Crystal River / Kings Bay SWIM Plan Sky Notestein Springs & Environmental Flows Section Quantifiable Objectives and Available Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agricultural and Biological Engineering SWFREC, UF/IFAS Immokalee.
Advertisements

Nutrient Loading in the Klamath Basin K.A. Rykbost B.A. Charlton Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station.
Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region.
Evaluation of Volunteer Data – The Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program Review Daniel V. Obrecht Anthony P. Thorpe John R. Jones Department of Fisheries.
Defining Restored Bay and Tidal Tributary Water Quality  Round Two  Draft Revised Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophyll Criteria.
Complexities of the Carters Lake TMDL Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech 26th Annual Alabama Water.
Springs Protection Options Septic System Evaluation Program Board of County Commissioners Meeting November 13 th 2012.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Justification of Review of Water Quality Standards for Nutrients and other Constituents Randy Pahl, NDEP.
Why is Groundwater Important? Drinking water for nearly 50% of US 98% of rural domestic supplies 35% of public supplies 42% of irrigation for agriculture.
Center for Watershed Protection Illicit Sewage Discharges in the Chesapeake Bay 2012 Chesapeake Bay Stormwater Retreat Lori Lilly Watershed Ecologist/Planner.
P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.
Nutrient Monitoring on the Ohio River: Balancing Information Needs.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
FLORIDA SPRINGS Case studies on impacts of nutrients on Florida springs ecosystems Source: J. Stevenson, Michigan State Univ.
Hypoxia. Nutrient Enrichment has two main effects 1.Hypoxia 2.Change of community structure.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Grand Haven Pond Study: An Investigation to Reduce Nutrient Loads and Evaluate Alternative Management Practices in Stormwater Ponds Mark Clark Wetlands.
An Ecosystem-Level Study of Florida’s Major Spring Systems Robert L. Knight, Ph.D. Jackson Blue Springs Working Group Tuesday, January 13, 2009.
Kiersten Honig. Lynnhaven River Watershed Comprises approximately 64 square miles of land and water, with nearly 150 miles of shoreline Used to be a prime.
The Cahaba River Watershed Nutrient TMDL 2006 National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA 2006 National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA Presented by:
It’s Not Easy Being Green Jill Buerck, Southeast Missouri State University Gretchen A. Koch, Goucher College Sarah Schubert, Southeast Missouri State University.
Mark Clark Wetlands and Water Quality Extension Specialist
Florida Numerical Nutrient Criteria Southwest Florida Water Resources Conference Scott I. McClelland Vice President November 20, 2009.
Ed Dunne, Ph.D, Division of Environmental Sciences, SJRWMD P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32178; ph:
1 Onsite Systems, Nutrients, and the Wakulla Springshed By Eberhard Roeder, Ph.D., P.E. Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs FL Dept. of Health, Division of.
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
Water Quality Short Course April 11, 2007 Lake and Reservoir Dynamics Dan Obrecht – UMC
Nutrients  Why monitor nutrients? –Plant and algae growth  Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, oxygen, silica, magnesium, potassium, calcium, iron, zinc, and.
Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) abundance and diversity in the tidal Potomac River and estuary By Nancy Rybicki, Jurate Landwehr, Edward Schenk, and.
Focus Group Meeting: September 27, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium Update Holly Greening Tampa Bay Estuary Program March 2014.
A Chemical and Vegetative Characterization of the Ichetucknee River Sky K. Notestein and Thomas K. Frazer.
 Nutrient Limitation What’s happening in the Chesapeake Bay and how does it compare to our results?
1 State of San Lorenzo River Symposium Nicole Beck, PhD 2NDNATURE April San Lorenzo Lagoon A Decade of Dry Season WQ Monitoring.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
LSJR TMDL BMAP 2013 Annual Progress Report: Trends in Nutrients and WQ Targets John Hendrickson, SJRWMD Wayne Magley, Ph.D., FDEP Sharon Piltz, FDEP Marine.
Watershed and water quality assessment of the Allen’s Creek watershed David A. Tomasko, Ph.D. Cheryl Propst, M.S. May 16, 2012.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Final Water Supply Plan Update July 2014.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Propagation Experiment Presenter/ Experimenter: Shavonne Newman Research Supervisors: Dr. Laura Murray and Dr. Micheal Kemp.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
CHESAPEAKE BAY. Chesapeake as an Estuary An estuary is a semi-enclosed body of water that has a free connection with the sea An estuary is a semi-enclosed.
Follow Up from the last Nutrient Criteria Meeting Dan Obrecht – UMC Limnology.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Nutrient Criteria Development Update Emily McArdle Nutrient Criteria Coordinator | Water Quality Standards Group
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
Comparison of freshwater nutrient boundary values Geoff Phillips 1 & Jo-Anne Pitt 2 1 University of Stirling & University College London 2 Environment.
2010 Water Quality Monitoring Activities -Medicine Lake -Twin Lake Keith Pilgrim Barr Engineering March 17, 2011 brain huser is great.
Minimum Price $100. Minimum Price $45 Minimum Price $40.
Minimum Price $100. Minimum Price $45 Minimum Price $40.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Project Schedule Final SWIM Plans GEBF Funding Request
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
Lake Spokane 2012 Nutrient Monitoring Data
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
The causes and consequences of water pollution and Solutions
Clark Fork Voluntary Nutrient Reduction Program (VNRP):
Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved
Validation of Trading Program: Scenario Simulations
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Marco island water quality monitoring
Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Crystal River / Kings Bay SWIM Plan Sky Notestein Springs & Environmental Flows Section Quantifiable Objectives and Available Data

Rainbow River Quantifiable Objectives As presented at SCMC July 8 th, 2015 Water QualityTarget Water clarity in the river >100 feet 1 Nitrate concentration in the springs and river <0.35 mg/L 2 Water Quantity Minimum flows for the springs and river system TBD in Natural Systems Coverage of desirable submerged aquatic vegetation in the river >65% 4 Coverage of invasive aquatic vegetation (hydrilla/filamentous algae) in the river <10% 4 1 Based on Anastasiou 2006 and average river-wide data presented in Table 3 2 FDEP 2013 – Nutrient TMDL for Rainbow Springs Group and Rainbow Springs Group Run 3 SWFWMD 2015 Minimum Flows and Levels Priority List and Schedule 4 Based on 2011 Rainbow River Vegetation Evaluation (Atkins and DCWI 2012) and data presented in Table 4

Water QualityTarget Water clarity - bay wide Water clarity - spring areas >20 feet >60 feet 1 Total nitrogen concentration in the bay <0.28 mg/L 2 Total phosphorus concentration in the bay <0.032 mg/L 2 Chlorophyll concentration in the bay <2.0 µg/L 3 Water Quantity Minimum flows for the River and Bay system TBD in Natural Systems Coverage of desirable submerged aquatic vegetation in the bay >65% 5 Coverage of invasive aquatic vegetation in the bay (including filamentous algae) <10% 5 Percent of shoreline in natural condition around the bay (including living shorelines) >50% 1 Based on data presented in Figures 16 and 18 2 Bridger 2014 – Nutrient TMDL for Kings Bay (WBID 1341), Hunter Spring (WBID 1341C), House Spring (WBID 1341D), Idiot’s Delight Spring (WBID 1341F), Tarpon Spring (WBID 1341G), and Black Spring (WBID 1341H) 3 Based on data presented in Figures 16 and 19 4 SWFWMD 2015 Minimum Flows and Levels Priority List and Schedule 5 Based on data presented in Table 5 Kings Bay Quantifiable Objectives

Water Clarity in Kings Bay Water Clarity Target Bay wide Spring areas >20 feet >60 feet Water Clarity 2014 average Bay wide Spring areas ~ 9 feet ~ 20 feet Kings Bay Water Clarity

Bay Nutrient Targets TN TP < 0.28 mg/L < mg/L 2014 averages TN TP ~ 0.25 mg/L ~ mg/L Nutrient concentrations in Kings Bay

Bay Chlorophyll Targets Chlorophyll < 2 µg/L 2014 average Chlorophyll ~ 8.7 µg/L Chlorophyll (phytoplankton) concentrations in Kings Bay

Kings Bay submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) coverage SAV Coverage Targets Native Invasive > 65 % < 10 % SAV Coverage 2013 average Native Invasive ~ 10 % ~ 19 %

Shoreline Targets Kings Bay > 50 % 2014 average Kings Bay TBD Shoreline in natural condition around King Bay

Action Item Approve the Quantifiable Objectives for the Crystal River / Kings Bay SWIM Plan