Developing a Comprehensive Learning Outcomes Assessment Strategy for Adult Learners Cindy MacMillan& Susan Davenport.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Advertisements

Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT PLANNING Presentation to CLAS Unit Heads Nov. 16, 2005 Maria Cimitile Julie Guevara Carol Griffin.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS Masters in Business Administration CIP Code: digit Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Fostering Continuous Improvement of Curriculum - Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf Director, Centre for Open Learning Educational Support University of Guelph.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
1 C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs Bob Smallwood, University of.
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Tusculum College School of Business. Tusculum College Program is: –Approved…Regionally by Southern Association of Colleges and Schools –Flexible & cost.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code Program Quality.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Learning Outcomes and Assessment APCC Peter Wolf April
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Jason D. Powell Ferrum College Saturday, October 15, :30-2:30 PM ACA Summit Asheville, NC.
University College: Assessment, Planning and Outcomes
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
Source Code: Simple Tool to Help Assess and Improve Student Research Writing Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian Southern Oregon.
Department of Education
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Department Mission Statement and Program Learning Outcomes.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
NDTAC Webinar January 20, 2011 Carrie Heath Phillips Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Assessment Workshop College of San Mateo February 2006.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Master Slide Subhead Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Master Slide Title September 15, 2015 Slide Subhead (Open Sans Bold 24) The body text goes here. The.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
Assessing Information Literacy with SAILS Juliet Rumble Reference & Instruction Librarian Auburn University.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Developing Program Learning Outcomes To help in the quality of services.
Program Assessment – an overview Karen E. Dennis O: sasoue.rutgers.edu.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Data Conventions and Analysis: Focus on the CAEP Self-Study
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Consider Your Audience
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Closing the Assessment Loop
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Assessing Learning Outcomes
QM and Accreditation—Sounds Boring but It’s BASIC
Shazna Buksh, School of Social Sciences
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Introduction to the AP Capstone™ Program
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Comprehensive Learning Outcomes Assessment Strategy for Adult Learners Cindy MacMillan& Susan Davenport

2 Agenda Introductions Characteristics of Thomas Edison State College Challenges in an adult learning environment

3 Introductions Susan Davenport, Dean of Heavin School of Arts and Sciences Cynthia MacMillan, Director of Outcomes Assessment and Accreditation Audience –Who’s here? –Where you are from? –Why this session?

4 Why Learning Assessment? Is it really all about accountability? Accreditors Students Mission You

5 What are the challenges assessing learning in an adult environment? Heterogeneous population with different needs and skills Significant learning that the student brings to the learning environment Access to students for assessment

6 Where to Start Phase One – Define Learning Outcomes at Institutional and Programmatic Levels Phase Two-- Operationalize the learning outcomes Phase Three – Implementation of assessment (finalize assessment matrix) Phase Four – Data collection and Analysis Phase Five -- Recommendations and transformations made in response to Phase Four data

7 Where to start! (cont.)

8 Phase One Define Learning Outcomes at Institutional and Programmatic Levels Buy In Strength in diversity Define and Describe Goals and Process –Institutional, Programmatic, Course

9 Thomas Edison State College Institutional Outcomes 1. Information Literacy The Information literate graduate will demonstrate the ability required to recognize when information is needed and has the ability to identify, locate, evaluate and use effectively and appropriately the information needed. 2. Technological Competency Graduates will be able to solve problems and perform tasks using appropriate technological tools. 3. Responsible Ethical Leadership Graduates will be able to articulate in their own words the ethical principles they have discovered and encountered in their academic discipline or profession. Graduates will recognize and articulate actual ethical dilemmas witnessed or experienced. 4. Scientific Reasoning Thomas Edison State College graduates will be able to analyze issues facing citizens by distinguishing scientific approaches from other ways to frame problems and issues. 5. Diversity/Global Literacy The Thomas Edison State College graduate will demonstrate an understanding of globally diverse perspectives, cultures, values, events, trends and issues.

10 Thomas Edison State College Institutional Outcomes (contd.) 6. Quantitative Reasoning/Literacy Thomas Edison State College graduates will be quantitatively literate. They will be able to understand and apply mathematical concepts and skills to inform personal and professional decision-making. 7.Written and Oral Communication Thomas Edison State College Graduates will be able to write and speak with proficiency. 8. Critical Analysis & Reasoning Thomas Edison State College graduates will be able to demonstrate critical thinking and problem solving skills and are able to analyze content, discover meaning or significance, draw conclusions, and make assessments. 9. Life Long Learning Graduates will demonstrate a commitment to lifelong learning.

11 Phase Two Operationalize the Learning Outcomes Indirect versus direct measures Quantitative versus qualitative measures Triangulation Low versus High Stakes Assessment Baselines and Benchmarks

12 Phase Two Continued Methods we are using – Standardized Assessment – ETS Proficiency Profile, SAILS Graduate Survey, Adult Learner Inventory Capstones Embedded Analysis Historical Data Review Survey ETS Major Field Test E-Portfolios

13 Example: Assessment Matrix for Program Level Learning Outcomes Bachelor of Science in Human Services outcomes: Program Element which addresses this outcome Measures (indicate direct or indirect)Benchmark/ Target (acceptable and ideal if appropriate) Interpret and critically analyze the research in the professional track Course in Professional track final project/paperA 70% earn a grade of B+ I 80% earn a grade of B+ SOS 492 Research Methods final research paper A 70% earn grade of B+ I 80% earn grade of B+ ETS Proficiency Profile Std. Test Critical ThinkingA 60% achieve proficient or marginally proficient I 80% achieve proficient or marginally proficient Apply theory to professional practiceCapstonefinal paperA 70% earn grade of B+ I 80% earn grade of B+ Apply knowledge of the specific skills, techniques, and agencies necessary to serve client populations PSY 331 Intro Counseling final examA 70% earn grade of B+ I 80% earn grade of B+ Capstonefinal paperA 70% earn grade of B+ I 80% earn grade of B+ Graduate SurveyItem 7-aA 80% respond positively I 90% respond positively Apply knowledge of cultural diversity as it relates to the field of Human Services. SOC 322 Cultural Diversity in the US final examA 70% earn grade of B+ I 80% earn grade of B+ Capstonefinal paperA 70% earn grade of B+ I 80% earn grade of B+ Apply theories of management as it relates to Human Services MAN 301 Principles of Management final examA 70% earn grade of B+ I 80% earn grade of B+ Capstonefinal paperA 70% earn grade of B+ I 80% earn grade of B+

14 Phase Three Implementation of Assessment Be realistic in scope Not everything needs to be assessed each year Be pragmatic in tying plan to funds Benchmarking –Internal –External Rubric elements

Information Literacy Data Collection Sample 15

Example: Data Collection for Human Services Degree 16 Bachelor of Science in Human Services outcomes: Benchmark/ Target 2010 results Interpret and critically analyze the research in the professional track 70% earn a score of 3 or above on a 4 point scale on rubric by reviewed independent consultant Above target Apply theory to professional practice70% earn a score of 3 or above on a 4 point scale on rubric by reviewed independent consultant Below target Apply knowledge of the specific skills, techniques, and agencies necessary to serve client populations 70% earn a score of 3 or above on a 4 point scale on rubric by reviewed independent consultant Below target Apply knowledge of cultural diversity as it relates to the field of Human Services. 70% earn a score of 3 or above on a 4 point scale on rubric by reviewed independent consultant Below target Apply theories of management as it relates to Human Services 70% earn a score of 3 or above on a 4 point scale on rubric by reviewed independent consultant Above target

Phase Four and Five– Analysis and recommendations 17

Information Literacy - SAILS Recommendations Continue to evaluate student learning outcomes in the area of Information Literacy using the SAILS. Embedded SAILS in an upper level course for general populations. Identify and implement additional methods to assess the outcome area not assessed by SAILS. Include the SAILS in a few more courses to ensure that all degree programs of the College are included in this informational literacy assessment. Target the SAILS administrations to students per year in order to facilitate longitudinal analysis in the future. 18

Information Literacy – ENC-102 Recommendations Expand the rubric elements to include one on grammar and spelling. Expand the data collection efforts in ENC-102 to include one section per semester. Expand the roll of the lead mentor to include collecting reliability data. Expand the use of Waypoint in other schools, courses and assignments. Explore viable options to communicate details of Waypoint use with mentors. Explore ways to minimize the use of instructional design resources. Seek efficiencies such as sharing rubric elements across schools. 19

20 Human Services – Analysis and recommendations Analysis of Human Services results led to the following curricular changes: 1. Modify the program description to more accurately describe the program and its objectives. 2.Modify the program outcomes to align with objectives in program by including diversity and theories of management. 3.Modify the general education requirements to 60 credits to align with the other degree offerings within the College. Require a three credit Ethics course under Humanities.

21 Phase Four and Five– Analysis and recommendations (contd.) 4. Modify the Core Requirements. Based on guidelines from national accrediting bodies (i.e. The National Human Services Organization and the Council for Standards in Human Services Education), the core requirements were replaced with the following areas: Theoretical Foundation, Intervention, Client Populations, Research and Mgmt. This improves the quality of student learning outcomes and ensures that the program objectives are appropriate and measurable. 5.Modify the Practicum to a capstone course and objectives to make the practicum an effective instrument for assessing the degree outcomes. 6. Change the grading of the capstone from Credit/No Credit to a letter grade. This will ensure a more accurate assessment of the outcomes of the course. A benchmark of “B+” was recommended.

22 Your best practices, lesson learned and questions Please share your feedback...

Thank you for your time and interest!