DPAS II, Component 5 for School Nurses Linda C. Wolfe, RN, MEd Director, School Support Services Facilitator, DPAS II Component 5, School Nurses 11/2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 1 Highlights (Hallahan & Kauffman)
Advertisements

1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Compacting Curriculum in Pre-AP and AP Social Studies College Board Southwest Regional Forum January 31, 2008 Ginny Garvic Katy ISD Social Studies Curriculum.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Understanding the IEP Process
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
Development of the P erformance A ssessment of C ontributions and E ffectiveness of Speech-Language Pathologists.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Overview of Computers and Nursing Virginia K. Saba Kathleen A. McCormick.
Asthma Knowledge and Skills Tests dPAS II Component Five Elizabeth L. Thomas MEd, RN, NCSN, FNASN DSNA, November, 2012.
THE JAMAICAN SCHOOL COUNSELLOR
Differentiated Supervision
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultants Early Childhood Consultation Partnership® Funded and Supported by Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
SGOs for Educators Providing Educational Services March 12, 2014 AchieveNJ Website Wireless connection at DOE Guest – doeit/wireless.
World Languages Portfolio. Student Growth Portfolio with Peer Review 2  THE GOAL: A holistic and meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to students,
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Domain 3 Instruction Engaging Students IN Learning.
KSIS End of Year Training, 5/1/13 Kentucky Department of Education May 1, 2013.
Coordination of Care Vision and Hearing Referral DPAS 2 Component 5 Growth Goals Indicator 3 and 4 Susan Hoffmann MSN, RN, NCSN.
Frequent Flyers Nancy Nadel Sharon-rose Gargula Nadel and Gargula 2012.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 16 Providing Competent Staff.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
Communication Partnership Student Health Collaboration Overview – Delaware School Nurses May 10,
DPAS II, Component 5 for School Nurses Linda C. Wolfe, RN, MEd Director, School Support Services Facilitator, DPAS II Component 5, School Nurses June 2013.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
School Year School Nursing report Step Up and Be Counted Initiative National Association of School Nurses National Association of State School.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Classroom Diagnostic Tools. Pre-Formative Assessment of Current CDT Knowledge.
Delaware’s Teacher Effectiveness Model SEADAE February 23, 2012 Deb Hansen, Delaware Department of Education.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Perspectives on the Future of Pediatric Nursing Education and Practice Marion E. Broome, Ph.D., R.N. FAAN Distinguished Professor and Dean Indiana University.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
ICCSD Learning Supports: Mental Health
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Co-Teaching Webinar 3: Evaluation Webinar
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Delaware’s Teacher Effectiveness Model Deb Hansen, Delaware Department of Education October 2012.
Mental Health Consultation Building capacity to meet the social emotional needs of children and families Presenters: Katie Schlipmann, Margo Camacho, Charice.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Workforce Planning Framework
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Presentation transcript:

DPAS II, Component 5 for School Nurses Linda C. Wolfe, RN, MEd Director, School Support Services Facilitator, DPAS II Component 5, School Nurses 11/2012

Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Myth or Fact? This will be the first year that school nurses will be evaluated with DPAS II. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

MYTH! The real FACT is – DPAS Evaluation began about 10 years ago. The changes this year are to include Component 5, which measures Student Growth. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

DPAS II – School Year will include Component 5 for ALL educators, including specialists Component 1 20% Component 1I 20% Component 5 20% Component III 20% Component 1V 20% Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

ALL certified staff in the public school system is evaluated with DPAS II: Administrators Teachers Specialists DPAS II, Components 1- 4 measure nurse activities. DPAS II, Component 5 measures student growth/change

Components 1– 4 for Specialists Component 1 – Planning & Preparation 1a. Designing Coherent Programs or Services 1b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Best Practice and/or Models of Delivery 1c. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students or Clients 1d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e. Demonstrating Knowledge of How to Design or use Student Assessments Component 2 – Professional Practice & Delivery of Service 2a. Creating an Environment to Support Student or Client Needs 2b. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness 2c. Communicating Clearly and Accurately 2d. Delivery of Services to Students or Clients Component 3 – Professional Consultation & Collaboration 3a. Collaborating with Others 3b. Serving as a Consultant to the School Community 3c. Providing Resources and Access 3d. Maintaining Standards of Professional Practice 3e. Using Assessment Data in Planning and Delivery of Services Component 4 – Professional Responsibilities 4a. Communicating with Families /Clients 4b. Recording Data in a Student Record System 4c. Growing and Developing Professionally 4e. Reflecting on Professional Practice Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Myth or Fact? Component 5 expands the role of the school of the school nurse and redefines what we do. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

MYTH! The real FACT is – The current role and responsibilities of the school nurse remain the same. The School Nurse Manual and NIC codes that we use will not change because of DPAS. DPAS II may help the nurse to consider new approaches to “old” problems. Best practice will result in better student outcomes. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Window of Opportunity to show what we already do and the difference we already believe we make Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Myth or Fact? Delaware School Nurses developed DPAS II and DPAS II Component 5. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

FACT! ABSOLUTELY! – A team of Delaware School Nurses developed DPAS, including the addition of Component 5. It is built on an educational model, but was built on NASN’s Scope & Standards of School Nursing Practice and on current Delaware practice for School Health Services. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Development Team for Component 5 Janet Brown Marilou Conlin Lori Economos Megan Fiorivanti Sharon-Rose Gargula Pat Guilday Susan Hoffmann Karen Kleinschmidt Cheryl Layfield Beth Light Nancy Nadel Sue B. Smith Libby Thomas Pam Wilson Linda C. Wolfe Kimberly Cole Marilou B. Conlin Lisa Fitler Pat Guilday Susan Hoffmann Loretta Newsom Frances Russo-Avena Susan Shank Bonnie Shockley Sue Smith Lucy Sturmfelz Libby Thomas Pam Wilson Linda C. Wolfe Summer Review/Revision Team Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Myth or Fact? The Growth Measures document is exactly like the ones for educators and other specialists. The only difference is that “school nurse” is inserted where the word “specialist” or “educator” would be in the other documents. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

MYTH! The real FACT is – The Growth Measures document uses the same framework (chapters, grids, etc.) as all the others, but there are some important differences! Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Delaware School Nurse Team Important additions to the Manual: Suggested activities for each measure Examples of calculations and cohorts Considerations for nurses practicing in different settings. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Myth or Fact? The Measures are ones that Delaware School Nurses identified based on current research. They did not come from a national study or an evaluation from another state. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

FACT! FACT – Delaware school nurses reviewed current literature and research to identify known areas where school nursing can impact a child’s ability to learn. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Myth or Fact? There are no restrictions on what baseline data the nurse can use or how long there can be between pre and post data. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

MYTH! The real FACT is – There is a minimum and maximum length of time for showing student growth. 1. The growth must be seen during the current school year. 2. Some baselines may need to be taken from last year’s data, attendance. 3. There must be a minimum of 4 weeks between the baseline and final data. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

MYTH OR FACT Did you get them all right? Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Student Growth Measures 1. Absences Due to Illness 2. Visits to the Nurse Office 3. Vision Screening Referral Completion 4. Hearing Screening Referral Completion 5. Return to Class These were the state selected items, which were believed to be applicable to all school nurses. They are marked in Performance Plus with R. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Student Growth Measures (cont.) 6. In-School Injury 7. Access to Health Resources 8. Health Behavior: Student 9. Health Education: Student 10. Infection 11. Delaware Student Asthma Test 12. IHP Goals 13. IEP Goals 14. IHP Activities 15. IEP Activities 16. Health Behavior: Staff 17. Health Education: Staff Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Student Growth Measures: Unique to School Nursing! Student Growth Measures: Unique to School Nursing! Focus: helping the child enter the classroom ready to learn Traditional: Decreasing Absences due to Illness Decreasing Visits to the Nurses Office Expanded Look at Outcomes: Vision/Hearing Screening Referral COMPLETION Return to Class More targeted approaches: Decreasing In-School Injury Decreasing Infection Recognizing impact of resources: Access to Health Resources Behavior is the application of knowledge: Health Behavior: Student Health Behavior: Staff School nurse role in education: (9) Health Education: Student (11)Delaware Student Asthma Test (17) Health Behavior: Staff Recognizing the work & value of IHPs & IEPs: IHP Goals IEP Goals IHP Activities IEP Activities The influence of staff: Health Behavior: Staff Health Education: Staff Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Selecting Items District will provide guidelines Selection should occur early in the school year ◦ Each nurse must have FOUR (4) measures ◦ Suggest - Don’t choose more than required for the first year. Selection of the measures and student cohort will be made in consultation and agreement with administrator, who will evaluate the school nurse ◦ The administrator has final decision-making authority. One activity could relate to 4 different measures One activity can be used for 4 different cohorts. The same cohort could be used for all measures. The measures must be followed as presented, but the rates can be negotiated. Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Highlighting 4 Measures Delaware Student Asthma Test ◦ Libby Thomas Infection Rates ◦ Lori Economos Vision/Hearing Referral Completion Rates ◦ Susan Hoffmann Visits to Nurses Office ◦ Nancy Nadel ◦ Sharon-Rose Gargula Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012

Leading the Nation again... Linda C. Wolfe, RN November 2012