase I – Evidence-base Search for solutions that are evidence-based to address contributing factors Identify general action steps that address contributing factors: – Remove barriers – Use leverage points – Incorporate evidence-based resources 17

Phase I - Theory of Action Identify results/outcomes to be accomplished including changes in: – System – Practices Identify general improvement strategies Develop logic model reflecting relationship between activities and outcomes 18

Theory of Action What are the issues: State System Level Local System Level Direct Supports Practices/Services Children and Families What are the issues: State System Level Local System Level Direct Supports Practices/Services Children and Families What are our activities: State System Level Local System Level Direct Supports Practices/Services Children and Families What are our activities: State System Level Local System Level Direct Supports Practices/Services Children and Families What are our desired outcomes: State System Level Local System Level Direct Supports Practices/Services Children and Families What are our desired outcomes: State System Level Local System Level Direct Supports Practices/Services Children and Families Back ifthen Theory of Action 19

Phase II - Improvement Plan Develop plan focusing on: – Infrastructure development – Support for implementing evidence-based practices – Evaluation of implementation 20

Phase II - Improvement Plan Infrastructure development includes: – Improvement activities that build capacity of early intervention programs – How state will align improvement work with other state initiatives – Leveraging resources from state initiatives 21

Phase II - Improvement Plan Support for implementing evidence-based practices includes: – Activities supporting implementation of evidence- based practices – How to support scaling up and sustaining evidence-based practices once implemented with fidelity 22

Phase II - Improvement Plan Plan to evaluate implementation includes: – Methods to collect and analyze data on activities and outcomes – How State will use evaluation results to: Examine effectiveness of implementation plan Measure progress toward achieving intended outcomes Make modifications to plan 23

How well is the solution working? What is the problem? Why is it happening? What shall we do about it? SSIP 24 SSIP Phase I SSIP Phase I and II SSIP Phase III SSIP Phase I

Phase III – Evaluation Evaluate implementation strategies including: – Extent of implementation – Extent of progress toward goals Use evaluation results to revise plan 25

Questions? 26