Unit 4 Connecting Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Go Math!/Common Core State Standards for Mathematics K-5 Leadership Training.
Advertisements

Common Core Mathematical Practices. People who are good in math… Make sense of problems.
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Coherence. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School.
Math Extension Activity JCPS Analytical and Applied Sciences.
Math Common Core Standards
Standards for Mathematical Practice
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
Unit 4 Creating High-Quality Writing Prompts Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Emphasizing Mathematical Practices. Task 1: Journey to the Bus Stop.
Mathematical Practices 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and.
1 Exploring Rigor in the 2011 MA Curriculum Framework for Mathematics Exploration Activity : Connecting the Standards for Mathematical Practice to the.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on As of December 1, 2011, 45.
CCSS Math Breakout Session. Where Are You? Get a Post-It Note Write your favorite math topic on it Find the Consensograph on the wall Place your post-it.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Unit 1 Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
Unit 3 Engaging the Three Components of Rigor Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
April 15,  Given a presentation on Common Core Math, participants will be able to incorporate at least one mathematical practice idea into a lesson.
COMMON CORE Math Joseph Baldwin & Pamela McHenry Adapted from slides from: Kelly Stadtmiller & Kristine Kaufman.
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
Math Foundational Services SHIFT 1: Focus October 9, 2014 Cindy Dollman & Joe Delinski The PROE Center.
Exploration of Key Instructional Advances in Mathematics Mimi Alkire of StandardsWork, Inc. U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical, and.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Welcome! U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education StandardsWork, Inc. New Orleans April 1—2, 2014.
The Importance of Coherent Lessons in Elementary Mathematics Linda Schoenbrodt, MSDE, Elementary Programs Specialist October, 2014.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Getting Started with the Practices Investigations.
The Common Core State Standards emphasize coherence at each grade level – making connections across content and between content and mathematical practices.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
February 6, 2015 Octorara Area School District K-6.
Teachers today must prepare students for a world of possibilities that may not currently exist. The workforce of tomorrow must be flexible, motivated,
Unit 2 Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
Elementary Math: 2 nd Grade Professional Development January 2012.
Math Standards  NCTM  Common Core State Standards for Math (CCSSM)  Needs of Diverse Learners.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Pennsylvania Core Standards 101 (aka: Everything you’ve always wanted to know but were afraid to ask.)
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
Summary of Common Core Standards in Mathematics and Implications for Higher Education Math Faculty Conference September 20, 2012 University of Central.
CCGPS Mathematics Georgia Department of Education Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent June 27, 2012  In CCGPS mathematics, content is divided.
. Do one problem “Meal Out” or “Security Camera”.
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
Mathematics Common Core State Standards Thursday, August 16 th, 2012.
May 8,  National standards developed by the National Association of Governors  Adopted by 45 states  Based on best practices in national and.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. 1.How many vertices are on a cube? 2.Subtract ½ from half a baker’s dozen. 3.How many prime numbers are between.
Professional Growth Systems And Nevada Academic Content Standards Strengthening teacher capacity through powerful feedback March 20, 2015.
Common Core Math Introduction Part 1: Instructional Shifts.
Mathematical ‘Shifts’ Shift 1: Focus From coverage to mastery Focus and deepen instruction Shift 2: Coherence Think across grades, and link to major.
INSTRUCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners, Inc. May 30, 2012.
Key Advances, Math Practices, and Translating Math Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Curriculum and Instruction.
ETSD Mathematics Program: Big Ideas Problem Solving Computation Concepts Deeper conceptual understanding (making sense of math), fewer topics, greater.
Oregon Response to Intervention Mathematics and RTI Research, Review, and The Beginning of State Support Tammy Rasmussen Oregon RTIi.
DELAC June 4, 2014 Transition To The Common Core Mathematics.
The College and Career Readiness Standards: An Brief Overview Troy Goracke, Program Administrator;
509A UNIT 1-WEEK2 Dr. Hasan Fall Classroom Observation Unit 1 In your small groups, reflect on your observation of the classroom video lesson using.
NGSS and Common Core State Standards. Mathematical Practices Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them Reason abstractly and quantitatively.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
Common Core State Standards for Math
Jeanette Grisham March 28, 2012
Planning for and teaching effective lessons
Colonial Hills Elementary March 27, 2015
CCGPS Professional Learning Opportunities and Resources
Westwood Charter Elementary Principal’s Coffee February 3, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Unit 4 Connecting Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor, Reingold, Inc. December 2014 The Instructional Advances in Mathematics CCR Standards for Adult Education

The Three Key Advances Prompted by the CCR Standards 2 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the CCR Standards focus. 2.Coherence: Design learning around coherent progressions from level to level. 3.Rigor: Pursue conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application—all with equal intensity.

Standards for Mathematical Practice MP.1Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. MP.2Reason abstractly and quantitatively. MP.3Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. MP.4Model with mathematics. MP.5Use appropriate tools strategically. MP.6Attend to precision. MP.7Look for and make use of structure. MP.8Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. 3

Unit 4 Objectives Connecting Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content  Recognize the Standards for Mathematical Practice as important processes and proficiencies with long-standing importance in mathematics education.  Understand how to recognize opportunities for observing the Standards for Mathematical Practice in the requirements of both standards and lessons.  Develop an understanding of how to integrate the Standards for Mathematical Practice with content in lessons as a means to enrich student learning. 4

Rationale for the Standards for Mathematical Practice Relevance and Importance Based on the Research  The Standards for Mathematical Practice rest on “processes and proficiencies” with established significance in mathematics education (NCTM and NRC).  When Standards for Mathematical Practice are connected to content, deeper understanding can occur, enabling students to extend them to new situations (ACT National Curriculum Survey).  Attention to the Standards for Mathematical Practice shifts the emphasis from just “how to get the answer” to also “learning how to learn.” 5

Implications of the Standards for Mathematical Practice on Instruction  The Standards for Mathematical Practice are applied across all levels.  Not all Standards for Mathematical Practice are appropriate for every lesson.  Students need opportunities to experience all of the Standards for Mathematical Practice over the course of the unit or the level of study. 6

7 Now let’s do some hands-on work with the Standards for Mathematical Practice...

Materials (Part One)  Directions for Participants  Worksheet: Matching Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content Standards  Resource: CCR Standards for Mathematical Practice  Resource: CCR Standards for Adult Education 8

Directions (Part One) 1.Carefully read the CCR Level B content standard on the worksheet. 2.Imagine a lesson that targets the standard. Then follow these steps: –Use the code X to mark Standards for Mathematical Practice that are central to the lesson you envision. –Use the code O to mark Standards for Mathematical Practice that support the lesson you envision. –Leave blank any Standards for Mathematical Practice that are not relevant to the lesson you envision. 9

Directions (Continued) 3. Working first independently and then with a partner, evaluate the relevance of each Standard for Mathematical Practice to the requirements of the content standard listed. 4. Discuss individual decisions and rationales at your table, including how the different types of lessons imagined would affect the relevance of a particular Standard for Mathematical Practice. 10

Materials (Part Two)  Directions for Participants  Worksheet: Enriching a Mathematics Lesson  Resource: Math Lesson—Equivalent Fractions  Resource: CCR Standards for Mathematical Practice  Resource: CCR Standards for Adult Education 11

Directions (Part Two) 1.Scan the lesson and make notes about how the Standards for Mathematical Practice might be observed in the activities of the lesson. 2.Use codes X and O to mark the central and supporting Standards for Mathematical Practice. Leave blank any Standards for Mathematical Practice that are not relevant to the requirements of the lesson. 3.Discuss individual decisions and rationales at your table. 12

Reflections  What are some of the Standards for Mathematical Practice that you think are central to the lesson?  What are some of the Standards for Mathematical Practice that you think might serve in a supporting capacity to the lesson?  Why is it important to emphasize the Standards for Mathematical Practice at all levels of adult learning? 13

Next Steps  How has participating in this activity changed your thinking about the CCR Standards?  How will you use the information and understanding you have acquired to improve your teaching practice and student learning?  What additional training and tools would strengthen your ability to do so? 14