Kristen Horstmann, Tessa Morris, and Lucia Ramirez Loyola Marymount University March 24, 2015 BIOL398-04: Biomathematical Modeling Lee, T. I., Rinaldi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome Harbison CT et al. Nature, 2004, Vol. 431, pp Milica Volar 3 March 2005.
Advertisements

PREDetector : Prokaryotic Regulatory Element Detector Samuel Hiard 1, Sébastien Rigali 2, Séverine Colson 2, Raphaël Marée 1 and Louis Wehenkel 1 1 Bioinformatics.
A Genomic Code for Nucleosome Positioning Authors: Segal E., Fondufe-Mittendorfe Y., Chen L., Thastrom A., Field Y., Moore I. K., Wang J.-P. Z., Widom.
Computational discovery of gene modules and regulatory networks Ziv Bar-Joseph et al (2003) Presented By: Dan Baluta.
Table 2 shows that the set TFsf-TGblbs of predicted regulatory links has better results than the other two sets, based on having a significantly higher.
Image Analysis Phases Image pre-processing –Noise suppression, linear and non-linear filters, deconvolution, etc. Image segmentation –Detection of objects.
Combined analysis of ChIP- chip data and sequence data Harbison et al. CS 466 Saurabh Sinha.
CSE Fall. Summary Goal: infer models of transcriptional regulation with annotated molecular interaction graphs The attributes in the model.
Transcriptomics Breakout. Topics Discussed Transcriptomics Applications and Challenges For Each Systems Biology Project –Host and Pathogen Bacteria Viruses.
Genome-wide prediction and characterization of interactions between transcription factors in S. cerevisiae Speaker: Chunhui Cai.
Basis State Prediction of Cell-Cycle Transcription Factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dr. Matteo Pellegrini Dr. Shawn Cokus Sherri Rose UCLA Molecular,
27803::Systems Biology1CBS, Department of Systems Biology Schedule for the Afternoon 13:00 – 13:30ChIP-chip lecture 13:30 – 14:30Exercise 14:30 – 14:45Break.
Schedule for the Afternoon 13:00 – 13:30ChIP-chip lecture 13:30 – 14:30Exercise 14:30 – 14:45Break 14:45 – 15:15Regulatory pathways lecture 15:15 – 15:45Exercise.
Microarrays and Cancer Segal et al. CS 466 Saurabh Sinha.
Introduction to biological networks. protein-gene interactions protein-protein interactions PROTEOME GENOME Citrate Cycle METABOLISM Bio-chemical reactions.
Indiana University Bloomington, IN Junguk Hur Computational Omics Lab School of Informatics Differential location analysis A novel approach to detecting.
27803::Systems Biology1CBS, Department of Systems Biology Schedule for the Afternoon 13:00 – 13:30ChIP-chip lecture 13:30 – 14:30Exercise 14:30 – 14:45Break.
The Hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems Maria I. Arnone and Eric H. Davidson.
1 Predicting Gene Expression from Sequence Michael A. Beer and Saeed Tavazoie Cell 117, (16 April 2004)
Promoter Analysis using Bioinformatics, Putting the Predictions to the Test Amy Creekmore Ansci 490M November 19, 2002.
ICA-based Clustering of Genes from Microarray Expression Data Su-In Lee 1, Serafim Batzoglou 2 1 Department.
Bryan Heck Tong Ihn Lee et al Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Epistasis Analysis Using Microarrays Chris Workman.
Comparative Expression Moran Yassour +=. Goal Build a multi-species gene-coexpression network Find functions of unknown genes Discover how the genes.
Modeling the Gene Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Δcin5 Under Cold Shock Conditions Kevin McKay Laura Terada Department of Biology Loyola Marymount.
Systematic Analysis of Interactome: A New Trend in Bioinformatics KOCSEA Technical Symposium 2010 Young-Rae Cho, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of.
Computational Molecular Biology Biochem 218 – BioMedical Informatics Gene Regulatory.
Genome of the week - Deinococcus radiodurans Highly resistant to DNA damage –Most radiation resistant organism known Multiple genetic elements –2 chromosomes,
Location analysis of transcription factor binding sites Guy Naamati Andrei Grodzovky.
Mapping protein-DNA interactions by ChIP-seq Zsolt Szilagyi Institute of Biomedicine.
MATISSE - Modular Analysis for Topology of Interactions and Similarity SEts Igor Ulitsky and Ron Shamir Identification.
TF Infer A Tool for Probabilistic Inference of Transcription Factor Activities H.M. Shahzad Asif Institute of Adaptive and Neural Computation School of.
TF Infer A Tool for Probabilistic Inference of Transcription Factor Activities H.M. Shahzad Asif Machine Learning Group Department of Computer Science.
Detecting binding sites for transcription factors by correlating sequence data with expression. Erik Aurell Adam Ameur Jakub Orzechowski Westholm in collaboration.
Gene expression and DNA microarrays Old methods. New methods based on genome sequence. –DNA Microarrays Reading assignment - handout –Chapter ,
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ANSCI 490 M Instructor: Lei Liu, PhD November 12, 2002 Daniel H. Barnett Department of Cell and Structural Biology.
* only 17% of SNPs implicated in freshwater adaptation map to coding sequences Many, many mapping studies find prevalent noncoding QTLs.
ChIP-on-Chip and Differential Location Analysis Junguk Hur School of Informatics October 4, 2005.
Proteome and interactome Bioinformatics.
Unraveling condition specific gene transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Speaker: Chunhui Cai.
I519 Introduction to Bioinformatics, Fall, 2012
Biological Signal Detection for Protein Function Prediction Investigators: Yang Dai Prime Grant Support: NSF Problem Statement and Motivation Technical.
Gene expression. The information encoded in a gene is converted into a protein  The genetic information is made available to the cell Phases of gene.
Data Mining the Yeast Genome Expression and Sequence Data Alvis Brazma European Bioinformatics Institute.
Modeling Promoter and Untranslated Regions in Yeast Abstract T ranscriptional regulation is the primary form of gene regulation in eukaryotes. Approaches.
. Finding Motifs in Promoter Regions Libi Hertzberg Or Zuk.
Nonlinear differential equation model for quantification of transcriptional regulation applied to microarray data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Vu, T. T.,
Microarray: An Introduction
Departments of Biology and Mathematics
Prediction of Regulatory Elements for Non-Model Organisms Rachita Sharma, Patricia.
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Today… Review a few items from last class
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Protein Complex Discovery
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Anastasia Baryshnikova  Cell Systems 
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Presented by, Jeremy Logue.
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Predicting Gene Expression from Sequence
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping
Global Position and Recruitment of HATs and HDACs in the Yeast Genome
Presented by, Jeremy Logue.
Genomewide profiling of chromatin accessibility in prostate cancer specimens Genomewide profiling of chromatin accessibility in prostate cancer specimens.
Presentation transcript:

Kristen Horstmann, Tessa Morris, and Lucia Ramirez Loyola Marymount University March 24, 2015 BIOL398-04: Biomathematical Modeling Lee, T. I., Rinaldi, N. J., Robert, F., Odom, D. T., Bar-Joseph, Z., Gerber, G. K., Hannett, N. M., Harbison, C. T., Thompson, C. M., Simon, I., Zeitlinger, J., Jennings, E. G., Murray, H.L., Gordon, D. B., Ren, B., Wyrick, J. J., Tagne, J. B., Volkert, T. L., Fraenkel, E., Gifford, D. K. & Young, R. A. (2002). Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science, 298(5594), DOI: /science Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Develop a mathematical model to map and understand how cells control global gene expression networks Experimental Design: Epitope tagging, Chromatin IP, Microarray, Statistical Analysis Regulator Density: Relationship between promoter and regulator Network Motifs 6 Networks: Autoregulation, Multicomponent loop, feed-forward loop, single-input, multi-input, regulator chain Network Structures Algorithm applied to cell cycle Computational model created Regulatory binding network Conclusion and Significance: Interactions between genes and transcription factors can be mapped using the model created Can then be used to improve our understanding of human health

Develop a mathematical model to map and understand how cells control global gene expression networks Experimental Design: Epitope tagging, Chromatin IP, Microarray, Statistical Analysis Regulator Density: Relationship between promoter and regulator Network Motifs 6 Networks: Autoregulation, Multicomponent loop, feed-forward loop, single-input, multi-input, regulator chain Network Structures Algorithm applied to cell cycle Computational model created Regulatory binding network Conclusion and Significance: Interactions between genes and transcription factors can be mapped using the model created Can then be used to improve our understanding of human health

Logic Know sites bound by transcriptional regulators Create model for transcriptional regulatory networks Identify network motifs Identify network motifs

Introduction Known how most transcriptional regulators encoded in S. cerevisae associate with genes Describe the pathways yeast use to regulate global gene expression Use the genome sequence and genome-wide binding analysis to find the transcription regulatory structure

Experimental Design Use genome-wide location analysis to investigate how yeast transcriptional regulators bind to promoter sequences across the genome Figure 1-A

Yeast and Tagging ●Studied all 141 transcription factors listed in the Yeast Proteome Database that were reported to have DNA binding and transcriptional activity ●Myc epitope tagging (at COOH terminus of each regulator) was used to identify transcription factors in each yeast strain, might have affected the function of some transcriptional regulators

Analysis ●Immunoblot analysis showed 106 of the 124 tagged regulator proteins could be detected when yeast cells were grown in rich medium (yeast extract, peptone, and dextrose) ●Performed genome-wide location analysis experiment for the 106 yeast strains that expressed epitope-tagged regulators ●Genome-wide location data were subjected to quality control filters and normalized, then the ratio of immunoprecipitated to control DNA was determined for each array spot

Statistical Analysis ●Confidence value (p-value) for each spot from each array was calculated using an error model ●Data for each of the three samples in an experiment were combined by a weighted average method ●Each ratio was weighted by p-value then averaged ●Final p-values for these combined ratios were then calculated

Statistical Results The total number of protein-DNA interactions in the location analysis data set, using a range of p-value thresholds

Develop a mathematical model to map and understand how cells control global gene expression networks Experimental Design: Epitope tagging, Chromatin IP, Microarray, Statistical Analysis Regulator Density: Relationship between promoter and regulator Network Motifs 6 Networks: Autoregulation, Multicomponent loop, feed-forward loop, single-input, multi-input, regulator chain Network Structures Algorithm applied to cell cycle Computational model created Regulatory binding network Conclusion and Significance: Interactions between genes and transcription factors can be mapped using the model created Can then be used to improve our understanding of human health

Regulatory Density ●~4000 interactions were observed between regulators and promoter regions (p-value = 0.001) ●The promoter regions of 2342 of 6270 yeast genes (37%) were bound by one or more of the 106 transcriptional regulators ●Many yeast promoters were bound by multiple transcriptional regulators o Previously associated with gene regulation in higher eukaryotes o Suggests that yeast genes are also frequently regulated through combinations of regulators

Regulators Bound per Promoter Region ●Red circles: actual location data ●White circle: distribution expected from the same set of p-values randomly assigned among regulators and intergenic regions

Different Promoter Regions Bound by Each Regulator ●More than one third of the promoter regions that are bound by regulators were bound by two or more regulators ●Relative to the expected distribution from randomized data, there was a high number of promoter regions that were bounded by four or more regulators ●Because of the stringency of the p- value (0.001) threshold, this is an underestimate of regulator density

Develop a mathematical model to map and understand how cells control global gene expression networks Experimental Design: Epitope tagging, Chromatin IP, Microarray, Statistical Analysis Regulator Density: Relationship between promoter and regulator Network Motifs 6 Networks: Autoregulation, Multicomponent loop, feed-forward loop, single-input, multi-input, regulator chain Network Structures Algorithm applied to cell cycle Computational model created Regulatory binding network Conclusion and Significance: Interactions between genes and transcription factors can be mapped using the model created Can then be used to improve our understanding of human health

Network Motifs in Yeast Regulatory Network = Regulator = Gene Promoter = Regulator binded to a promoter = Genes encoding regulators linked to their respective regulators

Develop a mathematical model to map and understand how cells control global gene expression networks Experimental Design: Epitope tagging, Chromatin IP, Microarray, Statistical Analysis Regulator Density: Relationship between promoter and regulator Network Motifs 6 Networks: Autoregulation, Multicomponent loop, feed-forward loop, single-input, multi-input, regulator chain Network Structures Algorithm applied to cell cycle Computational model created Regulatory binding network Conclusion and Significance: Interactions between genes and transcription factors can be mapped using the model created Can then be used to improve our understanding of human health

Assembling Motifs into Network Structures ●Algorithm was created that examines over 500 expression experiments ●Genome is scanned for genes common to phase G. Matches are examined for regulators common to S ●P value is then relaxed to “recapture” data that wasn’t used ●Ultimate goal: using the main motifs to create replica of cell cycle based only on the location/data of the regulators with no prior cell cycle knowledge

Yeast Cell Cycle Model ●Transcriptional regulatory network created from binding and expression data ●Boxes correspond to when peak expression occurred ●Blue Box: set of genes w/ common regulators ●Ovals: regulators connected to their genes w/ solid line ●Arc: defines time of activity ●Dashed line: gene in the box encodes outer ring regulator

Creating a Computational Model ●Created model based on peak expression of common expression multi-input motifs ●Three notable results: o Model correctly assigned all the regulators to previously proven stages of the cell cycle o Two relatively unknown regulators could be assigned based strictly on binding data o Required no prior knowledge and was completely automatic ●Hopefully can use as a general outline for creating more complex network models

Regulatory Binding Network ●All 106 regulators displayed in a circle ●Sorted into functional categories (color coded) ●Lines follow regulators binding to each other/itself

Develop a mathematical model to map and understand how cells control global gene expression networks Experimental Design: Epitope tagging, Chromatin IP, Microarray, Statistical Analysis Regulator Density: Relationship between promoter and regulator Network Motifs 6 Networks: Autoregulation, Multicomponent loop, feed-forward loop, single-input, multi-input, regulator chain Network Structures Algorithm applied to cell cycle Computational model created Regulatory binding network Conclusion and Significance: Interactions between genes and transcription factors can be mapped using the model created Can then be used to improve our understanding of human health

Significance of Regulatory Network Information ●Identified network motifs that provide specific regulatory capacities for yeast ●These motifs can be used as building blocks to construct large network structures through an automated approach that combines genome-wide location and expression data (without prior knowledge) ●Future research will require knowledge of regulator binding sites under various growth conditions and experimental testing of models that emerge from computational analysis of regulator binding, gene expression, and other information. (alter conditions) ●This approach can be applied to higher eukaryotes

Conclusion ●Cell is the product of specific gene expression programs involving regulated transcription ●Known how most transcriptional regulators encoded in S. cerevisiae interact with genes across the genome ●Describes potential pathways yeast cells can use to regulate global gene expression programs ●Identify network motifs and show that an automated process can use motifs to assemble a transcription regulatory network structure

Take home message The interactions between genes and transcription factors can be mapped using the model described, which can then be used to improve our understanding of human health and design new strategies to combat disease.