2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Seminar on Developing a Program for the Implementation of the 2008 SNA and Supporting Statistics in Turkey Derya TUNCER 10 September 2013 Ankara.
Advertisements

Online Privacy Survey Results Conducted: December 2011.
Connect Nevada Residential Technology Assessment Results.
Survey Methodology Nonresponse EPID 626 Lecture 6.
The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information.
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
7.Implications for Analysis: Parent/Youth Survey Data.
National Household Travel Survey California Data (NHTS-CA)
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
2 Presentation Overview Study Objectives Survey Design Trip Purpose and Trip Chaining Overview – Satisfaction with Roadways and Transportation in Communities.
Investigations of Cell Phone Use While Driving in NC Jane Stutts William Hunter Herman Huang University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.
The Characteristics of Employed Female Caregivers and their Work Experience History Sheri Sharareh Craig Alfred O. Gottschalck U.S. Census Bureau Housing.
Consumer Expenditure Survey Redesign Jennifer Edgar Bureau of Labor Statistics COPAFS Quarterly Meeting March 4, 2011.
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
Methodologic Overview of Two National Data Sets Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Issues in Comparing Findings.
Commuting in America Using the ACS to Develop a National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends Penelope Weinberger, CTPP Program Manager, AASHTO ACS.
THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI The University of Mississippi Institute for Advanced Education in Geospatial Science Census to American Community Survey.
Socio-Economic & Demographic Data Tools for Proactive Planning Robin Blakely-Armitage STATE OF NEW YORK CITIES: Creative Responses to Fiscal Stress March.
Understanding Web Completion in a Survey of New Businesses David DesRoches Tom Barton Janice Ballou Third International Conference on Establishment Surveys.
Transportation Operations/Mobility in the Baltimore Region Customer Satisfaction Survey AMPO Operations Work Group September 28-29, 2006 Las Vegas.
11 The American Community Survey Steve Murdock, Ph.D. Director, Hobby Center for the Study of Texas Rice University.
Household Surveys ACS – CPS - AHS INFO 7470 / ECON 8500 Warren A. Brown University of Georgia February 22,
Survey Methods By Shivakumaraswamy, K N
KY Module 3: Geocoding and GPS. What is the single hardest information to get from a travel survey? Location, location, location What is the address of.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Census Data for Transportation Planning Meeting presented by Kevin Tierney Cambridge Systematics,
The American Community Survey Texas Transportation Planning Conference Dallas, Texas July 19, 2012.
National Household Travel Survey Data User Tools Adella Santos FHWA-OFFICE OF HIGHWAY POLICY INFORMATION APDU 2008 ANNUAL CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 25, 2008.
Addressed Based Sampling as an Alternative to Traditional Sampling Approaches: An Exploration May 6, 2013.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
SPECA Regional Wrokshop on Disability Statistics, Dec 13-15, 2006 Issues Related to Disability Measurement: Cognitive testing and mode Jennifer Madans.
The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy Information.
KY Module 2 Household Travel Surveys Chapter 6 of TS Manual.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Social Sector Statistics Department Tourism Statistics Group
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
Lesli Scott Ashley Bowers Sue Ellen Hansen Robin Tepper Jacob Survey Research Center, University of Michigan Third International Conference on Establishment.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
GPS Leader™ In-vehicle Data Collection Ben Pierce By.
NHTS Update and Data Analysis Plans presented to Florida Model Task Force presented by Krishnan Viswanathan November 10, 2009.
2008 Missoula Long-Range Transportation Plan Survey May 20, 2008.
American Community Survey (ACS) 1 Oregon State Data Center Meeting Portland State University April 14,
Highway Information Seminar October 25, 2012 Adella Santos, NHTS Program Manager FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information.
Brown, Suter, and Churchill Basic Marketing Research (8 th Edition) © 2014 CENGAGE Learning Basic Marketing Research Customer Insights and Managerial Action.
Current Population Survey Sponsor: Bureau of Labor Statistics Collector: Census Bureau Purpose: Monthly Data for Analysis of Labor Market Conditions –CPS.
1 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Add-on Status Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
American Community Survey “It Don’t Come Easy”, Ringo Starr Jane Traynham Maryland State Data Center March 15, 2011.
Census 2000 Supplementary Survey: An Operational Feasibility Test Nancy M. Gordon Associate Director for Demographic Programs U.S. Census Bureau July 2001.
Household Surveys: American Community Survey & American Housing Survey Warren A. Brown February 8, 2007.
Measuring Disability: Results from the 2001 Census and the 2001 Post-Censal Disability Survey Statistics Canada January 10, 2003.
1 Public Library Use in Oregon Results from the 2006 Oregon Population Survey Oregon State Library March 2007.
Weighting Household Surveys By David F. Pearson, Ph.D., P.E. April 2007.
Survey Research.
Measuring Violence Against Women in Australia Horst Posselt Director Family & Community Statistics Australian Bureau of Statistics UNECE Work Session on.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
The Use of Random Digit Dialing in Household Surveys: Challenges and Changes Chris Chapman 2008 IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 11, 2008
American Community Survey (ACS) Using Census Data by Block Group January 21, 2016 Presentation at the National Community Development Association Winter.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Attitudinal Evaluation Overview and Update Johanna Zmud / NuStats October 28, 2004 MnPass Copyright WSDOT © 2002.
The Dutch travel survey Mixed-mode experiences from the Netherlands Ilona Bouhuijs Netherlands Statistics June 17th 2013 Disclaimer: the views expressed.
Sample Design of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Linda Tompkins Data Users Conference July 12, 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1 Economically Active Population Survey Dong-Wook JEONG Employment Statistics Div. Statistics Korea.
Transportation-related Injuries among US Immigrants: Findings from National Health Interview Survey.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office March 28, 2003.
CAR for Immigration Stories Steve Doig Arizona State University.
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
2007 Household Travel Survey
American Driving Survey: 2014 — 2015 September 2016
The European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Chapter 5: The analysis of nonresponse
Presentation transcript:

2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By

Acknowledgements MORPACE, International FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information

Page 3 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Presentation Outline  What is the NHTS?  What is the NHTS Add-on Program?  Kentucky’s Involvement  Overview of Survey Methodology  Review of Collected Data  Summary of Participation  Selected Results in Kentucky

Page 4 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS What is the NHTS?  Travel survey that collects information on travel from a national sample of the civilian, non-institutionalized population of the United States  Conducted roughly every five years since 1969, last conducted in 1995  Traditionally collected travel information for one day of travel; in 2001 also collected information on long-distance travel (prior 28 days)  Data are used to produce national estimates of travel and investigate topics in transportation safety, congestion, mobility of various population groups, the relationship of personal travel to economic productivity, the impact of travel on the human and natural environment, etc.

Page 5 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS What is the NHTS Add-on Program?  ~26,000 households included in the national sample  National sample designed for national estimates – not enough for reliable state and local estimates  FHWA offered states and local municipalities the opportunity to purchase additional samples specific to their area  In 2001, additional samples were purchased by nine state and local municipalities, adding an additional ~66,000 households  These additional samples are referred to as NHTS Add-ons

Page 6 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Kentucky’s Involvement  Kentucky participated as a 2001 NHTS Add-on Purchasing 1,100 households in Kentucky County Number of Purchased Households Number of Completed Households Carter150 Edmonson Pulaski Scott Total1,1001,154

Page 7 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Overview of Survey Methods  Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI)  Samples (households) are selected based upon telephone numbers using list-assisted, random digit dialing methods  Two stage survey –Household interview –Person-level interview (Extended Interview)

Page 8 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Overview of Survey Methods (cont.) Pre-Contact Letter Household CATI Interview Travel Diaries Telephone Reminder Calls Extended CATI Interviews Signed by Terri Giltner, Exec. Dir. Office of Public Affairs, KYTC $2 incentive First Class mail Up to 19 calls Household characteristics Household demographics Respondent  18 Diaries + Memory Aids $2 per person incentive Priority Mail Travel Day is days after Household Interview Day before Travel Day Message left on answering machine 3 busy signals before no- contact Within 6 days after Travel Day Personal travel characteristics Trip information Proxy reporting allowed

Page 9 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Overview of Survey Methods (cont.) Things to Note:  NHTS employs a “memory jogger” style diary, and is a trip-based survey  Information on trips is collected by first “rostering” all trips for an individual, then going back and asking detailed information for each trip  Trips are 1-way; origin-to-destination  Proxies are permitted, but only under certain conditions

Page 10 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS

Page 11 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Three Methodological Differences from NHTS National Methodology 1.National Sample used $5 incentive vs. $2 in Kentucky Add-on 2.National Sample included questions on long- distance travel, Kentucky Add-on did not 3.Definition of a “completed” household differed: National Sample = At least 50% of household members aged 18 years or older needed to complete the extended (person-level) interview Kentucky Add-on = All members of the household needed to complete an extended (person-level) interview

Page 12 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Data Collected FOR EACH HOUSEHOLD: Number of people Number of drivers Number of workers Number of vehicles Income Housing type Owned or rented Number of cell phones Number of other phones Race of reference person Hispanic status of reference person Tract & block group characteristic FOR EACH PERSON: Age Gender Relation to reference person Driver status Worker status/Primary activity Internet use Travel disability Effect of disability on mobility Highest grade completed Immigrant status Views on transportation Annual miles driven Incidence of public transit use in past two months Incidence of walk and bike trips in past week

Page 13 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Data Collected (cont.) FOR EACH WORKER: Full or part ‑ time work More than one job Occupation Workplace location Usual distance to work Usual travel time to work Drive alone or carpool Work from home If commercial driver, amount of commercial travel FOR EACH VEHICLE: Make Model Age (year) DAILY TRAVEL DATA: Origin & destination address (geocoded to Latitudes and Longitudes) Time trip started and ended Distance Means of transportation Vehicle type If household vehicle, which one If transit, wait time If transit, access and egress modes Detailed purpose Number of others on trip Specific household members Number not household members Who drove Most recent trip, for non ‑ travelers (date)

Page 14 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Data Collected (cont.): Geocoding Results Geocoding LevelNumber of LocationsPercentage Households Address Level1, % Closest Intersection201.7% Zip Code Centroid50.4% Non-Geocodable30.3% Work Locations Address Level % Closest Intersection867.6% Zip Code Centroid766.7% Non-Geocodable363.2% Trip Destinations Address Level7, % Closest Intersection9019.2% Zip Code Centroid6626.8% Non-Geocodable3513.6%

Page 15 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Summary of Participation  50% of eligible households provided household-level information. Household response rate ~40%  Detailed travel information collected from ~53% of households that completed the household interview and agreed to provide travel information  ~40% of all attempted person-level interviews were completed  The overall, person-level response rate for the study ~18% –Scott County Telephone Issues –Person-level RR lower in Pulaski and Scott –HH level issues were refusals and no-contacts (Scott) –Person-level issues were no-contact cases

Page 16 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Results: Summary of Participating Households

Page 17 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Note on Survey Weights  The NHTS utilized a complex sampling scheme – i.e. this isn’t a simple random sample!  Survey weights were developed for each type of data (household, person, vehicle, trip-level) –Account for complex survey design –Differences in non-response –Post-stratification  Survey weights should always be used when calculating standard errors or measures of precision (e.g., confidence intervals)

Page 18 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Results: Miles of Travel Vehicle Miles of Travel 3,435,945 or 1,254,120,088 Annualized Miles Per Vehicle 32.1 or 11,702 Annually Person Miles of Travel 5,329,575 or 1,945,294,783 Annualized Miles Per Person 41.7 or 15,220 Annually

Page 19 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Results: Trips Trips per Household per Day 5.7 Vehicle Trips/HH 9.1 Person Trips/HH Total Number of Reported Trips Person TripsVehicle Trips 453,554285, ,547,299 Annually104,358,225 Annually Trips per Person per Day 2.2 Vehicle Trips/person 3.5 Person Trips/person

Page 20 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Results: Percentage of Trips by Day of the Week

Page 21 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Results: Percentage of Trips by Trip Purpose

Page 22 Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop NHTS Results Many More Results…..