5/26/20161 NIATx ORP Change Project Enhanced Handoffs in Mi-LINC Gena de Sousa, Project Director Janet Fleege, WIser Choice Project Director Kit Van Stelle,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

2007 CAH HF Program Group 2 Roadmap Next Steps for Phase II January – March 2007 JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC Engage Internal Stakeholders Plan/Educate.

Advertisements

Brownell Center For Behavioral Health Services A Program of Liberty Resources, Inc.

Universal Counseling Services Baltimore, Maryland.

Improving Client Retention in Primary Care QI Project Review Title I Case Management HIV Quality Learning Network June 28, 2007.

Patient Navigation Breast Health Patient Navigator Program.

Let’s Make A Deal Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Division Milwaukee WIser Choice November 2010 – July 2011.

Working Toward Accreditation Joan Ellison, Public Health Director Mary Margaret Stallone, Director Center for Preventive Services Livingston County Department.

COMPASS: COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV LEAVING THE JAIL SETTING Emily Patry, BS The Miriam Hospital, Providence,

CENTRALIZED SCHEDULING PROJECT Washington County Behavioral Health Division.

Re-Entry and Recovery Tennessee A program of Volunteer Behavioral Health Care System Project Participants Robert Edmonds, Director of Quality Management.

(Title) Name(s) of presenter(s) Organizational Affiliation Welcome WI Mental Health Collaborative V February 24, 2014.

Overview Designing Change Projects Tab 11. Model for Improvement 3. What changes can we make that will result in an improvement? 1. What are we trying.

Clinical Quality Review Team (CQRT) A Guide to the Authorization Process for Alameda County Behavioral Health Plan Members.

NIATX CHANGE PROJECT 5X5 PRESENTATION MILWAUKEE COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH DIVISION.

AMBASSADOR PROGRAM INFORMATION CHAMBER AMBASSADOR TEAM MISSION The Greater Langley Chamber of Commerce Ambassador Team is a group of members dedicated.

ATLAS PROGRAM: HIV TESTING AND LINKAGE IN THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY CORRECTIONS CENTER Rachel Ciomcia, LISW-Project Coordinator Jenice Contreras, Director of.

Key Terms for Monitoring and Evaluation. Objectives Explain the difference between monitoring and evaluation. Introduce the most common M&E terms. Review.

Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies American Society of Criminology November 16, 2011.

Overview of NIATx & Process Improvement Process Improvement Overview and Basic Training 2008.

Anne Esson – Nurse Manager

Analysis of Adult Bed Capacity for Milwaukee County Behavioral Health System September 2014 Human Services Research Institute Technical Assistance Collaborative.

Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.

July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.

Hali Hammer, Director of Primary Care 1 SFHN Primary Care Nurse Managers Meeting April 14, 2014.

1 NIATx Coach Call October 31, 2012 Sustaining Change 1.NIATx case study: Betta Owens 2.Sustainability theory and new NIATx research: Jay Ford 3.Discussion,

Evaluations of CDCR Substance Abuse Programs: Lessons Learned Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. Criminal Justice Research Group UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse.

Participant Accrual. Numbers that Matter 3476= total number of women enrolled at least 95% retention at each visit, at each study site 100% attention.

Handoffs Technologies as Continuing Care NIATx Webinar Series May 15, 2013 David Mathews, Ph.D. and Todd Molfenter, Ph.D. 1/21/08 1.

NiaTx Project  Big Aim:  Reduce (re-) hospitalizations due to gaps in service delivery when consumers’ needs are immediate, multiple, and/or exceed.

Promoting the Use of Injectable Naltrexone (Vivitrol) in Colorado Staff Training, Patient Screening, Medication Administration, and Payor Source Development.

North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.

Bill Wendt, JD, CAC III CEO/General Counsel Signal Behavioral Health Network BJ Dean, MA, LAC Program Manager Arapahoe House Ron Gowins, BS, CACIII Substance.

Using GPRA to Improve Services Lessons from Wisconsin SAMHSA Strategic Planning for Providers to Improve Business Practices October 2009, Arlington, VA.

Welcome to the ER/CalWORKs Webinar! You should have a panel on the right of your screen that shows other attendees and has a box at the bottom to write.

Welcome Milwaukee WIser Choice Clinical Providers Wednesday December 12, 2007.

CJ-DATS 2: HIV Services and Treatment Implementation in Corrections (HIV-STIC) AIM: Increase admissions to post release hiv/aids treatment by completing.

1 NIATx Webinar Maximizing Staff Productivity Tuesday, March 9, 2010.

Missouri’s State and Provider Partnership Terry Morris Missouri Division of Alcohol & Drug Abuse August 2008 Advancing Recovery in Missouri.

Learning Collaborative January 11, Outline Review self-assessment purpose Jurisdictional and program differences Highlights of self-assessment tools.

Convener: Lynn Posze Coach: Elizabeth Strauss Participating Providers: Adanta, Inc. Communicare, Inc. Cumberland River Comprehensive Care Center Kentucky.

Using the NIATx 5x5 Presentation Model Telling Your Story.

Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.

Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation Who are We? We are: –Jefferson County, Alabama, Drug Court –Beacon Addiction.

Improving Continuation from Detox into Treatment – Arapahoe House Tucson Learning Collaborative – July 2009 Arapahoe House is the largest provider of substance.

. CARES is part of Denver Health and Hospital Authority and provides social model detoxification and residential treatment programs. The CARES detox program.

The Family Institute Learning Community * Plans / Activities for Remainder of 2014 *

Debbie Wells LaTescha Allen Robin McCormick Charmaine Webb Jean Rhodes PCI CHANGE PROCESS.

Hospital Follow-Up Care: Reducing No-Shows – NIATx Project 2013.

Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.

CIVIL COMMITMENT: Network Service Provider Responsibilities.

Integrating Health Care in Appalachian Ohio Family Healthcare Inc. (FHI) A federally qualified health center with the mission to provide access to affordable,

“One Chance to get it right’ End of Life Care

Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Division NIATx Project 2015 Increasing Referrals to Outpatient Treatment; Reducing Emergency Room Recidivism Team Members:

Faster Access to Aftercare Wood County Human Services Outpatient Behavioral Health Clinic and Norwood Health Center Wisconsin Rapids and Marshfield, WI.

Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs

Implementing EBPs through Systems Change Robert Woods Johnson Foundation (RWJF) Funded.

Overview Spectrum Health Systems Merrick Street Outpatient Reduce Wait Time Change Project Mark Orris Program Director.

Kings County Hospital Center MATP III NIATX PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT APR – NOV 2011 Our Change Team Executive Sponsor : Janet Aiyeku (Sr. Executive.

Update on Medicaid Integration in SW Washington January 7, 2016 Erin Hafer, MPH Director, New Programs Integration & Network Development.

1 The Power of Pact Parole Re-Entry Program Presenters: Bill Bullock, Santa Cruz/San Benito Department of Child Support Services

1 Michaela Frazier, LMSW Director of Community Benefit Programs Institute for Family Health Care Coordination and Technology to Support Physical and Behavioral.

Baseline The baseline at July Previously there was a lack of consistency for: Pathways into specialist clinics; Policies, procedures and guidelines.

NIATx Change Project 2014 Community Recovery Works Jefferson County Human Services Community Support Program.

Strategies for Linkage to and Engagement in Care

Common indicators related to organization and invitation

2016 FIT FOR PERFORMANCE Weight Control Program

Readmission Reduction Project – Dodge County

NIATx Project 2016 Jan Clemens- Change Leader

NIATX CHANGE PROJECT 2017 Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Division

NIATX Project: Hospital Readmission Reduction

Presentation transcript:

5/26/20161 NIATx ORP Change Project Enhanced Handoffs in Mi-LINC Gena de Sousa, Project Director Janet Fleege, WIser Choice Project Director Kit Van Stelle, ORP Evaluator Dr. Michael Nunley, Program Evaluator Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Division

Milwaukee Linking Individuals to a New Chance: Mi-LINC Target: Men and women returning to Milwaukee after prison release 6+ months prior to release: –Intake screen by Central Intake Unit (CIU) –Client chooses providers During 6 months prior to release: –Recovery Support Coordinator (RSC) reach-in visits –Single Coordinated Care Plan (SCCP) begun At release: –RSC contacts client, convenes Recovery Support Team (RST) –Clinical treatment begins immediately after release

Why Handoff Matters Mi-LINC builds onto WIser Choice, Milwaukee County’s recovery oriented system of care, which includes 70+ providers (Central Intake, Clinical, Recovery Support Coordination and Recovery Support Services) Over 80% of reentry clients who attend first appointment stay in treatment at least 30 days Reentry clients who complete an episode of treatment are half as likely to be reincarcerated A warm handoff communicates to the client a welcoming invitation to their recovery journey

5/26/20164 PLAN Problem: Appointments were not made at time of intake screen, so many clients were released without a treatment appointment at the chosen provider Aim:  Scheduling of treatment appointments prior to release from prison Goal: Increase to 100% Baseline: 28% Change Cycles: Jan 1, 2012 – Aug 20, 2012 Total improvement: 76%

5/26/20165 DO Appointment with treatment provider scheduled 45 days prior to release Included: –CIU staff –RSC staff –Provider Network –Better communication between CIU, RSC, RST, community providers (treatment, recovery support services), correctional institutions, and community corrections staff

STUDY Month#Released #With Treatment Appt ScheduledPercent Achieved BASELINE: Oct-Dec % Jan % Feb % Mar % Apr % May % June % July % Aug 2012 (to 8-20)6583% Total for %

STUDY

ACT Adopt!

LESSONS LEARNED COMMUNICATION! COMMUNICATION! COMMUNICATION! Enthusiasm wanes; procedural changes are needed for stable change. –Client status review (monthly) –CIU internal changes (process, tracking) Success achieved only with TEAM effort!