MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
Advertisements

Closing Summary Design Testing Abstract Monitoring crop heath via aerial photography is a proper technique used to maximize agricultural productivity.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
Bradley/Markley p1 SNAP Fine Guidance 11/16/2001 G&C SNAP Fine Guidance Art Bradley/ spacecraft System Engineering Services Landis Markley/ NASA/GSFC Nov.
Two-Gyro Performance: Scheduling and Acquisitions Merle Reinhart.
PRIMA Astrometry Calibration and Operation Plan PRIMA Astrometry Calibration and Operation Plan VLT-PLA-AOS draft Scope of the Document 
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky CUC September Overall Status of the Instrument 2.Update on Controlling the FP Temperature ACIS Ops.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.
GLAST LAT ProjectGLAST Flight Software IDT, October 16, 2001 JJRussell1 October 16, 2001 What’s Covered Activity –Monitoring FSW defines this as activity.
Attitude & Orbit Control Subsystem 26 April 2007.
Section 15-1GLAST Ground System Design Review August 18&19, 2004 ISOC Organization ISOC Manager R Cameron Commanding, H&S Timeline Planning Command Generation.
Conceptual Overview 7 step design Chapter 4 Database Design for Mere Mortals.
Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future.
May 15, 2013 Space Weather Product Team (SWPT) Making Sense of the Nonsensical.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Small Signal Stability Analysis Study: study prepared by Powertech Labs Inc. for ERCOT Vance Beauregard AEP 9 April 2002.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Super Star Tracker.
V. Rouillard  Introduction to measurement and statistical analysis ASSESSING EXPERIMENTAL DATA : ERRORS Remember: no measurement is perfect – errors.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Fine Guidance Sensor 2010 HST Calibration Work Shop Ed Nelan Barbara McArthur STScI.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Eric Stoneking Paul Mason May 17, 2002 ACS.
Software Inspection A basic tool for defect removal A basic tool for defect removal Urgent need for QA and removal can be supported by inspection Urgent.
Verification by test and quality assurance
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
1 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady The Inertial Stellar Compass (ISC) Tye Brady.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
Venus Observations HST Program Objectives v Explain Venus observing strategy. v Review areas of special concern with Venus observations and explain.
An Overview of the Recent HST Safings An Overview of the Recent HST Safings Ken Sembach TIPS Presentation September 20, 2007.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil)
1 Description and Benefits of JWST Commanding Operations Concept TIPS/JIM Meeting 17 July 2003 Vicki Balzano.
Dr. Aprille Ericsson Eric Stoneking June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Attitude Control Systems.
CHAPTER 9 INSPECTIONS AS AN UP-FRONT QUALITY TECHNIQUE
18 May 2006 Slide 1 of 10 STScI TAGFLASH Ground System Development Current ground system could support immediate COS launch Current ground system could.
Inertial Navigation System Overview – Mechanization Equation
PACS Spectrometer Spatial Calibration plan in PV phase A.Contursi D. Lutz and U. Klaas.
Two-Gyro Science Impact and Observer Information Ken Sembach STUC Meeting 18-November November-2004.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
START NICMOS COOLING SYSTEM ACTIVITY SUMMARY. 1/25/01Ken Pulkkinen2 START NCS ACTIVITY Applicable SMOV Requirements: J NICMOS Cooling System.
PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission SECCHI Calibration Activities Simon Plunkett SECCHI Operations Scientist Naval Research Laboratory.
Two-Gyro All-sky Scheduling Study TIPS April 15, 2004
FGS Astrometry in 2 Gyro Mode E. P. Nelan STScI B. E. McArthur McDonald Observatory, U. of Texas.
Purpose: The purpose of CMM Integration is to provide guidance for improving your organization’s processes and your ability to manage the development,
Mission Operations Review February 8-10, 2010 Cordoba, ARGENTINA SECTION 16.x Aquarius Science Commissioning and Acceptance Draft 2 Prepared by: Gary Lagerloef,
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Manager
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Venus Observations HST Program Objectives v Explain Venus observing strategy. v Review areas of special concern with Venus observations and explain.
Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.
NMP / EO-1 NMP EO-1 LE&O HANDBOOK September 24-26, 2000 Section 1 Master Timeline (Day 1-10)
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Monthly Status Review 24 October 2007.
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
Fuzzy Controller for Spacecraft Attitude Control CHIN-HSING CHENG SHENG-LI SHU Dept. of Electrical Engineering Feng-Chia University IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON.
1 Use or disclosure of this information is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. Flight Symbology to Aid in Approach and Landing.
EMCS Facility Status Thomas Niedermaier. This document is the property of Astrium. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written.
AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM (AFCS)
CINEMA System Engineering
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Proposal for LAT Year 1 Data Release Plan
Image Stabilization System (ISS)
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Two-Gyro Science Mode and Gyro Usage Options
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
LRO Mission Operations Concept
Flight Controller and Ground Station Software
Instrument Commissioning SDO SOWG - January 18-19, 2007 Purpose/Goal:
Presentation transcript:

MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements

MG 1/10/01 2 Objectives 1 Return HST to Normal Science Operations  Calibrate RGA drift rate bias and Initialize Attitude.  Verify the FHST/FHST alignments and update if necessary.  Monitor vehicle disturbances.  Perform on-orbit modal test, if necessary.

MG 1/10/01 3 HST Release 0d 0h 0m FHST FOV Check Gyro High and Low Mode Drift Rate Bias Calibration Attitude Initialization Normal Operation 0d 11h 0m Health and Safety SMS 1d 6h 15m FHST Alignment changed? ScI SMS 2d 14h 30m FHST/FHST Alignment Update Vehicle Disturbance Test Transfer Function Test (contingency) Note: Times shown are activity start times measured from HST release RGA/FHST Alignment Calibration (contingency) FHST/FGS Alignment Calibration (contingency) Slew to BEA Region 0d 0h 40m FHST/FHST Alignment Calibration Overview Yes No

MG 1/10/01 4 PCS-1: FHST Field of View Check Purpose: Verifies that the FHSTs are mapping normally and that the observations can be used for attitude determination (Req. J ). Description: FHSTs will be commanded in real time to perform maps of their full FOV and the observations will be analyzed to determine if the FHST performance is adequate for subsequent activities (initial attitude and gyro bias determination, attitude initialization and RGA to FHST calibration). This activity is expected to last three hours.

MG 1/10/01 5 PCS-2: Initial Attitude and Gyro Drift Rate Bias Determination Purpose: Compute the initial low and high mode gyro drift rate biases, to reduce the vehicle low mode drift to less than.05 arcseconds per second. This will allow a return to normal vehicle operations (Req. J ). Description: FHST maps are used to measure the vehicle attitude drift due to uncompensated gyro drift rate biases. There will be three FHST map periods with the gyro modes switched from high to low during the second map period. Attitudes computed from the first and second map periods will be used to determine the high mode drift rate bias, and attitudes from the second and third map periods will be used to determine the low mode drift rate bias. This real time activity is expected to last three hours. An additional three hours is needed for data processing, data validation, and Table Load generation.

MG 1/10/01 6 Purpose: Determine the vehicle attitude using FHST observations and update the On Board quaternion. This activity is needed to return to normal operations (Req. J ). Description: The FHSTs will be commanded in real time to perform a full FOV map. The observations will be used to compute an Attitude Reference Update that is uplinked to the On Board Computer. The duration for this activity is about one hour. PCS-3: Attitude Initialization

MG 1/10/01 7 PCS-4: FHST/FHST Alignment Purpose: Verify the FHST/FHST alignment prior to using the FHSTs for vehicle attitude updates (Req. J ). Description: With the vehicle at a constant attitude each pair of FHSTs will be commanded in real time to perform a full FOV map. The observations from these maps will be used to compute an FHST/FHST alignment. This alignment will be compared to the pre-Servicing Mission alignment. If there is a change of 20 arcseconds or greater in the pitch or yaw components, a new alignment will be uplinked to the vehicle. This activity requires seven hours of data collection, and 24 hours of analysis time.

MG 1/10/01 8 PCS-5: RGA/FHST Alignment Purpose: This is a contingency activity to calibrate a new set of gyros. This is required to maintain errors after a maneuver to less than one arcsecond per degree of slew (Req. J ). Description: Six maneuvers are performed. Each maneuver is about one of the vehicle axes with a slew angle of + or - 90 degrees. Before and after each maneuver the FHSTs perform a map of their full FOV. This set of maneuvers is repeated approximately 24 hours later to verify the new calibration. This activity requires about 56 hours to complete. The maneuvers require 8 hours to execute. Approximately 24 hours are required to process the data and uplink Table Loads. Another 8 hours are needed for the verification slews and about 16 hours to process the verification data. This activity is implemented via an SMS proposal.

MG 1/10/01 9 Purpose: This is a contingency activity that allows the FHSTs to be realigned to the FGS system. This is needed to ensure that FHST updates following maneuvers will result in successful FGS guide star acquisitions. This activity will be performed if guide star acquisitions are failing. (Req. J ) Description: FGS 3 will map out its FOV using coarse track astrometry observations while the FHSTs are mapping their FOVs. The FHST/ FGS alignment will be computed and Table Loads will be uplinked to the vehicle. The duration for this activity is 75 hours. The data collection requires 3 hours and the subsequent data processing requires about 48 hours. An additional 24 hours is needed to update the ground system and generate Table Loads for uplink to the vehicle. This activity is implemented via an SMS proposal. PCS 6: FHST/FGS Alignment

MG 1/10/01 10 PCS 7: Vehicle Disturbance Test Purpose: The purpose of the Vehicle Disturbance Test is to characterize environmental disturbances acting upon the HST during normal operations. This activity was previously done after Servicing Missions to establish a signature for disturbance baseline of the vehicle. (Req. J ) Description:The test consists of 12 orbits in a +V3 sunpoint attitude with solar arrays at 90 degrees and 5 orbits in a –V1 sunpoint with solar arrays at 0 degrees. The control law is commanded to use maneuver gains, and the gyros are commanded to low mode. Maneuver gains are removed at the end of the test. The +V3 sunpoint portion can be done during the BEA period.

MG 1/10/01 11 PCS-8: Transfer Function Test Purpose: The Transfer Function Test (TFT) is an on-orbit modal test designed to measure HST system modal parameters (modal gains, modal damping ratios and system natural frequencies). The TFT will be performed if PCS analysis of post-SM3B flight data (such as the VDT) indicates that HST modal parameters significantly differ from pre-SM3B analytical models. Reductions in the HST attitude control system stability margins and/or increased vehicle jitter can occur when on-orbit modal parameters differ from modal parameters used in pre-SM3B analyses. (Req. J ) Description: The TFT is a contingency test. The test consists of 9 orbits in the +V3 sunpoint orientation and 9 orbits in -V1 sunpoint. Prescribed forcing functions are applied via the RWAs and the responses are measured with the RGA gyros while the maneuver gain set control law is in effect and the gyros are in low mode.

MG 1/10/01 12 SMOV PCS Level 3 Requirements J Pointing Control Subsystem Verification Requirements J The initial attitude shall be determined to an accuracy within.2 degrees using Fixed Head Star Tracker (FHST) data. J The gyro drift rate bias shall be calibrated to within 0.05 arcseconds per second prior to the first guide star acquisition. J The FHST/FHST alignment matrices shall be computed, using FHST observations at the initial attitude, to an accuracy of 5 arcseconds (1  ). The FHST/FHST alignment matrices shall be updated if the change in the pitch or yaw alignment exceeds 20 arcseconds. The alignment computations will be further refined during normal operations to achieve accuracy comparable to the pre-Servicing Mission level J The gyro-to-FHST alignment matrices shall be updated to an accuracy that reduces the attitude error following a vehicle maneuver to less than one arc-second per degree of slew. J The PCS (Pointing Control System) shall acquire guide stars in fine lock. J The vehicle jitter during periods of fine lock shall be measured. J Perform a Vehicle Disturbance Test (VDT) to properly characterize the on-orbit system disturbances. J Contingency activity of performing a Transfer Function Test (TFT) in case post-SM3B HST flight data suggests that HST system modal parameters significantly differ from pre-SM3B analytical models.