ENABLING ACCESS TO AND RE-USE OF PUBLICLY FUNDED RESEARCH DATA AS OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES: A Strategy for Overcoming the Legal Challenges to Data Access.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
Advertisements

IP in Government Contracts Under the Whole of Victorian Government Intellectual Property Policy.
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
University of Maastricht January 17, 2014 Phasing Out Copyright Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
Research Contracts and IP Services TRAINING WORKSHOPS ON HORIZON 2020 – 27 NOV 2014 The Grant Agreement Roger Wallace – Research Contracts & IP Services.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Developing National Legislation based on the Pacific Model Law 2002 “Empowering Local Communities: Protection of Indigenous Rights” Knowledge Economy Fostering.
Scoping study for Improving Transparency through Citizen Charters in Serbia Transparency Serbia Presentation September 27 th 2010.
On Privacy-aware Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) in Enterprises: Setting the Context Marco Casassa Mont Hewlett-Packard.
Data Management Awareness January 23, University of Michigan Administrative Information Services Data Management Awareness Unit Liaisons January.
NSF Data Management Plan Requirements Alex Kanous
HSC: All My Own Work Copyright.
The Trusted Digital Repositories Checklist Government Records and Archives Aspects Dr Stephen Ellis Assistant Director – General Government.
THE JOINED UP WORLD OF E-RESEARCH Professor Neil McLean National Technical Standards Adviser to the Department of Education Science and Training (DEST)
FAMILY EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVACY ACT Electronic Signatures This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material.
Dr Anne Fitzgerald and Neale Hooper Pivotal June 2015.
International Conference on Enhancing the Effectiveness of Deposit Insurance Operation, Hanoi March, 2007 The Legal Architecture of Deposit Insurance Systems.
A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation Digital Curation Centre/ Edinburgh eScience Collaborative Workshop – 12th June 2008 Funded by:
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Database SIG APNIC Database Privacy Issues 1 March 2001 APRICOT, Malaysia Fabrina.
New copyright challenges for the users digital works Dragutin Nemec Library of the Faculty of law in Zagreb LIBRARIES IN THE DIGITAL AGE (LIDA) 2007.
Other Laws (Primarily for E-Government) COEN 351.
1 National Electronic Commerce Strategies The Malaysian Experience Ho Siew Ching Ministry of International Trade and Industry Malaysia Expert Meeting on.
Open for ^ Business Research Data Services & Data Management Planning Ryan Schryver Wendt Commons is our.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
Responsible Data Use: Data restrictions Robert R. Downs, PhD NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International Earth Science.
The Accomplished Connoisseur: Professional Expertise in Support for the Corporate Law Department Presented by: Lisa Daulby Canadian Association of Law.
Recommendation of the OECD Council for enhanced access and more effective use of public sector information 11 th Meeting of the PSI Group European Commission.
Copyright law and its Nexus with Education: A Critique Manasa Reddy Gummi.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J The OAK Law Project Legal Issues in Data Management: A Practical Approach.
The Need to Address Disclosure of Origin Requirements in Patent Law Harmonization Initiatives Joshua D. Sarnoff Washington College of Law American University.
State FERPA Agreements Using Data & Protecting Privacy SHEEO / NCES Data Conference April 2005.
Intellectual Property Alignment of Current Policies Tana Pistorius UNISA Government CIO Summit Towards reducing costs of doing business in government and.
Regulatory Transparency and Efficiency in the Communications Industry in Australia Jennifer Bryant Office of Regulation Review Australia.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
1 Access to Research Data from Public Funding: The development of international principles and guidelines for OECD countries CODATA conference, 23 October.
Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) Worldbank Global Development Learning Network The Advanced Program in Accounting.
Copyright ©2014 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved 1 Chapter 02 Compliance, Privacy, Fraud, and Abuse in Insurance Billing Insurance.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
1 Interim Report of the IWGDD May Overview: Pursuing Goals to Harness the Power of Digital Data for Science and Society The IWGDD recommends that.
Directive on the Authorisation of electronic communications networks & Services Directive (2002/20/EC) Authorisation Directive Presented by: Nelisa Gwele.
Biotechnology / Life Sciences Ensuring Access Christina Sampogna July 2005 CASRIP – University of Washington, Seattle *Views expressed are those of the.
1 PARCC Data Privacy & Security Policy December 2013.
Shaping Business Strategy Through Competitive Intelligence - Strategic Use of Intellectual Property Information – Topic 12 - Training of the Trainers Program.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
A New Standard for Disposal Mark Crookston Senior Advisor Appraisal Government Recordkeeping Group.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Privacy and Security in the US Lecture b This material (Comp11_Unit7b) was developed by Oregon Health & Science University.
Copyright, Intellectual Property, and Privacy 1 Lesson Plan: BMM A9-4.
Creative Commons terms and definitions By Chelsey Maton.
Howard Davies 3 March 2016 M25 Directors and Associate Directors The Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations in universities.
1 Intellectual Property Rights David Worrall – Legal Department.
VICTORIAN CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
Study on the Patent Involved in National Standards China National Institute of Standardization September, 2009.
Recordkeeping Requirements
Session 2. revision of Handbooks, manuals and guidelines
Slides Template for Module 5
Complying with Maryland’s Open Meetings Act
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Technology Commercialization Office
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh Treaty and the Production and Exchange of Accessible Books by the World Intellectual Property.
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
The Strategic Content Alliance
OEL Project.
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
CERERE Tom Reynolds Research and Innovation Advisory Group Member
International Copyright Legal Framework
Presentation transcript:

ENABLING ACCESS TO AND RE-USE OF PUBLICLY FUNDED RESEARCH DATA AS OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES: A Strategy for Overcoming the Legal Challenges to Data Access and Re-Use PROF ANNE FITZGERALD HASWIRA NOR MOHAMAD HASHIM IP and Innovation Law Research Program Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia A REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES 2012

PRESENTATION OUTLINE CONTENT SLIDE NO. 1.STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS 3STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS 2.PART I BASIC COMPONENTS OF THE POLICY4PART I BASIC COMPONENTS OF THE POLICY 3.PART II PROCEDURES OF THE POLICY5PART II PROCEDURES OF THE POLICY 4.PART III GUIDELINES OF THE POLICY6PART III GUIDELINES OF THE POLICY 5.CONCLUSION: FURTHER STRATEGIES 7CONCLUSION: FURTHER STRATEGIES 2

3 STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS TO DEVELOP A POLICY: Enabling Access to and Re-Use of Publicly Funded Research Data as OER. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: i.Type of policy: action/regulatory; ii.Nature of compliance: mandatory; iii.The standard to be adopted: international standard (OECD, RCUK); iv.The policy framework: basic components, procedures, guidelines; v.The policy criteria: clarity, simplicity, fair, law compliance; vi.Policy making process: bottom-up; and vii.The key stakeholders: the OER Institutions (staffs and students). HASWIRA tables of findings\Table 8.2 Main Recommendations.pdf The main recommendations become a starting point for the development of the policy. Based on the main recommendations, the policy is to be developed in three parts comprising of: i)basic components ii)procedures ; and iii) guidelines.

4 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS: There are 11 basic components recommended for the policy. The basic components are: i.the title;the title; ii.policy background;policy background; iii.purpose of the policy;purpose of the policy; iv.applicability and scope;applicability and scope; v.effective date;effective date; vi.definitions;definitions; vii.policy statements;policy statements; viii.governing principles;governing principles; ix.action plan;action plan; x.further information; andfurther information; xi.references.references. PART I BASIC COMPONENTS OF THE POLICY

5 PART II PROCEDURES OF THE POLICY PROCEDURES RECOMMENDATIONS: General and specific recommendations on the procedures of the policy. 1. GENERAL RECOMMENDATION: As a general recommendation, the procedures of the policy apply to all research data which are covered by the policy. Compliance by any person (researcher, data steward, data archive, data enclave manager) who is subject to the procedures is mandatory. Any person who fails/refuses to give specific and valid reasons for non-compliance with any of these procedures may be subject to the internal proceedings normally used by public research institutions/public research funding agencies to address lack of performance. In addition, the researcher who fails/refuses to give valid reasons for his/her non-compliance may also risk reduction in funding, restriction of funds or having the entire/remaining payments of the research grant withheld or becoming ineligible for future funding. 2. SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION: The recommended procedures of the policy are: i.data release procedure;data release procedure; ii.data security procedure;data security procedure; iii.data retention, preservation, maintenance and disposal procedure; anddata retention, preservation, maintenance and disposal procedure iv.data documentation and recordkeeping procedure.data documentation and recordkeeping procedure.

6 PART III GUIDELINES OF THE POLICY GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATIONS: The guidelines adopt the best practices from policies of public research funding agencies and universities from Australia, the UK and the US that support access to and re-use of research data as OER. It also adopts recommendations made by various reports, scholars and experts on the best practices to resolve the legal challenges to access to and re-use of research data as OER. Eleven (11 ) best practices to resolve the legal challenges are recommended as guidelines of the policy. The recommended guidelines deal with i.research data protected as intellectual property;research data protected as intellectual property; ii.ownership of publicly funded research data;ownership of publicly funded research data; iii.data exclusivity;data exclusivity; iv.legitimate use of research data;legitimate use of research data; v.licensing research data;licensing research data; vi.moral rights of data creator/originator;moral rights of data creator/originator; vii.confidential research data;confidential research data; viii.the informational privacy of subjects of research data;the informational privacy of subjects of research data; ix.classified research data;classified research data; x.research data about an invention;research data about an invention; xi.data providers’ duty to ensure data quality.data providers’ duty to ensure data quality.

7 CONCLUSION: FURTHER STRATEGIES 1.AMENDMENTS TO THE EXISTING POLICIES OF MALAYSIAN PUBLIC RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS The amendment is to ensure consistency between the existing policies particularly IP Policy, Research Dissemination Policy and Publicly Funded Research Commercialisation Policy and the proposed policy. The area of possible amendments are policy provisions dealing with ownership, the scope of legitimate use, licensing procedures and moral right of integrity. Also need to be consistent are the provisions dealing with confidentiality, privacy, national security, novelty requirement and data quality. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE EXISTING LAWS OF MALAYSIA Amendment to introduce a flexible fair dealing exceptions similar to section 200AB Australian Copyright Amendment 2006, a guidelines which provide a set of criteria to determine fair dealings and how much reproduction is allowed under fair dealing exceptions similar to Australian Copyright Act. Amendment to exclude author’s moral right of integrity in certain categories of works like in Australian Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act 2000 and Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (UK), or to recognise moral right of integrity in specific works only as in Visual Artists Right Act 1990 US). Amendment on Malaysian Data Protection Act 2010 to include protection of subjects of research data. 3. INTRODUCING LAWS TO FACILITATE OPEN ACCESS TO AND RE-USE OF PUBLICLY FUNDED RESEARCH DATA To introduce federal legislations similar to Federal Research Public Access Act (US), Data Quality Act (US) and Freedom of Information Act.

THANK YOU