Clean Smokestacks Act Benefits Update Division of Air Quality March 17, 2010 3/17/2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting More for Four Principles for Comprehensive Emissions Trading Jan Mazurek, Director Center for Innovation and the Environment 2002 Environmental.
Advertisements

Fine Particle Health Impacts and the Need for Control Measures in New Jersey Kenneth Fradkin, US EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Hearing of the New Jersey.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond April 7, 2005.
Estimated Mercury Emission Reductions in NC from Co- control as a Result of CSA 2004 NC DENR/DAQ Hg & CO2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 20, 2004 Steve Schliesser.
Clean Smokestacks Act North Carolina Mercury and CO2 Workshop April , 2004 Brock Nicholson, P.E. Deputy Director N.C. Division of Air Quality.
Environmental Leadership The Pursuit of Cleaner Air
Duke Power Clean Smokestacks & Mercury Efforts April, 2004.
1 Update on Status of Pending Federal Standards Update on Status of Pending Federal Standards Air Quality Committee Meeting July 13, 2011.
State of North Carolina v. EPA. Introduction The Clean Air Act gives the States the primary responsibility for air quality within their borders and requires.
The Clean Air Act.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Requirements for SIPs Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Chicago, Illinois Clean Air Interstate Rule - CAIR.
Energy and the Environment: Likely Winners & Losers in the Second Obama Administration ACG Breakfast - December 14, 2012 Copyright © by N.W. Bernstein.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Reducing Regional Transport of Emissions and Helping States Achieve the PM2.5 and Ozone NAAQS Beth Murray Clean Air Markets.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
EPA Air Policy Perspectives Presentation to 2 nd Workshop on Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Chapel Hill, NC 21.
Economic Strategies to Reduce Acid Deposition Ecological Economic Theory Fall 2003.
Transportation Air Pollution. Air Pollution – Sources.
MADISON CLIMATE PROTECTION PLAN GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION STRATEGIES Jayne Somers March 2001.
Solutions: Preventing and Reducing Air Pollution
1 Regional Wind Energy Purchase Jim Caldwell Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection April 5, 2004.
Control Measures for the 8-hour Ozone SIP Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Energy Environment Human Health U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Proposed Air Pollution Transport Rule Reducing Air Pollution.
Climate-Friendly Actions with Co-Benefits Julie McNamee NPS Air Resources Division July 17, 2007.
Update on Multi-pollutant Legislation Richard Long, Region 8 Wrap Meeting Nov. 14, 2001.
Progress Energy and the Environment Western North Carolina Air Quality Don Cooke April 29, 2003.
1 Current Issues And Problems Encountered For Projections In The United States And Canada Presented by Ms. Rebecca Lee Tooly USEPA Office of Air Quality.
Office of Air and Radiation Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities July 2006.
OTC Mobile Source Committee OTC Committee Meeting September 2009 Buffalo, New York 1.
0 Office of Transportation and Air Quality Update for Air Directors: Transportation and Air Quality Christopher Grundler Deputy Director NACAA Spring Meeting.
GA EPD Air Protection Branch AWMA Southern Section August 2015.
1 EPA’s Proposed Interstate Air Quality Rule Consideration of Issues Associated with Possible Expansion of IAQR to the West Patrick Cummins, WGA Background.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Reducing Power Plant Emissions for Cleaner Air, Healthier People, and a Strong America May 2005.
1 Potential Impacts of a National SO 2 Program WRAP Forum June 3, 2004.
1 The Clean Air Rules of 2005 Bill Wehrum U.S. EPA, Office of Air & Radiation.
Mobile Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13 th, 2012 Washington, DC 1.
Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear Skies Clean Air Initiatives in the 109th Congress: Clear Skies, or Not-So-Clear.
Instructor Özgür ZEYDAN (PhD.) Department of Environmental Engineering.
Sustainable Air Quality Michael Roberts February 4, 2002.
CLEAN POWER PLAN PROPOSAL Reducing Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants Kerry Drake,Associate Director Air Division, US EPA, Region 9 California.
1 OTC Regional Attainment Strategy Danny Wong OTC November 2005 Meeting Wilmington, DE.
1 Improving Air Quality in the Metro. Washington Region Phil Mendelson, Chair Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee October 19, 2006.
1 MAPS. Counties With Monitors Violating Alternate 8-hour Ozone Standards of and parts per million 398 counties violate.075 ppm 135 additional.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Local Reductions Incentive Program (LRIP) Encouraging Collaborative Solutions for the Future.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans022-1 Unit 22 Clean Air Act of 1970.
Overview of Transboundary Air Management in North America Gothenburg Protocol and Review 20 September 2006 Nav Khera and Kimber Scavo.
Main sources of Air Pollutants
The Effect of Environmental Regulation upon the Electric Power Industry: A Rating Agency Perspective 23rd February 2005 At the California Public Utility.
Rules and Exceptions - The Costs of “Cheap” Coal.
Fine Particles in the Air: Taking Action, Improving Health Presentation at STAPPA/ALAPCO Meeting Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Tom Curran, EPA Office of Air Quality.
OTC Control Strategy Committee Meeting Tad Aburn, Chair, Multi-P Workgroup October 5, 2005 The OTC Multipollutant Model Rule.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
Air pollution part 4 Reducing air pollution. Montreal Protocol 1987: Goal was to reduce CFC emissions by 35% between 1989 and : Copenhagen Protocol.
Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Transportation and the Environment
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Department of Environmental Quality
Clean Air Interstate Rule Office of Air and Radiation
U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets Division
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Clean Smokestacks Act Benefits Update Division of Air Quality March 17, /17/2010

Air Quality Management Findings of the Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative and subsequent regional modeling studies: – Reductions in NOx emissions are the most effective way to reduce ozone levels in NC and the Southeastern US – Reductions in SO2 emissions are the most effective way to reduce fine particle levels in NC and the Southeastern US – Reductions in NOx and SO2 emissions will reduce acid rain and nitrogen deposition as well as improve visibility – Emissions reductions applied in a particular State would generate the most benefit in that State 3/17/2010

Ozone Control Strategy Implementation Significant progress has been made in this decade to reduce emissions and lower ozone levels NOx reductions have been realized: – Utility sector (State Clean Smokestacks Act), – Utility and industrial boilers (Federal NOx SIP Call rule, Clean Air Interstate Rule), – Mobile (Federal engine and fuel standards, State vehicle inspection program) – Nonroad (Federal engine standards) 3/17/2010

Duke and Progress Energy NOx Emissions Note: Final NOx reduction goal in Clean Smokestacks Act is /17/2010

Ozone levels are decreasing 3/17/2010

Fine Particle Control Strategy Implementation Significant progress has been made in this decade to reduce emissions and lower fine particle levels SO2 reductions have been realized: – Utility sector (State Clean Smokestacks Act), – Utility and industrial boilers (Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule), – Mobile (Federal diesel engine and fuel standards) – Nonroad (Federal diesel engine and fuel standards) 3/17/2010

Duke and Progress Energy SO2 Emissions Note: Final 2013 SO2 reduction goal in Clean Smokestacks Act is 130,000 tons 3/17/2010

Fine Particle levels are decreasing 3/17/2010

Clean Smokestacks Act - Summary Implementation of the Clean Smokestacks Act ensured significant reductions of NOx and SO2 emissions in NC. It required each of the two major utilities in NC to reduce emissions below a system wide cap in NC. It did not allow sources to purchase credits to meet emission reduction goals in NC. 3/17/2010

Clean Smokestacks Act - Summary Implementation of the Clean Smokestacks Act provides significant co-benefits in the form of: – Mercury emission reductions – Reductions in Nitrogen deposition – Reductions in acid deposition The co-benefits are significant as they serve to protect and improve our air quality, water quality, plant life, fisheries, and ecosystems. 3/17/2010

Clean Smokestacks Act - Summary Implementation of the Clean Smokestacks Act better positions NC to respond to more stringent National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone and fine particles proposed by USEPA. 3/17/2010