Seung-Hoon Lee, Sewook Jung, Alexander Chang, Dea-Ki Cho, and Mario Gerla Network Research Lab Department of Computer Science University of California, Los Angeles
Overview of wireless networks in HealthNet Bluetooth networks in HealthNet A new protocol using BT 2.1 Simulation Conclusion
Interests in health care considerably increased BodyLAN based wireless sensor platforms Monitoring patient status Sensor Network
Wireless networks for cable replacement HealthNet Sensor
Wireless networks for cable replacement ◦ Issues: Small, cheap, power efficient ◦ Wi-fi, ZigBee, Bluetooth HealthNet Sensor
Bluetooth ◦ Small enough being attached on sensors ◦ Cheap, power efficient ◦ Widely being used – Most of cell phone, laptop Issues ◦ Long connection delay Connection establishment: 5 ~ 10 seconds ◦ Causes severe problem on time critical applications (i.e., emergency health applications) ◦ BT cannot be utilized for EMERGENCY uses.
Bluetooth 2.1 ◦ Recently published (July 2007) ◦ Introducing new enhancement features Customizing two new features of BT 2.1 ◦ EIR (Extended Inquiry Response) ◦ SSP (Secure Simple Pairing)
Bluetooth 2.1 ◦ Recently published (July 2007) ◦ Introducing new enhancement features Customizing two new features of BT 2.1 ◦ EIR (Extended Inquiry Response) Original purpose: Inquiry Response message Propagating emergency data ◦ SSP (Secure Simple Pairing) Original purpose: security mechanism for data Protecting EIR data Bluetooth 2.1
Comparison of data dissemination stages ◦ Bluetooth 2.0 Peer discovery: Find other peers within the communication range Paging: Connection setup Connection established: Data delivery ◦ Bluetooth 2.1 Peer discovery
Bluetooth 2.0
◦ Peer Discovery Bluetooth 2.1 Inquiry
Bluetooth 2.0 ◦ Peer Discovery Bluetooth 2.1 Inquiry
Bluetooth 2.0 ◦ Peer Discovery Bluetooth 2.1 Inquiry Response
Bluetooth 2.0 ◦ Paging Bluetooth 2.1 Exchange device information Channel synchronization
Bluetooth 2.0 ◦ Connected Bluetooth 2.1 Connection established Data delivery
Bluetooth 2.1 ◦ Peer Discovery Bluetooth 2.1 Inquiry
Bluetooth 2.1 ◦ Peer Discovery Bluetooth 2.1 Inquiry
Bluetooth 2.0 ◦ EIR Data Delivery Bluetooth 2.1 Data delivery
EIR based data delivery ◦ Connectionless ◦ Not protected by BT Security mechanisms Secure Simple Pairing (SSP) ◦ Customizing SSP procedures ◦ Protecting EIR data ◦ PKI based security method ◦ Keys generated by SSP stages ◦ Encrypt/Decrypt EIR data with the keys
Simulation ◦ NS2 + UCBT + BT 2.1 implementation UCBT: Bluetooth simulation module UCBT not supporting BT 2.1 ( BT 2.1 recently published)
HealthNet Scenario ◦ Patient monitoring system without any network infrastructure. ◦ Emergency data delivered by Peer-to-Peer overlay ◦ Three different nodes: Patient: Emergency data source (static) Nurse: Delivering data by P2P (mobile) Data Collector: Collecting data (static) Patient Body Sensors Nurses (Mobile) Collection Center peer-to-peer
HealthNet Scenario ◦ Patient monitoring system without any network infrastructure. ◦ Emergency data delivered by Peer-to-Peer overlay ◦ Three different nodes: Patient: Emergency data source (static) Nurse: Delivering data by P2P (mobile) Data Collector: Collecting data (static) Patient Body Sensors Nurses (Mobile) Collection Center peer-to-peer
HealthNet Scenario ◦ Patient monitoring system without any network infrastructure. ◦ Emergency data delivered by Peer-to-Peer overlay ◦ Three different nodes: Patient: Emergency data source (static) Nurse: Delivering data by P2P (mobile) Data Collector: Collecting data (static) Patient Body Sensors Nurses (Mobile) Collection Center peer-to-peer
HealthNet Scenario ◦ Patient monitoring system without any network infrastructure. ◦ Emergency data delivered by Peer-to-Peer overlay ◦ Three different nodes: Patient: Emergency data source (static) Nurse: Delivering data by P2P (mobile) Data Collector: Collecting data (static) Patient Body Sensors Nurses (Mobile) Collection Center peer-to-peer
Our protocol using BT 2.1 works a lot better than the conventional scheme Number of nodes: Various Node Speed: 1 m/s Area: 50x50 m 2
Our protocol using BT 2.1 works a lot better than the conventional scheme Number of nodes: 30 Node Speed: 1 m/s Area: Various
Resolving a connection delay problem of Bluetooth devices in HealthNet with keeping the same security level ◦ Customizing EIR and SSP Simulation results confirm the improvement of BT 2.1 based data delivery ◦ Delay and Power Consumption Bluetooth devices are applicable for emergency applications in HealthNet
Questions?