PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Advertisements

Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing
SLD Body of Evidence and Eligibility Denver Public Schools, 2011.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Margaret D. Anderson SUNY Cortland, April, Federal legislation provides the guidelines that schools must follow when identifying children for special.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
A NEW APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING LEARNING DISABILITIES RTI: Academics.
Curriculum Based Measurements and Response to Intervention Loretta Benenati WSU-Vancouver.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
Data Based Decision Making Measuring Responsiveness to Intervention.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
Determining Eligibility Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework TASP 2013 Fall ConferenceTASP 2013 Fall Conference Theresa Nicholls, Ed.S., NCSPTheresa Nicholls,
Curriculum Based Measures vs. Formal Assessment
Response to Intervention How to Monitor RTI Reading Interventions Jim Wright
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Response to Intervention RTI Data Challenge: Setting Individual RTI Academic Goals Using Research Norms for Students Receiving.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Level 2 at Middle School Curriculum Based Assessment.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving model that addresses individual student need.  This.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Today’s Learning Objectives: 1.What is Progress Monitoring? 2.Brief review of Universal Screening data, 2.Brief review of Universal Screening data, identifying.
Interventions ARC Chairperson Training Special Education Regulation 1997 Special Education Regulations …providing incentives for whole-school.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
1 Curriculum Based Measures Improving Student Outcomes through Progress Monitoring.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Response to Instruction & Problem Solving Teams Summer 2010.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Severe Discrepancy vs. Response to Intervention. Severe Discrepancy Model of Eligibility Determination (1974 – present) This method is used for students.
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
RTI 2 Please write down three things you want to know before this session is done today.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) LEARNING DISABILITIES (LD) By: Julia Bjerke, Monica Fontana Crystal Schlosser, & Jessica Ringwelski.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
Progress Monitoring Presented By: Bart Lyman. Aimsweb Progress Monitoring Guide-Pearson 2012 RTI Implementer Series: Module 2: Progress Monitoring Training.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
Response to Intervention
Data Collection Challenge:
Special Education Process
Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Data Based Decision Making
Response to Intervention Overview
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute

2 Progress Monitoring: Learning Goals for Today Determine student’s current level of performance (Baseline data) CBM Identify learning goal (norms) Implement Research-Based Interventions Continue to measure and monitor students’ performance on a regular basis Graph the results Compare expected progress to actual rate Adjust instruction based on the data

3 What IS Progress Monitoring Find the in your handout packet. Work with your TEAM to complete this. Be ready to share a specific example of Progress Monitoring in your school. Handout PM 1

4 Progress Monitoring is a scientifically-based practice that is used to assess students’ academic performance and evaluate the effectiveness of instruction – for an individual student or an entire class.” National Center on Progress Monitoring

5 A Scientific Base Supports One Form of Progress Monitoring: Curriculum-Based Measurement CBM

6 Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM)... Result of years of research Used in schools across the country Uses short “probes” for frequent PM Demonstrates strong reliability and validity Is sensitive to small gains in progress Helps teachers plan instruction

7 Uses of CBM Benchmark All Students – 3 times a year – F, W, S Strategic Monitor Monthly check up for students with moderate skill deficits who are receiving supplemental instruction in small group (3-5) Progress Monitor Monitor once or twice weekly to measure student’s response to more intensive interventions (individual or group of 2). Graph the data for on- going decision making.

School Calendar Year ( ): Benchmarking (Tier 1) 2-weeks during: September 1 to October 15 January 1 to February 1 May 1 to June 1

9 For Teachers: Classroom Report Benchmark Data AIMSweb.com

10 10th %ile 90th %ile 75th %ile 50th %ile 25th %ile Student is above the 90 %ile and is well above average. Student is above the 90 %ile and is well above average. Target ____________________________________ Box and Whisker Charts AIMSweb

11 AIMS web / Harcourt w/ permission 6/07

12 Decision Making Rules Students who score below the 25 th percentile on general outcome benchmark screening receive targeted intervention, and progress is monitored on a monthly basis. Progress for those below the 10 th percentile is monitored at least weekly, and they receive intensive intervention. Eight data points over at least 4 weeks are required to determine a trend line. Change or modify the intervention when the data points are below the aim line (goal line) for 4 consecutive data points, or when the trend line is not on course to meet the goal line.

13 AIMSweb/Harcourt w/ permission 6/07

14 AIMSweb/Harcourt w/ permission 6/07

15 AIMSweb/Harcourt w/ permission 6/07

16 How Does Student Progress Monitoring Work? Determine student’s current level of performance (Baseline data) Identify learning goal (local norms or accepted research standards) Use research based intervention(s) targeting the problem Continue to measure performance on a regular basis (CBM probes at same level) Graph the results Compare expected progress to actual rate Adjust instruction based on the data

17 Calculating Slope: First draw a Trend Line – Tukey Method Step 1: Divide the data points into three equal sections by drawing two vertical lines. (If the points divide unevenly, group them approximately.) Step 2: In the first and third sections, find the median data-point and median instructional week. Locate the place on the graph where the two values intersect and mark with an “X.” Step 3: Draw a line through the two Xs, extending to the margins of the graph. This represents the trend-line or line of improvement. PM 2

18 Step 1: Divide the data points into three equal sections by drawing two vertical lines. (If the points divide unevenly, group them approximately.) Step 2: In the first and third sections, find the median data-point and median instructional week. Locate the place on the graph where the two values intersect and mark with an “X.” Step 3: Draw a line through the two Xs, extending to the margins of the graph. This represents the trend-line or line of improvement.

19 Step 1: Divide the data points into three equal sections by drawing two vertical lines. (If the points divide unevenly, group them approximately.) Step 2: In the first and third sections, find the median data-point and median instructional week. Locate the place on the graph where the two values intersect and mark with an “X.” Step 3: Draw a line through the two Xs, extending to the margins of the graph. This represents the trend-line or line of improvement. X X

20 Step 1: Divide the data points into three equal sections by drawing two vertical lines. (If the points divide unevenly, group them approximately.) Step 2: In the first and third sections, find the median data-point and median instructional week. Locate the place on the graph where the two values intersect and mark with an “X.” Step 3: Draw a line through the two Xs, extending to the margins of the graph. This represents the trend-line or line of improvement. X X

21 Baseline Data & Goal TOM Second grade student, fall assessment, oral reading fluency, second grade probes Baseline Data: day 1 =11, day 2 = 13, day 3 =12 Plot these points on your graph PM 3

22 Baseline Data & Goal Line Baseline Data: 11, 13, 12 Find the median, or middle number when numbers are rank ordered: 11, 12, 13 Median = 12 words read correctly per min. Average Peer = ? Use norms table, Handout PM 4 Rate of Improvement = ? Words per wk. Use norms table, Handout PM 4

23 Baseline Data & Goal Baseline Data: 11, 13, 12 Median = 12 words read correctly per min. Average Peer = 55 wrc per minute Average Rate of Improvement = 1.1 words per week. Set a realistic but ambitious goal, such as: Goal = 2 words per minute more per week

24 Baseline Data & Goal Goal = 2 words per minute more per week Select # wks for monitoring: Weeks =12 Calculate: 2 wds./wk. increase, times 12 wks. = 24 words total increase Add the expected 24 word increase to baseline (12). Goal= 36 wrc in 12 weeks Mark the goal point (36) on the last data collection day, Thursday, at the end of 12 weeks of intervention. Connect baseline data median(12) to the goal point (36) = Goal Line (Aim Line)

25 GOAL LINE

26 Intervention Data Points 9/16/ /18/ /23/ /25/ /30/ /2/ /7/ /9/ Enter this data on your graph and draw a trend line.

27

28 Data-Based Decision Making Were there 4 consecutive data points below the goal line? Are there 8 data points for a trend line? Is the trend line on course to meet the goal line? Is this intervention effective? Decision?

29 Intervention #2 Data Points 10/14/ /16/ /21/ /23/ /28/ /30/ /4/ /6/ Enter this data on your graph and draw a trend line.

30 Intervention 1 Intervention 2

31 Data-Based Decision Making Draw a vertical line to show each intervention change. Label “Intervention 1”, “Intervention 2”, etc. Keep records of specific intervention protocols and fidelity of implementation. What is your decision based on Intervention 2 data?

32 Why is Fidelity Important? To demonstrate that measurable changes in behavior are related to systematic & controlled changes in the environment (intervention) Without objective & documented evidence that the intervention was implemented as planned, we can’t conclude that inadequate response to intervention was due to a poor intervention or insufficient intensity (ie: inadequate response may be due to poor instruction.) Likewise, success can’t be attributed to the intervention if we don’t know how it was implemented

33 3 rd Grade Winter R-CBM – Mia - Baseline Tues. 34 WRC Wed. 40 Thurs. 36 Enter the data. Mark MEDIAN with X PM 5

34 Graphing: Make Mia’s Goal Line Set a Reasonable but Ambitious Goal What is the average Rate of Improvement (ROI) for third grade? – norms – PM 4 Would a gain of 15 words per week be ambitious? Reasonable? Would a gain of 2 words per week be ambitions? Reasonable? Calculate Mia’s goal at the end of 12 weeks. Graph the GOAL LINE (Aim Line)

35 Mia’s Problem Statement “When given a third grade oral reading fluency probe, Mia reads 36 words correctly in one minute. Her average third grade peer reads 98 words correctly in one minute.” Intervention: Repeated Readings 2:30 – 2:50 M/W/F Implemented by: Classroom teacher Progress Monitor: T/Th R-CBM (3 rd )

36 Mia’s Progress Monitoring Data Mia’s R-CBM scores (Tues./Thurs.) Week 1: 34, 36 Week 2: 42, 36 Week 3: 36, 38 Week 4: 38, 38 Graph the data. PM 5

37 Make a Trend Line Use Mia’s data: Weeks 1-4 (Don’t include the baseline data) Use the Tukey Method to draw a trend line. Compare Mia’s Trend Line & Goal Line. What’s your decision about the intervention?

38 To Monitor Student Progress Determine student’s current level (Baseline) Identify learning Goal (local/research norms) Research based Intervention(s) target problem Implement with Fidelity Continue to measure performance on a regular basis (CBM probes at same level) Graph the results Compare expected progress to actual rate Adjust instruction based on the data

39 Where Do We Go From Here? RtI / SLD Eligibility Determination? Students who score below the 25 th percentile on general outcome benchmark screening receive targeted intervention, and progress is monitored on a monthly basis. Progress for those below the 10 th percentile is monitored at least weekly, and they receive intensive intervention. Eight data points over at least 4 weeks are required to determine a trend line. Change or modify the intervention when the data points are below the aim line (goal line) for 4 consecutive data points or when the trend line is not on course to meet the goal line. At least 2 intervention changes (ie: 3 interventions) are required before students may be referred for evaluation due to suspected disability.

40 Special Education Regulations Apply at Time of Referral Letter to parent informing of referral Evaluation decisions made by the Evaluation Team at the Review of Existing Data/Evaluation Plan Meeting. Parents are given written notice and must sign consent for the evaluation. “Specialized Instruction” is listed under “other” in the area of functioning (Ex: “Specialized Instruction, 225 minutes per week, special ed resource room.”) Specialized instruction must be very focused and targeted at the problem as operationally defined in the problem statement.

41 CBM is used to collect data in all academic areas, administered frequently (2X/wk) The Evaluation must be comprehensive and address all areas of concern. Consider norm referenced achievement assessment in addition to CBM (if not indicated in the student’s records). Level of performance must be far below & rate of improvement far below average peers. Use cognitive assessment if broad & pervasive concerns with student’s functioning across areas. However, do not calculate a discrepancy between IQ and norm referenced achievement scores. This information is not relevant to determining eligibility or interventions. See Handouts PM 7 & PM 8 for more specific procedues.

42 Progress Monitoring & IEP Goals Formula for Good Goals Using CBM Given a (specific grade level and subject area) probe, STUDENT will (increase/decrease/maintain) his/her ability to (state skill addressed) by (observable behavior) from (insert baseline) to (insert goal) for (insert monitoring period)

43 References Deno, S. (2003). Developments in Curriculum- Based Measurement. Journal of Special Education (37) (3), Fuchs, L. & Fuchs, D. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77, Hosp, M. & Hosp, J. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement for reading, math, and spelling: How to do it and why. Preventing School Failure, 48 (1),